Peter Clothier

Peter Clothier

Posted: July 8, 2009 04:59 PM

Obama: Is it Time to Give Up? (Part III of a Series)

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

This is the sad--and sadly serious--question I'm asking myself today. Is it time to give up on a political system that is now so irremediably broken that it has become impervious to our needs and irrelevant to our lives? Do we just leave those we elected as our representatives to get on with their incessant partisan blather while we get on with our lives? Is it time, as Voltaire suggested at the end of "Candide," to "cultivate one's garden"? Many friends have taken this path ahead of me, good-hearted and intelligent people who are no less concerned than I about the quality of our lives and our common future. I have understood and respected their choice without, myself, wanting to make the same.

I'm not sure what, right now, may have triggered this question. Perhaps it was watching Future By Design, the film about Jacque Fresco, who advocates a (quietly) revolutionary approach. He sees no beneficial outcome for the human species in adhering to outworn habits of thought and action; as he sees it, the old model of corporate, economic and political power is serving to get us only deeper into the mire we have already created. What's needed now, he says, is a whole new model, a whole new way of thinking about ourselves, the way we live with each other, the way we make decisions...

I have been clinging on to the notion of hope. I think I will still cling to it, when all's said and done, for at least a while longer--perhaps for long enough to see what happens with the health care legislation this year. But I have watched with increasing dismay as "the system" manages to re-establish itself after the ripple of the Obama election, which I had seen as a greater disturbance than it seems, from our current perspective, to have been. It has not taken long to return to the depressing, circular cliche of "politics as usual." I have watched a mind I still consider to be superior and visionary constrained by political and social contingencies that stubbornly reject the possibility of change--out of fear, our of habit, out of ideologies long since proven to be barren. I have watched the ranks of the nay-sayers grow serried on both left and right. I have watched the failure of a social system born out of a belief in the rights of the individual, as the individual grows more strident in demands whilst the larger needs of society are buried in the resultant discord. I have watched as once-great states--most notably our own, California--become ungovernable and jettison even the safety net that protected the children of the poor. I continue to watch as the world goes mad with greed and commerce and the obsession with "growth," on the one hand; and with need, hunger, war and pestilence on the other. I watch as the world's population continues to grow beyond our ability to cater to the needs of all, or even most of its inhabitants. And I watch as those in power stand idly by and bicker over trivialities as the planet speeds on toward its possible destruction.

So is it time to give up? Not on humankind, for God's sake, no. But on the system we have created in order to govern ourselves and serve our common interests and our common goals? Last summer I visited a friend in Oregon and was disappointed in his lukewarm reaction to Obama. He had already given up on the old, and was embarked on the search for something new. Perhaps out of despair, but not despairingly. His wisdom was/is to see stalemate for what it is, and to test the potential for salvation in small groups gathering together to cultivate individual integrity and responsibility, and to take action in the world in the context of a communal good. He was, as I see it, beginning to "cultivate his garden." He calls it creating sacred lifeboats.

I have been telling myself that I'm not that far along that I need to jump overboard. I have been persisting in the hope that things can change within this broken system; that this Barack Obama can change hearts and minds, as a preliminary to making those significant changes in health care, the economy, the environment, world peace... the changes that we sorely need. Call me quixotic, naive, gullible, but I want to hold on to that hope a while longer yet. Which is why I have been posting these Obama pieces in the past couple of weeks, in the attempt to get my own head straight--and convey something of my personal struggle with others who may share my views.

The fact that I have received so much response in bringing up these matters suggests that there are many who share my doubts as well as my by now somewhat desperate hope. I'm particularly saddened that there are those who have read my words as a dismissal of the importance or urgency of gay rights. I understand, I think, where they're coming from, but that was far from my objective. It's one, only, of many points on which I personally disagree with the President without dismissing him, and without using my disagreement to withdraw my support or undermine his efforts. As he has often said, it's not about him; it's about us. He needs me, as he needs all of us who seek to bring about serious change in America. I was talking with a gay friend at the gym today, who said this: "I need to believe in that man." We agreed that Obama is having to walk a crooked path, not the straight (no pun intended) line that those who hew to a straight (ditto) ideological path would have him do. For now, I'm choosing to believe that he's playing a canny game to reach goals that we share. And unlike Rush Limbaugh, I do want him to succeed.

So my answer still is No, it's not yet time to give up. It's a time to be pragmatic rather than ideological. Time to push forward, against the deadwood opposition. Time not to let personal needs and anger get in the way of a last chance to return to sanity. It's no sacrifice of principle to recognize that uncompromising adherence to principle can sometimes serve only to achieve the opposite of its goal. As Shakespeare cautioned us in one of my most frequently used quotations, it's sometimes necessary to follow the crooked path in order to find our way: "by indirection," Hamlet said, we "find directions out."

That said, and while I understand the caution of his approach, I would wish that our President could see his way to be more bold in word and action, and take more risks than he has been willing to do thus far. So far as I can tell, the worst is already happening. We have nothing left to lose.

 
Comments
6
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
- Richrdh I'm a Fan of Richrdh 5 fans permalink

I can't give up because there is no real alternative unless you feel that another Bush or Palin in the White House is okay. It seemed like when Obama was elected that the country had been rescued from an occupying army. I agree that I have given up one day, then I hear Obama and I am right back in the fight. I have written and called more Congressman this year than I have in my entire life. It is people like Boxer (CA), Bernie Sanders (VT) that give me some hope that the world will get right again. The climate legislation was a surprise, thanks to Waxman another solid real leader. Will it survive the Senate, no! They are so paid off by lobby groups that you can not tell the difference between the two groups. The idiot senator from Missouri said it was "too bold." Now isn't that a sad thing to say about legislation. I can't give up, but I admit it is a battle that could use a few nuclear weapons along the way.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:19 PM on 07/08/2009
photo

watch out, mister - all you are doing is giving the naysayers the opportunity to say "I told you so" and fight even harder for the status quo.

now, more than ever, is the time to get behind President Obama and make our views known. call, write, PROD our representatives - Democratic AND Republican - into working FOR us, instead of special interests lobbying for OUR time and money.

or did you actually believe that Barack Obama was going to effect all this change **by himself**? seems to me he stated PLENTY of times that it's US who need to get to work - not to get him elected, but to HELP HIM get those things changed that WE need.

sitting down and whining didn't do anything. even Sarah Palin will learn that soon - do you really want to be put into HER mold?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 06:06 PM on 07/08/2009

Time to give up? We've just fricken started! Obama has been in office for 6 months and already people are willing to give up on the promise? And you are willing to consider it, but ok you'll give him another chance. 6 months in the midst of a Great Recession, international revolutions, and republicans looking like they are working for SNL. Really? Maybe the reason the system is so broken, is that everytime someone tries to rally and fix the problem, suddenly all the people who want the change have dissapeared saying oh it'll never happen so why bother. 6 months really? 6 months and all the problems haven't been solve, must be impossible. I swear I don't know how anything ever got accomplished ever.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:31 PM on 07/08/2009
- lgillooly I'm a Fan of lgillooly 65 fans permalink
photo

I agree. I still have hope, but watching the Corporate interests win each battle is disheartening. Banks, Health insurance companies, Big oil, Corporate media and the Military Industrial Complex have become the real constituents. I am not sure how we get back to a Government for,of and by the people.
The voices of hate,backed by these special inteerst groups, have damaged the Country tremendously. When a company like Clear Channel pays Rush 50 million/yr and has to lay off 3,000 people, there is something wrong. Obviously, his message is important to those who want the status quo, even when 3,000 people/families lose their jobs......

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:26 PM on 07/08/2009
- doctarr I'm a Fan of doctarr 2 fans permalink



What does this have to do with Michael Jackson?

Geesh.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:18 PM on 07/08/2009

President Obama is still the man he was 8 months ago 15 months ago. What exactly is bold? I think bold would describe the previous administration. President Bush was bold and the sad thing is that he had bipartisan support. He is not the one who is failing us. It is the Democratic Congress that has failed me. The Republican party's lack of introducing alternative solutions united what was left in the party. No vote for anything Obama. Unfortunately the Democrats in Congress who were united for change last fall will be responsible for not delivering on their promises. What are his options?

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 05:07 PM on 07/08/2009
Comments are closed for this entry

 You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 

Connect