A hundred years ago, any soapbox orator who called for women's suffrage, laws protecting the environment, an end to lynching, workers' right to form unions, a progressive income tax, a federal minimum wage, old-age insurance, the eight-hour workday and government-subsidized healthcare would be considered an impractical utopian dreamer or a dangerous socialist. Now we take these ideas for granted. The radical ideas of one generation are often the common sense of the next. When that happens, give credit to the activists and movements that fought to take those ideas from the margins to the mainstream. We all stand on the shoulders of earlier generations of radicals and reformers who challenged the status quo of their day.
Unfortunately, most Americans know little of this progressive history. It isn't taught in most high schools. You can't find it on the major television networks or even on the History Channel. Indeed, our history is under siege. In popular media, the most persistent interpreter of America's radical past is Glenn Beck, who teaches viewers a wildly inaccurate history of unions, civil rights and the American left. Beck argues, for example, that the civil rights movement "has been perverted and distorted" by people claiming that Martin Luther King Jr. supported "redistribution of wealth." In fact, King did call for a "radical redistribution of economic power." Using his famous chalkboard, Beck draws connections between various people and organizations, and defines them as radicals, Marxists, socialists, revolutionaries, leftists, progressives or social justice activists--all of which leads inexorably to Barack Obama. Drawing on writings by conspiracy theorists and white supremacists, Beck presents a misleading version of America's radical family tree.
Many historians, including Howard Zinn in his classic A People's History of the United States and Eric Foner in The Story of American Freedom, have chronicled the story of America's utopians, radicals and reformers. Every generation needs to retell this story, reinterpret it and use it to help shape the present and future. Unless Americans know this history, they'll have little understanding of how far we've come, how we got here and how progress was made by a combination of grassroots movements and reformers.
That's why, for this week's issue of The Nation Magazine, I have compiled my list of The 50 Most Influential Progressives of the 20th Century. The list appears in three parts (as slideshows) and will be followed by your suggestions, both for progressives we should have included, and nominations for the leading progressives of this century. The full article, with all 50 people, will be available on Monday. The magazine will be on newstands next week.
The list includes fifty people -- listed chronologically in terms of their early important accomplishments -- who helped change America in a more progressive direction during the twentieth century by organizing movements, pushing for radical reforms and popularizing progressive ideas. They are not equally famous, but they are all leaders who spurred others to action. Most were not single-issue activists but were involved in broad crusades for economic and social justice, revealing the many connections among different movements across generations. Most were organizers and activists, but the list includes academics, lawyers and Supreme Court justices, artists and musicians who also played important roles in key movements. The list includes people who spent most of their lives as activists for change -- long-distance runners, not sprinters.
The list includes people who spent most of their lives as activists for change--long-distance runners, not sprinters. Many of them were born in the nineteenth century but gained prominence in the twentieth. Some important activists who lived into the twentieth century but whose major achievements occurred in the previous century--such as labor organizer Mary Harris "Mother" Jones; environmentalist John Muir; African-American journalist, feminist and anti-lynching crusader Ida B. Wells; agrarian Populist leader Mary Lease; and Knights of Labor leader Terence Powderly--are not included.
Although many politicians were important allies of progressive movements--including Senator (and Governor) Robert La Follette; Senators Robert Wagner, Paul Douglas and Paul Wellstone; Congress members Victor Berger, Jeannette Rankin, Vito Marcantonio, Bella Abzug and Phil Burton; Mayors Tom Johnson, Fiorello LaGuardia and Harold Washington; as well as Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and (for his domestic social programs) Lyndon Johnson--the list excludes elected officials.
At a moment when Glenn Beck and the right have hijacked progressivism as dangerous, it is more important than ever that we engage in a real discussion about the accomplishments of true progressives. I encourage you to read; discuss; let us know who you would include, and most importantly share the feature.
I'll give you the first five here: Eugene Debs; Jane Addams; Louis Brandeis; Florence Kelley; John Dewey.
For the rest, please click over to the first of our 50 Most Influential Progressives of the 20th Century slideshows.
Jim Wallis: It Takes a Movement: The Next Steps
Jim Wallis: It Takes a Movement: Why a 'Movement' Is Necessary -- Part 3
We have successfully done that before under Eisenhower, and we don't have to deport all of the illegals, but can simply make it impossible to have a job here. The Eiesenhower deportations removed millions more by that pressure. It also raised wages by a large amount in the areas where there were large numbers of illegals.
Or the gold snatching tyranny of FDR.
Or the "gunboat diplomacy" of Teddy Roosevelt.
Progressivism is scourge on humanity and an affront to individual liberty and justice.
It wasn't that long ago that there were NO government safety nets for Americans (Social Security, Medicare, WIC, Food Stamps). There were no consumer protections (FDA, building inspectors, product safety). There were no workplace laws (child labor laws, minimun wage, weekends, OSHA, family leave). There were no environmental protections (EPA, NOAA). I could go on, but you get it.
We take these things for granted. We should take them for granted because they are the hallmarks of a civil, advanced society. But on the other hand, we must never take them ofr granted becasue right now, they are endangered by the Right.
While we need to ensure that these progressive programs are remain embedded, we should also also note that the values of Progressivism are actually part of our evolving mentality. Human beings must constantly move forward or we risk oblivion.
Sadly, the right does not believe in good government nor good governance. They have always opposed every initiative supporting social cohesion.
http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/zinn_howard.htm
The term progressive has long been another word for socialist Socialism has long been an excuse for some to take power. How do you think tyrants get power? It isn't by saying that they are going to kill millions of Jews or that they are going to purge millions of their own citizens. Even if those in government today don't have those kind of designs when you give that much power to central government all it takes is someone with those types of ambitions to take the reigns.
The "rich" want tax cuts? Most people define rich as having a great deal of wealth, not having a high income. Certainly a high income could help you become rich. Those that make over $250,000 employ alot of people. Raising their taxes in this economy could cause some additional lay offs. If you want to raise their taxes at some point that is something else, but to do it now would likely cost jobs of people who are not rich.
2) Mao
3) Pol Pot
Faced with the ever-rising living standards in the more capitalist countries, from the United States to West Germany to Asia, and with the ever-increasing misery and even death in the more socialist countries, from Soviet Russia to East Germany to North Korea, the Left had a choice. Either reevaluate the path to progress and become a champion of capitalism, or continue attacking capitalism knowing full well that it is the only means to prosperity.
The Left chose the latter.
In the long run, socialism has always proven to be a formula for tyranny and misery.”
For the same reason the EU will fail, the US will fail. If liberals embraced the Constitution we could be more like Europe, with states rights.