More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter Bosshard

GET UPDATES FROM Peter Bosshard
 

How Dams Can Kick Up a Storm and Change Our Climate

Posted: 06/08/11 01:44 PM ET

Only 140 kilometers from our Berkeley office, the Folsom Dam towers 100 meter high over the American River. When it was built in the 1950s, the project was supposed to withstand the most severe flood in 250 years. Yet after it was completed, strong floods suddenly became more frequent and overtopped the dam at several instances. Until a safety upgrade goes forward, 440,000 people in the downstream area are exposed to the highest level of flood risk in the US. Scientists have now found evidence that the project's problem may be partly of its own making, and that dams can in fact kick up a storm.

We have known for a long time that dams can influence local rainfalls. Humidity evaporates from reservoirs and irrigated fields and gets recycled as rainfall. Dams and levees can reduce evaporation and rainfalls when they drain wetlands and open up woodlands for deforestation. The Niger Delta in West Africa is an example. In September, the delta's wetlands extend to 30,000 square kilometers -- roughly the size of Belgium -- and feed rainfalls over a much larger region. Yet existing and proposed dams on the Niger would reduce the river's flow by almost half. Christopher Taylor of the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology warns that this could "significantly reduce" the seasonal window when the delta induces rainfalls.

This spring, a devastating drought crippled large part of Central China. Local people maintain that droughts have become more frequent and severe since the massive Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze River was completed in 2003. If you look at the immediate impacts, this does not appear to the case. Chinese researchers found that after 2003 rainfalls decreased somewhat south of the reservoir, and increased significantly about 100 kilometers to the north.

Yet the Three Gorges Dam may have more significant indirect impacts. During the flood season, the Yangtze used to expand the size of the Dongting and Poyang lakes from about 4,000 to 24,000 square kilometers. By storing flood water for electricity generation, the Three Gorges Dam is now greatly diminishing the seasonal expansion of the two flood basins, which had already been dwindling due to land reclamation. During this year's drought, the majestic Dongting Lake -- the home of the famous Chinese dragon boat races -- turned into a sad mudflat with isolated pools of water.

The hydropower operators released extra water from the Three Gorges Dam in late May, claiming that they thus contributed to the drought relief. This is disingenuous: without the dam, much more water would have replenished the flood basins naturally. Research on wetlands and climate around the world suggests that chocking off the Yangtze's flood basins is likely to have significant negative impacts on rainfalls that cannot be compensated by evaporation from the Three Gorges reservoir.

Reservoirs don't only influence rainfall and droughts in their vicinity. They also contribute to climate change by emitting greenhouse gases. Rotting organic matter from the vegetation flooded when the reservoir is filled releases methane and carbon dioxide. The plankton and plants that live in the reservoir, the detritus washed down from the watershed, and the seasonal flooding of plants along the reservoir fringes ensure that emissions continue for the lifetime of a reservoir. Greenhouse gas emissions are particularly high from shallow tropical reservoirs. Philip Fearnside of the National Institute for Research on the Amazon calculated that three hydropower projects in Brazil emit greenhouse gases approximately twice as high as the emissions of modern coal-fired power plants with the same energy output.

Ivan Lima of Brazil's National Institute for Space Research estimated the total methane emissions from large dams at 104 million tons per year. This is around 4% of human-made climate change - equal to the contribution of the civil aviation industry. Just as flying is not a sustainable form of transport, hydropower can not be considered a renewable form of energy.

Three researchers from Tennessee Technological University and the University of Colorado have now made the latest contribution to the debate on dams and climate change. By overlaying a databank of large reservoirs with meteorological stations all around the world, they found that dam building has influenced the severity of storms. In Southern Africa and Southern Europe, dams "appeared to have increased extreme precipitation by as much as 20% during the last century." A smaller increase occurred in India and Central Asia.

In a separate study, a group of scientists around Faisal Hossain and Roger Pielke Sr. found "the possibility of storm intensification in impounded basins of the Mediterranean and arid climates of the United States." This region includes the Folsom Dam on the American River. Comments Hossain: "Now, our results give us a better idea of which dams are most likely to gradually change local climate and what that means for managing those reservoirs as time passes."

Climate change puts dam builders in a bind. Changing rainfall patterns make it difficult to assess future streamflows, while more frequent storms can make dams unsafe. The US government has approved $1 billion for a safety upgrade of the Folsom Dam. This is a price which many governments in poor countries cannot afford. They need to diversify their energy sectors and build decentralized projects which are more resilient to the vagaries of climate change than bulky large dams.

 

Follow Peter Bosshard on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PeterBosshard

Only 140 kilometers from our Berkeley office, the Folsom Dam towers 100 meter high over the American River. When it was built in the 1950s, the project was supposed to withstand the most severe flood ...
Only 140 kilometers from our Berkeley office, the Folsom Dam towers 100 meter high over the American River. When it was built in the 1950s, the project was supposed to withstand the most severe flood ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
02:05 AM on 06/10/2011
The planet is overpopulated by people by an order of magnitude or more.

Human population growth rates are the single biggest threat to the planet.

This is by far the biggest problem on the planet and it MUST be addressed first.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
11:15 AM on 06/09/2011
NEW TECHNOLOGY CAN HARNESS ELECTRICITY FROM RIVERS WITHOUT DAMS!

A little known breakthrough is past Proof of Concept and may soon be prototyped with potential early applications in the Hudson River and California.

Feel free to contact me for additional information.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
b525
06:31 AM on 06/09/2011
The building of hydro-power dams in Africa and other tropical countries has been shown to massively increase malaria and other deadly water born parasites by reducing, warming and stagnating downstream river water flows for hundreds of miles. This stagnant river water is perfect habitat for malarial mosquito larva and parasites.

There are at least three examples of this in Africa alone:

-the Akasombo Dam in Ghana created dramatic increases in malaria and water bourne parasites after building of the dam on the Volta River there in the 1960's. This dam flooded the land in Ghana with a 200+ mile long dam reservoir which can be seen from space. (called "Lake" Volta). Many ancient riverside villages and farms were permanently drowned under dam reservoir water.

Malaria and parasite rates are sky-high there even today, especially in children. Ghana is still one of the most impoverished nations on earth despite having one of the largest dams in Africa. (I believe the dam was built by the Alcoa company to smelt aluminum...one aluminum smelter can use as much electricity as a fairly large city).

-the Aswan Dam on the Nile River in southern Egypt caused similiar spikes in malaria and parasites.

-also the Manatali Dam in Senegal

After these dams are built downstream river fisheries are usually destroyed because most river fish cannot live and breed in warm/stagnant river water......even in the tropics.

I'm sure there are more examples of this phenomenon in the tropics.
FreeHat
Really?
07:03 PM on 06/08/2011
"Changing rainfall patterns make it difficult to assess future streamflows,"

When have rain patterns been predictable. Tie into c02 please. No peer reviewed papers? Well, then don't make the assertion.
01:22 PM on 06/08/2011
"Just as flying is not a sustainable form of transport, hydropower can not be considered a renewable form of energy."

These are the kind of unqualified statements that destroy any value from the argument made. Hydropower IS renewable, regardless of methane emissions or other problems depending on where the dam is made and how large it is.

If there are valid arguments to avoid hydropower megaprojects, it is disingenuous to think that all dams should be dismantled. All forms of energy production have environmental downsides including wind and solar, the trick is to understand the problems and minimize them, but absolute statements don't help the cause, and promote the idea that environmentalism is by definition extreme.
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
01:54 PM on 06/08/2011
Well said. There are no 'environmentally benign' energy sources (although solar comes close). It's important to understand the risks and plan appropriately. The idea that we can construct an energy infrastructure based on price of energy, and price alone, given the many economic and environmental variables that should enter into that equation, is ridiculous. And, yet, that is what we have done. Hence, we select coal, oil, and natural gas, and to H8ll with the consequences. Bad idea.

I plan to be flying, on biofuel, far into the future.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Peter Bosshard
02:10 PM on 06/08/2011
As you say, all forms of energy generation have downsides, and if planned and built diligently, hydropower projects can be an acceptable source of energy. This doesn't make them renewable though. Greenhouse gas emissions are not the only irreversible impact of dams. As the World Commission on Dams, the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and the Global Biodiversity Outlook have documented, dams have massive impacts on freshwater ecosystems. Not least due to river fragmentation, freshwater is affected by a much higher loss of species than terrestrial and marine ecosystems. GHG emissions from hydropower are often much lower than from fossil fuels, but I don't see how projects that irreversibly deplete our biodiversity can be considered renewable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cempiremtn
05:49 PM on 06/08/2011
"Irreversibly deplete "OUR" biodiversity"...What an egotistical statement.
First of all, it the "EARTH'S" biodiversity, NOT mans. Man is nothing but a minor player in the scheme of things. "We", think we have so much power to change our environment, yet one small increase or decrease in the sun's output and we are done, period! The sun IS the cause of "Global Warming", and Mars warming, etc. Man has only been on Earth a short time and we have only had time to see minor changes. Mother nature created one of the biggest dams of all time, when it dammed the Grand Canyon, we better file a lawsuit so THAT will not happen again.
You name all these scientists, with their possible results of mans doing, yet I would bet they ALL have income derived by keeping MCGW in the news...Follow The Money...Al Gore,GE,Obama, Just don't STEAL mine, I work too hard for it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
09:09 PM on 06/08/2011
Very well stated. Our quest for power has many negative impacts, it is good that you have pointed out the dangers of hydroelectric power.