iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Peter Ubertaccio

GET UPDATES FROM Peter Ubertaccio
 

The Most Important Person for Democrats in Massachusetts

Posted: 06/28/2012 4:12 pm

For Democrats in the Bay State, the most important person at the Symphony Hall gathering in Boston on Monday night was John Walsh. The chair of the state's Democratic Party is not the media-savvy insider that one finds swirling around contemporary American politics. He's a throwback to a time when party leaders knew how to organize precincts, get out the vote, and wear out a decent pair of shoes going door to door to find and motivate voters.

Barack Obama is going to win Massachusetts this fall, and his margin of victory may decide whether Elizabeth Warren goes to the Senate or back to Harvard. Recent polling suggests that the Senate race remains a dead heat. Scott Brown's favorability ratings are on the rise, and he has, thus far, positioned himself as a senator that Massachusetts voters can embrace while they simultaneously embrace the president.

Enter John Walsh and his remarkably succinct strategy. Just about 36 percent of Massachusetts voters are registered Democrats, compared with 11 percent who are registered as Republicans. Independents, or unenrolled, voters account for 52 percent of the electorate, and they lean Democratic. Walsh's strategy is to knock on their doors. He's determined not to go through another January 2010, when the Senate seat held by Democratic icon Ted Kennedy went to Brown. It was a humiliating loss for the party, and Walsh took it personally. He cut his teeth on get-out-the-vote efforts, leading Deval Patrick to victory in 2006, over the party's preferred candidate, Tom Reilly. Patrick asked Walsh to assume the leadership of the same party Walsh had just outmaneuvered with an explicit grassroots strategy. But the strategy failed in the special election of 2010.

One of the main lessons Walsh took away from that defeat was that a media strategy doesn't knock on a voter's door, provide a human contact, and motivate them to vote. So he sent his party members into the streets to meet voters. It's quaint, old-fashioned, not at all hip and modern. It's not a media strategy. But it is highly effective. Recognizing the challenges of direct mail, the clutter of television ads, and the fact that those who still have landlines don't answer them, he turned to precincts and breathed life into a coordinated campaign strategy.

The party went from defeat in January 2010 to victory 11 months later, reelecting Deval Patrick and Senate President Therese Murray, who faced a stiff challenge from a tea-party-backed Republican and kept all statewide offices and the congressional delegation Democratic. Walsh and his party then immediately cast their sights on Scott Brown. The party put together "interconnected organizers" of volunteers, about 10 per precinct. They were charged with connecting with 50 voters each, and the activists were rewarded for their efforts with incentives and recognition by party leaders. He encourages his party activists to connect with people they know first, then those they share acquaintances with, then the unknown voter who is inclined to vote Democratic but has rarely been contacted by a party member.

The party has redefined "community" for its get-out-the-vote purposes to go beyond geography: Churches, social clubs, union halls, and social networks are all now brought into the mix. On top of that, the chairman figuratively plays the role of Santa Claus. He checks voter lists and checks them twice. He oversees a party operation that has stimulated activity among the local town committees by giving them access to voter information that allows them, with relative ease, to pinpoint Democratic voters or Democratic-leaning voters, with the purpose of getting them to the polls via direct contact.

Of course, any successful party effort creates a competitive effort to catch up. The GOP in Massachusetts has launched MassVictory and is working to reach out to their base, unenrolled voters, and Democratic voters who have, thus far, prevented Elizabeth Warren from turning all those Obama supporters into her own.

While Warren and Obama stole the show on Monday, John Walsh's old-fashioned politics may turn out to be the deciding factor in the president's margin of victory here and whether or not Scott Brown remains a U.S. Senator.

 

Follow Peter Ubertaccio on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ProfessorU

FOLLOW POLITICS
For Democrats in the Bay State, the most important person at the Symphony Hall gathering in Boston on Monday night was John Walsh. The chair of the state's Democratic Party is not the media-savvy insi...
For Democrats in the Bay State, the most important person at the Symphony Hall gathering in Boston on Monday night was John Walsh. The chair of the state's Democratic Party is not the media-savvy insi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
01:29 PM on 07/03/2012
If the voters of Massachusetts want continued conflict and political gridlock, they should split their tickets and vote for President Obama and Scott Brown since putting Brown back in Washington with six years to go before another election virtually guarantees that we won't feel compelled to vote against the wishes of his Republicon managers and Wall Street donors. However, if the goal is good government, the answer is clear: Elizabeth Warren. Warren is and has been dedicated to honesty in government and support for the middle class. Scott Brown is dedicated to the Republicon Party and Wall Street.
04:21 PM on 07/27/2012
Good government? 40+ months of 8% or higher unemployment; personal wealth down as much as 40% (IRA's, retirement accounts, etc); the staggering number of small businesses that have closed over the past 4 years; more debt on the national debt in 3+ years than in the whole 8 years under W; 5 million more Americans on Food Stamps; Eric Holder, who may be the most partisan Attorney General in US History---even more so than Mitchell; I could add more, but would get cramps. You want 4 more years of this? Then by all means, re-elect Barrack Obama and put Elizabeth Warren in the senate, because as much as you blast Brown for being a partisan Republican, you really don't believe she would be any less a partisan Democrat, do you?
02:20 PM on 07/30/2012
As someone once said, there are lies, damned lies, and statistics. Do you deny the attempts the President has made to change the situation and the fact that the Republicons in Congress have blocked him at every turn? And please identify the source of your assertion that personal wealth in the U.S. is down 40%. Your statement about Attorney General Holder is simply bogus. So, yes, of course I would  prefer to have an honest Elizabeth Warren in the Senate voting for policies that would benefit the majority of the people of Massachusetts and the country as a whole rather than Scott Brown who votes as Mitch McConnell directs 80% of the time.