iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Olga Bonfiglio

GET UPDATES FROM Olga Bonfiglio
 

Dorrien: Republican Presidential Win Would Give Free Rein To Neocon Ambitions of Empire

Posted: 03/26/2012 9:36 pm

Nine years ago Gary Dorrien spoke to Kalamazoo peace activists about the nation's policy of perpetual war as advocated by the neoconservatives.

On Sunday, Mar.18, the Episcopalian priest and Reinhold Niebuhr Professor of Social Ethics at Union Theological Seminary and Columbia University, returned to a capacity crowd of over 500 people at First Presbyterian Church in Kalamazoo, a place that has opened its doors over the past decade to pray and observe the beginning and subsequent anniversaries of the Iraq War. The event was sponsored by the Interfaith Coalition for Peace and Justice.

He spoke once again about the neoconservatives and their quest for American global domination. The neocons became the dominant foreign policy faction in the Republican Party during the mid-1990s and continue to be so to this day, he said.

The goals of that policy in 2000 included the following:
-Repudiate the ABM treaty
-Build a global missile defense system
-Develop a strategic dominance of space
-Increase defense spending by $20 billion per year
-Establish permanent new forces in Southern Europe, Southeast Asia and the Middle East
-Reinvent the U.S. military to fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars.

The election of George W. Bush allowed the neocons to institute their policy, and most of the above goals have come to pass. They were especially keen to overthrow the power structures of Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Syria and North Korea, he said.

"[They] wanted to create a pro-American Iraq that gave the U.S. a direct power base, ensured the oil supply, set off a chain-reaction of regime changes, gave relief to Israel and got rid of a thuggish enemy, Saddam Hussein," said Dorrien.

The attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 gave the Bush administration the excuse it needed to attack Afghanistan in October in an attempt to kill Osama bin Laden and quell Al Qaeda, and in 2003 to invade Iraq, which Americans were told had weapons of mass destruction.

The "stampede to war" is a regular tool for uniting the country whenever it feels it is being attacked, said Dorrien. Presidents have used it to take continental lands from the Native Americans, to extend slavery in the West and the Caribbean and to invade Latin America. From the Monroe Doctrine in 1823 to the Bush Doctrine of 2001, the United States has asserted its right to invade sovereign nations. In 1945 we began to amass a global military empire with bases in western Germany, Japan, Korea and the eastern Mediterranean.

By 1991 as the only superpower, the United States wondered what it would do with its unrivaled might, said Dorrien, so the neocons advocated a new kind of empire not based on the conquest of territory but on "full spectrum dominance."

"The U.S. employs five global military commands to police the world," said Dorrien. "It has 750 military bases in 130 nations, covering two-thirds of the world; it has formal military base rights in 40 nations; each branch of the armed services has its own air force; the U.S. Air Force operates on six continents; the U.S. deploys carrier battleships in every ocean' and U.S. Special Forces conducts thousands of operations per year in approximately 170 nations."

"Full spectrum dominance" has been a staple of the defense industry and the Pentagon since the mid-1990s as a primary military policy, said Dorrien. The Joint Chiefs of Staff describe it in their Joint Vision 2020 issued on May 30, 2000:

"The overall goal of the transformation described in this document is the creation of a force that is dominant across the full spectrum of military operations--pervasive in peace, decisive in war, preeminent in any form of conflict...Full spectrum dominance [is] the ability of U.S. forces, operating unilaterally or in combination with partners, to defeat any adversary and control any conceivable situation across the full range of military operations."

Neoconservatism is merely an extreme version of U.S. empire, Dorrien pointed out, and the neocons have been able to influence American foreign policy because they are entrenched in the Pentagon and the defense industry. They also have an extensive network of think tanks (e.g., American Enterprise Institute, Hoover Institution) and media outlets (e.g., Weekly Standard,Commentary, National Review).

"If John McCain had won the presidency, neocons would still be running our foreign policy [as they did under Bush 43]," said Dorrien. "Today they are demanding that we overthrow Iran. And, they are lining up to take over in a Romney or Santorum administration."

What drives the neocons and the Republican Right in their quest for global domination is their "persistent anxiety," which is an inherent problem in empire, he said.

"For the empire, every conflict is a local concern that threatens its control," said Dorrien. "However, secure it may be, it never feels secure enough. Every threat feeds a constant howling of alarm."

President Obama did not favor invading Iraq, but he added 17,000 combat troops and 4,000 trainers to the force of 37,000 already in Afghanistan. Then he sent 30,000 more--all this within 18 months of taking office.

"Obama has taken the path of Lyndon Johnson and Mikhail Gorbachev, escalating on a mess that he inherited, just as Johnson and Gorbachev escalated in Vietnam and Afghanistan," said Dorrien. "In both cases, everything got worse, although at least Gorbachev recognized it and reversed course."

The result has been increasing hatred of the United States by both Afghanistan and Pakistan, more drone attacks without accomplishing any real progress and the perpetuation of Afghan dependency because the people have no incentive to fight for a government they despise.

Today, the situation in the Middle East is extremely volatile, especially as the Netanyahu government in Israel is threatening to bomb Iran. If this happens, the entire region could explode into a ball of fire, said Dorrien. Once again, the neocons are saying there is no serious alternative to war because Iran's rulers are supposedly so deranged and suicidal that they want a nuclear war with Israel.

"But that is the crazy, suicidal and self-fulfilling position in this debate," said Dorrien. "And we have to say no to that!"

Dorrien sees Obama as a moderate, liberal-leaning politician who needs to be pushed by a strong progressive movement.

"He doesn't think people want a different kind of country than we already have," said Dorrien. "That's why he kept Bush's secretary of defense and appointed General James Jones as National Security Advisor, who was astonished himself to be asked."

Nevertheless, Dorrien supports the re-election of Obama because he doesn't want the neoconservatives to return to power as indeed they will under Romney or Santorum.

He also sees those who belong to a faith tradition as key in countering empire and perpetual war because they may impel people into the struggle for social justice.

Adopting a religious stance also does something else, said Dorrien. It motivates people to give food to the hungry, help the needy and "overcome the violence that is in the world and become partakers of the divine nature."

Dorrien was not talking about adopting religious dogma, sustaining the prejudices of the past or substituting church power over civil government, but rather in creating "new forms of community that arise out of, but transcend religious affiliation, culture and nation." These new forms resist a structure of power based on privilege, racism, sexism, homophobia, anti-Semitism, Christian supercessionism and exclusivism., he explained.

"Now more than ever, we need a self-consciously anti-imperial movement that says: 'I don't want my country to invade any more nations. I don't want my country to be dragged into wars. I don't want my country to say or to agree that bombing Iran is better than bargaining with Iran. I don't want my country to build new military bases for itself anywhere in the Middle East. Not in my name do we launch yet another war in the name of making us safe."

Dorrien has published 14 books and written over 250 articles in the fields of ethics, social theory, theology, philosophy, politics and history. His latest book, The Obama Question: A Progressive Perspective, is now available.

 
FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:13 PM on 04/01/2012
They will do this if we do not stop them. On the domestic front, american workers will be competing for jobs that pay Chinese wages. Older folk will no longer have SS, medicare and will have to depend on their children for support--the same ones making "Chinese" wages.

Children will work for pennies per hour to replace all the "illegals" who have been forced out of our country. Women will be barefoot and pregnant, cooking, cleaning, and in the kitchen where neo's think they belong.

Hunks of the US will be sold to China to help pay back the $trillions$ the government borrowed and continues to borrow for continued build up of the military. If American workers save enough to enjoy a trip to a National Park, they will pay with Chinese Yin.

The top 1% will live like kings and the rest of us will watch our longevity become lower and lower. Life expectancy will be 90+ for the uber rich, and 40- for the other 99%. No unions, no benefits, the supreme court will be controlled by the neo's and will decide which corporation will be "president" for the next 16 years.

Bright future? Oh, Yeah!! For the 1%!!!
12:52 PM on 03/30/2012
Holy Smokes!

Neo-cons would not return under Ron Paul, but I guess most progressives just can't get past the abortion and welfare questions to get out from under the Military-Industrial Complex.....

Nonetheless, Obama is NOT supportable and has done much to undermine the rule of law in our (once) constitutional republic. He continues, accelerates and exacerbates the destructive path of his predecessors. Your vote is your approval.
09:43 AM on 03/29/2012
I actually do not believe there is a great difference between republicans and democrats on foreign policy under Obama and it is on the domestic front where the religiously inspired republicans pose the greatest threat to the country especially to women, blacks, the poor and the middle class or if you prefer to all those not in the Romney class and this is where this next election should be fought because if the republicans gain the white house and keep the house we will see an escalation of religious and economic divisions that will seriously threaten the social peace.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fireslayer
11:51 PM on 03/27/2012
All of the Republican candidates to date have bought into the neo-con, neo-imperialist meme. They have an agenda for perpetual war in the Middle East, This is supported by under 20% of the American voting public. This is the main reason to never, ever vote for a Republican for anything.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:48 PM on 03/27/2012
Obama has been obedient in following the neo cons agenda.
Here are some the Nobel Peace Prize winners accomplishments.
Free pass to the admitted torturers Bush and Cheney.Check.
Free pass to spying on Americans and peace groups.Check.
Expand the war in Afghanistan.Check.
Expand killing with drones.Check.
Expand the military budget..Check.
War on Libya.Check.

..
12:46 PM on 03/27/2012
Plenty of Dem neocons make this piece factually inaccurate. They are a bipartisan menace, and it should be acknowledged.

Otherwise, I agree with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marignymitch
E pluribus unum percent
11:53 AM on 03/27/2012
What's the diff? Perpetual war is Obama administration policy too.
schlinky
someone still cares
11:18 AM on 03/27/2012
As the richest and strongest Country on Earth the only ism. we should be concerned with is Humanism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NoboyukiMasaki
happy-happy, joy-joy
10:36 AM on 03/27/2012
Pinky: "Gee Brain, what are we going to do today?"
Brain: "The same thing we do everyday, Pinky - try to take over the world..."
08:08 AM on 03/27/2012
I don't think it's quite that simple I think that on one level yes Obama is governoring to the people but at the same time he did end Iraq and he is ending Afganistan so he's not precisely emmulating Johnson or what's his name (i hate spelling) and above all Obama did get the job in Afganistan done
01:05 AM on 03/27/2012
Naive and uninsighful. After reading this I wish I had the last few minutes of my life back.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:21 AM on 03/27/2012
You can lead a Horse to Water, but you can't make him drink. I think your post is the definition of Naive.Boston , ha ha Not this time.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Skip Moreland
12:03 PM on 03/27/2012
Right, pursuing perpetual war is a far better idea.
11:12 PM on 03/26/2012
As a vet I saw the conservative agenda in Vietnam started by America by the lying "Gulf of Tonkin Resolution" Then Iraq and WMD'S and the lies Bush and his cronies pushed. Now I see a supposed Liberal leaning President enhance another ludicrous war. Why is the typical American not seeing what is before their eyes? The most dreadful aspect of these wars is they are started mostly by Politicians who never served their country and their children will be the one's who probably will never serve. Throughout history the lower class fought the upper crust wars. Don't you get it, America is an aggressor nation. For you 9/11 advocates retribution was correct as in Pearl Harbor but an Army was not needed to correct the problem. Now the bill has come due, hatred for America in the Middle East and were broke like Russia when they fought in Afghanistan. All Lunatics, our foreign policy makers and those in office. I blame us for being so involved in the Middle East by the likes of AIPAC.
ScaredAcademic
The GOP: Peddling Hate Since '68
11:36 PM on 03/26/2012
Eisenhower warned us. We didn't listen. But boy could you make a fortune investing in Lockheed-Martin and Northrup Grumman in 2000 and early 2001. I wonder who owns stock in those companies.....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnash26170
01:29 AM on 03/27/2012
But give Americans the sop of beer and football and nothing else matters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
manroj1
Gamma Ray Burst
04:01 AM on 03/27/2012
The Super Bowl was invented in the 1960's to take American's attention away from Johnson's lies and the Vietnam war. I call it the Stupor Bowl.
skykam
Sarcasm is a dish best served bitter.
11:04 AM on 03/27/2012
Doritos and circuses.