More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Memo to 14-time Emmy Award-Winning Daily Show Host Jon Stewart:

I'm a big fan.

Unlike Oprah, I've been featured on your Emmy-Award-winning fake news show. It happened this year on April 12, in an interview about Open Carry with Wyatt Cenac. Brady Campaign VP Dennis Henigan also has been a guest of yours.

We understand why you were voted as America's most trusted news anchor in an online poll conducted by Time Magazine. America adores you. And you won't find a Brady staffer who isn't a devoted watcher of The Daily Show. We love you and your show as much as you love Nightly News Anchor Brian Williams.

So it is with a heavy heart that I ask: Really, Jon? Really?

Did you really suggest on the Oprah Show while promoting your Rally to Restore Sanity that when it comes to the horrific experience of school shootings that it's not the guns that are the problem, but "crazy is the problem"?

Did you really say that if all the guns were gone that there would be "a 100,000 percent increase in school bludgeonings"? Did you, Jon Stewart, really say that?

If you did say those things, then I have to ask: Did you mean what you said?

When, really, was the last time somebody in America was able to terrorize a college campus, kill 32 people, and wound 17 others in less than 12 minutes with a blunt instrument? The Virginia Tech killer was able to do these incredibly awful things by getting off 174 rounds with the two semi-automatics that he wielded. In less than 12 minutes.

Our Capitol Hill staffer, Colin Goddard, was one of the 49 people shot at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007. It became the worst school shooting in America's history. Colin was shot four times, but bravely was the first to dial 911.

Colin lived, thank goodness, but had to spend weeks in rehab learning to walk again. Earlier this month he underwent a second surgery on his hip to remove some of the leftover bullet fragments from the shooting. It took him a week to recuperate and still more fragments remain.

Colin is now featured in the upcoming documentary, Living for 32, because of his journey of renewal and hope, since the tragedy. Colin is a big fan of yours, too, Jon. He'd love to talk to you about what he experienced as a victim of a school shooting, and what all Americans can learn as a result of it.

Colin also would address how schools could improve their policies and procedures to limit the suffering, in the case of a shooting, and how mental health policies play a huge role in preventing violence in schools.

Colin would tell you that in America often those with malicious intent have too easy access to guns because our gun laws are so weak. Right now, anyone can walk into a gun show in most states and buy a gun without a Brady criminal background check. This is how the Columbine shooters got their guns. We need to make it harder for dangerous people to get dangerous weapons. We can save lives with commonsense steps.

Colin would have the kind of conversation that you're hoping to spark with your Rally to Restore Sanity on October 30.

So I encourage you, Jon: Have Colin Goddard or someone like him on The Daily Show so that you can talk face-to-face about what it's like to experience gun violence and maybe lay the groundwork for more sanity regarding guns in America.

Americans account for 80 percent of all firearm deaths among high-income populous countries. Every day in the United States, around 300 people, including 65 children and teens, are injured or killed with guns in murders, assaults, suicides, and accidents. A police chief recently testified before Congress and stunned them with the fact that "America has lost more people to gun violence than during all the wars in the 20th century combined." Isn't that insane?

Having Colin on your show, as someone who knows the real difference between what a gun and blunt instruments can do, could be the just the thing that America needs, along with your rally, to walk us back toward sanity. Really.

Paul Helmke is president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. Follow the Brady Campaign on Facebook and Twitter.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 410
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:26 PM on 10/31/2010
how can that not be understood?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fgbouman
Curmudgeon & Designer
05:25 PM on 10/31/2010
It is hardly the guns that cause the problem - they are just a tool for people to vent their anger without going through the effort of settling the dispute another way. A Norse berserker running through his village and chopping down his fellow citizens with his sword or axe was acting out the same rage with the available tool. Banning swords wasn't the solution to the problem, either getting rid of the reasons for the rage or developing less destructive ways to deal with it was necessary to resolve the issue... and it has been resolved.
Brazil, with less than 10% of the gun ownership of the U.S. has very nearly the same rate of deaths. The claim that guns are the cause of deaths is conclusively statistically false. That isn't to say that guns aren't a problem; they put too much power in the hand of the would-be killer, but the genie is long, long out of the bottle and trying to implement meaningful controls on firearms without jeopardizing more than just the right to own and bear arms is probably a fruitless exercise. A universal push to a more reasonable and just society is more likely to have a meaningful result.
Olethea
Life may be sweeter for this- I don't know.
04:39 PM on 10/31/2010
The level of snark in this article leaves a bad taste.

That said, I don't think private citizens should have automatic weapons for the reasons cited here. Other than that, Jon Stewart is spot on. Crazy people use violence, and they will do so whether a gun is made available to them or not. Remember, 9/11 was committed with box cutters.
02:27 PM on 10/31/2010
Actually, Canada has more guns per capita than the US buut far less gun violence, so it's good to look for why US culture has more of an inclination towards violence. Whether it's "craziness" or something more subtile like am emotional response over reason (one aspect of craziness), it's not necessarily the guns.
06:10 PM on 10/28/2010
While "bludgeoning" is probably an unlikely choice, I do believe that his point in valid. If people are crazy enough to want to go around killing people, they're going to. If guns are illegal, they're going to find them on the black market or make their own. Even if high school shootings didn't happen, I would bet that they would start using explosives or god knows what. Murders would still happen because, as Stewart put, there's still a whole lot of crazy out there.

There are two points about gun control that are important here:

1) Guns are not the cause of murder. They're a tool. Eliminating guns is only alleviating a symptom of the problem, not eliminating the source. Until we solve the real problem (the fact that people are going out there with the intent to kill) murders won't just stop or even decrease.

2) Making guns illegal just takes them away from good people, not bad. Bad people will find a way to get their hands on weapons whereas good people will obey the law. Just what we need, right? Take guns away from the people who need them to defend themselves, but not the people who use them for the wrong reasons.

Do we need to make it tougher to get guns? Yes. Do we have a way to do so successfully? Not yet. Guns are relatively easy to make, which makes them very hard to control. From what I've seen, criminals always find a way.
01:56 PM on 10/07/2010
Paulie--I read your amicus brief in the Peruta case--and you really need to either get a competent lawyer to write your briefs or find a new job or both since even to a non lawyer like myself, your premises are laughable
10:05 AM on 10/04/2010
You can always find examples of reasons that freedoms should be restricted or eliminated - but being scared of freedom is not how I wish to live. I am all for freedom of choice, and I think that is what makes the U.S. a great place. Oppose restrictions on freedomd whether it be gun ownership, abortion, gay marriage, don't ask - don't tell, etc. Come down on the side of freedom and choice - although it will be hard to pigeon hole you as a liberal or a conservative if you consistently favor freedom over discrimination. I'll take sanity instead of "keep fear alive". Go JS!
07:22 PM on 10/03/2010
How often do we hear about villages being raided and everyone killed by machete's in Africa and other countries where guns are less available? Very often.
photo
dragondani73
RN for Obamacare
08:08 PM on 10/02/2010
I watched this entire show, and I think this is a little out or context. I think what Jon said was on the nose.
02:08 AM on 10/02/2010
Looks like Paul is running out of allies to help him spread his hate propaganda. Too bad Paul, but I'll enjoy watching you squim as your list of supporters keeps shrinking.
10:05 PM on 10/01/2010
Tonight on Helmke Live: The Brady Campaign in a game of clutching at straws. It should be fun to watch the continued fall.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:04 PM on 09/30/2010
Hmmm...

The Brady Bunch says they just want reasonable gun regulation.

Elijah24, who supports the Brady Bunch position, calls for a $100,000 tax on each bullet sold.

Yep, sure sounds reasonable to me.
photo
Sugarmaker
Act like what you do makes a difference, it does
02:23 PM on 09/30/2010
Didn't Pat Moynihan introduce some bills to that effect in the heydays of the great democratic gun control experiment?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SmileAndActNice
Utilitarianism, the -ism that works.
09:29 PM on 09/29/2010
Mr. Helmke,

Being liked does not oblige one to agree with every position of ones fans. Nor does sharing many views guarantee agreement on a given view. Mr. Stewart did not betray you, he owes you nothing.

And there are mass bludgeonings and stabbings in parts of the world where guns are less available. 41 people, for example, were stabbed by a berserk teen with a knife in a Berlin train station in 2006. And one of the first folks the knife hit was HIV positive. http://wapedia.mobi/en/Berlin_Hauptbahnhof#5.

The most lethal attacks use explosives and fire rather than firearms. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daegu_subway_fire

The problem is, indeed, the crazy. Remove firearms and crazy finds something else - possibly something much worse.
photo
SOD
As kind as possible and as unkind as necessary.
10:16 AM on 09/30/2010
Hear hear!

It astounds me how some people disregard the fact that guns cannot think or shoot themselves. I wonder what hoplophobes think homicidal maniacs did before firearms?

"Blaming firearms for gun violence is analogous to blaming flatware for Rosie O'Donnell's massive girth."

-- I. M. Kable

Fanned and Faved for bringing facts to the table.
photo
Sugarmaker
Act like what you do makes a difference, it does
02:26 PM on 09/30/2010
"Blaming firearms for gun violence is analogous to blaming flatware for Rosie O'Donnell's massive girth."

As Larry would say: Now that's funny. I don't care who y' are... that's funny.
rikilii
Hush, was the first word you were taught...
12:01 PM on 09/30/2010
Helmke also ignores the fact that the rate of death from mass shootings in Western Europe is not actually that much lower than in the United States.

There are many differences between Western European countries and the United States that account for much of the difference in homicide rates.  Access guns has little or nothing to do with it.  The U.S. is just a more violent place, guns or no guns.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rooster Coburn
Less Gov't + More Responsibility = A Better World
06:30 PM on 09/29/2010
To "Elijah24": Just which part of shall not be infringed is so hard for you to understand?
As far as background checks go, fine, same as on books and newspapers.
05:54 PM on 09/29/2010
One can still commit acts of mass violence without the use of firearms. It's relatively easy to build several types of bombs which can do at least as much damage as firearms.

Also the statement, "Americans account for 80 percent of all firearm deaths among high-income populous countries," misses the point for two reasons. (1) The U.S. has a larger population than other high-income countries, which will naturally skew the numbers. (2) Many other countries have stricter gun control, so they are using other implements for violence and suicide. A more useful statistic would compare the rate of all deaths that are either violent or suicidal in high-income populous countries to similar deaths in the US where a firearm was used.
Olethea
Life may be sweeter for this- I don't know.
04:42 PM on 10/31/2010
Good point. I'd also like to know the statistics on school violence in other countries.