Why does the government spend so much time/money going after harmless pot smokers?
Pot isn't even physically addictive.
Ever heard of someone dieing from smoking too much pot? Me either, so what's the big deal?
I could go into all the ways cocaine, heroin and meth are much worse but instead I think I will ask :
Why is pot illegal but alcohol is legal? How many people die in drunk driving accidents a year? Yet we serve people alcohol with their dinner and send them home driving but scoff at the relaxed pot smoker who stays at home and minds his own business. It's crazy.
Why should narcotic painkillers be legal when pot is not? Pot grows out of the ground, it is smoked in it's natural form. Where other drugs, including the legal drugs, are full of chemicals.
The chemical drugs often cause people to act overtly different than they normally do, sometimes violently and often recklessly. Chemical drugs are physically addictive and very bad for our bodies.
Pot is a natural "drug", people tend to relax and get hungry when they smoke it. But their attitudes rarely change and they go back to work the next day. It is even more rare to hear of someone smoking pot and becoming violent, or reckless.
So why does the government spend so much time harassing people that are basically harmless when there are so many others that pose an actual threat? Doesn't the government have something better to do?




Loading comments…

Posted September 24, 2007 | 06:22 PM (EST)