iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Noah Fitzgerel

GET UPDATES FROM Noah Fitzgerel
 

President Obama, Save Syria

Posted: 06/13/2012 9:26 am

The resilience of the people of Houla, Syria is absolutely and unequivocally inspirational. While the Syrian Foreign Ministry continues to deny that the deaths that have bloodied the streets of Houla within the last 14 months were caused by the Syrian government, the world watches on, ignoring the overwhelming amount of evidence provided by YouTube videos and news reports that all indubitably reveal the Syrian government's role in the death of its own people.

Short of the Russian and Chinese Ministers of Foreign Affairs, a global citizen who is not convinced that the Syrian government is behind the deaths of its own people is hard to find. The United Nations has not only acknowledged the truth behind the relationship between the murder of Syrians in Houla and the Syrian government, but has also condemned it.

So, the question is, why are we so slow to react?

In light of America's involvement in the Arab Spring -- in which America provided air support and weaponry without deploying any troops onto foreign soil -- it is certainly inappropriate to state that America must make a choice between deploying troops onto foreign soil and remaining indifferent.

As evidenced by his multilateral approach to foreign policy (think his approach to Iran and North Korea), President Obama has certainly been a careful student of history. It is for this reason that I do not suggest that the Commander-in-Chief make any radical military decisions regarding the American relationship with Syria. However, I certainly think that the United States can do far more than champion the issuance of a largely inconsequential U.N. resolution.

I am certainly no expert on foreign policy or diplomacy, but I believe that this issue can be treated with greater expediency. In early May, it was reported that the Obama administration had finally gathered its wits regarding the heinous crimes being committed in Syria. But until such plans prevent the death of innocent citizens, their provisions on paper mean nothing.

We need to act now. Fiscally, we cannot be the police force of the world, but the events occurring in Syria are beyond petty crimes. This an opportunity to show the international community that the United States is willing to put all aside in order to protect the most basic violations of human rights -- and that which is unalienable -- life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

 
FOLLOW TEEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:40 PM on 06/17/2012
Sure, we can help Syria. Will they still hate us in the morning? Yup.
photo
smahl
I miss the days of Paul Wellstone.
07:49 AM on 06/14/2012
He should of helped them out a year ago instead he helped lybia. Now Syria has exculated to what it is today. If he really wanted to show the international community that the United States is willing to put all aside in order to protect the most basic violations of human rights -- and that which is unalienable -- life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. He should of done it back then.
photo
ConcernedCitizenEU
Addicted to the Shindig
09:54 PM on 06/13/2012
President Obama, Save Syria!

And when that mission is accomplished, please save Sudan, Congo, and ... well, just every messed up country in the world.

Mr Obama, the Nobel Peace Prize has been given to. Don't you dare take care for your own people!

Sincerely, a deluded European citizen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:17 AM on 06/14/2012
we're pretty much broke from IRAQ $$$$$....and Afganistan $$$$$4
and wild GOP spending under Bush, and the stimulas to
fix those problems to some degree.....
too spread out with our military, and no money.....
best to get out of the Mid East mostly.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
altheschrod
I'm pedaling hard.
09:30 PM on 06/13/2012
NO, NO, NO!! The U.S. MUST NOT act unilaterally! Once and for all, let's give the U.N. an oportunity to do what it was established for. And remember, young man, Syria is in Russia's "sphere of influence"--NOT ours!
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
02:30 PM on 06/13/2012
The people of Eastern Europe overthrew their Soviet-backed regimes without any outside assistance, and the people of Egypt overthrew Hosni Mubarak without any outside assistance. The people of Syria can do the same.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
04:49 PM on 06/13/2012
Apparently not.
The Soviet Union had had enough of trying to oppress after Poland in 1981.
Hosni was on the payroll.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
08:50 PM on 06/13/2012
Either way, military action against Syria wouldn't have any good outcomes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Craig Dietz
01:17 PM on 06/13/2012
I applaud Noah for taking a stand, though I disagree. Not that we shouldn't do more, we don't need to get into another war. A war that would likely draw in Russia, Israel, Iran and could quickly inflame that region. Syria is not Libya, where we could exercise our power, and we wanted revenge against Kadaffi for his bombing of Pan Am Flight 103. Anyone who remembers that, understand our deep anomosity toward thim.

Assad is different. He has powerful allies in Russia and China, who have little interest in seeing their sphere of influence reduced because the Arab Spring destablized autocratic governments. With Putin in power and the Communists. There is little we can do without provoking a wider conflict. And no one wants that! Ten years of war have sapped this country; it's time to nation build here at home.

Our approach to Syria has to be to isolate them both economically and diplomatically.
12:50 PM on 06/13/2012
Clearly this opinion was penned by a teenager. Unless we can send in a couple drones to do the dirty work the US should and must stay out of Middle East affairs. If the situation is so appalling and in dire need of intervention let the illustrious and ineffectual United Nations send in troops - that should work out quite well as have their efforts in the past have done. Second choice? Let the Arab League and the members of the newly formed Arab Spring, "spring" into action. All our efforts to promote good will towards the United States over the past couple decades have only resulted in American deaths and the expenditure of billions. HEY? Do they have OIL?
02:14 PM on 06/13/2012
The UN does NOT have a military.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Allene Stucki
12:37 PM on 06/13/2012
Some once wisely observed that the problem with young people is that they all seem to believe that the world began the day they were born.

This young man sorely needs a serious dose of historical perspective and a reality check.
12:51 PM on 06/13/2012
so aptly stated