Don't Blame The Supreme Court For Citizens United
WASHINGTON -- The two most controversial campaign financing practices of the post-Citizens United era aren’t actually the Supreme Court’s fault. ...
WASHINGTON -- The two most controversial campaign financing practices of the post-Citizens United era aren’t actually the Supreme Court’s fault. ...
Lyle Denniston | Posted 05.04.2012
Many observers have blamed the Court's January 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission for supposedly turning on the corporate money-in-politics spigot. But even some members of the Court are questioning anew whether that was a mistake.
Rich Nadworny | Posted 05.25.2011
A lot of people got very worked up last year over the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision. The more I read the news these days, the more I think those justices might be on to something.
The Washington Post | Dan Eggen | Posted 05.25.2011
Democrats plan to introduce legislation next week that would sharply limit the ability of foreign-connected companies to participate in U.S. politics ...
The Hill | Russell Berman | Posted 05.25.2011
Legislation that aims to counteract the landmark Supreme Court ruling allowing corporate and union campaign spending could be introduced by the end of...
Lawrence Lessig | Posted 05.25.2011
Representatives must remain dependent upon citizens, not upon special interests, and the Supreme Court has made that practically impossible. Only an amendment can reverse this now.
Elizabeth Westling | Posted 05.25.2011
I want America to be a democracy where "speech matters"; where it is not just a rhetorical device used to obscure or trick people into thinking they are being heard.
Andrew Reinbach | Posted 05.25.2011
What the Supreme Court's recent Citizens United ruling tells us is that the Right Wing has no principles, no morality, no ideas, and will do anything to destroy the Constitution and the idea of America.
Rob Warmowski | Posted 05.25.2011
Today's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United, led by corporate enthusiast and Bush appointee Chief Justice John Roberts has fully removed the pre...
Geoffrey R. Stone | Posted 05.25.2011
In Citizens United, the "conservative" justices, who claim to exercise judicial restraint, are reaching out in this case to assert a very aggressive interpretation of the First Amendment.
Steve Cobble | Posted 05.25.2011
We all know that people are not the same as corporations. The Roberts Court does not. It's a bad day for democracy.
HuffingtonPost.com | Jason Linkins | Posted 05.25.2011
As you may have heard, in a 5-4 decision, the SCOTUS essentially went at the teeth of McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform with hammer and tongs.
HuffingtonPost.com | Arthur Delaney | Posted 05.25.2011
By a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court on Thursday rolled back restrictions on corporate spending in federal campaigns. The decision could unleash a tor...
Doug Kendall | Posted 05.25.2011
Citizens United blows away any notion that conservative judges, who profess to be "originalists" and "umpires," are in fact faithful to our Constitution's text or bound by reasoned precedent.
HuffingtonPost.com | Dan Froomkin | Posted 03.24.2012