John Boehner Gives Obama 'Terrorist Fist Bump' On New Yorker Cover
In his inaugural address in January 2009, President Barack Obama promised a new era of diplomacy in foreign affairs. "To those who cling to power thro...
In his inaugural address in January 2009, President Barack Obama promised a new era of diplomacy in foreign affairs. "To those who cling to power thro...
HuffingtonPost.com | Jason Linkins | Posted 05.25.2011
[UPDATED, below.] Andrew Sullivan pulls this editorial cartoon from David Horsey, and asks, "How would the Republican base react to this?" Of cour...
236.com | 23/6: The News, But Funnier | Posted 05.25.2011
In light of the controversy surrounding this week's New Yorker cover, we wanted get some insight from an insider at the notoriously tight-lipped publi...
HuffingtonPost.com | Jason Linkins | Posted 05.25.2011
The larger problem with the the New Yorker cover is that what Barry Blitt has created may be "satire" in the artist's mind, but it is not satire as executed.
Justin Frank | Posted 05.25.2011
The New Yorker gives Obama an opportunity to right himself and get back to being who he is. He needs to address people's fears -- not just to rebut them or dismiss them.
Trey Ellis | Posted 05.25.2011
I get the joke. But dressing up perhaps the next president of the United States as the new millennium equivalent of Hitler is just gross and dumb. Anything would have been better.
Huffington Post | Posted 05.25.2011
Barack Obama was asked if he had a response to the very controversial New Yorker cover that combines every rumor and smear about him and his wife Mich...
Michael Shaw | Posted 05.25.2011
Huffington Post | Rachel Sklar | Posted 05.25.2011
Presumably the readership is sophisticated enough to get the joke, but this going to upset a lot of people -- probably for the same reason it's going to delight a lot of others on the right.
Huffington Post | Rachel Sklar | Posted 05.25.2011
This week's New Yorker cover shows Barack and Michelle Obama as Muslim terrorists burning a flag in the Oval Office. Why would they publish such a thing? We asked New Yorker editor David Remnick. Here's what he said.
Politico.com | Posted 05.25.2011
The New Yorker says it's satire. It certainly will be candy for cable news. At a press availability Sunday afternoon in San Diego, Senator Obama was ...
Huffington Post | Rachel Sklar | Posted 05.25.2011
Who knows if they'll get this in Dubuque, but they sure aren't going to like it in Chicago: This week's New Yorker cover features an image of Michell...
Posted 05.25.2011