According to a recent survey, the percentage of Americans who claim to be Christian is somewhere north of 75 percent.
Really? Three out of four people are followers of Christ?
Let's see, if the population of the United States is about 311 million and 75 percent are Christians that brings the number of Christians to somewhere in the neighborhood of 233 million. That's a lot of Christians. I don't see nearly that many Jesus fish on car bumpers. I don't know, maybe all the Darwin fish ate them. I'm just saying something about that percentage is off. Because if there really are that many Christians, then why will some 35 million people in America go to bed hungry tonight, including 13 million children? If 75 percent of Americans are Christians, then how is it possible that 40 percent of the homeless are under the age of 18? Why are there more than 120,000 children waiting to be adopted? I could keep going, and that's just in the States. The numbers don't add up. Jesus said the evidence that someone is one of his followers is love. So 233 million? The evidence just isn't there.
What's the explanation for such a discrepancy? A number of years ago I read an article about the new vegetarians. These new vegetarians don't eat meat -- most of the time. One of them explained that she was a vegetarian, but she really liked bacon. A vegetarian, by definition, is someone who doesn't eat meat. Umm, yeah, but isn't bacon a meat? Is it really accurate for her to identify herself as a vegetarian? If enough people who eat meat started calling themselves vegetarians wouldn't that throw the numbers off? The discrepancy was solved by coming up with a new term to describe vegetarians who aren't committed to abstaining from meat. They now identify themselves as "Flexitarians."
A Christian, by definition, is a follower of Christ. So, I'm thinking that what might help make sense of the 233 million number is a new word to describe people who identify themselves as Christians but have little interest in actually following the teachings of Jesus. Perhaps instead of "followers," it would be more accurate to call them "fans."
The word fan is most simply defined as, an enthusiastic admirer. And I think Jesus has a lot of fans these days. Some fans may even get dressed up for church on Sunday and make their ringtone a worship song. They like being associated with Jesus. Fans want to be close enough to Jesus to get the benefits, but not so close that it requires anything from them. They want a no-strings-attached relationship with Jesus. So a fan says, I like Jesus but don't ask me to serve the poor. I like Jesus, but I'm not going to give my money to people who are in need. I like Jesus, but don't ask me to forgive the person who hurt me. I like Jesus, but don't talk to me about money or sex that's off limits.
Fans like Jesus just fine, but they don't want to give up the bacon.
Fans tend to identify themselves as Christians not because they are committed to following Jesus, but for a number of other reasons. They might point to their family heritage thinking that being a Christian is in their DNA. Like a pug nose or a unibrow it was somehow passed down from mom and dad. Fans might identify themselves as Christians by pointing to religious rituals they've kept and rules they've followed.
Ultimately, defining what it means to be a follower of Jesus isn't nearly as arbitrary or subjective as we've made it. Jesus very clearly lays it out in Luke 9:23. He says, "Whoever wants to be my disciple must deny themselves and take up their cross daily and follow me." These words tend to separate fans from followers. Followers are to deny themselves and take up a cross. Instead of giving a theological explanation of what that means, it's probably more helpful to show what it looks like. I've spent the last year collecting stories of fans who have become followers.
That's just three stories of followers. I'm praying that there would be around 233,249,997 more. They may not be as dramatic or inspiring but my prayer is that Christians would be known not by a fish on their bumper -- or the profile on their Facebook page -- or by going regularly to their church, but they would be followers of Jesus who are known for their love.
Survey conducted by Book Tracker, the PubTrack Consumer Buyer Panel. January 2011.
Jonathan Dudley: Christian Faith Requires Accepting Evolution
Christian - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Are You a True Christian? Do You Observe the Gospel of Jesus ...
Catholic Charities' Office for Social Justice
A Biblical View of Social Justice | The Christian Worldview
Sojourners: Christians for Justice and Peace
Ryan J. Bell: I'm A Social Justice Christian
Social Justice | Christianity Today | A Magazine of Evangelical ...
There are quite a few Jesuses to follow, it seems. Which one do you suggest I try to emulate? Perhaps the petty Jesus who cursed a fig tree for not bearing fruit out of season, despite that (if his claims to be god are taken seriously), he is indeed the one who made it and designed its cycle so?
Or perhaps the Jesus who introduced the concept of eternal and limitless suffering to the world would be preferable, though I can't say that my neighbors wouldn't prefer the car-giving type of Christian to the fire and brimstone sort.
Putting my case another way what you're stressing is human agency, people who actually care about others enough to go out and take care of someone who they feel they want to help. Good actions chosen by good people. Why the window-dressing? Why pick and choose your Jesus, when you can simply choose to be good?
"If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself, take up his cross and follow me."
Four compelling insights/directives in that one sentence:
1) "If anyone would COME AFTER ME" (that's INTIMACY ... with God).
2) "he must DENY HIMSELF" (that's HUMILITY ... before God)
3) "take up HIS CROSS" (that's SERENITY ... before God)
4) "and FOLLOW ME" (that's LOYALTY ... to God)
Read my column at Patheos - http://www.patheos.com/About-Patheos/Robert-Crosby.html
Read my blog at Patheos - http://www.patheos.com/community/robertcrosby/
Outstanding article. You're right, the numbers do not add up. Thank you for the keen insights. I look forward to reading more from you...
I am not sure there is logic in asking - if there are so many Christians why do we have orphans, hunger, homeless? Christ reminded us that the poor are always among us - maybe it would be better to ask them first what brought them to that state and try to solve that - the old 'teach a man to fish rather than give a man a fish' philosophy.
Thanks for the article. I might just have to use it in one of my upcoming sermons.
I have had so-called Christians here in my complex leave notes on my car that I need to move out before I bring Satan in. Someone wrote on the back of a church tract that I was going to hell. My son got thrown out of the school cafeteria by the First Priority student group so they could hold a prayer meeting. It was before school so they got away with it. He got thrown out because he was an "Idol Worshipper". He had a necklace taken away and got a 30 minute lesson on the Antichrist by his school councilor, she gave it back and apologized after I called and threatened to go to the School Board. His necklace was a dragon and phoenix whch symbolizes the union between wisdom and compassion.
I know that all Christians aren't that way. But enough are that it makes being a Non-Christian difficult. The reason I posted was it's not just individual people, churches do the same sometimes. And that is what I meant by it's not just people but churches too that are "fans" of Jesus and not "followers".
It doesn't matter if you are a Christian or not, and I offer it to you here:
http://www.oxfam.org/
How do people go from fans to followers? I hope your three examples don't mean that you think we ought to do works. I would hope that the works would flow naturally out of changed hearts...