iOS app Android app

Nick Wing
Senior Viral Editor at The Huffington Post.

Twitter | Facebook

Entries by Nick Wing

If The Anti-Abortion Movement Doesn't Condone Violence, How Do Republicans Explain These Remarks?

(0) Comments | Posted November 30, 2015 | 12:19 PM

After Robert Lewis Dear was arrested for opening fire inside a Colorado Planned Parenthood clinic on Friday, he reportedly made a remark about "no more baby parts," according to a law enforcement official. The revelation prompted a heated debate about what motivated Dear to allegedly target a reproductive...

Read Post

Police Have No Idea How Laquan McDonald Footage Vanished Right After They Watched It

(17) Comments | Posted November 25, 2015 | 9:28 AM

On Tuesday evening, more than a year after Laquan McDonald's death, Chicago police released dashcam video showing officer Jason Van Dyke killing the black 17-year-old in a hail of 16 bullets.

Hours before the public saw the graphic footage, Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez charged...

Read Post

This Year, Be Thankful That This Video Of Sarah Palin's Turkey Massacre Still Exists

(3) Comments | Posted November 24, 2015 | 3:38 PM

This story was first published in 2012, and has been published every year since.

For one...

Read Post

Here's Why It Seems Like Donald Trump Never Tells The Truth

(13) Comments | Posted November 23, 2015 | 3:19 PM

Facts are not Donald Trump's strong suit, according to an independent analysis of the billionaire reality TV show host's most controversial statements.

That conclusion might not exactly surprise anyone who's followed the narrative of Trump's campaign, which has kept him atop the polls with a heavy dose...

Read Post

Here's A List Of The Democrats Who Voted To Shut The Door On Syrian Refugees

(6) Comments | Posted November 19, 2015 | 5:45 PM

Forty-seven House Democrats joined their Republican colleagues in voting for a measure that would likely halt...

Read Post

Hating Refugees Is Pretty Much As American As Apple Pie

(2) Comments | Posted November 18, 2015 | 9:48 AM

In the wake of the Paris terrorist attacks, a growing number of politicians are calling on the United States to close its doors to refugees fleeing war-torn Syria. Their concerns center around the fear that terrorists could pose as refugees and enter the country, even though none of...

Read Post

These Are The 'Dangerous' Syrian Refugees You've Been Hearing About

(19) Comments | Posted November 17, 2015 | 5:32 PM

In the aftermath of the deadly terrorist attacks in Paris last week, many Americans and U.S. politicians are demanding that somebody do something. What they want to be done and why they want it to happen, however, are more difficult questions.

A number of governors and GOP presidential...

Read Post

Look At These Photos Before You Say We Can't Take In Syrian Refugees

(11) Comments | Posted November 16, 2015 | 2:42 PM

French authorities are still piecing together information about the terrorist operation that killed at least 129 and wounded hundreds more in Paris last week, but on Monday, a number of American politicians said they'd heard enough to make one immediate conclusion: There's no place for Syrian refugees in...

Read Post

Prosecutor And Cop Lose It Over Idea Of Needing A Conviction To Take Property

(9) Comments | Posted November 13, 2015 | 12:28 PM

Oklahoma might be best known as a home to Sooners, Cowboys and country music fans, but a local prosecutor and police officer say the state will be welcoming violent drug cartels if a Republican lawmaker gets his way.

State Sen. Kyle Loveless has been trying to

Read Post

It Shouldn't Be So Hard To Accept That Racism Is A Problem At Mizzou

(6) Comments | Posted November 12, 2015 | 3:14 PM

Change is afoot at Mizzou.

On Monday, University of Missouri system president Tim Wolfe tendered his resignation. His announcement followed weeks of intense backlash over his perceived mishandling of high-profile incidents of racism on campus and failure to address the lack of diversity in the university's...

Read Post

Here's What Happens When Cops Police For Profit, Not Public Safety

(0) Comments | Posted November 10, 2015 | 11:48 AM

A controversial program that allows police to seize private property has become a massive revenue driver for law enforcement departments around the country, an expansive report published Tuesday has found. Under the practice known as civil asset forfeiture, police and prosecutors work together to permanently seize cash and property -- including cars, homes and businesses -- based on the suspicion that it's connected to criminal activity.

While civil forfeiture is regularly touted as an important crime-fighting tool, authorities don't need to charge owners with a crime in order to take their property, and most of the time, forfeiture is approved without any definitive proof of the alleged criminal ties. Once the government takes control of a person's property, it's typically sold off, sending proceeds back the police departments and legal offices that worked the case.

In the new edition of its "Policing for Profit" study, the Institute for Justice, a libertarian public interest law firm, reports that civil asset forfeiture nets the federal government billions of dollars each year. The Justice Department and Treasury Department deposited more than $5 billion jointly into their forfeiture funds in 2014, up from less than $1 billion in 2004. Each year, feds give hundreds of millions of dollars back to the state and local agencies that are often responsible for making the initial seizures. But even after their obligations, the total value of assets remaining in these funds surged to $4.5 billion in 2014 -- more than seven times what it was a decade ago. 

While these numbers include property confiscated through both criminal and civil forfeiture, the report notes that the vast majority of forfeitures over the past nearly 20 years have come through the civil process. Criminal forfeiture attracts less criticism than its counterpart, because it actually requires prosecutors to charge a suspect, build a case and ultimately obtain a conviction before making a seizure permanent.

Civil forfeiture, on the other hand, allows authorities to bypass the legal protections granted to criminal defendants, because they're technically only charging the property itself with a crime. At the federal level and in 31 states, for example, authorities only need to show that seized property is more likely than not to be connected to criminal activity. That's far below the standard required for a criminal conviction, which puts the burden of proof at "beyond a reasonable doubt." 

This means that even if an innocent person has the time and financial resources to fight for their property in court, they may have an uphill battle to provide sufficient evidence that it was not, in fact, linked to a crime. And if they choose not to contest the seizure, in most cases the property will simply be presumed "guilty."

Law enforcement officials say this standard makes it possible to target the finances of wealthy criminals who may no longer carry cash and contraband in the same car, for example. But the countless horror stories of law-abiding civilians who have gotten hopelessly entangled in the process suggest the current rules are prone to abuse.

The report also digs into the profit motives civil forfeiture offers to police who make seizures. If departments operate with the understanding that more seizures lead to more money for budget items including equipment and salaries, they're more likely to aggressively pursue that process, inevitably leading them to exploit its lack of significant safeguards for innocent owners. This can have a further corrupting influence on law enforcement by leading police and prosecutors to adjust their budgets and tactics in order to prioritize fundraising over public safety and justice. A 2014 report published by The Washington Post revealed just how big the business of civil forfeiture has become for police forces, often leading them to train officers in the best way to pursue seizures and take advantage of lax standards for the benefit of the department.

Lawmakers and critics have begun pushing back on civil asset forfeiture at the state level over the past year, introducing reform measures to address abuse and concerns about incentive structures. Advocates have already been successful in places like New Mexico, Michigan and Washington, D.C. But the Institute for Justice's new report card on state civil forfeiture laws shows just how much work there is left to do. In total, 35 states earn grades of D-plus or below, suggesting there's a national standard of weak protections for property owners and high profit margins for police.

Due to a general lack of public reporting and overall transparency, there's not sufficient data to tell exactly how lucrative or common civil forfeiture is in each state, the study notes. But in reviewing limited information from 26 states and Washington, D.C., the Institute for Justice found that police there had taken in more than $254 million through forfeiture in 2012 alone, bolstered in large part by weak laws governing the process. In states where more complete data was available, the report also found that forfeiture revenues had grown rapidly since 2000.

But even in states with stronger civil asset forfeiture laws, police can typically get around protections by partnering with federal agencies for seizures and seeking forfeiture through the federal process. While the Department of Justice announced changes earlier this year to this program, known as "equitable sharing," the new rules only affect a tiny portion of forfeiture cases. And state and local police departments aren't hesitating to take this more direct path to profits, as equitable sharing payments from the Justice Department totaled nearly $650 million in 2013. Perhaps unsurprisingly, police in states with stricter civil forfeiture laws have been shown to be more likely to circumvent their own rules through "equitable sharing," the Institute for Justice reports

Despite growing criticism over civil asset forfeiture, however, most Americans still aren't familiar with the practice. A HuffPost/YouGov survey conducted in August found that 72 percent of respondents had never heard the term "civil asset forfeiture." And just 30 percent of respondents correctly indicated that law enforcement can use the practice to permanently seize money or other property from a person even without an arrest or conviction.

The issue of visibility is just one challenge that groups like the Institute for Justice face in pushing for broader reforms to civil asset forfeiture in the U.S.

"Most people unfamiliar with this process would find it hard to believe that such a power exists in a country that is supposed to recognize and hold dear rights to private property and due process of law," writes Scott Bullock, senior attorney at Institute for Justice, in the report's foreword. "We will not rest until civil forfeiture is either radically reformed or -- even better -- abolished."

So if this all of this sounds ridiculous, confusing or unbelievable to you, watch the video above, also produced by the Institute for Justice. Then read their whole report here.

Related on...

Read Post

Ted Cruz: An Atheist 'Isn't Fit To Be' President

(67) Comments | Posted November 9, 2015 | 10:04 AM

Presidential candidate Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) said Friday that he believes anyone who wants to be president must fear...

Read Post

People Wrongly Blamed A 'War On Cops' For An Officer's Death. Here's What They're Saying Now.

(12) Comments | Posted November 5, 2015 | 3:51 PM

It’s now clear that Lt. Charles Joseph Gliniewicz -- the Fox Lake, Illinois, police officer whose death captured national headlines in September -- was not a hero gunned down in the line of duty. Investigators revealed this week that he had been stealing and laundering public money from...

Read Post

Heroin Deaths Are Surging, But Deadliest Drugs Still Come In Pill Bottles

(2) Comments | Posted November 5, 2015 | 2:40 PM

Prescription drugs kill more people in the U.S. than any other drug, but heroin overdose deaths have exploded, leading the Drug Enforcement Administration to declare both as the most threatening drugs. 

Drug overdoses continued to be the leading cause of injury death for Americans, killing more people than

Read Post

Police Make No Promises To Discipline Officers Who Violate Body Camera Policy

(3) Comments | Posted November 5, 2015 | 12:10 PM

Police departments in 17 of the 30 largest U.S. cities have begun to push forward with body cameras, issuing the devices to officers in a move that police reform advocates and law enforcement officials say can help bring more transparency and accountability to policing.

But according to...

Read Post

Louisiana Police Officers Open Fire On Car, Killing 6-Year-Old Passenger

(39) Comments | Posted November 4, 2015 | 5:17 PM

Police officers in Marksville, Louisiana, shot and killed a 6-year-old and critically wounded his father following a vehicle pursuit on Tuesday.

Avoyelles Parish Coroner Dr. L. J. Mayeux later identified the boy as Jeremy Mardis. He was reportedly in the passenger seat of the car when he was...

Read Post

A Prosecutor's Guide To Not Prosecuting A Cop Who Killed Someone

(6) Comments | Posted October 27, 2015 | 6:36 PM

Lt. Mark Tiller did not violate the law when he fired two shots into a moving vehicle in July,...

Read Post

More Cops Have Been Charged For Shootings This Year, But There's Much More Work To Be Done

(0) Comments | Posted October 27, 2015 | 9:35 AM

It's been almost a year since a St. Louis County prosecutor cleared Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson in the fatal shooting of Michael Brown. We've seen some significant changes since Nov. 24, 2014: Missouri overhauled its...

Read Post

These Are The Prosecutors Who Have Decided What Happens To Cops Who Kill

(0) Comments | Posted October 26, 2015 | 12:12 PM

Prosecutors walk a delicate line in determining whether or not to charge a police officer in a fatal shooting. Facing pressure from the public and police, they must navigate a legal system designed to shield officers from criminal liability and arrive at an answer that fulfills...

Read Post

GOP Lawmakers Want To Make Gun Silencers Cheaper, Easier To Buy

(36) Comments | Posted October 23, 2015 | 11:12 AM

House Republicans on Thursday introduced a bill that would eliminate a federal tax on gun silencers and would weaken licensing requirements that currently make the devices more difficult to buy than most firearms.

The Hearing Protection Act of 2015, proposed by Rep. Matt Salmon (R-Ariz.)...

Read Post