I can't imagine Eliot Spitzer is not going to resign as governor of New York now that he has been caught in what today's papers are calling a sex ring. (How divine. A sex ring.) The Times has an editorial urging him to leave office on the grounds that he'll be so busy defending himself in this current legal mess that he won't have time to be governor. So it's a done deal, really: he'll be out by noon is my guess. So goodbye. I feel sad. I liked him. It's tragic. Etc.
But having read every word of the indictment, may I suggest that should he stay on, Spitzer will probably have far more time to focus on being governor, in that he won't have to spend hours on the phone with someone named Temeka arguing over his 55 per cent deposit, his in-store credit, the cash limits on bank machine withdrawals in late-night Washington, and ways for Kristen the prostitute to get into her hotel room without her having to give her name at the check-in desk downstairs.
Meanwhile, Spitzer, who a year ago had a shot at national office, is today a laughingstock because of his reckless involvement in ... what? Let's just say this right out: in nothing. He arranged for a date with a hooker and she crossed a state line. This violates something called the Mann Act, which was passed in 1910, before women could vote. It's the legal equivalent of an old chestnut, it seems barely constitutional, and no one with half a brain could possibly think of it as anything worth prosecuting anyone for. Although Eliot Spitzer might. This is the problem these guys get into: they're so morally rigid and puritanical in real life (and on some level, so responsible for this priggish world we now live in) that when they get caught committing victimless crimes, everyone thinks they should be punished for sheer hypocrisy.
But they shouldn't really. It's one of the things you have to admire about Senator Larry Craig: he's still there. And who can say he's doing a better or worse job than he was before? And compared to whom in the United States Senate?
Which reminds me, New York's Senator Chuck Schumer has been heard from on the question of what is to be done about Eliot Spitzer. He has gone out on a limb to say he is sad for Spitzer's family but he isn't going to comment until Spitzer is more forthcoming. I can only suggest that Schumer has not read the indictment, since there's no way to do so without hoping that there will be nothing more forthcoming.
New York's other Senator also had something to say on the subject yesterday, and it may not surprise you to hear that she somehow managed to make Senator Schumer look brave. "Let's wait and see what comes out over the next few days," Hillary Clinton said.
"Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problem to which the Federal government was turning a blind eye."
Yes, "The Sheriff of Wall Street" was once again on the case to protect the little people and against the bank bail out, a lone voice against the banking industry. I think this is the first high profile case of political wiretapping since the Nixon era. With no oversite by FISA, the Bushies can spy, wiretap or do what ever they like in the name of "protecting us." We need protection most from there abuses of power and subversion of The Constitution.
This is where the 1984 stuff gets very much into abuse of power by the party in power.
It's not just moral hypocrisy -- he had other human beings locked in cages for doing the same thing he did.
This is the most incarcerated country in the world.
Wake up, Ephron -- this is about way more than moral priggishness.
Nowadays when someone comes out of jail, we do not see them as having "paid their debt to society."
Nowadays when you have a criminal record, your life is permanently ruined. Forever and ever.
You are discriminated against in many ways for the rest of your life.
Liberals like yourself are part of the problem, Ephron, because you don't take incarceration seriously.
I take it very seriously and I say -- Spitzer needs to suffer the same penalties that he wanted for everyone else in his situation.
Maybe if people see him go to jail -- they'll start to reconsider what it means to put someone in jail for this kind of activity.
I really hope he does time. He needs to do time, to make his supporters think about all the other people they've subjected to the same cruel fate.
Spitzer on Predatory Lending
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021302783.html
and the outrage - so much more than the outrage over far more serious publica sins such as bush's lies to Congress and the American people. Let's not forget that he stood int eh well of the House of Representatives and lied straight out to all of us. Lies that have lead to the death of 1000's, the squandering our nation's taxes and the wastage of our international reputation. With that sort of criminality getting a free pass, I resent that anyone be prosecuted for anything while that war criminal runs around.
"This is the problem these guys get into: they're so morally rigid and puritanical in real life (and on some level, so responsible for this priggish world we now live in) that when they get caught committing victimless crimes, {{{everyone}}} thinks they should be punished."
Not everyone, they themselves. There's an idea for a Saturday Night Live skit, Spitzer cross examining Spitzer.
Victimless crime is your statement! Certainly you are not a member of N.O.W. and a feminists are you? Victimless; let's see Wife Three Children ='s FOUR persons to start with. Let's move on to his family's pride and ethical bearing='s betrayed brothers/sisters/ Parents! Say 15more folks. Moving on to the State of New York and it's citizens='s a really large group of folks='s 30million?
Finally there's those pesky "puritanical" and "priggish" attitudes. This is a true window into your essence. Nora long before you were born our entire society was and still is based on the "10 Guidlines of Love" and respect for our fellow man. You shall not committ adultry is one issue. Then there's the old "Honor you Parents" thing about living a strong moral/ethical life. How about "You shall not steal" aka use of public funds for illegal enterprises. Maybe the last is "You shall not lie"aka bearing false witness in words or lifestyle!!! There's some very strong reason to show you that Eliot Spitzer committed a CRIME that affected many! AKA VICTIMS of immoral and ILLEGAL behavior!
As for "who can say" whether Sen. Craig is doing a worse job in the Senate now that he has been stripped of his committee assignments and is shunned by his colleagues, I'll go out on a limb and say that I can say he is doing a worse job as a United States Senator than he did before he argued that having only 3 weeks to decide to plead guilty to a public lewdness charge is something beyond his capacity to do rationally.
Always saddened and angered when featured bloggers pose misleading rhetorical questions that an interested (or responsible) person could find an actual answer to.
1. According to the news, his use of prostitutes goes back years ... back even to when he was a prosecutor. As a prosecutor he went after prostitution rings. Now, every one he managed to convict in those prosecutions is going to be filing appeals based on selective prosecution. He only prosecuted those prostitution rings he didn't himself frequent.
2. As NY Attorney General, he went after Wall Street wolves for their fraudulent activities, such as setting up dummy corporations and money laundering. Turns out Spitzer used dummy corporations and money laundering techniques to hide his own payments to prostitutes. Now the Wall Street predators are in position to undo every thing he accomplished towards reining them in.
Basically, he's undone everything he ever managed to accomplish for the people.
Having said that, I think this law needs to go the way of the horse and buggy as well..
http://www.cosmictap.com/spitzer-and-the-mann-act/
I just don't get why a modern society sees fit to legislate victimless personal behaviors. And don't start in about how these girls are "victims." No one's forcing them to engage in this profession, they're paid infinitely better than they would be in alternate professions, and besides, this is a slippery slope... The Mexican-American man who lives across the street from me and, despite a broken hand, is forced to get up every morning at 6AM to tile a roof so that he can feed his family is much more a victim, in my eyes, than a girl who gets five grand to have an hour of dull sex with a politician.
My $0.02.
And the Mann act is still in play today, gangs get busted for this one all the time so its not some ancient out of step law.
And unlike you I don't ADMIRE Larry Craig! sheesh! He had some backroom politicking that got him off the hook, with the promise that he not run when his term is up.
The point about Larry Craig is not that he was more or less admirable as a consequence of his experience in the rest room, but his capacity for the job of senator; i.e., providing cover for an administration of war criminals and blocking progressive legislation that might occur to a member of the other party (ridiculous thought!).
Why not just an affair? short trysts with women for no money? THAT would have been his own business which, although embarrassing, would not necessarily lead to blackmail or further illegal behavior.
No. This is NOT nothing. He engaged in an ongoing pattern of Illegal behavior that required him to launder money and opened him up to potential blackmail and coersion that could have ultimately harmed millions.
Let's face it, if you are engaging in a behavior on an ongoing basis which, if it were to come to light, you would IMMEDIATELY need to resign, you have already failed your post as Governer.
http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2008/03/sex-trumps-presidential-race-coverage.html
We're in for the long term as observers, and as bewildered as we may be.