iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter H. Gleick

Peter H. Gleick

Posted: August 23, 2010 07:55 PM

First it was Central Florida University, which built a 45,000-seat football stadium with no (that's right, zero) water fountains. And at their very first game in September 2007, 18 people went to the hospital and another 60 were treated at the stadium for heat-related problems. I describe this remarkable story in Bottled and Sold: The Story Behind Our Obsession with Bottled Water.

Then, the sports arena that hosts the Cleveland Cavaliers removed its drinking water fountains. The only way for thirsty fans to get water was to wait in line at the concessions counters for a free small cup or pay $4 for bottled water or try to drink water from the bathroom faucets.

Now the 100,000-seat Michigan Stadium, at the University of Michigan (the "Big House"), has just reopened after renovation and they've announced that no one can bring water into the stadium. Instead, fans must buy $4 bottled water at the 40 concession stands, find one of four "hydration tents" (whatever those are), wait in line for a free cup, or try to find one of only 28 water fountains (one per 4,000 fans). I've looked at the stadium website and the official stadium map: the concession stands are listed, but not the location of the water fountains. And in what seems more like a bad joke than an actual benefit, the University has announced a promotion for the Wolverines' home opener on September 4th: the first 25,000 fans through the turnstiles will receive a commemorative plastic bottle of commercial water. Oh boy.

It is time to stand up and demand that our public places and spaces have clean, working, water fountains. It used to be that no city in ancient Greece and Rome could call itself civilized unless public fountains were available for everyone. Even today, when our tap water is remarkably safe and inexpensive, we need water in our public areas.

Water fountains are perfectly safe. There are no public health recommendations to close water fountains, nor (so far as I can tell) any scientific papers with evidence of the transmission of disease from drinking water fountains. Might it happen? Sure. Though as I've said before, that sneezing, coughing guy in the arena seat next to me is likely to be a far bigger health threat. And the quality of bottled water is less well monitored and regulated than our tap water.

2010-08-23-Michiganbwjpeg.jpg

And as for the University of Michigan? I recommend that they drop the plan to give away commercial bottled water and offer a first-day promotion of a free, refillable/reusable, water container with the Wolverine's logo, along with a map to every water fountain in the stadium, and indeed, on campus.

Peter Gleick
Pacific Institute

 
 
 

Follow Peter H. Gleick on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PeterGleick

 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:09 PM on 08/25/2010
it was mandatory in taiwan (where I grew up) for every kid to carry our own sports bottle to school everyday. And when I was living in Europe, I saw that many of my japanese friends still carrying a small sports bottle everywhere they go so they can refill when they see a waterfountain or at a cafe, and none of them ever got sick.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sabelmouse
i love to tumble , ask me why .
06:23 AM on 08/25/2010
wow. it's like something out of a distopian scifi novel.
05:58 PM on 08/24/2010
The oil companies bought the tramlines and shut them down. We got in our cars and made them rich.

Apart from oxygen, water is our common necessity. It is now a commodity like oil. So pay up.
05:23 PM on 08/24/2010
Don't forget the recent launch by University of Texas of their own "Texas Water"...so that you can gulp your water from a replica of the UT Tower.

We've been so entranced with the mystique of bottled water these past 25 years that we've made it the "new normal" when that normal used to be drinking from a public fountain. Now it's an uphill battle as we've allowed our public fountains to degrade. The U.S. should take hard look at the success of the Manly Water Council Project in Australia that is combating bottled water by creating "designer" fountains that are clean, sleek, and well maintained. Read the report here: http://www.bottledwateralliance.com/Manly-Council-Brochure.pdf

Bottle water is selling lifestyle. If sustainability (i.e., public fountains) cannot win on conscious, it might want to fight fire with fire.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
phoenixdoglover
My dog loves my progressive treats agenda
04:48 PM on 08/24/2010
Peter,

The bottled water industry has done a great job marketing their products, and many leaders of public water utilities wish they could do the same; but public agencies don't charge $5 a gallon (!), so their marketing efforts consist of little inserts with your water bills.

I agree with you wholeheartedly that public water fountains should be preserved or restored.
05:26 PM on 08/24/2010
My utility sells each million gallons of water for under a thousand dollars to bottlers that then sell it for $5 a gallon. Purchase natural resource for $900 for $5 million of retail value. Talk about fleecing taxpayers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Lauria
02:45 PM on 08/24/2010
This is Tom Lauria from the International Bottled Water Association. It is incorrect to state that bottled water is not as regulated as tap water. Federal law requires them to be equal. As you know, FDA inspections apply to all packaged foods and beverages. FDA prioritizes its inspections based upon risk, and bottled water has been determined to be a low risk product from a food safety standpoint. In fact, according to a 2009 Government Accounting Office (GAO) report (p. 45, state Health Department survey), there has not been a single reported illness from bottled water in the past five years. In contrast, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has estimated there are between 4.2 million and 16.4 million acute gastrointestinal illnesses each year caused by tap water consumption:

“National Estimate of Waterborne Disease associated with Public Drinking Water” http://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/statistics/surveillance/national_estimate_waterborne_disease.html

Thus, there is a factual basis for a differential in the frequency of governmental oversight. It is also worth noting the important role that states play in augmenting FDA’s inspectional presence.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:06 PM on 08/26/2010
Hey Tom, I have a question.

Bottled water sits in warehouses, then on market shelves for weeks before purchase. And you say that that's perfectly safe. So, what's the basis of the campaign for us not to re-use these bottles by filling them with also perfectly safe filtered water from the frig or even plain tap water, if all the minimum safety specs are the same?

Wouldn't re-using those bottles save us consumers a lot of money, as well as cut down on the amount of plastic waste floating around in our oceans, not to mention the fossil-fueled, energy cost of producing and shipping those bottles?

So, what's the skinny here, advertising man?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Lauria
02:53 PM on 08/26/2010
If you want to fill your own bottles, please use your own container. Our super-thin, light-weight PET plastic bottles are intended only to be recycled, not refilled. The thin plastic walls -- so thin the bottle itself can expand and contract while drinking from it -- can develop tiny cracks and wear marks with use. That wear compromises the extra-thin plastic bottle's ability to be used again, and prevents it from being properly santized for re-use. Extremely thin-skinned bottles -- reduced in weight by 32% in past 8 years -- are the equivalent of taking one out of three bottles out of the waste stream, since waste is measured by weight. But light-weighting, as it is called, also makes them unable to be used more than once. As you put it, the "mimimum safety specs." shift after a single use. No worries! With recycling, that bottle will be made into another bottle or something else. As long as you mention fossil fuels, do you know plastic is derived from oil by-products leftover after gasoline production? The sludge left behind after making gasoline is literally recycled into plastics, including PET plastic. Consumers enjoy safe, healthy, convenient bottled water for many reasons, but it is illogical to lament that bottled water is shipped when, in fact, every single packaged good in America is shipped at some point or other in the distribution cycle.
09:47 PM on 08/23/2010
Fund it from taxes on the profits of anyone selling water.
Business shouldn't take profit from water, period.

And, if we're running out of drinking water in so many years... why do we still allow these sugar crap soda's and alcopops on the market? Can I get some priorities up in this ** ?
09:53 PM on 08/23/2010
Not a bad idea, but eventually we'd all be mandated to buy some bottled water so that there would be enough water taxes to pay for water fountains for people who can't afford bottled water but still need a drink.
09:15 PM on 08/23/2010
Please write a story on the bacteria in drinking fountains. Until they are routinely cleaned and sanititized, people won't use them.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hJ3aQX1MXwE

Google bacteria in drinking fountains and you will see a variety of reputable stories on the contamination problem, including e. coli and fecal bacteria.

Until we demand they are cleaned and sanitized, bottle water is safer though we should have a safe option.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Peter H. Gleick
Hydroclimatologist, President, Pacific Institute
01:35 PM on 08/24/2010
Sorry, when I google bacteria in drinking fountains I do NOT get reputable stories on contamination. And when I use Google Scholar I do NOT find scientific studies.

I have no doubt there can be problems, and I agree they should be regularly cleaned as part of maintenance, but bottled water is not any safer.
09:08 PM on 08/23/2010
Here is one link about bacteria in water fountains exceeding those in toilets:

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3293080&page=1


I am not for bottled water, just hygiene.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Peter H. Gleick
Hydroclimatologist, President, Pacific Institute
01:37 PM on 08/24/2010
This one story has been repeated over and over. Yet there has been no confirmation of this; no scientific studies that support this. And frankly, I don't believe that the toilet was cleaner. Great NEWS story, but not good science.
09:07 PM on 08/23/2010
Actually I've seen tests of many many bacterial studies on waterfountains and apparently cleanging crews do not clean or sanitize them- note the green growth on many. Because the water splashes up, there is a chance of contaminiation but not to the point they should be eliminated- they should be routinely cleaned and santitized. Water should be available with easy access, free, and clean.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Peter H. Gleick
Hydroclimatologist, President, Pacific Institute
01:38 PM on 08/24/2010
Yes, they should be cleaned and sanitized regularly. But WHAT tests have you seen? Where? Can you share them? Who did them? I'd love to see them.
05:29 PM on 08/24/2010
Remember half of fast food soda fountains found fecal bacteria in some study. However in a controlled facility inspected by health departments this is a complete non issue. So rather than having a guy that collects the recyclables you have a guy cleaning the fountains.

I'm with you public drinking fountains are a must particularly at large venues.