iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins

GET UPDATES FROM Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins
 

Chevron: The Toxic Threat Next Door

Posted: 08/17/2012 2:00 pm

When the fire broke out at the Chevron oil refinery in Richmond, California last week, this is what families living nearby--including some of our own staff at Green For All--experienced: Their windows rattled and their houses shook. Some of them watched fiery explosions and plumes of dark smoke pour from the refinery. Others just heard the frightening wail of the city's emergency sirens. They gathered up their children and pets, covered their mouths and noses, and scrambled to seal their doors and windows.

Across the Bay, San Francisco residents watched as a toxic black cloud billowed over Richmond--a city in which 85 percent of the residents are minorities and roughly one-quarter live below the poverty line.

In the days after the fire, more than 9,000 people poured into emergency rooms, complaining of nausea, headaches, and breathing problems. Chevron, meanwhile, offered an apology for the "disruption."

I wish that were enough. Enough to erase the terror that workers and families experienced that day. Enough to prevent the potentially long-term illnesses they face as a result of breathing those toxic fumes. And I wish it were enough to undo the health problems that Richmond's families have faced for years.

The truth is, it doesn't take a massive explosion to send folks in this neighborhood to the hospital. Here, next door to the refinery--which has consistently violated the Clean Air Act and the Clean Water Act--rates of ovarian, prostate, and breast cancer are among the highest in the state, along with incidents of childhood asthma.

But it's not just about Richmond. Across America, hundreds of other cities choke in the shadow of dangerous, polluting oil operations. Who lives in these cities and neighborhoods? By and large, people of color. In California, a staggering 62 percent of residents living near polluting oil refineries, cement plants, and power plants are people of color. Not surprisingly, rates of asthma are dramatically higher in these communities: One out of every six African-American children in this country suffers from asthma, compared with one in ten nationwide.

No one--whether they're from Richmond or anywhere else--should have to live in fear of this kind of disaster. They shouldn't be forced to breathe toxic fumes or drink polluted water just because companies like Chevron refuse to clean up their act. This is a corporation, after all, that raked in almost $27 billion in profits last year--but failed to spend any of it to fix the leaky 40 year-old pipe that almost cost its workers and neighbors their lives.

But we don't need to wait around for Chevron to do what's right. We have a choice. We can embrace cleaner, safer, healthier forms of energy and leave oil where it belongs--in the last century.

The first step is to stop rewarding companies like Chevron and BP with billions in subsidies from taxpayers' pockets while we ask hardworking Americans--especially low-income and minority kids--to pay the price with their health. Instead, we should invest in forms of energy that don't pollute our air and water.

This isn't a distant dream; the clean energy revolution is already well underway. Over the past four years, America's wind and solar sectors have grown substantially--wind power has doubled and solar increased six-fold--enough to power 15 million homes. We're less dependent on fossil fuels than we have been in decades. And the Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that clean energy and other industries that protect our air and water already employ roughly 3.1 million Americans in safe, good-paying jobs that can't be shipped overseas.

Many of these are the type of jobs that create pathways into the middle class--and out of poverty. They're exactly the type of jobs that can transform communities like Richmond.

The fight for clean energy is not just an environmental issue. It's a human rights issue.

Every child deserves to breathe clean air and drink clean water. No matter whether they're rich or poor, no matter whether they're black, white, Asian, or Latino. We all deserve to live without the fear of a toxic disaster next door. It's that simple. But in this country, people of color have shouldered the burden of polluting industries for too long--and it's time to stop.

All we have to do is decide: Do we stand by and wait for the next oil disaster? Do we sit quietly while our kids struggle to breathe? Do we continue to spend our hard-earned dollars rewarding companies like Chevron with subsidies and tax breaks? Or do we change the game?

 

Follow Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins on Twitter: www.twitter.com/phaedrael

FOLLOW BLACK VOICES
When the fire broke out at the Chevron oil refinery in Richmond, California last week, this is what families living nearby--including some of our own staff at Green For All--experienced: Their windows...
When the fire broke out at the Chevron oil refinery in Richmond, California last week, this is what families living nearby--including some of our own staff at Green For All--experienced: Their windows...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:15 PM on 08/21/2012
"We're less dependent on fossil fuels than we have been in decades"
This is strange, because this article from Learsy
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/raymond-j-learsy/americas-increased-relian_b_1809527.html?utm_hp_ref=business
says this
"So far this year America's dependence on Saudi Arabian oil has increased by 20 percent"
So which is it? Does anyone have the correct facts, or do we just make them up as we go along?
01:07 PM on 08/21/2012
There are several issues here

1.) Lobbyist influence
2.) Campaign Finance Money influence = too much money in elections
3.) Energy Policy is complicated, jobs, biofuel, competition, foreign investment etc..
4.) National Security
5.) Republicans = keep voting republican and you'll NEVER ever have a say so about energy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
I just don't understand people
06:40 PM on 08/20/2012
First, we need to eliminate corporate lobbying, PACs, campaign contributions and the revolving door. Then we need to end subsidies for dirty energy and use them for clean energy development and deployment.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:12 AM on 08/20/2012
Spoken like someone whose home and region has not been destroyed by Chevron Wind and Chevron Solar. Oh yes, it is the same despicable "kill wilderness for profit" folks who bring you the refinery fires and oil leaks who bring you the turbine fires and dust storms in our deserts.

Big Energy is the problem, doesn't matter if it's wind, solar, gas, nukes, coal or oil - it's all lousy for the economy and for the environment. Sure, moving all the destruction to the deserts so that everyone there gets valley fever, ruined aquifers, dead raptors and bats (so massive increases in disease vectors), invasive species and destroyed vistas from Richmond may feel good to an SF Bay person, but you are not solving anything and are causing a huge pile of new problems for other low-income and disadvantaged communities that a few short-term bulldozer jobs won't solve.

ROOFTOP solar, efficiency, passive heating/cooling and other POINT OF USE solutions within the built environment are the only way forward. Hiding behind Chevron Wind and Chevron Solar is a copout. Time to get serious. No more Big Energy. None.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roosevelt Democrat
04:19 PM on 08/19/2012
Refineries in this nation were build decades ago. People move to these area's for jobs. I live next to a Chevron Refinery in El Segundo, it's over 100 years old. It's also bordered on the other side by Manhattan Beach, typical pricing of homes in this combined area run from $750,000.00 up! I reject the implied thought that refineries locate in minority communities to poison minorities.

2nd I think the proposal of taxing the top 5 Big oil companies at a different rate would be like taxing Democrats at a higher rate than Republicans simple because Democrats want higher taxes.

Finally BIG OIL would love it if President Obama and congress ended drilling subsidies. Big oil is only responsible for about 10% of all the oil & natural gas wells in the U.S. This is because BIG oil is not eligible for these drilling subsidies because of the ATM (Alternative Minimum TAX - got to love that). Eliminate these subsidies and THOUSANDS of these drilling companies will close! Currently there are over 3000 drilling companies operating in the U.S.

When the government reverses course and makes an industry more efficient we get BANKS TO BIG TO FAIL!

Do we really want to go this path again?
12:28 PM on 08/19/2012
Bemzene is a natural consituent in all fossil fuels, petroleum, natural gas and coal. Burning of fossil fuels releases airborne benzene particles into the atmosphere. Benzene exposure has been linked to many disease including cancer. Another severe medical problem was recently discovered by the C-BASS (Chinese Benzene Sperm Study) group. They recruited three groups who had worked for more than year who were workplace benzene exposed in manufacturing plants in China. The vulnteers included a low exposure group, a moderate exposed group and a high exposed group. A control group of 11 unexposed workers from the same town were recruited for comparison. All four groups were found to generate 1P36 sperm mutations. Compared to unexposed controls the frequency of sperm mutations compared to controls were higher in the low exposure group, even higher in the moderate exposed group and highest in the high exposre group. The authors concluded that wotkplace benzene exposure was a risk factor for 1p36 deletion syndrome.

The 1p36 deletion syndrome is one of the most devasting genetic syndromes:

http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/condition/1p36-deletion-syndrome
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
02:31 AM on 08/19/2012
Why would you live next to an oil refinery to begin with? Everyone knows they pollute - they refine oil into gasoline! It is not a particularly clean process. It's like people who know the health effects of smoking, but still choose to do it.
07:54 PM on 08/17/2012
To understand the sleaze-side of Chevron, see, www.truecostofchevron.com. Why should the public pay for Chevron's negligence, by paying for higher gasoline prices? Chevron should pay for their own accidents, and not the consumer. Chevron lots of money, because in 2011, Chevron made $27 billions, paid no federal tax and received billions in tax breaks.