So nice that the FDA now says it finds no real difference between (or should we say "among") the meat and milk of cows, pigs, and goats that are bred naturally (sheep have been mysteriously excluded for now: what do they know and when did they know it?) and the meat and milk of creatures that have been cloned.
Can I say that I will sleep better tonight or that I will insist on eggs over easy and bacon lightly cloned the next time I chow down my big breakfast at the local café? Hmmm. Doubtful.
Because everyone is waking up to the non-neutrality (OK, let's just say the outright WHOREDOM) of U.S. government-sponsored research studies in a time of maximum state subservience to corporate power, the FDA's alleged good news about cloned animal protein will impress few on these shores and impress absolutely no one abroad. Why would anyone trust an FDA report in Year Eight of the Bush Protectorate?
But I am more interested in the deeper sources of resistance to engineered foods of all kinds.
Even here, and even in Iowa and Wisconsin and Nebraska, people are having trouble with this shit. And not just upper middle class people who can be ever so finicky about what goes down the old alimentary canal. I'm talking about meat-and-potatoes people who, up until around now, have been reasonably content with the engineering of pest-free varieties of crops and also with fruit and veggies that ripen sooner, look tastier, and ship better on account of their genetic tweaking.
In animal cloning line has been crossed. I want to say from a theological perspective that the line has to do with (here goes) our human creatureliness.
Whatever one wants to say about Genesis creation accounts--and who imagined that people would still be duking it out over these texts in the 21st century?--what stands out most strikingly in Genesis is not the few-and-far-between allusions to alleged human supremacy but rather the repeated insistence on human embeddedness within the whole of the created order.
You can read it yourself. The deal in Genesis is not that God had come upon a whole different idea when humans came along. It's much more that God thought a little more mindfulness in one species--a tweener species, so to speak--could be a good idea. A species capable of stitching the thing together and of passing blessings up and down the range of a vast and splendid sensorium.
So here's my theory. We're creeped out even now by the notion of cloning our meat and milk because we can see and feel the teleological arrogance--and the deep-level irreverence--of doing that. We know that we don't know what we are doing with our commercialized cloning: we know that we are operating way above our creaturely pay grade and that the consequences of this particular lab work could be very heavy indeed.
More than that, and despite our huge bloody hunters' mark in the world, we know that it's just plain cruel and unethical to manipulate other species for our short-term advantage to the extent of FDA-approved commercial animal cloning.
We're moral animals.
God be praised.
WASHINGTON — With the economy still firmly in the grip of...
WASHINGTON — Contrary to White House wishes,...
Long before $150,000-gate, Sarah Palin seemed to...
The Obamas dropped by the Vatican on Friday, with daughters...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
I never actually heard the words made famous by a certain man on a certain TV show. Instead I got a lot...
"What's for dinner?" A lot of us ask that question right...
I'm pleased to announce the launch today of...
ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The former fiance of Gov. Sarah Palin's...
Hermione herself, Emma Watson, charmed David Letterman and...
Think Progress flags David Brooks telling...
While we of course do not claim to know anyone's thoughts, we nominate these...
The Daily Show's John Oliver is unhappy with mainstream journalism, and even drearier...
For this week's installment of their "Lunch with the FT" feature the...
Al Franken's been anointed as Minnesota's junior senator, but how did the...
SYDNEY — Residents of a rural Australian town hoping to protect the earth and their wallets...
What are your greatest strengths? I am...
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
What we know is that our government can't even keep our natural food safe. Now we are to trust that something won't go horribly wrong with these foods because they've tested it for a few years & they say so? Hardly. I'm thinking mad cow but on a macro scale. I don't know about theology and mythology, but I definitely know safe vs. tainted and what genetic defects can do to living organisms. And NO WAY do I trust my government to look out for my welfare in this new century!
I'm fine with cloning of animals. Actually I'm sort of alright with the cloning of people within certain lawful and ethical confines.
I tend to think this religious fear of science does nothing but hurt humanity. How many people need to die before the Religous stop imposing bigoted, fearful moralities on legitimate progress? Bleh.
If you read the creation story in Genesis, you'll see that God took Adam's rib and made Eve out of it. Since Eve wasn't a product of a mother and father having sex, but instead the product of just one set of cells (Adam's), wasn't she cloned?
Easy solution--stop eating animal products. No more need to be creeped out by anything.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in or