iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Nigel Barber

GET UPDATES FROM Nigel Barber
 

Atheism to Defeat Religion By 2038

Posted: 06/05/2012 5:00 pm

Countries with the best standard of living are turning atheist. That shift offers a glimpse into the world's future.

Religious people are annoyed by claims that belief in God will go the way of horse transportation, and for much the same reason, specifically an improved standard of living.

The view that religious belief will give way to atheism is known as the secularization thesis. The specific version that I favor (1) is known as the existential security hypothesis. The basic idea is that as people become more affluent, they are less worried about lacking for basic necessities, or dying early from violence or disease. In other words they are secure in their own existence. They do not feel the need to appeal to supernatural entities to calm their fears and insecurities.

The notion that improving living conditions are associated with a decline in religion is supported by a mountain of evidence (1,2,3).

That does not prevent some serious scholars, like political scientist Eric Kaufmann (4), from making the opposite case that religious fundamentalists will outbreed the rest of us. Yet, noisy as they can be, such groups are tiny minorities of the global population and they will become even more marginalized as global prosperity increases and standards of living improve.

Moreover, as religious fundamentalists become economically integrated, young women go to work and produce smaller families, as is currently happening for Utah's Mormons.

The most obvious approach to estimating when the world will switch over to being majority atheist is based on economic growth. This is logical because economic development is the key factor responsible for secularization. In deriving this estimate, I used the nine most godless countries as my touchstone (excluding Estonia as a formerly communist country).

The countries were Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Japan, Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom. These nine countries averaged out at the atheist transition in 2004 (5) with exactly half of the populations disbelieving in God. Their gross domestic product (GDP) averaged $29,822 compared to $10,855 for the average country in the world. How long will it take before the world economy has expanded sufficiently that the GDP of the average country has caught up to the average for the godless countries in 2004?

Using the average global growth rate of GDP for the past 30 years of 3.33 percent (based on International Monetary Fund data from their website), the atheist transition would occur in 2035.

Belief in God is not the only relevant measure of religion, of course. A person might believe in God in a fairly superficial way without religion affecting his or her daily life. One way of assessing the depth of religious commitment is to ask survey participants whether they think that religion is important in their daily lives as the Gallup Organization has done in worldwide nationally representative surveys.

If fewer than 50 percent of the population agreed that religion was important to them, then the country has effectively crossed over to a secular majority. The godless countries by religiosity were Spain, South Korea, Canada, Switzerland, Uruguay, Germany and France. At a growth rate of 3.33 percent per year it would be 2041 before the average country in the world would be at an equivalent level of affluence as these godless nations.

If national wealth drives secularization, the global population will cross an atheist threshold where the majority see religion as unimportant by 2041.

Averaging across the two measures of atheism, the entire world population would cross the atheist threshold by about 2038 (average of 2035 for disbelief and 2041 for religiosity). Although 2038 may seem improbably fast, this requires only a shift of approximately 1 percent per year whether in religiosity or belief in God. Using the Human Development Index as a clock suggests an even earlier arrival for the atheist transition (1).

Is the loss of religious belief something fear? Contrary to the claims of religious leaders, Godless countries are highly moral nations with an unusual level of social trust, economic equality, low crime and a high level of civic engagement (5). We could do with some of that.

Sources
1. Barber, N. (2012). Why atheism will replace religion: The triumph of earthly pleasures over pie in the sky. E-book, available at: http://www.amazon.com/Atheism-Will-Replace-Religion-ebook/dp/B00886ZSJ6/
2. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Barber, N. (2011). A Cross-National test of the uncertainty hypothesis of religious belief Cross-Cultural Research, 45, 318-333.
4. Kaufmann, E. (2010). Shall the religious inherit the earth? London: Profile books.
5. Zuckerman, P. (2008). Society without God: What the least religious nations can tell us about contentment. New York: New York University Press.

 
FOLLOW SCIENCE
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,220
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
photo
Woden
Atheist, skeptic, and proud of it.
07:17 AM on 07/12/2012
An additional reason that religion might be losing out is that, with increased standards of living, education tends to increase. Now, while being religious does not equate to being stupid or uneducated, being uneducated *does* seem to make people less inclined to question what they are told growing up.

Conversely, being educated allows people to more easily see the "God of the gaps" arguments for what they really are (particularly when they are used on areas which aren't even gaps; Bill O'Reilly's famous comment about how we can't explain the tides comes to mind), which can lead to more questioning and rejection of religion.

I guess, as a summary of what I'm trying to say, getting an education makes people more likely to realize that there are alternatives to whatever beliefs they were raised with.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nilsjames
Abide
05:57 PM on 06/21/2012
If you can be a good person to your fellow human beings simply by choosing to do so without any fear of reprisal or promise of reward from a deity, why would you want to deal with the additional burden of religion?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chrysostomos
Zizek built my hotrod,
09:01 PM on 06/25/2012
The question that no theist can seek to answer without sounding like a nihilist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nilsjames
Abide
09:31 AM on 06/26/2012
I've yet to hear a concinving explanation.
10:22 AM on 06/29/2012
Why would you need to help your fellow man, especially one who is weaker, poorer, (and for most atheists, anyone who disagrees with them is), less intelligent? Don't most atheists love Ayn Rand and her social darwinist philosophy? Where do you think the children and grandchildren of atheists of a hundred years from now will learn mercy and sharing of resources? From science? Sorry, you guys are super-delusional. The only thing science is concerned with is making everyone better, faster, stronger, there is no place for the old, weak, sick, disabled, imperfect. All these people will be culled in the atheist utopia.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dean J Smith
Trying to be rational
02:53 PM on 06/29/2012
Most atheists are liberals. Science is descriptive not prescriptive...just because the theory of gravity says things fall, it doesn't mean you should jump off a roof. If you look around you, it seems to be the Religious Right who are the Social Darwinists...which is a particularly ironic term since Darwin advocated taking care of the sick and disabled. I think you would like atheists a lot if you were fair to them since you have to paint us in such ridiculous extremes that you wind up parodying yourself. That you can't imagine having compassion for others without God's endorsement says way more about you than it does about us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doctor Nick
Hi, everybody!
06:33 PM on 06/29/2012
Ayn Rand is an atheist, but so was Karl Marx and so are most communists and socialists.
The left in Europe - which is most concerned with protection for the old, the weak, the sick, the disabled - has traditionally been less religious than the right (the center-right parties in Europe are called "Christian Democrats" while the center-left parties are all "labor" or "social democrats").
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tagbs
don't poke the aliens!
05:15 PM on 06/21/2012
"Is the loss of religious belief something fear? Contrary to the claims of religious leaders, Godless countries are highly moral nations with an unusual level of social trust, economic equality, low crime and a high level of civic engagement (5). We could do with some of that."
I just love reading that part over and over again. It helps to bring me warm and fuzzy feelings about humankind again.
02:43 AM on 06/17/2012
This is hilarious and proves two things - 1) 87% of statistics are made up and 2) the author has no concept of history. In 1960 we were told that God was dead and that religion would be over by 2000. In 2000 the Economist published an obituary for God. In November 2007 they issued a 16 page retraction entitled 'God returns to Europe'. The urbanisation leads to secularisation theory has been discredited so much that it is clear the only reason for this article is to reflect the author's own prejudice. Disappointing that the HP continues to encourage such biased irrational comment.
03:41 PM on 06/22/2012
I do think the authors estimation was flawed, but it does point out one thing. There is in fact an increasing trend, or I should say decreasing trend, in religiosity. This seems to parallel increased education levels, as well as monetary value. Essentially, the more educated someone is, the less religious (Typically) they are. This has always been the trend. More and more people are receiving higher levels of education increasing the total "godless" population. The author did bring up the point that fundamentalists do breed rapidly, and typically educated individuals don't. I can acknowledge this first hand in my home town, where the dutch reform church has tens of families with double digit kids occurring twice in two generations.
12:14 PM on 06/30/2012
I'm not very religious...but when I read this I can only think of this quote..."It is harder fora rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven than it is for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle.
08:33 AM on 06/24/2012
HP is a liberalistic paper and reflects the personal beliefs of the founder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nunyabiz1
10:51 AM on 06/15/2012
The loss of religious belief is something to cheer and rejoice about.
Religion is and has been THE leading cause of hatred, racism, war, death, civil unrest, genocide than any other reason in all of history.

It appears as though the transition may be speeding up thankfully because just 7-10 years ago it was supposed to be around 2050 before there are more Atheist in the world than theist.
Hopefully this will happen in my lifetime.

The biggest problem we have in this country are those infected with religion voting against their own best interest because they are so easily fooled.
and Religious luna.tics being voted into positions of power and destroying everything they touch.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tagbs
don't poke the aliens!
05:17 PM on 06/21/2012
love your comment, f&f!
09:25 AM on 07/05/2012
I am a recovering 40 year "christian". I still believe in the divine but without the dogma of religion attached. I am a spiritual being and I believe in the love and acceptance of all. As I spread this message of love and acceptance those who would claim to be "good christians" attack me.

I rejoice at the loss of religion also. ;-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nunyabiz1
09:55 AM on 07/05/2012
You should really think about becoming/joining "Secular Humanist" they have the "spiritual" and the good without all the childish mythology attached.
photo
Woden
Atheist, skeptic, and proud of it.
07:41 AM on 07/12/2012
As an atheist, I've never had a problem with others believing in the divine--just with organized religion being used as a tool of control and oppression, and with the religious trying to force their beliefs on others or persecute others.

I honestly could not care less what portion of the population was religious, so long as the religious population paid more heed to the verses about caring for their fellow man and less about the verses condemning sin.

However, as this seems to be a sticking point for more religious people than not, I'm left approving of the secularization of the world as well. :)
02:12 PM on 06/14/2012
I wish.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charlotte Bonnie
Agnostic. Turkish-American. Classical liberal. Gay
05:12 PM on 06/13/2012
This article doesn't take into the account that most of the countries mentioned above such as UK, France, Switzerland, Netherlands etc. have an increasing Islamist population. They will likely be the majority by 2050 and they don't seem to convert to atheism anytime soon. I think Islamic conservatism will replace whatever improvements the West has achieved and then muslims themselves will go through an "enlightenment period" but it will take time. I agree that as the living standards improve a decline in religious beliefs occur but 2038 seemed too optimistic to me.
05:22 AM on 06/15/2012
This enlightened period you mention starts now but many are trapped in it. Indonesia is home to more muslims than anywhere else in the world - 200 million. Recently an atheist jailed simply for non-believing.

Some excerpts from this article for you - 'In Indonesia, jailed for non-believing'

"On Thursday, the 32-year-old civil servant from Dharmasraya in West Sumatra was been sent to prison for two and half years and ordered to pay a fine of around $10,000."

"Atheism appears to be growing in Indonesia, with nearly 1,000 followers on Twitter for a group called Indonesian Atheists. Most of the members are too afraid to expose themselves, a fact which underlining the existing intolerance towards “non-believers”.

"Until this day, atheism and communism are practically synonymous in Indonesia. But a new generation has long forgotten these painful historic events. Some decided to join the atheist community after witnessing growing intolerance in name of religion."

http://blogs.aljazeera.net/blog/asia/indonesia-jailed-non-believing?utm_content=blogs&utm_campaign=Trial4&utm_source=twitter&utm_term=socialflow&utm_medium=tweet
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charlotte Bonnie
Agnostic. Turkish-American. Classical liberal. Gay
07:32 AM on 06/15/2012
Thanks for the link. The same thing happened in Turkey with Fazil Say, who is an open atheist, he was charged with "insulting Islam": http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/01/fazil-say-turkish-pianist_n_1562221.html

Neither Indonesia nor Turkey was so religious in the past so going backwards is what concerns me. Atheists in general tend to be very individualistic, they don't have strong united communities like christians and muslims so maybe it is time atheists/agnostics unite and fight against intolerance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nunyabiz1
10:53 AM on 06/15/2012
there is zero difference between Islam and Christianity, both are equally insane, equally vile, equally hateful.
All religion is basically the same.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charlotte Bonnie
Agnostic. Turkish-American. Classical liberal. Gay
12:26 PM on 06/15/2012
Wrong. Islam has political roots where in Christianity there is no direct relation between governing and religion besides while the two religions may be equally violent it is the behavior of people that matter not the contents of the book. Muslims need to learn to be more tolerant to others. Most Christian nations achieved that as we can see in Europe.
Republican crybabies
Enemy of plutocrats
02:03 PM on 06/12/2012
Social progress creates atheists. People come realize that they are masters of their own destiny.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
That One
Birch, please!
07:14 AM on 06/21/2012
Yep. That which the faithful only pray for is what we as a human society are supposed to be actually DOING.
Pray to end hunger, no way, enact policies that work against hunger.
Pray for peace, how about negotiate to end conflict.
We are not gods. We are men and there are no gods to do our work for us.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
F-BVFF
12:38 PM on 06/12/2012
Interesting how this is exactly what Nachmanides predicted, down to the year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aidan Maslow
12:22 AM on 06/12/2012
Not bloody likely! I am an atheist and a psychologist. Interpreting these stats completely ignores the exact nature of what religion is for most people: intellectually cheap anxiety protection. Global socioeconomic and general education conditions really are not getting better fast enough to sustain this pattern. One can even argue that we are at the peek of global economic and education growth, which will only get worse as population increases and the earth warms. These facts would ensure increasing levels of stress, and a more poorly educated global population. The result would be that more individuals will need the type of ideological quick fixes that religion offers. In other words, they would have too much on their plate to invest the type of intellectual effort necessary to be an atheist and will be more likely to take the intellectually lazy way out.

My prediction: Atheism growth plateaus out in the next decade and begins rapid decreasing!
photo
pdferguson
Micro-bios? We don't need no stinkin' micro-bios!
11:46 AM on 06/12/2012
Well said, Aldan. It is wildly naive to think after thousands of years that religion would magically disappear. It's exactly this sort of wishful thinking that's behind religious belief in the first place.

Technology has changed the landscape of belief tremendously, by helping demolish the centuries old taboos that religions carefully erected to insulate themselves from criticism. But that alone likely is not sufficient to destroy religion, which are, after all, the oldest and most successful human institutions ever created. Like all institutions, the one and only drive religions have is self-preservation; they will say or do anything to protect themselves, which we see today in the RCC's response to the worldwide, decades old pedophile scandal.
06:46 PM on 06/12/2012
I don't exactly agree. The author is not suggesting that religion will "magically disappear". He suggests that the world will cross an atheist threshold where the majority see religion as unimportant. "Although 2038 may seem improbably fast, this requires only a shift of approximately 1 percent per year whether in religiosity or belief in God." The research I have done suggests that this 1% will be easily attained.

I think you underestimate the power of the internet and todays world. We learn and grow now like never before. The internet also provides an alternative that many of the poor or isolated have never had. And the world gets easy access to the truth now. Even what other great men have said of it, like Einstein, Hawking, Adams. Jefferson for example that said, "Christianity is the most perverse system that has ever shone on mankind". All this and more that are now just clicks away. The kids aren't as stupid as many adults. They will see it like never before.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nunyabiz1
10:55 AM on 06/15/2012
Lets hope not.

I think the biggest reason more become Atheist is education, the higher the education the more likely one is to be Atheist.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyNameIsKarsten
...sounds like Chewbacca when he yawns.
06:45 PM on 06/11/2012
I wish there was more in this article about the effects of education on religious beliefs.

The Bible is filled with stuff that can't even stand up to 5th grade science. Be it the proposed age of Adam and Noah, the construction of Noah's boat, the supposed age of the earth, Jonah's fascinating vacation in a digestive tract - you name it!

The only miracle about Christianity is that it lasted as long as it did. But it's about time that Jesus found a place on the shelf: Somewhere between I for Isis and K for Khepri.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
F-BVFF
12:36 PM on 06/12/2012
What about the proposition that it must be true because the receiving of the Torah was experienced by millions of people simultaneously and that's something that's impossible to be forged. Jews would claim that this would outweigh everything that seems to fall outside of nature.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyNameIsKarsten
...sounds like Chewbacca when he yawns.
06:30 PM on 06/12/2012
You forgot to include your proof that the Torah was received by millions of people simultaneously.
06:30 PM on 06/25/2012
Huh?

Millions of people didnt write documents. If Tom Clancy writes that millions of people saw a city destroyed by a nuke, that doesnt make them real.
humilityisrare
I think, therefore I am... an Independent
02:34 PM on 06/12/2012
Jesus looked at them and said, "with man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible." Matt. 19:26

With all due respect, there is nothing in 5th grade science that can refute any of the "stuff" you mention. As someone with a postgraduate degree, I can tell you that education may impact religious beliefs but not through compelling, scientific argument. There is nothing in the Bible, not one thing, that can be proven false. There may be things that seem improbable or even impossible by our human understanding or by the current scientific standards, but yet, they cannot be proven wrong or impossible.

Who can prove than men did not live 8-10 times longer at one time than they do today? The Bible nowhere states the age of the earth (although it may show a lineage from Adam to Jesus) but only lists the lifetimes of certain members since Adam's creation. There is plenty to support that the 7 days of creation may have lasted much longer than seven 24 hour days.

The miracle that Christianity ever even got off the ground is much bigger than the miracle of its continuation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MyNameIsKarsten
...sounds like Chewbacca when he yawns.
06:26 PM on 06/12/2012
I'm sorry to say, but I disagree with just about everything you wrote. I do appreciate though, that you remained polite.

First and foremost, I find it nonsensical to quote the Bible to prove/indicate that the Bible is true. Would you be in any way convinced if I dug out a similar quote from the Qu'ran?

Second of all: We do have scientific data concerning life expectancy of earlier times. All data proves that life expectancy has only skyrocketed within the last 100 years or so and that it had previously been very low. Average life expectancy is now somewhere in the 60s, and yet somehow you think it's possible that it could have been 8-10 times that despite the lack of medicine, antibiotics or surgery?

Don't even get me started on the story of the ark. Now that's the pinnacle of implausibility.

"Proof" or not, a little quote from an ancient book is not enough to satisfy people in this day and age. God could make it so easy and have a wonderful relationship to all humans by just revealing himself, but believers have a nifty cop-out for that too: "He's testing our faith".
07:13 PM on 06/12/2012
"With all due respect, there is nothing in 5th grade science that can refute any of the "stuff" you mention."

I respectfully disagree. We have proven I think that women were not made from a rib. We have also proven evolution. We have proven that snakes do not have an ability to speak. We know that nobody can walk on water, or part water, etc etc. This list is endless as to what mankind has proven wrong in the Bible.

"There is nothing in the Bible, not one thing, that can be proven false." I think an absurd statement.
10:06 AM on 06/11/2012
Codygirl is right! Chasing ones tail is now a National USA Preoccupation, AGAIN; as once in ancient Greece when people soon solved the depressing problem of Whom, How, Why, Whence are WE? They did it by "deconstructing" the discomfiting, time-consuming question into an Olympic Mountain of Mythology which contained all the ingredients of life, from the cradle to immortality. But, thanks to a modern half-educated media which indiscriminately parcels-out equal time to both useful facts and worthless speculation, we wallow about in a mental corral of illogical predication that goes nowhere for Centuries, entirely of our own making....I have many times referred to Atheism, calling it a religion because it sports the same evangelistic temperament of some religions, even though I always knew that such a term does not even begin to fit the abstract, Antediluvian idealism (that is all it is). Religions have proportion, philosophy, defined virtues, moral basis, commitment, standards, expectations, Love and Hate, Light and Darkness. Religion is conceptually Endless because it reaches beyond the transient into the newness of self-discovery, returning us to the reality of the IMAGE of God, ineluctably. Only FOOLS are atheistic but that is because they can be rescued...If they were STUPID, they would be hopeless. Terminology matters!
photo
pdferguson
Micro-bios? We don't need no stinkin' micro-bios!
07:22 PM on 06/11/2012
Yes, terminology matters, but facts and evidence matter more. I'm sorry you don't understand that, and I'm more sorry it has lead you to the bigotry of calling us FOOLS or STUPID. Unfortunately, that is the expectation I have when believers engage in flinging their self-righteous nonsense at atheists.
09:01 PM on 06/11/2012
The "National USA Preoccupation" is that 46% of Americans deny evolution, which goes against 99% of the worlds scientists. So who "chases ones tail" here? That statistic is incredibly shameful not only for Americans but for humanity. Who are the "fools" here? Who are the"stupid" here?

Atheism in NOT a religion. I suggest a 10 year old could tell you that.

The difference between the religious and atheists is a simple one. We put mankind first, and you put it second, to a God or Gods. The result and evidence of this is everywhere, and we tire of it.

But the horror of it all people can take no longer. I recently watch this "Jesus Camp" documentary. Tell me that that isn't a group of completely insane adults turning beautiful children completely insane. Simply gross child abuse. And this is why we can sit back no longer. You must be stopped. You are void of any ability to think rationally.

You are even quite prepared to walk into a paradise fully knowing others will be burning. You need to be a special type of a person to do such a thing. If I am ever at some pearly gates I would rather burn with my brothers and sisters than to enter your paradise. The ideologies of religion are completely disgusting. I will go to my grave not understanding the religious and how you think. The evolution statistics say much here I think. It is an amazing thing to me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
F-BVFF
12:37 PM on 06/12/2012
Could you define "religion"? After reading all these posts, the correct meaning has become quite elusive.
10:40 PM on 06/09/2012
Atheism IS A RELIGION!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mansterEZ
searching for secular humanist fact-based truth
12:42 AM on 06/10/2012
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts. Beliefs do not require evidence.
06:36 AM on 06/10/2012
If something is said over and over it doesn't make it true.

Atheism is nothing more than a lack of belief in the supernatural and that is not a religion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greg Holden
12:35 PM on 06/10/2012
A lack of something is never something.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
the analyzer
03:02 PM on 06/09/2012
Having said what I have said in my previous comment, I will have to add a disclaimer that atheists can be extremely nice people too. The question is whether they will value people over material prosperity when push comes to shove. I think not.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MagicManDoneIt
When facts are lacking. Just say...
04:47 PM on 06/09/2012
Being an atheist (or theist for that matter) says nothing about whether or not someone will value people over material prosperity. I think most people will (regardless of religious belief) and others will not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
the analyzer
07:35 PM on 06/09/2012
I am just making the correlation between material prosperity and atheism that the writer of the article has made - those are his conclusions.
07:11 PM on 06/09/2012
Value people like the religious? I hope not. The religious put a zero value on mankind. Atheists put humanity first, not second to any Gods.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
11:45 AM on 06/09/2012
That's nothing more than atheistic pipe dreaming.

7.1 billion people on the planet

6.9 billion people are religious.

2038? Really??? LOL.

The US is a perfect case against this as is China were their economic growth and the growth of Christianity out pace us, the same for even more developed countries in Latin America. It fails to account for affluent Christians of which there are millions.

It presupposes, rather erroneously that religion is ONLY a function of economic insecurity or a lack of education. I personally know of thousands of people who are affluent, educated at top universities who are passionate Christians, old and young.

None of those issues deal with the notions that many, even in the scientific community believe we are hard-wired for such beliefs. This would explain the permanency of religion since the inception of mankind. So after millions of years, religion will disappear in 26 years?

That's so comical it barely deserves a response.
SelfAwarePatterns
seek truth; question everything
12:42 PM on 06/09/2012
Actually, only about 4.5 billion or so are religious.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_religion

That is almost certainly the lowest proportion in history. The broad sweep of history is that religion is losing ground in the developed world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
01:00 PM on 06/09/2012
Wrong.

That is incorrect. Its 6.9 billion, maybe 6.6

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_religious_populations

Not losing ground.
SelfAwarePatterns
seek truth; question everything
12:43 PM on 06/09/2012
Oops, make that around 5.5 billion. Main point is that about 1.5 billion are irreligious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
detroitblkmale30
Wise Men Still Seek Him
01:02 PM on 06/09/2012
Nope. Its 6.9 billion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_religious_populations
SelfAwarePatterns
seek truth; question everything
02:12 PM on 06/09/2012
Look at the second to last row on that table. It lists 1.5 billion for irreligion.

Also,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreligion