iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter Diamandis

Peter Diamandis

Posted: December 7, 2009 08:15 PM

Today Virgin Galactic and Scaled Composites rolled out SpaceShipTwo (SS2) a commercial passenger carrying spaceship derived from the winning ship which captured the $10M Ansari X PRIZE (www.xprize.org) for spaceflight in 2004.  While SpaceShipOne (SS1) carried only one pilot and two passengers, the much larger SS2 will be flown by two pilots with seats for six paying passengers.

Five years ago, 20,000 people gathered at the Mojave Air & Space Port to watch as Burt Rutan and his team at Scaled Composites, backed by Paul Allen, accomplished what many considered impossible - building and flying a privately funded, privately piloted spaceship, twice, to altitudes above 100 kilometers.  On that fateful day, October 4th, when the ship successfully flew its second flight into space, it carried on it the Virgin Logo and a pledge from Richard Branson to fund a commercial version to carry the paying public into space.  Well, here we are. The commercial version is now built and will soon start test flights.  While the project is a few years behind schedule, it has made incredible strides.  Branson and Will Whitehorn (the CEO of Virgin Galactic (www.virgingalactic.com)) have committed hundreds of millions of dollars to get it to this point and everyone is the space community is very thankful.

Equally of note to the hardware rollout, is the confirmation of the marketplace.  Tens of thousands of people have gone online to register for a future seat, and some 250 of them have put down the full $200,000 deposit to be amongst the first to fly.

A new era of private spaceflight is unfolding in a very similar fashion to the early days of aviation.  In the decades following the Wright Brothers, "tourism flights" were the primary mechanism by which those early aeronauts earned their living. Barn-storming, as it was called, offered an individual the opportunity to pay a handsome sum (typically a month's wages) to fly to the death-defying altitude of 5,000 feet from which he/she could view their town from the air.  Soon, barnstorming gave way to real aviation businesses such as airmail and passenger point-to-point carriage.  

In the same fashion, a number of commercial providers, in addition to Virgin Galactic, will offer space tourism flights in the years ahead.  These flights will then be followed by flights carrying scientific experiments and flights conducting astronaut training.

So who else is building vehicles and selling seats?  First it should be noted that Space Adventures (www.spaceadventures.com) has been carrying privately paying passengers to orbit, to the International Space Station, for the past 9 years using the Russian Soyuz (Disclosure: I am a co-Founder and Managing Director of Space Adventures).  Space Adventures has also sold over 100 seats for future suborbital flights at a ticket price of $98,000.  In addition to Virgin Galactic and Space Adventures, three other companies fit prominently in this era of private spaceflight.  John Carmack, CEO of Armadillo Aerospace (www.armadilloaerospace.com) and creator of the video games 'Quake' & 'Doom' is developing a passenger carrying suborbital vertical take-off/landing ship.  His vehicle is a derivative of the ship which was one of the two winners in the Northrop Grumman Lunar Lander X PRIZE Challenge (Masten Space was the other winner).  In addition, Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon.com has started a space exploration company called Blue Origin which has been cloaked in secrecy for the past 5 years.  "Blue" as it's called, is focusing on a variety of human carrying designs, the first of which is a vertical take-off, vertical landing sub-orbital ship.  Blue is also rumored to be working on orbital flight as well.  The third prominent player is SpaceX (www.spacex.com), founded by PayPal Founder, Elon Musk.  SpaceX is developing orbital passenger carrying capability using the Dragon Capsule, which will fly about the Falcon-9 booster to orbit carrying future Astronauts to the International Space Station for NASA.  The first test flight of Dragon/Falcon-9 is scheduled for February 2010.

How cheap could a seat get?  First we need to distinguish between sub-orbital and orbital flights.  Getting to orbit (i.e. going completely around planet Earth in a 90-minute orbit) is approximately 50-times harder than just going up into space and back down to the Earth on a suborbital flight.  Today, Virgin Galactic (a suborbital provider) is selling seats at $200,000.  Neither Armadillo or Blue Origin have announced seat prices. But theoretically, in my opinion, we could likely see the price per seat for sub-orbital flights drop rapidly over the next decade to under $50,000 per person.   In the orbital world, today, Space Adventures offers a seat to orbit aboard the Russian Soyuz for about $45M+.  The first orbital passenger, Dennis Tito, spent $20M and the latest Space Adventures customer, Guy Laliberte, paid in excess of $40M.  If all goes well, in the decades ahead, I hope we'll see the price return to $20M and eventually to a price under $5M per person.

I'd like to also point out how magical it is that SS1 and SS2 are being designed and built by a small group of designers enabled by incredible technology.  While it once took the wealth and resources of a nation to fly into space, it is now possible for a smart and dedicated team to build such technology.  In the case of SpaceShipTwo, special recognition to Burt Rutan, Scaled CEO, Doug Shane, Scaled designers, Jim Tighe, Bob Morgan, Matt Stinemetze, and Marc Zeitlin and Scaled Flight Test Operations Chief, Pete Siebold.

Ultimately, it's easy to dream and talk about spaceflight, but it comes down to those who put up their wealth, reputations and time.  It is for this reason that today I praise Richard Branson, Will Whitehorn, Burt Rutan, Paul Allen and the Ansari Family for their role in SpaceShipOne and SpaceShipTwo.  We all share a mutual desire and vision to enable the day when tens of thousands of people will be traveling beyond the Earth on a regular basis. 

So, congratulations to the Virgin and Scaled teams for today's success.  I wish you the best of luck in the months ahead as SpaceShipTwo enters into its test flight, and look forward to its first commercial flight in the near future.  

 
 
 

Follow Peter Diamandis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PeterDiamandis

 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:29 PM on 12/08/2009
And by "the rest of us" I assume you mean rich businessmen who think 50 grand is nothing?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:52 PM on 12/08/2009
Where can I buy flight insurance?
12:39 PM on 12/08/2009
I suspect, had one put a solid fuel (or hybrid solid) rocket uo the "butt" of the Concorde, it too would have flown at Mach 5 and gone 60 miles up.

As for "weightlessness", the "Vomit Comet" has been around for decades.

Not the SpaceShip 1, SpaceShip 2, nor Rutan's "round the world on a tank of gas" airplane have actually advanced aerospace technology.
12:24 PM on 12/08/2009
Dear Mr. Diamandis,

Great title for this article. I love the fact that you say "Commercial Spaceflight for the Rest of Us," because that's just it. It seems in the forseeable future, with the economy downturn and such, that indeed Commercial Spaceflight is really just for the rest of you Presidents/CEOs of the corporate world. Though I do agree this is a great achievement, this is FAR from "Commercial Spaceflight for the Rest of" the non-rich citizens of the world. I'm not sure that you know that most people in the world make less than 50,000 a year.

Enjoy your elitist flight.
Me.
01:12 PM on 12/08/2009
Great point. I'm not sure who "the rest of us" represents, but I know it doesn't represent me. With a current price tag of $200K for a sub-orbital flight and an estimated future price tag of around $50K, "the rest of us" would appear to represent a fairly small number.
11:59 AM on 12/08/2009
NASA does science and military applications. Branson is commercializing space flights. That means that his work enters the commodification system of capitalism with all the sensational publicity and spectacle that implies. Big commercial, entertainment and political interests will pay to use his platform for mass markets. See my post at adobeairstream for some notions of the future: http://www.adobeairstream.com/component/zine/article/255-space-cowboys-saddle-up-for-the-ss2.html
11:09 AM on 12/08/2009
where the hell are we going, and how did we get in this hand basket?
(this is a true criminal waste of resources)
12:44 PM on 12/08/2009
Funny you should point this out. I was complaining the other day, to various European monarchs, the utter uselessness of putting sails on perfectly satisfactory rowboats. I mean....crossing an ocean? What possible good is that? Ya think an unknown land mass (unknown to us Europeans) might exist and be valuable? Utter bosh.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:47 PM on 12/08/2009
You're seeing land masses out there somewhere?
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
08:28 AM on 12/08/2009
Reminds me of the Concorde.

An impressive piece of technology, but I don't see that many people willing to pay the price to fly it.

$200,000 is a ton of money for a 5-minute joy ride.
05:34 PM on 12/08/2009
Tiger could have paid that much--for a 5-minute joy ride that had nothing to do with space flight ;>).
07:57 AM on 12/08/2009
One of the interesting thing about the modern sub-orbital vehicle designs is that they mark a return to the type of aerospace development we were doing from the late '40s into the early '60s, before the race to the moon. The X-craft series--famous for being the first aircraft to break the sound barrier--were well on the way to giving us a different (and perhaps better) way of getting into space. While landing on the moon would have taken longer, we could have had a much more highly-developed orbital infrastructure in the process. Alas, much of that development ended with the shifting of resources at the start of the Mercury program.

Although many may not yet see how short sub-orbital flights for space tourists are practical, keep in mind these are only the first generations of such craft. Even prior to achieving true orbital capabilities, vehicles like these will soon offer practical potentials. Anyone who has spent most of a day flying to Australia would appreciate making the trip in just a few hours, following a higher/longer ballistic path than SpaceShipTwo is able to offer.

Like DVDs and flat-screen TVs, this is a technology that only the wealthy will enjoy... at first.
11:49 PM on 12/07/2009
The real significance of SpaceShipTwo is, not the innovation of passenger-carrying spaceflight, but the fact that one has finally devised an spacecraft which can be launched conventionally from your average everyday runway, break into orbit, and then return home, a far cry from the primitive, costly, and much more dangerous methods NASA utilizes to get astronauts into orbit.

Clearly, this should be considered a major embarrassment to America's space administration, having been upstaged by private entrepreneurs who actually have managed to think outside of the box.
01:52 AM on 12/08/2009
Not orbit

",and it will be an entirely new vehicle capable of carrying up to 6 passenger astronauts and up to 2 pilot astronauts into space on a sub-orbital flight."

Mach 5? you need mach 20 for orbit.
07:07 AM on 12/08/2009
Exactly. This is nowhere near orbital, and not any embarrassment (or worry) to NASA whatsoever. I hope that jhamm1 does learn more about the extreme differences between sub-orbital and true orbital flights. The SpaceShipTwo is physically incapable of entering orbit and was never designed to be able to do so either; it does exactly what was intended - launch onto a 'ballistic trajectory' off an already-flying 'plane', enter by-definition 'Space' and return to Earth safely (by a controlled fall) and landing , then doing it again reasonably soon after with minimal and/or minor refurbishings/refuelings as needed. Mission accomplished (almost!)...

I find it very encouraging that things are still moving forward for sub-orbitals, and hope that no (or at least very few) further tragedies occur in this very, very dangerous business.

Good luck folks!