iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Dr. Peggy Drexler

GET UPDATES FROM Dr. Peggy Drexler

Hot Women Of The Republican Right

Posted: 08/10/11 12:01 PM ET

Sure, Michele Bachmann might look a wee bit scary on the Newsweek cover that launched a thousand blogs.

Liberal bias? Maybe. But I've seen that gaze -- like the one my dog has when there's a deer in the yard -- in her own campaign material. And maybe the "queen of rage" thing was a bit much as a cover line. But she does seem pretty upset.

To all those right-thinking Republicans lamenting imagery, I have to say: "Wait a minute. You started this."

When Sarah Palin strode on the convention nominating stage with her tight skirt and traditional values, the fellas on the right said "We're on to something here."

Palin begat Christine O'Donnell, the spectacularly unqualified Senate candidate from Delaware, who begat Nikki Haley in South Carolina, Bachmann and now Kristi Noem, a lushly-coiffed brunette that Huff Post readers named "Hottest freshmen in Congress." Interestingly, Noem's pictures often show that same deer-in-the-yard stare that has the Bachmannites taking up their spears.

Line up their pictures, and it's obvious they share more than their Tea-Party fan-base.

Of course, good looks never hurt any candidate. Reagan, Kennedy, Clinton and Obama lead a long list of candidates where looks and charisma cross over into votes. Mitt Romney rocks the silver-fox thing to perfection. Would Michael Bloomberg's presidential possibilities be better if he were six inches taller?

Appearance and popularity are a connection as old as junior high, but The University of Helsinki actually quantified it. The UK's Telegraph reports that 1,992, photos of political candidates were shown to 10,011 people. Affiliation wasn't mentioned -- just that they were politicians.

The interviewees were asked to rate the photos on a scale of attractiveness and perceived qualifications. For every small increase in the attractiveness rating, there was a much larger jump in perceived competence, trustworthiness and other qualities you might like to have in a public servant

But there is something going on with these Republican women that goes beyond good looks. It's deft packaging.

In the same way a hardened commie-fighter like Richard Nixon was the one to open China, these women are a fascinating vessel for conservative thought.

Take perfect teeth, glossy hair, sparkling eyes, flawless make up and clicking heels. Now combine that with values much more likely associated with a sensibly-shoed audience gathered on the state-house lawn in their Uncle Sam hats and Tea-Party T-shirts. Anti stem cells, anti abortion, anti gay marriage, anti big-city smart asses suddenly have star power. It's a juxtaposition that flummoxes opponents -- like Barbra Streisand supporting assault-rifles.

As Ann Coulter memorably put it: "I am emboldened by my looks to say things Republican men wouldn't." As an '08 campaign button said of Palin, a former third-place finisher in the Miss Alaska pageant: "Hottest VP from the Coolest State."

It's a brilliant formula, although not perfect: Palin became a Tina Fey punch line ("I can see Russia from my house!") and O'Donnell had to assure voters "I am not a witch." But with Bachmann, Hailey and Noem, the handlers appear to be improving on the hot conservative mama prototype. Although there may still be some kinks: Noem voted to raise the debt ceiling.

It's geometrically brilliant because it can be so readily replicated. A little experience and the right positions combined with a pleasing package: It's enough to vault a woman from the backwaters of regional politics to the national stage.

The question is what happens when they get there.

 
 
 

Follow Dr. Peggy Drexler on Twitter: www.twitter.com/drpeggydrexler

 
 
  • Comments
  • 771
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (14 total)
photo
surfandshop
"What we think, we become."
01:54 PM on 08/16/2011
I want young women to remember what it was like before Roe vs Wade.(1971) My friend almostbled to death in her room,botched abortion by her family doctor.
If you wanted an abortion, you had to go before a panel of three judges and convince them that if they did not allow you an abortion, you would commit suicide or go to Mexico for one. It was a very scary thing have an unwanted pregnancy. Do not allow these basic women's rights to change. It is for our daughters and thei daughters. Keep aware! Vote Pro Choice!! Your life may depend on it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
haval2
what to say?
07:46 PM on 08/14/2011
Ignorance is never "hot."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wolverine 556
Moderate Boogeyman
01:00 PM on 09/21/2011
Millions of Republicans would disagree, which is why our country is in this mess with seemingly no way out. Anti-intellectualism is on the rise while the country declines, but Republicans blame trying to move into the 21st century for the problems. Their solution is to return to the 19th century.
04:22 PM on 08/14/2011
The "professional politicians" & good government types on both sides haven't exactly done a bang up job.
Why not get back to the "citizen legislature" the Founders envisioned?
Frankly, I find these woman's common sense attitudes about all the Washington nonsense rather refreshing. So what if they're not the most polished?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
randomelyawesome1969
05:27 PM on 08/14/2011
Frankly, I don't find being ignorant ("Paul Revere warned the British about Americans") and dishonest ("Obama admin only allowed 1 offshore drilling"), "refreshing".
06:29 PM on 08/14/2011
Actually, Sarah Palin was correct on Paul Revere history. Whether the drilling figure is correct (it may have been permitting) certainly this admin. is hostile to drilling, which is the main idea.
You're "randomlygroping" for a point, as if to be incorrect once publicly is to be forever unfit for public service. There isn't a public figure on earth that hasn't had a public gaffe occasionally. Obama's 57 U. States to Pelosi's "unemployment insurance creates jobs" there's plenty of cement headed leftist comments to pick on. Let's just all have a laugh then get back to the serious debate.
You can carp all you want about Michelle Bachman-------but William & Mary is an elite college & it doesn't give out Masters Degrees to dummies. That is a top shelf school with a top shelf degree program. Disagree all you like with MB---------but be prepared to defend your argument------she ain't dumb.
03:34 PM on 08/14/2011
The question is, "Am I shallow enough to cast my vote based on good looks?" If you answer yes, you will be voting Repub, in 2012. Tea Party women are hot!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharkcellar
SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL LIBRARY.
01:55 PM on 08/14/2011
Coulter: "I am emboldened by my looks to say things Republican men wouldn't."

Ann Coulter is as hot as deep space. I suppose some people find cadaverous blondes attractive, but usually we incarcerate those kinds of folks, or heavily medicate them.
03:35 PM on 08/14/2011
Your photo leads one to believe you would vote for anyone cadaverous. Just saying...
04:26 PM on 08/14/2011
No different than a black comedian making use of race humor, saying the same things that the NAACP would blow a fuse about if it came from Rush Limbaugh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
randomelyawesome1969
05:32 PM on 08/14/2011
You really don't understand social dynamics, do you?

When two women call each other "b!tch" in a bantering manner, yes, they are ok with it. But when a man call a woman that in a spiteful manner, no, that's not ok. Do you understand that? Ok, now, the same word doesn't have the same effect when it's used by a black comedian or Rush Limbaugh. Get it? Ok, now go drink some milk.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sharkcellar
SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL LIBRARY.
10:53 PM on 08/14/2011
Whatever.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:45 PM on 08/14/2011
The local Kroger's sells a lot of crappy baked-goods this way--they look like moist, sweet cakes but they're all looks without any substance. And the indgredient are processed-food chemicals from a bunch of corporations. Yuck.

But with the cakes, I don't mind if people buy 'em--it's their funeral. With political leadership of the country/free world, little bit of a different matter.
04:29 PM on 08/14/2011
The difference is Coulter & the Tea Party would like to limit the government. I have to live with the EPA regulating light bulbs, & public schools "educating" kids.
10:17 AM on 08/22/2011
The Tea Party will not be happy until the middle class and poor are living in roofless houses with dirt floors and a corner for a toilet. This to me is neither freedom nor progress. Furthermore, the bullying in public education is the activity of the fascist right deliberately installed there to ensure that the children of the poor and middle-poor see no social progress. This bullying extends into college where the Republicans have made sure that if any poor or middle class person is aided financially for school they will be enslaved by a lifetime of debt held by the private sector with no consumer loan protections whatsoever. The Right, in short has completely bastardized every attempt by the left to help people lift themselves up by their own bootstraps! Their fascism will without a doubt cast all people in America into slavery as surely as it has in third world countries where they have assassinated every third world leader who failed to agree to do their dirty work of keeping the third world enslaved to debt and to first world corporations.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shadow7
11:51 AM on 08/14/2011
The hidden agenda here is NOT that Bachmann, or Palin will appeal to men because of their 'hot' look- which is open to conjecture at any level. These candidates are mistakenly trying to appeal to women. Palin was selected to lure the HIllary supporters under the mistaken belief that the only quality she had was her gender.

Women voters are not stupid. While right wing women will support candidates who spout their socially extreme views, - they will not vote for someone who represents a step back into the Dark Ages for women who worked so hard to achieve equality in this country. Just substitute 'Bachmann' for 'Palin' in this article and understand that we've seen this movie before:
http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/editorial/reggies-commentary/3924-sarah-palin-lemming-hunter.html
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
03:49 PM on 08/14/2011
You make a good point in that they seem to be interchangeable, just like Barbie dolls.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shadow7
05:48 PM on 08/14/2011
Thanks. but these women are far more dangerous. Barbie is not an ideologue trying to pitch for the bible or corporate interests. At least, not so far...:-)
11:12 AM on 08/14/2011
Hot is not the word that comes immediatley to mind.
08:30 AM on 08/14/2011
And what is Fox News and it's collection of conservative "blondes" if not that?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheBodySacred
divine diva
07:39 AM on 08/14/2011
The GOP 'traditional female values' is a farce. These are the same people who teach that women should be submissive and not lead a man, stay home and raise children, and yet they have sent so far two female candidates for President/Vice President in these last two elections. It is only traditional female values when it suits them - hypocrites!
10:28 AM on 08/22/2011
These women are tools. Furthermore it is evident from the support they get that many women are too lazy to go to work and it is easier (or thought easier until they actually have to do it) to put on the show of the stay at home wife than to actually go out and work themselves through college, if not as a a matter of self-improvement and intellectual growth, at least as a matter of a step toward a career. But to think Palin, Coulter, Roper, Bachman are all women who somehow got through the higher educational system while remaining utterly uneducated, well, one can only speculate as to how that happened.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fwwest
71 year old grandmother
05:53 AM on 08/14/2011
Sighhhhhhhhhh, the fact that these women tell out right lies doesn't bother anyone? Where are the 23 children Michele Bachman raised and went home to fix supper for everynight? Where are the promised health records of Sarah Palin, the ones she promised to show in 2008? Neither one can get thier historical facts right. I can make a longer list but don't think I need to.
photo
effect
The Shadow knows...
04:49 PM on 08/14/2011
"...the fact that these women tell out right lies doesn't bother anyone?"

Well, yeah - but not the personal ones. It's the policy lies and !nsan!t!es they spout that send a chill down my spine.
Aesculus glabra
My micro-bio is empty
08:38 PM on 08/14/2011
I'm more troubled by Obama's lies.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
RainbowTeacher
Evolution is a thing.
09:14 PM on 08/14/2011
Because they are so hard to find? Because he doesn't spew them constantly like the right does? Do you have anything that can be proven a lie?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:42 AM on 08/14/2011
So, put simply, they deserve it because of how they dress?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
propitiousmoment
the journey is the destination....
12:00 AM on 08/12/2011
You know what? I'll say it. I can't stand that there are actually women who hold the political views that these women do. I don't despise them because they are women, I despise them because they are women who use every bit of their god-given power, wealth, and charm to destroy at every turn, for women, children, and men, their own fellow Americans, the chance to have the same opportunit­ies and advantages that they enjoy. They are traitorous to their gender, to children, and to human beings in general. They parrot talking points not because they have given it deep thought and considered every side of a difficult question, but because it brings them accolades from people who mindlessly hold the same positions to their own detriment, and because it brings them cash in the form of campaign contributi­ons and speaking fees. Do I hate them because they're women? No. I loathe them because of the *kind* of women that they are.
12:14 AM on 08/12/2011
You hate them because they are not fem-bot feminists. Talk about parroting, take a look in the mirror. Your entire comment is the basic liberal response to any question, stance, or belief that differs from yours. Trying having an original thought, not one put there by liberal indoctrination.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
propitiousmoment
the journey is the destination....
01:26 AM on 08/12/2011
Project much? You don't know where I come from, intellectually speaking, or what I used to think, or why I believe the way I do. It is possible to see how republican policies hurt women and children, right now, today. It is possible to see how republican policies foreclose opportunity for people with less control over resources, right now, today. Women who vote for and work to further such policies do actual harm to other women, and to children, and to the less-than-wealthy, right now, today. If you are for that, fine. But because I am against it does not make me a fem-bot, or unoriginal, or indoctrinated.
04:08 AM on 08/12/2011
I see you stopped off to see Frank Luntz long enough to pick up your talking points
and word of the day.

Try having an original thought, not one put there by conservative indoctrination, and
you'll find that you get more respect and people will find you more interesting.
04:18 AM on 08/12/2011
F/F Your comments are spot on. I find it absolutely stunning that there are so many women
of the far right who act with a callous disregard for the harm they are visiting on those they
should be defending most.

At the risk of sounding sexist, you just plain expect more from women.
02:21 PM on 08/11/2011
The question is what happens when they get there?

Easy.

Their handlers will continue to nurture them in the background.
photo
sodisenchanted
oh yea, well don't tread on me either!
01:29 PM on 08/11/2011
This is nothing new in women's advertising, only in political women's advertising. Women in advertising are always depicted in sexually submissive positions or at least sexually receptive positions, even when gripping a bottle. If, you occasionally see a woman in an advertisement in a position of power, such as standing over a reclining man, she will almost always have that faraway look in her eyes. It's a subtle indication that she is still not paying attention to what she's doing and is therefore vulnerable.

Bachmann is no proponent of women's rights and it stumps me why Gloria Steinem or NOW would want to defend her in any way. I'm not surprised that any magazine or advertising agency would fall back into an old habit they've been using successfully for nearly a century, though.
03:44 PM on 08/14/2011
Not so...you assume that you have a handle on what women's rights are.