Former Bush adviser Karl Rove is making the rounds to promote his new book Courage and Consequence: My Life as a Conservative in the Fight. He landed on NBC's Meet the Press Sunday, interviewed by Tom Brokaw. Brokaw asked him about his book's discussion of the Iraq War:
BROKAW: And in it, you acknowledge when weapons of mass destruction were not found, everyone was startled and not very happy about that. If that had been the case before war began, you couldn't have gotten congressional authorization.
ROVE: Nor in all likelihood U.N. approval, as we had as well.BROKAW: Would you have launched the war if you had known there were weapons of mass destruction?
ROVE: Well, as I say in the book, we would not have had either the authorization from Congress nor the U.N., and we probably would have found other ways to constrain his behavior.
There was no U.N. approval for the Iraq War.
The White House always argued that U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441 gave them legal cover for the war, but it did not -- it warned of "serious consequences" if Iraq failed to disarm.
As the U.N. weapons inspectors were reporting back from Iraq, the White House was seeking a second Security Council vote that would have officially sanctioned military action. That effort was unsuccessful, and the U.S./U.K. attack began without that Security Council approval.
This is not ancient history, nor is particularly obscure; coverage of Iraq and the U.N. weapons inspections in early 2003 was fairly intense, and Brokaw's NBC newscast aired several reports on the U.S. efforts to win U.N. support for a war resolution. (Brokaw himself on March 10, 2003, for example: "Tonight, the French vowed to veto any U.S. war resolution at the U.N., while Secretary of State Powell continued to look for votes and a plan that would allow the United States to go to war with some kind of U.N. approval.")
Rove undoubtedly knows this history, too. What he's counting on is that journalists like Brokaw will either not remember these facts, or will be too polite to bring them up.
Loading comments… 
The resolution congress passed required UN approval before an invasion of Iraq.
There was no UN approval.
There was no authorizat
Rove is attempting to rewrite history and he appears be going around unchalleng
Having said that, Dems have been complicit in that re-write since they have yet to prosecute anyone for those illegal acts.
Maybe we can get the internatio
There is no statute of limitation
People who support torture are going to try and that is what we are up against.
We really ought to give Karl his due. Let's face it, the guy has found himself in a nasty, unenviable situation. How would you like to be in the poor bastard's place? Think about it! He is desperatel
Then again, the guy is so unbelievab
So let's all sit back and have a good laugh while watching Karl Rove try to whitewash his crimes against the American people. This ought to be a hoot-and-a
http://www
Tom Degan
Tom Brokaw: part of the Problem.
He's a "tough-as-
RIGHT.
Part. Of. The. Problem.
.
After months in Iraq Mr Blix was not finding any WMD and Saddam had agreed to allow the UN inspectors to travel wherever they wanted and search whatever they suspected.
But W refused to allow them to finish their inspection because it interfered with his plans to invade Iraq and Paul Wolfowitz, assistant secretary of state, told Congress that we would pay for this military adventure from the proceeds of Iraqi oil.
Mr Rove knows that the imperialis
Mr Rove reminds me of Glenn Beck; fast and loose with the facts and very selective with the truth.
I don't understand why "journalis
It is irresponsi
Until the networks start investigat
If it is just a "talk show" and guests like Rove can just talk and make up facts then it is no longer news.