iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Nora Ephron

Nora Ephron

Posted: October 3, 2008 12:45 AM

The Graph and I


I tried to watch the vice presidential debate tonight but it wasn't easy. This was because I was forced to watch it on CNN. I happen to be an MSNBC junkie -- but the TV set was already tuned to CNN so that was pretty much that.

This was the first time I've watched a debate on CNN, and it turns out to have this graph running along the bottom of the screen, a graph that allegedly represents the moment-by-moment feelings of a group of supposedly independent voters in Columbus, Ohio, who sit, with some sort of electronic devices, and register their warmth or cool as the debate goes on.

Well, this is no way to watch a debate. It reminded me of this thing that's happened in New York City, which is that all restaurants with more than fourteen locations have to put on the menu the calorie count of each food item. This is an appalling development. It's hard enough to figure out what you want to order without someone explicitly telling you that you're going to drop dead if you eat it. But more important, I don't believe those calorie counts. Who knows how many calories there are in a grilled cheese sandwich? No one, that's who. But there it is, on the menu, in a grim black and white parenthetical, and it affects you, you can't help it, and as a result you end up not ordering the thing you wanted and instead ordering some stupid bowl of soup that barely gets you through till three in the afternoon.

Well this graph on CNN affected me, it affected me so much that I could barely focus on the debate, I was so busy watching the graph. I knew it was completely unreliable and irrelevant, and yet my heart sank and rose according to it. I sort of heard what the candidates were saying, but mostly I watched the orange (for women) and green (for men) lines rise and fall as each phrase was uttered. When Sarah Palin spoke and the lines went up, I felt irritable. When Joe Biden spoke and the lines went up, I felt happy. Don't get me started on Gwen Ifill.

Every so often Sarah Palin would say things like "darn right" and "bless their hearts" and "you betcha" and I noticed that the people in Columbus were unmoved by Palin's folksy expressions, at least according to the graph; this gave me faith in America. But then I reminded myself that the graph was probably as unreliable as the calorie count that caused me not to order what I really wanted to eat for lunch.

When the debate was over, we were all sad to realize that it had not been the exciting blood bath we were hoping for (I mean, let's admit it) but thrilled to hear that Biden was the winner. So I came home and celebrated: I had a grilled cheese sandwich (530 calories) (not really).

Read more reactions to the Biden-Palin Vice Presidential debate from HuffPost bloggers

I tried to watch the vice presidential debate tonight but it wasn't easy. This was because I was forced to watch it on CNN. I happen to be an MSNBC junkie -- but the TV set was already tuned to CNN...
I tried to watch the vice presidential debate tonight but it wasn't easy. This was because I was forced to watch it on CNN. I happen to be an MSNBC junkie -- but the TV set was already tuned to CNN...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 295
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
09:56 AM on 10/11/2008
I AM OBSESSED WITH THE GRAPHS, but they are BAD. They start to influence(subtly) what you think you should have thought about what the candidates were saying. But these are "UNDECIDED" voters turning these dials--voters unwilling to commit to either, and I hate to say it, probably not that thoughtfui a group of people.
They get too much power if 10 million people watching CNN can be affected by their overly emotional responses.
10:32 PM on 10/05/2008
I hate the graph! I agree that it's distracting and you get caugh up in trying to WILL the lines up or down.
09:54 PM on 10/05/2008
CNN is all gimmicks.
~s~
09:36 PM on 10/05/2008
I loved the graph.

I would not have reacted at all like the focus group did so it was fun to watch others react differently.

It was great to watch people fall/not fall for lines.

You could tell from that graph that McCain was in big trouble and sure enough the polls show him down at his lowest low forties support which is basically his base support.

It was fun watching an election standing there naked for what it was: A madison avenue execise in freindly persuasion with McCain playing Avis and Obama playing Hertz.
photo
TurnToTheLeft
We have nothing to lose but our chains.
08:11 PM on 10/05/2008
"Don't get me started on Gwen Ifill." I will start it for you Nora. Ms. Ifill asked easy questions without much substance. Even so, Ms. Palin chose not to answer several and had the unmitigated gall to state so and flaunt it. Where was the moderation Ms. Ifill? Why did you let her step on the debate format and thus your own reputation? Ms. Ifill by being so lax with the rules you disrespected the American public. At least Jim Lehrer tried to repeat questions in the presidential debate and made note when they were not answered. Ms. Ifill by not pressing for answers you have given Ms. Palin permission to act in a way that disrespects the debates - the method by which we can judge our candidates.
09:55 PM on 10/05/2008
Intimidation by the McCain campaign played a part, but I've long felt Ms Ifill falls in the group of 'journalists' who are predisposed to be liberal, but they are so insecure about themselves they over-compensate trying to prove they are 'unbiased' or 'equal'.

ABC's George is the same.

I didn't suspect she'd do much better than she did. I constantly scream at the screen telling Ms Ifill to follow-up on her questions. For someone you would think would be assertive, I've never seen her be anything other than timid.

It's not the same as the 'journalists' who are biased, but they try to appear fair by having both sides on as talking heads. It generally fails, as they invariably let the most egregious spinner rant on and on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
timmmahhhh
Self-employed architect, pauper among plutocrats
07:04 PM on 10/05/2008
I agree with you that the graph would be a distraction. I watched it on NBC and I appreciated the highlights they showed of this graph, AFTER the debate.
06:55 PM on 10/05/2008
I tuned in to watch it and used CNN, ten minutes later, I switched to MSNBC. I found the graph lines terribly annoying and it took away from the debate for me which is why I changed the channel. I paid too much attention to the yellow and green lines. Bad idea to televise this.
3rdCitizen
Nobody knows for sure.
04:52 PM on 10/05/2008
By getting you to order soup instead of a grilled cheese sandwich, the calorie counts did what nutritionists wanted them to do. By getting you to focus on a popularity contest instead of rational arguments over important issues, the graphs did what CNN wanted them to do.
04:27 PM on 10/05/2008
“...remember that we are choosing a vice president, not a shoe-shopping buddy. Allegiance to other XX chromosomes cannot outweigh the civic duty of choosing the person who can do what is best for our country. More importantly, if traditional family values – the ones gay marriage and other godless acts seek to destroy – are truly a priority for conservative voters, then it is time to respect a woman´s right to choose. Palin made the choice to mother five children, including an infant in need of special care.

The American dream of doing and having it all is merely an illusion. We can have anything we want, but not everything we want. In Palin´s case, her service to the country should come second to the responsibilities of a mother. Not because she is a woman, but because it´s living out the values she promises America.” http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/72835
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ebie58
04:16 PM on 10/05/2008
You are so right when you say that 'this is no way to watch a debate'..I was watching CNN before the debate between Obama and McCain and when Wolf Blitzer started explaining this graph 'thing', I decided to turn to a station that just lets us watch the debate. I knew that it would be very distracting and might interfere with my own thought process. I guess CNN does it as a gimmick to get more people to watch. But, I don't like it at all. Too many things to deal with.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:19 PM on 10/05/2008
All the major news networks have been racing to find the lowest common denominator, and CNN's graph thingy showed they finally found a way to look less professional than FOX. Next time try C-SPAN or PBS.
02:41 PM on 10/05/2008
Weird -- some of my "older" friends (and I'm ...um...55) had the same reaction, that the graph was distracting. I found it pretty fascinating. What I didn't like was the lack of any real analysis of it by the CNN talking heads. All they ever do is take one example showing it go up for one candidate, and one where it goes up for the other ... and that's it. My impression -- and I watched it pretty closely -- was that a) Every time Biden made his points it seemed to elevate pretty high -- 80 and sometimes up into the 90's, and once or twice (his emotional moment for one) it maxed out....with Palin on the other hand it stayed pretty much flatline often when she was making her points, and -- sometimes it dipped when she thought she was delivering zingers, such as her "white flag of surrender", where it went down to about 35. The dial thingy left me convinced, before the post-debate polls came out, that Biden would come out on top by a wide margin - and he did.
12:59 PM on 10/05/2008
What does the graph really mean anyway? It is supposed to show whether the user likes what is being said, but what does that mean really? If Palin says "White flag of surrender" and the graph goes down, does it mean they think she is wrong, or she is right?
10:43 AM on 10/05/2008
A sure sign you survived is that you didn't need a Xanax afterwards. Regarding Gwen, the repugs bluffed her and she blinked. At one point, I thought Palin was the moderator. Next time try CSPAN.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
buckbuck11
03:19 PM on 10/05/2008
Yep. Worked like a charm. Took her completely out of the debate. She become nothing more than an question asking robot - one of those third graders at, what was it, Alice B Toklas Elementary School (?) could have done just as well.
09:57 AM on 10/05/2008
Well look at hte positive side, at least you were distracted from the winking lady trying to hit on me all night. I had to tell the bartender, "Thanks but no thanks" for the drink she wanted to buy me..