EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Paul Rieckhoff

Paul Rieckhoff

Posted: July 15, 2010 05:13 PM

BP: Stop Hurting National Security, Start Paying for National Guard GI Bill Benefits

What's Your Reaction:

BP may have lobbied for the release of a known terrorist to secure an oil contract with the Libyan government. They may finally plug the leak this week. And Tony Hayward may go on another sailing race. Top hats and booms. Cleanup crews and lawsuits. Over the last few months of this disaster, we’ve heard talk about it all. But what you haven’t heard about is the significant national security risk created by this catastrophe. And you probably also didn’t hear that due to a bureaucratic loophole, many of the men and women in uniform responding to this mess in their own state are not receiving credit toward educational benefits they have earned.  

Since the spill began, nearly fifteen hundred National Guardsmen have been deployed to the gulf region to clean up BP’s mess. This call-up is the latest contribution to years of overuse and overextension of a force that really can’t afford it.  Though it may seem like a small number of troops, we have few to spare, and the impact on the force and the individual is substantial. With the National Guard making up at times roughly 40% of our force in Iraq and Afghanistan, the same folks are being deployed and re-deployed one, two, maybe three times again. Imagine coming back from your second or third tour to Iraq or Afghanistan, and being told you’re being redeployed to scrub oil from the beaches in Louisiana. It’s happening right now to thousands of troops, and the impact is being felt by them and their families across America.

By definition, the role of the National Guard is to serve during times of domestic emergencies.  And they’ve done it very well.  Over the last few years, they’ve played a critical role in the aftermath of 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, the California wildfires, and a variety of other local and regional disasters. Now, they have been called to respond to a disaster of corporate negligence and recklessness -- a far cry from the work of Mother Nature.

While BP takes advantage of this overused backstop security force, allowing our military’s performance at home and abroad to suffer, they aren’t even ensuring our troops get the benefits they have earned.

For many, service accrued for serving in the Gulf doesn’t count towards education benefits under the new GI Bill.  As the law is written, Guardsmen who are deployed under “Title 32” orders are not given credit for this active duty time served in their home state. An Army Reservist doing the same job as a member of the Louisiana Guard sandbagging St. Bernard parish, would amass benefits for the GI Bill. But for a member of the Louisiana or Mississippi National Guard, this loophole costs tens of thousands of dollars, and might be the difference between going to college or not.

Instead, BP launched a $50 million advertising campaign to let Americans know “it won’t happen again.” $50 million was devoted to image building, instead of to covering the education benefits for thousands of National Guardsmen scrubbing rocks and filling sandbags.

Regardless of whether or not the spill is stopped this week, there might be help on the way. But it’s not coming from BP. A GI Bill fix legislation package is making its way through Congress that promises to address the issue. But very soon, Congress will go on vacation for the summer and unless we see action fast, these Guardsmen might just be stuck in the muck, without a diploma. If the president wants some asses to kick, this would be a good place to start.

And if that fails to happen, maybe BP can use its advertising budget to foot the $12,000 bill to send each one of the Guardsmen charged with cleaning up its mess to college.  Now that’s beyond petroleum.

Tell Congress: Don’t make our troops pay for BP’s mess. Sign the petition and tell your member of Congress to take action on the new GI Bill fix Package TODAY.

Crossposted at www.IAVA.org

 
 
 

Follow Paul Rieckhoff on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PaulRieckhoff

BP may have lobbied for the release of a known terrorist to secure an oil contract with the Libyan government. They may finally plug the leak this week. And Tony Hayward may go on another sailing race...
BP may have lobbied for the release of a known terrorist to secure an oil contract with the Libyan government. They may finally plug the leak this week. And Tony Hayward may go on another sailing race...
 
  • Comments
  • 88
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Harker
12:12 AM on 07/20/2010
bp should pay for the military now. interestin­g
12:35 PM on 07/19/2010
They are ALL guilty. But THIS President, NOW is COVERING UP for BP.

THIS president is ordering the COAST GUARD (they are in the armed forces by order of the Commander-­in-Chief) to spray COREXIT.

THIS president rubber-sta­mped the Deepwater Horizon (Rolling Stone).

Why is everything a PARTISAN ISSUE with you people (NOT you, Paul, commenters on this article and others on Huffington Post)???

I don't give a damn if this oil explosion happened on the watch of the BLUE, GREEN, YELLOW, PURPLE, RED OR ORANGE PARTY'S.

It is AN ATROCITY and one that did NOT have to happen and does not need to continue to be dealt with by ARROGANCE, PARTISANSH­IP, GREED AND COMPLETE AND UTTER LACK OF MORAL AND ETHICAL REGARD for LIFE
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
teaserpony
10:54 AM on 07/19/2010
Did you see that Little Bobby Jendel's famous sand berms have washed out to sea? Yes.. sad but true, Little Bobby Jindel wasted million$ and million$ on a sand d ike that took a hike... They love Little Bobby down there in LA. So it's still Obama's fault. Now there are earth-move­rs on the ocean floor. Those darn "pointy head" scientist warned Lil' Bob that the sand was going to walk, yet he and bunch of "others" prayed hard and Jesus must have told them all what to do...Heck Jesus walked on the water... so add little praying , couple of D9s and a contractor friend of Little Bobby Jindeld, plus the taxpayers money and build the sand dam that could hold back the sea....a dam made of sand.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
aligatorhardt
empty on purpose
11:20 AM on 07/19/2010
Anyone who has built sand castles on the beach knows their creation will be short lived. There always a big crowd when the pork barrel barbecue comes to town. They just want to get some hours on the heavy equipment so they can present the Feds with a big bill.
photo
blondebeblonde
Blondes also prefer gentlemen
01:30 PM on 07/19/2010
Snap. Perfect analysis of the situation. Fanned.
03:38 PM on 07/19/2010
Get your facts straight, aligator.

Building the sand berms IS HELPING to protect the estuaries and marshes from the OIL that Obama REFUSES TO ADDRESS.

First he rubber-sta­mped the Deepwater (rolling stone), then he WENT GOLFING, then he did a PHOTO-OP in Louisiana and told Louisianan­s that he "could not exactly go DOWN there and suck it up with a STRAW", then he PICKNICKED with Congress on the White House Lawn, then he did SOME MORE GOLFING and then he VACATIONED IN MAINE.

I am a liberal and I will be damned if I defend ANY elected official, orange, blue, red, green or purple, who KNOWINGLY has put people, the environmen­t and animals lives' at risk.

THEN, he dumped and continues to dump TOXIC COREXIT( active ingredient 2-Butoxyet­hanol named a "FETAL TOXIN" by the EPA - Riki Ott's book, "Not One Drop") on the people, the ocean and wildlife.
03:30 PM on 07/19/2010
Its because the Army Corps of Engineers wouldn't let them finish the job properly because of environmen­tal concerns, of course they weren't going to last the distance, they should have been done properly at the beginning when the State asked for them and when the spill was contained and oil was not washing up any more sand berms could have been dismantled­.

Now because of a few fish issues all the fish and seafood and wetlands are contaminat­ed.
10:33 AM on 07/19/2010
Plug this loophole, it's only fair that state orders confer the same benefits as federal orders.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kurtvb
Knowledge is Power
10:17 AM on 07/19/2010
The problem starts with how national defense strategy is developed. As a COST cutting measure, many functions of the military have been shifted to the National Guard and Reserves. Because these men and women are not full time, their benefits are limited and the cost of employing them is less (one weekend per month, two weeks for annual training). I have been part of all three, Active duty, National Guard & Reserves. The latter two do not receive the same QUALITY training as active duty just because of the time factor. Further, their service time counts differentl­y, especially for the National Guard. They also do not have the same quality equipment. During the build up and initial combat, Guard and Reserve units saw their equipment sent overseas to replace damaged equipment, while the manufactur­ers built up production­. This new production went to combat units first before backfillin­g Guard and Reserve units. They work for the state government except for their two weeks of annual training or if they have been federalize­d. Therefore they are treated differentl­y as to what benefits they get and when they can use them. Guard and Reserve personnel do not get their pension until they reach 65 years old. However, active duty personnel get theirs when they have served 20 years and leave the service. Guard and reserve personnel do not get they same VA benefits as do active duty personnel unless they have served during a declared war. The federal government owes this benefit.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
aligatorhardt
empty on purpose
11:21 AM on 07/19/2010
Thanks for the info. This is a legislativ­e problem, Congress needs to re-examine the rules.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul Rieckhoff
Founder, Iraq & Afghanistan Veterans of America (I
12:39 PM on 07/19/2010
Thanks for the note. That's why I linked to the petition at the bottom of the page. We need pressure from folks like you to make Congress move on this issue.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hardyman1966
The antonym of liberal is INTOLERANT.
10:10 AM on 07/19/2010
Between the National Guard, Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines, we sure do a bang-up job of taking care of everyone who serves, don't we? Oh no, wait, that's the contractor­s.

It's hard to look good this way when we've got the world's biggest military everything­.
10:02 AM on 07/19/2010
I do not think you can blame this on BP, It looks like congress screwed up with their determinat­ion of what qualified for college credits.

Maybe the democrats who are in control of congress should have concentrat­ed on the little guy instead of bailing out big banks. There is enough outrage at BP, without throwing more onto the pile for congress' screwup.
10:32 AM on 07/19/2010
" ....the democrats who are in control of congress..­.." Where have you been since 2006 when the D's nominally took over? Rs have the filibuster record for all time and have even blocked bills to clean up punctuatio­n and other errors in bills. Slam the republican­'ts, the Party of NO, but I don't think you should try to hang this on the Ds.
03:27 PM on 07/19/2010
they either took over, I think Nancy has been holding that Gavel so tightly they are going to have to pry it out of her hands, they were not "nominally­" in charge they were in charge, you can't have it both ways.

They have made a hash of a lot of stuff and now are trying to shift the blame, that's what happens when you write legislatio­n in the middle of the night and no one reads it, just rubber stamps it and its passed!
03:42 PM on 07/19/2010
Will you knock it off already with the D's and R's.

Who the heck cares??

This is about an ATROCITY that has been committed against the Gulf coast, the people, the animals, the ocean.

IT NEVER SHOULD HAVE HAPPENED.

THEY HAD NO BUSINESS BEING IN THAT OCEAN.

The Oceans are homes to dolphins, whales, sea turtles, pelicans and countless life.

The Federal Government should have banned ALL offshore drilling.

WE NEED TO DEMAND THE GOVERNMENT BAN ALL OFFSHORE DRILLING IMMEDIATEL­Y.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
aligatorhardt
empty on purpose
09:55 AM on 07/19/2010
This stylized font is more difficult to read than standard text. I prefer block letters.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Hardyman1966
The antonym of liberal is INTOLERANT.
10:12 AM on 07/19/2010
Agreed on all counts.

Italics are not easy on the eyes.

Go back to a regular san serif font!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fauker1923
'Give 'em the Good News'
09:41 AM on 07/19/2010
The IAVA is a great, young organizati­on that needs your help to get this message out. Please repost this to your FB and Twitter accounts. The NG guys and gals deserve to be treated as equals, they share the same risks, they should get the same rewards.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Paul Rieckhoff
Founder, Iraq & Afghanistan Veterans of America (I
12:38 PM on 07/19/2010
Thanks, fauker1923­. The support is much appreciate­d!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
aligatorhardt
empty on purpose
09:29 AM on 07/19/2010
BP should pay the wages of those who are working to clean up their mess. But BP should not suffer extortion for other matters not directly related to the clean up. The Congress should make the laws fair to the service personnel. They are risking their lives for these military campaigns and if they are ordered to action then they deserve credit for their time. It does not matter what they are doing on their job. If they are employed by the military then every day counts until they are released from military duty.
08:19 AM on 07/19/2010
Why are we fighting a war WE WILL NEVER WIN.

How many more of our troops are going to be killed before Washington finally wakes up and brings them all home. This war will never be won.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
The Dude67
Living is easy with eyes closed - J. Lennon
09:08 AM on 07/19/2010
The war is actually going just exactly as planned. The problem is "we the people" keep looking at the ostensible purpose of the war - keeping the homeland safe from 'terrorist­s' - instead of the true purpose of the war - profit.

Much profit is being made. That is why when this 'war' ends we have another one already cued up - Iran. And it will be Obama that leads us into Iran.
photo
blondebeblonde
Blondes also prefer gentlemen
01:33 PM on 07/19/2010
oh god oh god oh god oh god I hope not.
09:27 AM on 07/19/2010
Agreed, alleycat.

OBAMA is sustaining perpetual war and PROFITS for OIL COMPANIES AND ALL WAR PROFITEERS at the expense of people's lives.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
The Dude67
Living is easy with eyes closed - J. Lennon
02:51 PM on 07/19/2010
and livelihood
07:47 AM on 07/19/2010
These troops should certainly be granted the GI Bill benefits they are earning by serving their country. Regardless of the reason (oil company or otherwise) they were called to service, they are serving the American people. It is good to hear the governemen­t is taking action to correct this oversight.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
aligatorhardt
empty on purpose
09:33 AM on 07/19/2010
There is no oversight. The law was written to cheat the soldiers. These laws are crafted on purpose, lawmakers write the language and it is reviewed and voted on. This is another example of the contempt some members of Congress have for the citizens of our country.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
aligatorhardt
empty on purpose
10:01 AM on 07/19/2010
There is no oversight. The citizens are being treated unfairly by representa­tives who write the law. I don't think the wording of the law is accidental­. There is so much debate on every law that the intent of rules should be apparent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mechadave
07:19 AM on 07/19/2010
While I'm in favor of making BP pay for damages, it isn't BP's fault that our NG makes up 40% of our forces in Iraq and Afghanista­n. Nor is it BP's fault that the Dept. of Defense plays games with the continuous service clause and sends units home just long enough to make sure they don't qualify for benefits.
We need to get our military out of those colonial wars and back home.
09:25 AM on 07/19/2010
Well said, mechadave.

Our government is ultimately responsibl­e and is pulling all the strings.

Pay the individual­s what they have coming and DEMAND THAT OBAMA END THE WAR NOW.
07:04 AM on 07/19/2010
When did BP get the power to call up the National Guard?
12:57 PM on 07/19/2010
BP can't call up the National Guard. When the Deepwater Horizon exploded and it was determined to be leaking oil under the surface, Gov. Jindal (LA) sent a Request for Assistance to the Department of Defense to activate LA National Guard under Title 32 status, which allows the Federal Government to pay for the activation­, and as a result they get a greater series of benefits than being deployed under State National Guard activation­...which confers no such benefits in Louisiana. Each of the other Governors of the Gulf States who have requested assistance did so using the same request-ty­pe and format.
03:23 PM on 07/19/2010
that was my point, they have no authority to call the guard, the government activated the guard and they have to bare the responsibi­lity. The administra­tion needs to negotiate any compensati­on with BP and employers, this is not the responsibi­lity of BP, you can't just shift all the blame onto them.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
madisonhack
I prefer not to......
07:02 AM on 07/19/2010
...and that would be $12,000 per semester? That's about what it costs now...