More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Paul Abrams

GET UPDATES FROM Paul Abrams
 

"Job-Killing Regulations and Rhetoric"? So, Why Is Oil Industry Employment at Record Highs?

Posted: 02/ 2/2012 5:31 pm

The right-wing states it in any number of different ways. Sometimes they claim that "Obama did not cause the recession, but he made it worse". On other occasions he is the "food-stamp president". Other times they claim that the stimulus program did not create a single job. Alternatively, they try to switch labels -- that Democrats, not Republicans, are responsible for the worst recession since the Great Depression.

The "best Congress money can buy", as Mark Twain once called it, is hell bent on doing the bidding of its paymasters, stripping industry regulations by using the excuse that they are killing jobs. Wall Street and right-wing industrialists whine and moan over the President's "harsh, anti-business" rhetoric, claiming it to be a major cause of low job growth. [Of course, there is nothing the President has said that even comes close to statements made by FDR ("economic royalists"), JFK ("all steel men are sons-of-bitches") or even W himself, but why quibble over facts].

But, if there is one industry whose claims about the president's rhetoric and regulation have even a drop of merit, it is the oil patch. The president has called for repeal of taxpayer subsidies to the most profitable industry on the planet. I suppose if one were a hypersensitive spoiled child, such rhetoric could be deemed "negative". The Environmental Protection Agency has declared CO2 to be a pollutant, subject to regulation (fulfilling, by the way, a promise George W Bush made during the 2000 campaign that Dick Cheney did not allow him to pursue), and the Administration has made an agreement with the auto industry to reduce tailpipe pollution progressively over time. Then, of course, we had the BP oil spill, and the brief suspension of new permits in the Gulf. Finally, the President has kept the oil industry out of ANWAR, and recently disallowed the XL-Pipeline.

Based upon Republican claims of the impact of rhetoric, uncertainty and regulation, one would think that US employment in the oil and gas industry would be plummeting or, at least, not growing.

One would be wrong.

To drill-baby-drill down on the actual data, the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows, US employment in the oil and gas industry has reached record highs. Note that total oil patch employment increased by as many jobs during the first 3 years of the Obama presidency than it did during the first 6 years of the Bush/Cheney Administration. [Of course, Bush had failed as an oil executive -- or, at least, his investors did -- so perhaps that was to be expected].

2012-02-02-dfdfdfdbvbvbvbvb.jpg


Do not be at all surprised if Republicans ignore such data and continue to lie about the causes of the great recession and the causes for slow job growth as we come out of it.

They would not be Republicans if they did otherwise.


 

Follow Paul Abrams on Twitter: www.twitter.com/pabrams2001

 
 
  • Comments
  • 84
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:18 PM on 02/03/2012
As always, this 'analysis' is too simplistic to explain, well, anything. The increase in employment is the natural gas boom brought on by fracking technology and the oil boom in the northern plains states brought on by fracking and high crude prices. It has pretty much zero correlation to rhetoric from either side.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul Abrams
01:54 PM on 02/03/2012
Actually, sir, that was the point. That there is zero correlation with the complaints of negative rhetoric or regulation. It is not a "from either side" type of analysis. Republicans claim that negative rhetoric and regulation is killing job growth. The job growth in the oil industry shows this is a lie. Your confirm that, as you have raised unrelated factors that have spurred employment growth.

I thank you for your agreement, and for supplying some missing details.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mhh310351
Roosevelt Democrat
01:44 AM on 02/05/2012
Don't forget the subsidies which I support.

http://www.forbes.com/2011/05/02/eliminate-oil-subsidies.html

Seems there are over 3000 different drilling companies. The funny thing is BIG OIL does not qualify for these subsidies or tax deductions because of the dreaded AMT, that's right the Alternative Minimum Tax!

Now the question becomes why would President Obama push an idea per Forbes and other experts that would make BIG OIL stronger and help reduce the competition?
10:56 AM on 02/03/2012
Did it ever cross your so called mind that the oil companies have to hire more people to meet compliance with regulations? Big business can afford compliance departments.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:19 PM on 02/03/2012
That ain't it.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
phoenixdoglover
My dog loves my progressive treats agenda
12:35 PM on 02/03/2012
You may not be aware that industry typically dedicates less than 1% of their staff to environmental compliance (dealing with regulations).  Your suggested explanation is not plausible.
02:11 PM on 02/03/2012
Environmental regulation does not constitute the entirety of regulation.

I do not suggest that compliance accounts for all increase in employment.

Besides staff, increased complexity of operations required by regulation also increases labor demand.

All of it raises fuel prices.

In case you haven't noticed, they are drilling in the Dakotas. More jobs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
suddenfun
Subvert the dominant paradigm
10:31 AM on 02/03/2012
Yeah, how do they keep getting elected? Ah, the power of fear and ignorance and bigotry...and scapegoats...who god forbid might get one cent of money they didn't earn or that came from someone else...and yet, the general welfare is a net benefit to everyone...but they would rather benefit the few and help no one but their rich patrons. What a fun bunch a white guys.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fisher65
10:09 AM on 02/03/2012
reps are hooked on lies .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blogging Patriot
Serf-ing the Economy
10:08 AM on 02/03/2012
We spend 4 billion a year subsidizing oil. We spend almost as much funding research projects for commercial oil. Then there is the military spending.

Roger Stern, an economic geographer at Princeton University published a peer-reviewed study on the cost of patrolling the gulf from 1976 to 2007 for the explicit mission of securing oil shipments, he combed through the Defense Department's data and came up with a total, over three decades, of $7.3 trillion. Just in the Gulf.
maruski
Liberal Lutheran; lean left, save America!
11:58 AM on 02/08/2012
Exactly, the corporations --in this case oil-- externalize their real cost of doing business to the public while at the same time keeping all the profits private and avoiding taxes to a degree of 0% paid.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Blogging Patriot
Serf-ing the Economy
10:08 AM on 02/03/2012
The head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission says his agency will take action "to guard against the burdens of excessive speculation" after new data revealed that 90% of oil traders are short-term speculators whose bets are driving up prices.

Day-trading and trading around expiration of futures contracts are likewise boosting grains and other commodities. Data released by CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler suggest that "huge inflows of speculative money are driving up (oil) commodity prices."

Saying that “net speculative positions are four times as high as in June 2008,†investment banker Goldman Sachs “issued a warning that the price of oil has grown out of control due to excessive speculation."

Exxon Mobil Chief Executive Rex Tillerson noted in testimony before the Senate Finance Committee that this year's oil prices don't make economic sense. He said current fundamentals and production costs would dictate oil around $60 to $70 a barrel. That's $43 cheaper than this year's highs of $113 a barrel reached on April 29 and May 2.

Delta and the Air Transport Association, the lobby for airlines, have been out in front among 98 companies and trade groups that banded together to create the Stop Oil Speculation Now coalition. During peacetime, Delta is the world's largest consumer of jet fuel, edging out the Department of Defense.

And the GOP will still rant "Supply and Demand." Brilliant.
10:45 AM on 02/03/2012
That is the problem with the commodities market. It has turned into a system where the people that sell the commodities are buying them in order to increase the price they can sell it for. This practice needs to be stopped.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
David Durham
Just a guy who tries to stay informed and stand fo
09:46 AM on 02/03/2012
Does anyone really believe President Obama took a bad economy and made it worse?
10:18 AM on 02/03/2012
Yes . Just ask any republican
10:45 AM on 02/03/2012
Of course not. They know the truth, but the truth doesn't get Republicans elected.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pmoschetta
Where are the Jobs, Speaker Boehner?
03:27 AM on 02/04/2012
and neither does honest elections
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hoover52
Tickle me blue
09:28 AM on 02/03/2012
I find it helpful to check the BLS reports myself to keep informed on the truth of the matter. Here's the link, if anyone is interested:

http://bls.gov/
traceymarie
Independent to Dem in 2007
01:43 PM on 02/03/2012
natural gas corporations are cutting back because profits are too low.
09:26 AM on 02/03/2012
I wonder how long it will be before the oil industry lets the public know what chemicals are being used in the fracking process? Maybe after all our ground water has been contaminated and we no longer have drinking water. Industry doesn't need to be regulated.....they will always do what is in the best interests of the public, right? Just take a look at a long history that proves otherwise!!
traceymarie
Independent to Dem in 2007
01:44 PM on 02/03/2012
Go to the schlumberger website, they list all the chemicals and the MSDS sheets, you will be disgusted
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pmoschetta
Where are the Jobs, Speaker Boehner?
03:28 AM on 02/04/2012
why do you think the director of the documentary Gaslands was arrested at the congressional hearings this week?

Because he has exposed to the masses that the chemicals used in fracking is the source of the contamination of ground water in people's wells in Wyoming.
09:20 AM on 02/03/2012
If the Republicans and Teabaggers repeat the lies enough times, their members will believe it true.....in the face of data and facts that indicate otherwise.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:21 PM on 02/03/2012
Hey, if it worked for the bible, it'll work for anything.
photo
marshhen
Northern by birth, southern by choice
08:27 AM on 02/03/2012
It would interesting to know how many were hired to comply with regulations? How many environmental engineers and paper shufflers versus laborers....
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul Abrams
11:11 AM on 02/03/2012
regardless of what that number is, the industry is the most profitable on the planet. So, it can't be much of a burden, can it?
and, what if there were environmental engineers and compliance personnel? Isn't it better to have the oil extracted safely, rather than spawning more BP spills? Is that what you want our beautiful country to become, a waste dump?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Why does this generation ask for a sign?
02:29 PM on 02/03/2012
Yes, they are profitable. And yes, inefficiencies do slow growth. Money spent on inefficiencies can't be used for growth. Delays are probably the bigger problem.

http://money.cnn.com/2010/05/27/news/economy/offshore_drilling_ban/index.htm

I think Obama okayed the drilling for 2012. Maybe employment will accelerate even faster now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:22 PM on 02/03/2012
Very few. There happens to be a gas and oil boom in the US.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:04 AM on 02/03/2012
Since 2005, US oil consumption has fallen by 2 million barrels a day.
Domestic oil production is already up 11% under Obama.
Cana­dian oil production continues to grow quickly.
US is a gasoline EXPORTER…

But oil is 3 times more expensive than in late 2008.

Because today U.S. and Canada are only producing 12% of the world's oil.
OPEC and Russia are producing 46 % of the world’s oil and they don’t want to bring the price of oil down.

At the same time, outside the Middle East, new drillings make economic sense as long as oil prices remain between $60 and $80 a barrel.

So, oil will remain expensive.
10:22 AM on 02/03/2012
Between $60 or $80 in not expensive when you are paying arount $100
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Vegasyankee
Making Energy for a Strong America!
04:30 AM on 02/03/2012
“We believe that by 2020, the United States will become the largest producer of hydrocarbons in the world, surpassing Russia,†said Roger Diwan, partner and head of financial advisory operations at PFC Energy. Now that producers have solved the problem of producing oil and gas from tight shale formations, the nation is on the verge of a golden energy era which is reshaping the industry worldwide, he maintained. “When you look at global oil and gas investment, the US has been the key destination in the last 10 years,†Diwan said. “The global industry is making money all over the world, and investing it in the US.†There is no GOP lie about what we are doing, it's the reality of what we could be doing. Imagine a world where the U.S. is no longer dependent of the Middle East for ANY of it's energy needs. The fact is that "The Golden Age" is coming and the U.S. Oil & Gas industry is one of the nations very best employers with the highest wages imaginable. You can either get on the bus now or sit on the bench and whine while another opportunity pass you by.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TMS3100
Tea Party has run off with his light saber.
04:19 AM on 02/03/2012
Your link is broken to the actual data.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul Abrams
11:13 AM on 02/03/2012
I'm sorry, I'm not sure I understand your comment. The actual data is in the section to which the link links.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:40 AM on 02/03/2012
My 85 yr old mom still has 25% mineral rights on 940 ac in northcentral MT. But the Bakken formation doesn't extend to it. There is oil there, a test will drilled several yrs ago, but not enough or too much water in it. I was hoping to become the next Beverly Hillbillies! The ones who have the other 75% would have done it and we couldn't have stopped it. Oh well, maybe some day..............But there must not be much, the mineral rights are only worth $10/mineral acre.