More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Patricia Martin

GET UPDATES FROM Patricia Martin
 

Are Americans Still Eager to Learn?

Posted: 12/13/11 03:31 PM ET

At a recent leadership conference, academic leaders voiced concerns about the future of education in America. According to the Chronicle of Higher Education, their remarks were punctuated by angry protesters who openly confronted the panel of college presidents about the high cost of a college education.

What struck me is how much "Occupy" behaviors are creeping into daily life. People are no longer willing to politely sit and listen when they hold a collective grievance. This open defiance frays the warp and woof of authority and raises the question: who's in charge?

Last week, I was in Denver giving a talk to non-profit leaders. They shared their anxieties about the road ahead. After years of uncertainty, there seems to be confusion about what it means to be a leader. In the past, authority and leadership went hand-in-hand.

Unless you live in a cave, you're already feeling the impact of the societal shifts underway. These tremors are being amplified by a rising generation no longer willing to knuckle under to authority. Why should they? The status quo has failed them. In large part, it has made the core value proposition of getting an education all about failure and hardship, rather than striving and achievement.

Henry S. Bienen, a former president of Northwestern University, pointed out that just 8 percent of the graduates of the Chicago public schools, on whose board he sits, are college-ready. That's 8 percent of a population already narrowed down by attrition -- only 57 percent of students in Chicago finish school. Shocking!

When we make learning all about difficulty, we diminish its potential to lift people up. Call me old-fashioned, but we used to believe in learning in America. Otherwise, we never would have instituted the GI Bill or the land grant college system. The former allowed my father, an otherwise indigent kid for Appalachia, to get a college education. The latter made it possible for me to afford tuition at Michigan State University by waitressing and tutoring athletes.

Are we still eager to learn?

As a marketer, I wonder what it would take to revive our enthusiasm for learning. Can we market our way toward a better set of beliefs about education in America?

I make my living advising clients how to seed the culture to speed the adoption of new social norms. I want to believe that it's possible to foster a culture where learning is nurtured as a way of life.

By all indications, tapping into the passions of the young protestors will be part of the solution. Hint: They're in charge.

 
 
 

Follow Patricia Martin on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PatriciaMartin

 
 
  • Comments
  • 4
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:19 PM on 12/21/2011
I believed myself to be a "lifetime" learner. Unfortunately, I was prohibited from finishing my graduate studies when one instructor gave me a "B-" and took my work to an "ad hoc" committee just before II was set to finish the core requirements. Unfortunately, I provided two years of public service for my school and community at a government agency in exchange for being prohibited from achieving my goal. Our President has given himself that grade, yet a student fails for the same grade? Not to mention has anyone noticed all those blunders other politicians are making in the GOP? But my school, who has a history of wrongdoing, is allowed to expel a student without "due process" or, at the very least, affording the student some type of "corrective measures"?
12:30 PM on 12/20/2011
As a CPS teacher, I am not excusing the graduation rate of high school students or the low college-readiness skills our kids have. BUT , you can blame teachers all you want, WE are NOT the ones who set the curriculum , focus on testing frenzy, refuse to reduce class size, deny funds for extracurricular activities, eliminate vocational ed, or control any number of other negative factors that have hurt public education. My job used to be about TEACHING kids units of instruction that would not only make them better readers & mathematicians, but actually TAUGHT them something. It wasn't about drilling isolated skills like "find the main idea" or "explain how you solved that math problem in a paragraph". I was always good at math, and NO ONE ever asked me to explain how I solved something . Funny that I still managed to go to college and graduate with honors, without this "important" skill ! We have taken all the curiosity and fun out of Teaching, and therefore also out of Learning . Why should we wonder that kids are not that interested in it anymore?
07:32 PM on 12/18/2011
Does this article point the finger at CPS or at higher ed? Why is it just the Chicago School system and its teachers on the hook for the "failure" of those 92%? What is the grad rate at various illinois colleges? Why isn't anyone upset about those 50% or possibly more that start college but don't finish? Does a college professor have less at stake than a seventh grade teacher in maintaining a love of learning in his/her pupils? Where is the reform movement in the public universities? If any institution is run for the benefit of its employees, I'd say the professors benefit a lot.
08:09 PM on 12/16/2011
It's almost as if CPS is being run for the benefit of the employees.Who do a poor job.And,resist efforts to change.And,search for scapegoats for their failings.And are Democrats.And public union employees.