More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Patricia Clarkson

GET UPDATES FROM Patricia Clarkson
 

Returning to the Gulf After BP Destroyed It

Posted: 07/26/10 06:32 PM ET

Even though the Deepwater Horizon well has been capped and the relief wells are almost finished, the BP oil disaster is far from over. It will take decades to recover from this catastrophe.

I don't think people fully realize the scale of the damage: BP has ruined the Gulf of Mexico. One company has single handedly destroyed an enormous source of beauty, marine life, and cultural traditions that have been passed down for generations.

It's unconscionable. And it's time to put our foot down. We need to establish better safety regulations, and we need to hold BP accountable for its disastrous behavior. I've worked with NRDC to record a video to help tell this story and I hope you'll watch it:

I was born and raised in New Orleans. I spent my youth swimming at Gulf beaches from Grand Isle to Pass Christian, sailing on Lake Pontchartrain, traveling through the wetlands by boat. It is a glorious region, and I am lucky to have grown up there.

But when I returned to some of those places a month ago, I was sickened by what I saw. I went out on a boat with my mother, who is a councilwoman for New Orleans, and Billy Nungesser, the president of Plaquemines Parish. We went through Barataria Bay and within 15 minutes of leaving the dock, we were in a sea of oil.

I remember the bay as a place filled with wildlife -- birds, alligators, sea turtles, and of course abundant oyster, shrimp, and crab beds. But since the BP explosion, the bay has become an industrial zone.

Oil sheen covered the water as far as we could see, and in every single marsh we passed, it was as if someone had taken a giant brush, dipped it in a big bucket of paint and painted the grass black. We went over to Cat Island, where the pelicans gather. There was no place for them to land that was oil-free, so they touched down in oily water, and their bellies were covered with the stuff.

I was shocked to see the booms they are using to try to block the oil. They're like band aids on gunshot wounds. They are incapable of protecting the marshes.

Even though Americans have seen photos of the spill, I am not sure we have grasped just how hard this is hitting people in the Gulf.

There are men who will never fish or shrimp again. There are Gulf children graduating from high school who will never find jobs in fishing or tourism. There are oyster beds that may never come back -- and that's why the 134-year old New Orleans institution, P&J Oyster Company, has stopped shucking. The company survived several wars and the Great Depression, but BP has finally brought it to a halt.

This spill is a wakeup call for all of us. It's criminal that one company can take so much away from so many people, and we have to stop it. We need to strengthen the regulations for offshore drilling so a disaster like this never happens again. And we need to shift to the cleaner cars that will help us need less Gulf oil in the first place.

And we need to figure out a way to clean up the damage already done in the Gulf. Traveling through the blackened marshes, I got the sense that the task was Sisyphean, but I remain hopeful.

In the meantime, I still worry that the spill will fade from the headlines, and people will forget that BP has trashed the Gulf of Mexico. I hope instead that Americans will keep clamoring until this once-vibrant region is restored.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 140
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:52 PM on 08/01/2010
Sorry to tell ya, but the bay has been an industrial dump ground long before this latest disaster. With the full support of a majority of the local folks I might add.
08:20 PM on 08/01/2010
People of the Gulf region need to acknowledge their responsibility for the BP disaster. There is no offshore drilling in the Pacific Northwest is becase the people will not allow it. When oil companies made noises about drilling off our coasts, the people rose up in protest and promised to sabotage them. We prefer clean oceans here to oil profits.

In the Gulf region, the people apparently do not love Nature's beauty and bounty enough to protect her. Indeed, after the BP gusher, Gulf people were clamoring for drilling to begin again. Because of oil and gas and chemical plants, the entire Mississippi delta and Gulf Coast regions are the most polluted and toxic in the country. People there have astronomical cancer, allergy and asthma rates, but keep electing corporate Republicans.

People of the Gulf region relate to nature as an object to be exploited. They have allowed thousands of offshore oil wells and base livelihoods on killing fish, oysters, shrimp, wildlife and an ecosystem. Instead of loving the beauty and bountry Nature provided, Gulf region people cared only about how to turn that beauty into cold hard cash. When you love money more than Nature, ultimately you will pay the price. Karma is inexorable and Nature bats last.

The rest of the country was sick at heart at the images of dying oiled endangered pelicans and sea turtles. The innocents suffer because of the greed and stupidity of modern money-loving humans. Gulf people are reaping what they sowed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
11:10 PM on 08/01/2010
Does your evironmental concerns pervent you from gassing up your car because you know that the gasoline mostly comes from states that do allow offshore drilling? Have you cut off electricity at your house?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
tibetanterrier
reirretnatebit
07:50 PM on 08/01/2010
To save the gulf the people of the gulf need to change their ways.. Why would they care if some Californian ends up paying $4.50 a gallon cause they say no more foolish drilling in deep waters.

The oil industry is part of who they are
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:12 PM on 08/01/2010
Read an article positing that the oil spill and the dispersant used to hide the oil has resulted in the weakening of the currents in the Gulf of Mexico, and that the Gulf Stream will be weakened as a result. If there is truth to this allegation, the consequences can be worse even than the destruction of the Gulf ecosystem.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
11:13 PM on 08/01/2010
There's no truth to the allegation. The EPA says thier tests have detected no trace of chemicals associated with dispersants in sediments, in the water column or on the seabed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patches12
02:51 PM on 08/01/2010
Hey Patti ... its not "destroyed"... get some perspective.. the miracle is that the damage is as small as it is!!!
03:13 PM on 08/01/2010
Ah, the glass is half full view of a disaster. And it's a miracle, too!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littlewitch
losing faith in humanity one vote at a time
04:47 PM on 08/01/2010
Hey Patchy...Not destroyed????? Really... have you been to Barataria Before the oil spill and since. Been reading a lot of BP press releases lately????
They report that there is no noticeable oil in the gulf . Sounds good till you are here. It takes about 20 minutes to find plenty of oil off Barataria.
I have long considered the Barataria Bay /Lafitte area of Southern Louisiana to be one of the most inspiring hallowed areas of our country. Go there now , it is creepy quiet , no sounds of nature nothing hallowed about it where are the pelicans and blue heron and the sounds of life in the swamp??? It is all stomped.
The oyster estuaries are full of oil. Oysters take 21/2 years to mature so this crop is lost and who knows what will happen in the next 21/2 years to 5 years.
The people in that area have been shrimpers for 140 years. Even if they succeed in their catch, no one in the rest of the country will trust the Southern Louisiana "BRAND" for years to come. We have yet to determine the effects of the dispersant on the oxygen levels in the water and subsequent effects on animal and fishlife in the area. Not to mention marsh plants and sea animals

The "miracle "is how quickly and others like you decide that everything is okay without knowing about which you speak...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:33 PM on 08/01/2010
"The "miracle "is how quickly and others like you decide that everything is okay without knowing about which you speak... "

They just wanna keep driving ...
02:23 PM on 08/01/2010
I stopped reading your article when you stated, "We should put our foot down". Don't you mean UP?

Dam, if the demand for fuel was not so great none of this might have happened.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:35 PM on 08/01/2010
Well, that's true, but it's also true that there's overwhelming evidence BP has been unusually negligent among oil companies, in this instance, and in others. Unfortunately, from now on, most oil will be harder to get at, more ecologically risky and destructive to extract, and there will be many influential people as well as a deadened American public who will continue to demand gasoline so affordable that it can be frivolously wasted, as they've always had.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
01:24 PM on 08/01/2010
I think instead of doing anything meaningful to make petroleum obsolete, we should instead don our coal sacks, cover ourselves with ashes, and then do some of the old self-flagellation with the scourge-thing at mid-day in town square. Or, maybe not. That kind of sounds like a painful, and pointless exercise. Instead, maybe we should consider looking at the Deepwater Horizon disaster not as an equipment, personnel, or management failure, but rather a symptom of the lack of progress we've really made in the area of energy over the years, and push to make up for some lost time, there.
In english: The market demanded more crude oil. So, the folks at BP et. al. said, 'OK', and towed their rig into position, dropped anchor, and fired up the machinery, and set about the business of trying to drill a hole 13,000 feet deeper than the ocean floor, which was already 5,000 feet down, well past crush depth for most manned submersibles. Then, under management pressure, they pushed this already risky process. Then, the worst happened, and the well filled up with oil and pressurized methane, and KAR-BOOM! Splash one oil rig. Did millions of people start boycotting automobiles? No. People just shrugged, and changed channels to ESPN, to catch the latest sports scores. Well, personally, I think that people like Pickens will do a lot more for our national transition off oil than the public ever will, heartfelt sentiments notwithstanding.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
01:46 PM on 08/01/2010
Rising energy prices will eventually make alternate energy options cost effective. Barring some technological breakthrough, such as a hydrogen-based economy, the solution will probably be a mix of technologies, including some no so environmental friendly. A part of the solution will be doing without. Some Army installations, for example, have "no heating/no cooling" months during the transitional period between winter and summer and between summer and fall. It includes on-post housing as well as office buildings and barracks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
12:18 PM on 08/01/2010
Fishermen who have resumed fishing in areas already re-opened to fishing are reporting normal catches and say there is nothing wrong with the fish or crabs. Shutting down fishing temporarily probably just increased the fish population. The EPA website says, "Sediment samples collected July 14, 2010 were measured for four of the chemicals associated with dispersants (2-Butoxyethanol, 2-Ethylhexyl Alcohol, Propylene Glycol, and Di(PropyleneGlycol) ButylEther)) but did not detect them. In a previous press release, the EPA stated dispersants biodegrade, have not been found in the water column and have not settled on the floor of the gulf. The major fear is that fresh water diverted into the marshes may has decreased salinity in some oyster beds, but his will be a short-term effect. Areas still closed to fishermen will probably be quickly reopened.
01:08 PM on 08/01/2010
Problem solved. I guess you and I can go watch American Idle now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:21 PM on 08/01/2010
Put your money where your mouth is, are you willing to eat the fish and the oysters from those areas? Take the first step and be an example.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:39 PM on 08/01/2010
It doesn't matter whether "BlairCase" is so ignorant as to be willing to consume those fish and oysters. No one should, but chances are good many people are going to be unwittingly consuming such seafood in the years to come. And "BlairCase"'s rose-tinted corporate issue glasses won't do a damned thing to keep them from getting sick.
10:34 AM on 08/01/2010
"There are men who will never fish or shrimp again. There are Gulf children graduating from high school who will never find jobs in fishing or tourism. "

They can always find jobs in the oil industry that we go out of our way to protect at the expense of the environment. I think government and policy has demonstrated which they feel is more important.
Viper
Former repub, still repenting
10:13 AM on 08/01/2010
This incident was BAD, A result of deregulation and Firms literally in bed with regulators , providing drugs and a better job if the regulator is fired.

The oil companies however doomed Louisiana and the wetlands more than 50 years ago when the State allowed them to drill in the wet lands and make channels to get access and then not repair the damage. And yet those in Lousiana never take this responsibility and wnat the BIG government to bail them out. ,,, any more than the south admits that most of those repug states are welfare states gettting more federal money back than they pay in while decrying welfare or redistribution of wealth, just liek an former part time Alaskan governor who headed another welfare state,

The 3000 acres soiled is wetlands that wouild have been loss by year end anyway! Where is the demands from Lousiana's to have a tax placed on Big Oil to p[ay for the 50 billion cost to save their disappearing life style/land???

The repugs would now like the American taxpayers to pick up the 50 billion in damage done by Big Oil to the wetlands, and then at the same time complain about government and not those on Big Oils payroll or their own state government for doing nothing as the state washed away and New Orlenas lost its protection.! Anyone in Lousiana running for office and demanding that the oil companies pay to fix what they destroyed?


Regards .
10:38 AM on 08/01/2010
Ahhhh... the old, "she was wearing a tight skirt," rape defense. How refreshing.

I am sure every single American has a responsibility to own up to their share for the reasons the spill ocurred; inefficient autos and homes and a lackadaisical mentorship of corporations and legislators to name but a few. Does it really matter what the cleanup costs? Isn't the price of inaction, both toward the cleanup and moving to end the use of fossil fuels forever, far steeper?

I hope we are able to make BP pay for this, both financially and criminally. It is very much deserved. I, on the other hand, don't want to wait for trials to begin for the cleanup to continue. Do you?
08:34 PM on 08/01/2010
You do not know your history, happystead. It was the oil companies who deliberately and conspiratorily destroyed the public transportation system in this country so that they could profit by selling oil. Los Angeles used to have a public transit train system, which was systematically dismantled by Standard Oil.

It is not individual Americans who decided that we need gasoline-powered automobilies instead of efficient public transportation. It was the oil and auto industries who foisted their preferences on the American public.

The Europeans have been smarter, almost every city I have visited there has excellent public transportation, trains, light rail, street cars, underground metros. There is no reason that cannot happen in America except for the contrary lobbying of the oil and auto industries. I do not understand why Americans stupidly keep electing oil men to public office.

And by the way, most of my transportation is done on an electric bike that gets its electrical recharge from electricity made by non-polluting hydropower. There is no reason that people cannot learn to walk, run, bike and drive electric cars.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
03:21 PM on 08/01/2010
The wetlands are dissappearing because the levee system decreases the amount of silt the Mississippi used to washed down to the Mississippi Delta. Has nothing to do with the oil industry. We could rebuild the delta by demolishing the levees. Demolishing the levees, however, would disrupt a lot more lives than the BP oil spill.
08:26 AM on 08/01/2010
What are Ms. Clarkson qualifications to make long term estimates on the damage done by the spill?
10:35 AM on 08/01/2010
I am imagine you hold BP's estimates as more credible. I bet you enjoy their commercials.
11:22 AM on 08/01/2010
Try to stay on point. I asked what her her "Qualifications" to say the Gulf is ruined for decades. What training does she have to make that statement?

I do not watch BP commercials, but you must spend a lot of time watching them
10:40 AM on 08/01/2010
Well, she was born with two eyes and a nose and, obviously, the willingness to go there and see for herself. Good enough for me.
11:26 AM on 08/01/2010
I have friends and associates who have been there. They also have two eyes and a nose. They say it is bad in places and in other places you could not even tell there had been a spill.

All reported the waste of money on places where no oil was even present.
01:36 PM on 08/01/2010
I seek not not to quell debate or discussion but to not fall victim to the "Chicken Little Theory"

You make the assumption that I stand in the way of progress, while in reality it is you who will stop progress with your one way views.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Marchmont
02:23 AM on 08/01/2010
The pillorying of Hayward throughout the US and Obama’s xenophobic ranting against “British†Petroleum was all part of the process of deflecting blame. No-one in the American government, environmental movement, or media was going to acknowledge that the despoliation of the Gulf coast has been going on for decades. Long ago the politicians and people of Louisiana embraced rampant, corrupt, poorly regulated Big Oil without any hyperventilation about delicate marshlands. The state became a Cajun sheikhdom, over-dependant on one commodity with chronic underdevelopment everywhere else and a coast wrecked by pipes, roads and canals. It is revealing that the real issue for locals is compensation payment and the President’s moratorium on deep-water drilling caused outrage because local jobs would be lost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Simon Woodward
02:06 AM on 07/28/2010
For goodness sake, when will the US wake up to the fact that is was a US company - TransOcean - that was responsible for the accident. They had 90% of empooyees on board. They, with Halliburton (and king leech Che n ey) set the operational procedures. They had turned the alarms off three years earlier so people could sleep undisturbed. Enough already with the BP hounding and look to yourselves.
10:38 AM on 08/01/2010
Halliburton and TransOcean were contracted by BP. Doesn't that make BP responsible for the acts of it's contractors?
10:42 AM on 08/01/2010
And so the finger pointing begins. Thanks!!!

I think its safe to say that responsibility lies in many places and that ALL those responsible should hang.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:35 PM on 07/27/2010
WE ARE RESPONSIBLE!!
BP is not responsible for the spill. They didnt do it, we did. We do it every day, every time we fill up our cars, every time we buy the products that contain the oil. We do it, own up to that fact, and instead of demanding that they make better safety precautions, how about we make a real choice and demand that we dont f....... drill out there any more..
BP? hardly. Just 30 years ago someone else did the same damn thing and none of this hubub was raised. We didnt care then, too many people dont care now.
What will it take for everyone to finally demand NO MORE OIL!!!!
Viper
Former repub, still repenting
10:27 AM on 08/01/2010
BP did it! We will need oil for a long time or face complete economic collapse, even worse than what Reagan economics have done so far.. I'm all for immediate massive government building of solar/wind farms.. can be sold off later.. most forget that electric plants were first owned by state/local governments. I'm for carbon taxes since its not a cost, some pay more , some make more... and 42% of the worlds GDP is operating under Carbon Cap and trade now and unlike us they have trade surpluses.

But talk extremely and your ideas are branded as such and you hurt your own cause.

And you are wrong on another fact.. its not so much filling up.. thats a necessity although repug blocking changes to CAFE stds for more than a decade did not help even in the face of energy cost incresing 400% under BUSH. Greate Energy plan reougs.. of course it was a written by BP, Enron and etc...... Our real energy problem is our homes and our power plants, aging electric grid all of which are far less than half as effecient as in Japan or Europe.

Regards
Viper
Former repub, still repenting
10:28 AM on 08/01/2010
We are making progress on cars and only getting worse in the providing of electric to homes and business and using mostly Coal to do it! Drilling for oil is a mere fraction as damaging as Coal pits... Reduce the oil now and more coal is burned.. and there is no such thing as clean coal.. Germany tried and they are now on their way to solar.. and they dont have the sun we do..

Regards
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:50 PM on 08/01/2010
I would never consider myself extreme. Nor do I say I know all the answers. I know this though, before I was born we had technology that was cleaner than what we have now. We've had the knowledge to change things gradually for more decades than I know, yet still here we are. We burn gas when other, cleaner fuels are there and have been. And coal... you are preaching to the choir on that one. I grew up in 'coaltown', wv, I saw the nastiness of it every day and that has nothing to do with the actually mining/burning of it, I'm talking just the residuals on the environment around me. Ever see blackened snow...
No, its not an easy choice, but America wasn't born on making easy choices. It's time... its past time to start making hard choices. Choices that will suck down to our nethers, but if we don't then the only choice we've made is to leave it, again, for the next generation. I DONT WANT TO CHOOSE THAT OPTION. :(
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:58 PM on 07/27/2010
Ms. Clarkson,

I am an avid fan of yours and appreciate what you're doing with the NRDC. However, I think the environmental groups have been woefully silent on this devastating travesty, and I'm loathe to think that it's because of some sensitivity toward this administration but I can't help but wonder. My memories of the Exxon Valdez were images of animal after animal drenched in oil whereas I've seen the same dozen photos repeated time and again during this crisis. We've lost thousands of marine lives but I see no coordinated effort from environmental groups to shock people's sensitivities about the loss. Maybe it's the media's fault, but I'm really sick of blaming them for everything. Maybe we're just desensitized as a nation. But it's so sad to me that we're not collectively doing something to save the animals we can. Anyway, thanks for your effort to bring attention to the catastrophe and keep up the great screen work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
03:44 PM on 08/01/2010
The reason you are not seeing images of thousands of dead birds is that impact on birds and marine life was minute compared to the Exxon Valdez spill. An article in the London Telegraph says the Gulf spill killed less than one percent of the birds killed in the Alaskan spill. If thousands of birds had been killed, we would be seeing images of thousands of dead birds, just as we did during the Exxon Valdez spill. We would also be seeing images of thousands of dead fish, except the Gulf spill doesn't seem to have kill any. The major worry is that fresh water diverted into the marshes may have decreased salinity in some of the oyster beds, but this is still to be determined.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whale
04:43 PM on 08/01/2010
The Alaskan spill didn't have a virtual press blackout. Oh, and by the way, how are they doing on cleaning up that spill? Do you think they do any better in the Gulf once the media moves on to another starlet going into rehab?
08:38 PM on 08/01/2010
BlairCase, do you not read the newspapers? BP prevented photographers and journalists from getting to areas where they could photograph the horrid effects of oil and dispersant on wildlife. Louisiana police, instead of honoring the First Amendment, or the public nature of our coastal waters, actually assisted BP in keeping journalists and photographers from the scene.

I cannto believe that you are so gullible and naive. Do a ltitle googling and you will be able to find stories and photographs of dead birds, fish, turtles, pelicans, dolphins, etc.