iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Patrick Disney

Patrick Disney

Posted: June 14, 2009 06:16 PM

On Iran, the Power of Obama's Silence


"Help us."  That was a comment, translated from Farsi, that was posted on the blog that I manage for the National Iranian American Council yesterday.  It came from a reader in Tehran, imploring that someone in the West do something to stop what he or she calls "a military government" being set up in Iran. 

For those watching intently for any bit of information they can grasp, it is a painful waiting game.  Even for those of us who are relatively well connected to Iranians--either through friends or family--it is difficult to find out any really conclusive news.  The mainstream media has largely taken the weekend off from this story--due in part to the government's suppression and intimidation of journalists--leaving the heavy lifting to new media and the blogosphere (which has performed amazingly well over the past 48 hours).  And it is most likely that our government doesn't have much more information that the rest of us, as illustrated by the relative silence coming from the White House and the State Department on the events of the weekend. 

Though Obama, Biden, Clinton and Gibbs have all gone on record with brief statements about the election, they have been extremely prudent, preferring to "monitor the situation" and "wait and see"--a stark contrast to some of their predecessors, who jumped on every opportunity to call for uprisings in the Middle East.  In a remarkable display of message restraint, public pronouncements coming out of the White House have made no mention of anything that could even remotely be seen as trying to influence the outcome of the weekend's events. 

Given Iran's well-known allergy to foreign meddling--and the hardliners' adept ability to justify their harsh repression by blaming alleged foreign plots--the Obama administration is doing exactly the right thing.  Just as the absolute worst thing the US government could have done in the days leading up to the elections was impose new sanctions to "cripple" Iran's economy,  the worst thing the administration could do now is take sides in the political infighting before knowing that its help would actually be welcome.

Of course, there are some who view this weekend's events as an opportunity for the US to support a particular Iranian faction loudly and clearly; Indiana Republican Mike Pence said

that he hopes President Obama will throw his support behind Mousavi by the end of the day.  But these people are playing with dynamite.  At the moment, lectures on democracy and Jeffersonian diatribes against tyranny are the last thing the Iranian people need.  At best, such grandstanding would give the hardliners in Iran a reason to paint the reformist camp as a stooge of the West; at worst, it could incite the crowds even more and risk blowing the top off an already tumultuous situation.  

Before we Americans come rushing onto the scene with an offer of help for the process of democratization in Iran, we need to be certain that the parties on the ground actually welcome our involvement, and that it won't in fact do more harm than good. 

Human rights defenders in Iran are always the first to speak up in support of greater transparency and political openness in the Iranian system.  Their commitment to their cause is beyond measure, and the events over the next few days will determine just how much progress they have been able to make.  But these brave activists have also made it abundantly clear to policymakers in the West that we have to be very careful about how we get involved in the affairs of their country. 

For now, the Obama administration is just taking a step back and assessing the situation, and rightly so--at the moment, the only certainty in this entire ordeal is that the more accurate information everyone has, the better.  But the Obama administration is also making it perfectly clear that, regardless of the outcome of the next few days, they are committed to engage in direct diplomacy with the Iranian government. 

At this point, that's the best we, as Americans, can do. 

"Help us."  That was a comment, translated from Farsi, that was posted on the blog that I manage for the National Iranian American Council yesterday.  It came from a reader in Tehran, implor...
"Help us."  That was a comment, translated from Farsi, that was posted on the blog that I manage for the National Iranian American Council yesterday.  It came from a reader in Tehran, implor...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 145
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
01:59 PM on 06/17/2009
"We need to be certain that the parties on the ground actually welcome our involvement." I believe that this is the most important quote from this article. Before we go taking sides please make sure that the people would actually want our help. Check out Asia Chronicle (www.asiachroniclenews.net) and contribute to the Iran election discussion there as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CherokeeGirl
one pissed off Indian.
07:24 PM on 06/16/2009
Finally, someone writing a story that doesn't compare Obama to Bush. Thank you! :)
01:39 PM on 06/17/2009
Have you heard the latest? Tehran is saying that the West's meddling into the elections is intolerable! Wait a minute I thought we've been keeping silent? The people in power over there are just like my schizophrenic mother in law...you can't talk sense to her and sometimes no matter what you do you can't make her happy.
01:44 PM on 06/17/2009
Yes, isn't sad that he is almost exactly like Bush?! The latest, not releasing the W.H. visitor logs, same as Bush.....Transparency anyone?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cyndeewi
Here to save the day
07:56 AM on 06/16/2009
I totally agree. America should stay out of this for now.
10:11 AM on 06/16/2009
Barak Obama is making sure that no one other then Republicans speak oot aganist Iran and he is correct. This is not our business and Iran would love tp blame America for there corruption and the baclash.

The Republicans strive for conflict and more wars but some smart Republicans realize to stuff a sock in it and say nothing for the good of America.

This is no small protest it massive and i believe it may take root and develope into something positive.

The young are tired and very strong and mostly educated and will not allow this to go away. They know a fraud was comitted big time aganist the people and it does not matter what the council says unless they declare a new winner and if that does not happen stayed tuned.
07:34 AM on 06/16/2009
It is not America's business who Iran picks to lead its pseudo-democratic theocracy. It is a legitimate concern, since we have to deal with the Iranian government, but it is soley the business of the Iranian people. Every people gets the government they deserve. When Iran has had enough of the Mullahs, they will go they ay of the Shahs. Until then, Americans should talk to every Iranian they know about Iran's situation while America's government keeps its mouth tightly shut..
03:23 AM on 06/16/2009
First of all , I want to thang the educated and young people who strived for their rights. I think these demonstrators are not only interested in giving back their votes and send the reformist Mousavi on throne, but also they want to question the credibility of the unelected Supreme Leader and the Council of Experts who are responsible of determination of good and bad aspects for their suffurin people. The people at 1979 rovolted against the endless power of Shah and the dictatorship, but now we can see that the results of such a revolution have not take the right path, for instead of former dictators one could see many false elected one as well as unelected leaders. The will of people and especiall the "Green" supporters is much more powerful than the will of group of peoplewho has already "Lost a Game" as described by the former president Ahmdi Najad_ one cannot say the current president since his dministration and the entire regime is under the the challenge of its validity.
07:28 AM on 06/16/2009
Well-said.
12:12 AM on 06/16/2009
Patrick Disney. Excellent article thank you.
What a significant change from the Bush era. If George W Bush and Dick Cheney had still been in power today. The first wave of bombers would be about to strike Iran-but not their oil well, of course-.they would be the property of the US. Devoid of information what can anyone say? One day the entire population of the US may come to realize it's better to know what the complaint is about before terminating the life of the man complaining.
I venture to suggest that the Republican from Indiana, Mike Spence, illustrates to perfection what not to do when something like the Iranian election/pending revolution/whatever happens. It is people like him who give Americans the unfortunate reputation of being none too bright and shooting from the lip. Down Fido your record is broken.
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
11:04 PM on 06/15/2009
i think we have our own military government to worry about -- jeez. its awful hard having a tea party in the middle east these days and a lot of it is the fault of our own government. more meddling is the last thing we need to be thinking about. who wins the election in iran is decided by Khamenei, not the people. just like who wins the elections in the united states is decided by corporate interests, not the people. how silly we are to think you can sing "its a small world after all" and everyone is going to be good and love and respect each other.
10:49 PM on 06/15/2009
if we really had a President with BALLS,the right thing to do is to back the people who want freedom just as much as every American citizen has in our country!he would rather spend more money this country does not have and grow the federal deficit!
03:07 AM on 06/16/2009
I take it that you would not have minded if another country had landed troops in Alabama, Mississippi or Georgia during the Black civil rights era to stop the lynchings and bombings by the DECENT citizens of the country. Your'e logic gets stymied when you flip the script.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
t9chi
08:37 AM on 06/16/2009
Very well said.
09:53 PM on 06/15/2009
This is the best thing that's happened for the neo-cons since George Bush's election.
09:31 PM on 06/15/2009
Haven't we meddled enough in the Middle East? Isn't Mr. Obama wise to give this the quiet brush? (Doesn't he have enough on his plate?) By the way, regarding altered election results: Have we forgotten the year 2000, former Secretary of State of Florida, Katherine Harris and Gerorge W. Bushs' brother, former Governor Jeb Bush and their "faulty" voting booths? Do we have any room to talk?
09:19 PM on 06/15/2009
Yes, it is best that the U.S. not interfere in Iranian politics. U.S. support for anyone would be the kiss of death for that politician or political party.

If anyone in the West should question the election results, it would be better that the EU speak up, not the U.S.

Did any international group at least try to monitor the Iranian election so we would have some independent assessment of its fairness?

In the past month there has been an election in Lebanon and an election in Iran, and yet the U.S. elite continues to claim that the only democracy in the Middle East is Israel. What is the difference between a "democratically-elected government" and a "democracy"? The former is an enemy of the U.S. and the later is a friend of the U.S.?

If the results stand, it is very worrying that Netanyahu and Ahmadinejad will both continue to be in power. Bibi is doing all he can to prepare for an attack on Iran as well as prevent any Israel-Palestinian peace deal. Under no circumstances should the U.S. allow Israel to drag the U.S. into an attack on or war with Iran.
08:40 PM on 06/15/2009
Obama's measured response to the election protests is exactly what is called for at this point. Iranians are accostomed to incredible arrogance on the part of American leaders. It is inevitable that Iran will eventually come around and re-join the international community. It was Bush's "Axis of Evil" speech that strengthened the radical elements in Iran and set the process back many years.
10:07 PM on 06/15/2009
Thank you...I was hoping someone else would come to the same conclusion as I did. And Thank God we have a President graced with intelligence.
08:25 PM on 06/15/2009
The uprising against the government in Iran is happening precisely because 1) Barack Obama is president, and 2) the United States is keeping its nose out, for now. Until Jan. 20, it was much easier for the Iranian government to unite its people against the U.S. by framing us as imperialistic, Muslim-hating outsiders. Now that distraction is out of the way.
08:41 PM on 06/15/2009
Precisely.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sunshineejc
Oligarchy~NO! Koch~NO!
09:31 PM on 06/15/2009
Tsinky-If you think that the tail has not wagged the head- you have a blind memory. Domestic politics has driven our actions covertly to sponser these uprisings in many strategic Muslim countries all to satisfy our blind commitment to the Isreali lobby. As to imperialism-The west and now it's head The USA have been doing it from the time the word was first mentioned.

Crusades, Colonialism, Imperialism, meddeling, CIA covert operations, The Mousad are the building blocks of the present day Middle East. The United States is keeping it's nose out now just as a thief keeps quite after he steals.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JonW
07:48 PM on 06/15/2009
What a pleasure to have a thoughtful prudent guy at the helm instead of the shallow. sabre rattling W.
The old song "Fools rush in where wise men fear to tred" seems appropriate here.
08:16 PM on 06/15/2009
It is Obama is not enough of a leader to place Iran on the right perspective or he knows that Iran elections are only but a distraction of a hell bent Theocracy. Only time will tell.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rsprags
No Pets but like Animals
08:33 PM on 06/15/2009
It is not President Obama's role to put Iran's leaders in their place; it is the President's responsibility to attempt to work with whoever is the governing body in that country!
We need to think with the brain and not with the repurg/FOX News talking points!
06:58 PM on 06/15/2009
I hope his silence means he's consentrating on the country that elected him. We need fixing. No more foreign, anything. We're going to end up, dead last, if we keep playing big brother to our own and daddy to foreign countries. Gesssh!
07:28 PM on 06/15/2009
Barak Obama is doing the smart thing. For Republicans who love wars but mostly are cowards they smell blood and want another war with Iran fast.

I was a Republican and when to realize those that control the party love wars and have true anger problems you undersatnd to run fast.

The extreme right wing is danger enough but when you ass in some of there church teaching promote the end of times you are dealing with real loony tunes.

I am proud of Barak Obama and how he is dealing with this very dangerous situation but count on the Republicans wanting a confrontation.

The Republicans should stand up proudly and sign a contract with America that a special draft will happen for their children and also them if they are of age. See how many of the cowards and trouble makers line up.
11:47 PM on 06/15/2009
You're not a Republican or even a citizen of the US.....please stop posting as such....and btw, the US military is overwhelmingly Repulican.....
09:45 PM on 06/15/2009
YES!!