Speculations on 'Partisan Rancor'

Saturday, September 6th

3:55 pm CDT - If you ever really need to remind yourself that September is not July, jump in a lake in northern Minnesota. If your brain does not immediately enter a state of shock, then you will feel the enlightened joy that comes when nature gives you a firm reminder that there are some things that people are just not meant to do.

I grew up coming to this lake every summer and it's been my end-of-summer ritual for some time now to take a quick swim before retreating back to reality. Normally, my end-of-summer ritual takes place at the end of summer. This is the first year that it's taken place at the beginning of autumn and - now that my anatomy has unshrunk and I have verified that my vitals are normal - I can say with certainty that there are certain rituals and traditions that simply ought to be abandoned.

Let me use that sentence to make a clumsy transition: traditions abandoned is essentially change. Change seems to be a big theme these days... screw it. I want to talk about a line in McCain's speech.

"The constant partisan rancor that keeps us from solving these problems isn't a cause, it's a symptom. It's what happens when people go to Washington to work for themselves and not you."

Here's the line of the speech that has struck me as most absurd in these past few days. I keep running it through my brain and it gets no better with repetition. The theory is that Joe Representative (from your district) is actively and nefariously out to further his own financial, personal, or career interests and thus pisses off his legislative opponents by demanding earmarks, kickbacks, or personal favors (let us not speculate).

Apart from being insulting to his fellow congresspeople, the line grossly understates the importance of differing ideologies. Sure, money plays a part. There is no question that there are politicians who can be bought (Louisiana's William Jefferson, the congressman caught with $90,00 in ill-gotten cash in his fridge, springs to mind). There is also no question that money buys access to a candidate. The freshman West Virginia congressman who receives a huge sum of money from flunkies of the coal industry, will probably set aside some of his schedule to hear what they have to say.

But kickbacks don't cause partisan rancor. Republicans don't oppose welfare-to-work programs because their corporate sponsors tell them to, and Democrats don't support civil unions and gay marriage because the union bosses say so. Partisan rancor occurs when the leadership of one party or both chooses to emphasize a legislative agenda upon which there can be no compromise at the expense of bringing to the floor more agreeable initiatives. And that happens when your governing strategy is to beat the opposing party out of office rather than to take their objections into account... when you seek to appeal to your base rather than capture the middle.

Sunday, September 7th
1:51 pm - After a harrowing flight back to New York through the remnants of a hurricane, I am at home and rethinking things. There is a second, more charitable interpretation of that line in McCain's speech. Perhaps congressman Joe (first names only please, he's a man of the people) refuses to compromise on any of his own principles. The self-righteous bastard blocks any legislation that doesn't fit letter-perfect to his own ludicrously exacting standards. Joe will not compromise and he thus fails his constituency by his mindless adherence to his Snow-White-pure idealism. Rep. Joe's purism serves none but himself, so he is working for himself and not you. And he's a real dick about it. Ergo partisan rancor. QED.

McCain does have a record of reaching across party lines, particularly on good government issues. And he isn't the insane, values-over-evidence conservative that Bush was. Let's hope he and his speech writers had this second meaning in mind.

Comments

[tompoe]

The absolute last thing McCain plans is to "reach across the aisle". This is the candidate that wants to privatize social security, the VA, Medicare, Medicaid, turn over the SBA to the corporate giants, and make sure no woman gets the chance to make the choices Palin and her daughter got to make. The list is too long to iterate. McCain was watching real close when Bush did his executive order thing. Continuing the Bush administration is going to be easy, and if there was doubt that he believes in Kings and Queens, look to his feeling about having Palin respond to questions from the media. He gives two hoots as to what the public needs to know.

[fairwitness]

I forgot to ask: why do so many continue to give McCain the benefit of every doubt, when he has demonstrated time and again his distain for anything but gaining power for himself? His cocky, rules-be-damned "maverick" attitude is exactly Bush's, his selfish aversion to considered thought in favor of impetuous "gut" decisions is exactly Bush's, his lusty craving for "beauty queens" (current wives be damned) is, well, not exactly Bushian--as far as we know--but indicates he is ruled by rather adolescent tides in his personal navigation­...

That the media so largely buy and sell McCain's mythic personal narrative is more disturbing than anything else---why are so many media so in the tank for McCain? I'm sorry, but having been shot down while bombing the city of Hanoi is not heroic; having been a prisoner does not qualify anyone for the presidency--quite the contrary, if you ask other pows. It would be another travesty upon our current travesty if McCain can ride this country's worship of anything military into its highest office.

[BADEN]

Don't bet on it.

McCain will say anything to get elected.

He is bound by his words.
So far, so good.

You will know him by them.