More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter Montgomery

GET UPDATES FROM Peter Montgomery
 

Values Voter Summit 2011 & America in 2013

Posted: 10/12/11 01:13 PM ET

The Values Voter Summit, the year's biggest political gathering for the Religious Right, took place in Washington, D.C. this past weekend. Every Republican presidential candidate with the exception of Jon Huntsman addressed the summit, evidence of the continuing importance of Religious Right activists and political groups to the GOP. Ron Paul's campaign brought in enough voters to win the straw poll, but it would be wrong to say he was the favorite of the Values Voter crowd. It was up-and-coming candidate Herman Cain who won the loudest cheers (and took second place).

Two days of speeches from presidential candidates, congressional leaders, and Religious Right activists painted a clear picture of where they'll try to take the country if they are successful in their 2012 electoral goals. In the Religious Right's America, banks and corporations would be free from pesky consumer and worker protections; there would be no Environmental Protection Agency and no federal support for education; women would have no access to abortion; gays would be second-class citizens; and for at least some, religious minorities would have to know their place and be grateful that they are tolerated in this Christian nation.

Here's a rundown of some major themes from the conference.

Religious Bigotry on Parade
In one of the most extreme expressions of the "Christian nation" approach to government, the American Family Association's Bryan Fischer has stated repeatedly that the religious liberty of non-Christians, including Mormons, is not protected by the First Amendment. Before the conference, People For the American Way called on Mitt Romney to take on Fischer's bigotry, which he did, albeit in a vague and tepid manner, criticizing "poisonous" rhetoric without naming Fischer or explaining why his views are poison. Getting greater media attention were comments by Baptist pastor Robert Jeffress, who in his introduction of Texas Gov. Rick Perry insisted on the importance of electing a "genuine" follower of Christ. Following Romney at the microphone, Fischer said that the next president has to be a Christian "in the mold of" the founding fathers, calling this religious test for the presidency a "political test."

Beating up on Obama
A major theme of the VVS was attacking President Obama and his policies. Perhaps the nicest thing anyone said about the president was Mitt Romney's snide remark that Obama is "the conservative movement's top recruiter." Less nice, from virtue-monger Bill Bennett: "If you voted for him last time to prove you are not a racist, you must vote against him this time to prove you are not an idiot." Rep. Anne Buerkle, one of the Tea Party freshmen, said flat out that the president is not concerned about what is best for the country. Many speakers denounced "Obamacare," and most of the presidential candidates promised to make dismantling health care reform a top priority. Many also attacked President Obama for not being strong enough in support of Israel, and repeated a favorite right-wing talking point by pledging to "never apologize" for U.S. actions abroad.

Gays as Enemies of Liberty
It is clear that a Republican takeover of the Senate and White House would put advances toward equality for LGBT Americans in peril. Speaker after speaker denounced the recent repeal of the ban on openly gay and lesbian servicemembers in the armed forces; many also attacked marriage equality for same-sex couples. And many portrayed liberty as a zero-sum game, insisting that advances toward equality posed a dire threat to religious liberty. Predictably, the AFA's Fischer was most vitriolic, declaring that the nation must choose between homosexuality and religious liberty and insisting that the country needs a president "who will treat homosexual behavior not as a political cause at all but as a threat to public health."

Loving Wall Street, Hating Wall Street Protesters
On the same day that moving pictures of Kol Nidre services at the sight of Occupy Wall Street protests made the rounds, VVS speakers portrayed the protests as dangerous and violent. Others simply mocked the protesters without taking seriously the objections being raised to growing inequality and economic hardship in America. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor denounced the protesters as "mobs." A number of speakers promoted Christian Reconstructionist notions of "Biblical economics," with Star Parker declaring that "this whole notion of redistribution of wealth is inconsistent with scripture" and calling for the selection of a candidate with commitment to the free market according to the Bible. Ron Paul said "debt is not a biblical principle." The AFA's Fischer said that liberalism is based on violating two of the Ten Commandments, namely thou shall not steal, and thou shall not covet anything that belongs to your neighbor. Liberalism, he said, is "driven by angry, bitter, acquisitive greed for the wealth of productive Americans."

No Love for Libertarians
A major theme at last year's Values Voter Summit, and heard again this year, was an effort to make social-issue libertarians unwelcome in the conservative movement by insisting that you cannot legitimately claim to be a fiscal conservative if you are not also pushing "traditional family values." First Things web editor Joe Carter took a shot at gay conservatives, saying it was not possible to be conservative and for gay marriage -- it simply made you a "liberal who likes tax cuts."

Crying Wolf on Religious Persecution
Religious Right leaders energize movement activists with dire warnings about threats to religious liberty and the alleged religious persecution of Christians in America, which retired Gen. William Boykin said is worse than ever. Crying wolf about persecution of Christians in America is offensive given the very real suffering of people in countries that do not enjoy the religious freedom we do. Several speakers addressed the case of a Christian pastor facing death in Iran. That is persecution; having your political tactics challenged or losing a court case is not.

America is Exceptional; Europe Sucks
We heard plenty of talk about at VVS about "American exceptionalism," a favorite GOP campaign theme in 2010 and apparently for 2012. Rep. Steve King, for example, said "this country was ordained and built by His hand," that the Declaration of Independence was written with divine guidance, and that God moved the founding fathers around the globe like chess pieces . Many speakers contrasted a freedom-loving, God-fearing America to socialist, post-Christian Europe, which Gen. Boykin declared "hopelessly lost."

Smashing the Regulatory State
The anti-government, anti-regulatory fervor of billionaire right-wing funders like the Koch brothers was on vibrant display at the VVS. Without the slightest nod to the fact that regulating the behavior of corporations' treatment of workers, consumers, and the environment is in any way beneficial, a member of a Heritage Foundation panel said conservatives' goal should be to "break the back" of the "regulatory state." Some presidential candidates vowed to halt every regulation issued during the Obama administration. Michele Bachman said her goal was to "dismantle" the bureaucracy.

Judging JudgesMany speakers criticized judges for upholding abortion rights, church-state separation, and gay rights. Newt Gingrich took these attacks to a whole new level, calling for right-wing politicians to provoke a constitutional crisis in which the legislative and executive branch would ignore court rulings they didn't like. He called the notion of "judicial supremacy" an "affront to the American system of self-government." Aside from Gingrich's very dubious constitutional theory, the speech seemed out of place at a conference in which speakers had been calling for the Supreme Court to overturn the health care law passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama.

Deconstructing the 'Pursuit of Happiness'
VVS speakers love quoting the Declaration of Independence, but some are clearly a little troubled with the notion that the "pursuit of happiness" is an inalienable right, one that might apply, for example, to happy, loving gay couples. Rick Santorum said that the founders' understanding of "happiness" meant "the morally right thing" and doing what God wants. Steve King said the pursuit of happiness was not like a tailgate party, but the pursuit of excellence in moral and spiritual development. Michele Bachmann has equated the pursuit of happiness with private property.

 

Follow Peter Montgomery on Twitter: www.twitter.com/petemont

 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:48 AM on 10/14/2011
It will never be pretended that any persons employed in [the formation of the American governments] had interviews with the gods or were in any degree under the inspiration of Heaven, more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses ...”

- John Adams, “A Defence of the Constitutions of the United States of America,” 1787
02:11 AM on 10/13/2011
It looks like Cain, Romney, and Paul are the top three. Perry continues to fall and Gingrich is the only one who even has a chance to rise above single digits. Any one of these would be better than Obama (except Perry) but I'm still undecided.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjRcO1Sm0HU
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rockysparks
there's no law against being annoying.
11:36 PM on 10/12/2011
The Values Voters Summit did at least one positive thing --- it turned over a rock and revealed the rather pitiful, unsavory crop of slimy things underneath it: The lackluster list of Republican candidates and their really extremist surrogates like Mr. Fischer and Reverend Jeffress.
11:18 PM on 10/12/2011
Hey Peter Montgomery stop writing political propaganda when you haven't even read the first Amendment, or are just too dumb to understand it.
09:02 PM on 10/12/2011
I stopped reading as soon as I saw this -

"Ron Paul's campaign brought in enough voters to win the straw poll, but it would be wrong to say he was the favorite of the Values Voter crowd"

Yeah the guy who won 1st place wasn't the favorite, it was the guy who came second. Give me a break.
08:54 PM on 10/14/2011
Yes, Ron Paul won. I was there. Supporters came in from all over VA, MD, NY and NJ. Following social media appeals, they learned if they paid $10 to go to D.C., they could vote in a straw poll and meet their hero. The campaign subsidized the $75 registration fee for the event.

Most event attendees arrived Friday morning. Over 600 Ron Paul supporters arrived by the busloads on Saturday. While many waited in line to register, some attended the 20 minute speech with Ron Paul and thoroughly made their presence known. However, the room was far from full. As soon as the speech concluded, his followers left the room chanting loudly "Ron Paul, Ron Paul..." It was clear they only wanted to hear one person. Then, they attended the meet and greet with their leader and departed almost as quickly as they arrived.

Oh yes, Ron Paul won the straw poll. To call him the "Values Voter Favorite"...is a stretch. His campaign proved they can mobilize people by the hundreds, swarm in like locust, and flood the ballot box. They still however have a difficult time drawing double digits in national polls.

While Herman Cain came in second, so many people wanted to hear him the organizers couldn’t close the auditorium doors. Spontaneous cheers and ovations erupted throughout Cain’s speech.

In this humble attendee’s opinion, he seemed to be the one who truly resonated with the straw poll voters. To me, that makes him the real winner.
04:28 AM on 10/15/2011
You sir are a complete liar. The campaign did not subsidize anything. There where people filling the whole room and lined up out side for Ron Paul. Ron Paul had the most support, the loudest cheers, and clearly won fair and square. you are as bad as this BS article. You are your National polls bs, you mean the ones the media picks and chooses?

Ron Paul has won more straw polls then all others, has more donations from military men and woman the Obama,Romney, Perry, and Cain Combined, has 5 times the amount of people donate to him as Romney and Perry(Cain raised so poor i dont even know).

Vote Ron Paul 2012!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ljimlong
To promote the general Welfare-Constitution
06:30 PM on 10/12/2011
Wonder how many of them remember when one of their darling leaders, Ralph Reed, was caught on tape telling Jack Abramoff how he could raise a few million from, "His crazies.?'
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarketAnarchist101
Make my enemies ridiculous.
05:27 PM on 10/12/2011
Mr. Montgomery, I do love how you say that Ron Paul won.. dismissed him then proceeded to say all of the things that Ron Paul doesn't support.. as you don't have a single quote from him about any of your topics. Thanks for deceptive reporting Mr. Montgomery. Btw the only quote you do have from him is that 'debt is not a Biblical principle.' just letting you know.. that means absolutely nothing in the context that you tried to fit it with.
Chinawanderer
A biography should never be micro
04:38 AM on 10/13/2011
If Ron Paul doesn't support the things the VVC stands for why did he attend?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarketAnarchist101
Make my enemies ridiculous.
11:36 AM on 10/13/2011
Did you read the things Mr. Montgomery said the VVC stands for.. because all except for smashing the regulatory state is not what Ron Paul is about also, if you didn't notice.. the Man that won the poll was quoted ONCE in the entire article.. and it was about the Bible and debt... you know why that is.. because Ron Paul doesn't think gay/lesbian/transsexual people are the enemies of liberty, he doesn't bash Obama because his record proves the points that he makes against Obama's Ideology, he doesn't judge judges (he thinks that the federal judges should have jurisdiction over it.), No love for libertarians (Ron Paul is the most libertarian candidate in the field).. do you want me to break it down point by point?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kctoad
04:58 PM on 10/12/2011
Would Jesus Christ really embrace these values?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mtdem4ever
Malcolm Reynolds - Need I Say More?
05:12 PM on 10/12/2011
Um...................no.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarketAnarchist101
Make my enemies ridiculous.
05:31 PM on 10/12/2011
Man.. if he were here today you guys would be calling him an anarchist who doesn't care about the poor.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NrthrnLord
Prince of a very small part of the universe.
07:05 PM on 10/12/2011
these guys'd have him in gitmo, wet and sputtering.
photo
Maria Pellio
"Ron Paul ideologically pure and tough as nails."
04:32 PM on 10/12/2011
Ron Paul has the right values for America, it's called FREEDOM.
Chinawanderer
A biography should never be micro
04:25 AM on 10/13/2011
What Ron Paul calls freedom sounds more like a Hobbesian state of nature. I would hardly call that freedom. Freedom to do what exactly--die in the streets?
09:34 AM on 10/13/2011
Freedom to own personal responsibility for your own actions. Freedom to make your own personal, economic, health, etc choices. Freedom to do as I please so long as I'm not injuring, defrauding, or otherwise infringing on somebody's else's property.

For those who rather wish for government dependency for their well-being, do it at the local/state levels. But there's no reason to enforce central planning on the whole population for nearly everything we do... which is what we have now.

What is so bad about that?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarketAnarchist101
Make my enemies ridiculous.
04:22 PM on 10/13/2011
Yeah.. because you know.. in the Hobbesian state of nature (which conveniently people prefer the Lockean view of government when it is actually Hobbesian) the men in government are the wolves.... guess what.. the government operates on that principle. Take a look at the Lockean view of the state of nature.. then look at reality.. we want to be like Locke when it comes to government (even though we are Lockeans in a state of nature) we operate on Hobbesian principles because we're afraid of Chaos and Anarchy! When government produces chaos and isn't anywhere near anarchism.
03:40 PM on 10/12/2011
These value voters are a very important reason America has been going downhill over the last two decades at least. They are a very retrograde force whose agenda of ignorance and hate has done terrible damage to the national spirit and our collective intelligence.
stateretiree
Yes, I know my micro-bio is empty!
02:40 PM on 10/12/2011
Don't you just love how republicans know exactly what the founding fathers were thinking and feeling? These are the kind of people who turn other people away from religion. Very sad in this day that you have so many hate filled people, pretending to be Christians, what would Jesus think!!!
Chinawanderer
A biography should never be micro
04:26 AM on 10/13/2011
Considering that many of the Founding Fathers were deists I find their views on the establishment of this country not only sad but ignorant.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Dennis
No matter how cynical I get I can't keep up.
02:36 PM on 10/12/2011
Pop Quiz for Values Voters:
Who was it who said: `Verily I say unto you, inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these My brethren, ye have done it unto Me.'

Give up? That's becuase you ignore those parts of the Bible that stand in the way of your agenda.


And, my valueless Value Voting friends, here's a free quote to have tattooed on your foreheads:
“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross.”
- Sinclair Lewis
02:11 PM on 10/12/2011
What is it about these people that makes them believe that their values, which for the most part are narrow and parochial, qualifies them for the title "values voters"? Do they somehow believe that their values are superior to anyone else's?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rhuffie
02:25 PM on 10/12/2011
Of course they do...thet claim not to judje others but this is exactly what they do every single time they elbow their way into political discussions.
The scarest part ...they actually think they know what God wants - and they have no hesitation whatsoever in feeling OK about imposing these beliefs on the rest of us..
Chinawanderer
A biography should never be micro
04:29 AM on 10/13/2011
Perhaps they are being ironic with their title. I have never found hatred, selfishness and narrowness to be values or virtues. Just the opposite.
01:28 PM on 10/12/2011
Hmm...I wonder where Ron Paul fits in all this. Many of the people that voted for Paul just signed up only to see him speak and immediately left after he was done. Ron Paul supporters are not of the 'Religious Right' and actually are socially liberal on many issues. I just don't want all of this scary GOP stuff to be associated with Ron Paul.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mtdem4ever
Malcolm Reynolds - Need I Say More?
05:16 PM on 10/12/2011
The people I know who support Ron Paul do so for two reasons - they want marijuana to be legalized and they love conspiracy theories.

I, too, want marijuana legalized, but I understand that things will not change with a Congress beholden to Big Pharma, no matter who is elected President. I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories and I don't want women's reproductive rights and the rights of homosexuals to either be squashed (trust me RP is NOT pro-choice) or delegated to the states.
09:02 PM on 10/12/2011
The people I know who support Ron Paul do so because they believe in following the Constitution.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarketAnarchist101
Make my enemies ridiculous.
11:44 AM on 10/13/2011
That can only change if the ideas surrounding the parties that control the power in Washington change in a significant and fundamental way.

I don't subscribe to a perfect federal government, I'm not naive enough to believe that the government hasn't done terrible things because we know it has. I don't want the federal government to be involved with who has more rights than others because we are all human regardless of race, sex, creed, or sexual orientation. I don't believe that people should be forced to pay for things they don't believe in and I don't believe that it is good to let the government have power over our lives. I support state's rights as a stepping stone to greater freedom. People seem to believe that if the states had more power they would oppress however, logically speaking this would be stupid for states to do because they would lose tax dollars in the form of people wanting to be in places where their rights aren't squashed and where businesses can prosper. RP is definitely not pro-choice, but that doesn't mean that he thinks the federal government should be involved in the issue at all. After all forcing people to pay for things they don't believe in or fostering a system that they don't believe in doesn't make it anymore right for you to do it to them for them to do it to you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarketAnarchist101
Make my enemies ridiculous.
05:22 PM on 10/12/2011
that and you had to be signed up months in advance to even be able to vote there in the first place... If anything the dismissal of Ron Paul based on cheers instead of votes is surprising.
01:19 PM on 10/12/2011
Wow, its actually a whole lot scarrier that I thought. This country (and quite possibly the whole world) is doomed in any of these nutcases gets elected.