The 1-Question Climate Quiz
What do the NAACP, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, SEIU, and the US Conference of Catholic Bishops have in common?
a. They're calling for strong climate legislation to combat global warming
b. They're calling for strong economic legislation to combat the recession
c. They're calling for equal protection and equal opportunity for working class Americans
d. All of the above
The answer is D.
These groups have joined together with more than two dozen others (including Green For All) in a new alliance of economic justice, faith-based, labor, and civil rights groups.
Together they form the Climate Equity Alliance.
The Alliance, announced this morning through a national press teleconference, calls for strong climate legislation that protects and provides opportunity for low- and moderate-income Americans.
The Climate Equity Alliance represents how choosing between options a. and b. in the quiz above -- environment vs. the economy -- is a false choice. Strong climate legislation can, and must, be strong economic legislation.
If done right, climate policy can fight pollution and alleviate poverty at the same time. The shift to a low-carbon, clean, green economy can create large numbers of quality green-collar jobs for American workers, and lower energy bills for American households. A federal climate bill must deliberately advance principles of fairness, opportunity, and equal access.
The Climate Equity Alliance comes just in time. Last week a discussion draft of the Climate Bill (the America Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009) dropped in the House of Representatives, firing "the opening shot in the battle about what we do about global warming".
It is essential that this bill be strong on climate and do right by American workers and families, not one or the other. Our planet and our people depend on it.
Members of Congress are trying to craft a bill that will be strong on climate, and politically viable enough to pass through Congress and signed into law. In order for an effective climate bill to pass, it'll need to take into account the needs of all kinds of people. Last summer's Warner-Lieberman climate bill was derailed from bogus -- yet largely unchallenged -- right-wing messaging that climate legislation was waging a "war on the poor."
The Alliance is committed to strengthening climate legislation which member organizations consider absolutely necessary to meet the needs of low- and moderate-income communities.
The Climate Equity Principles
The Alliance is brought together by a set of 6 principles:
1. Protect people and the planet: Limit carbon emissions at a level and timeline that science dictates.
2. Maximize the gain: Build an inclusive green economy providing pathways into prosperity and expanding opportunity for America's workers and communities.
3. Minimize the pain: Assist low and moderate-income families in meeting their basic needs.
4. Shore up resilience to climate impacts: Assure that those who are most vulnerable to the direct effects of climate change are able to prepare and adapt.
5. Ease the transition: Address the impacts of economic change for workers and
communities.
6. Put a price on global warming pollution and invest in solutions: Capture the value of carbon emissions for public purposes and invest this resource in an equitable transition to a clean energy economy.
Read more about the principles.
Those who are truly concerned with the future of our planet, and our people (both in the short and long term), must be a voice for strong climate legislation that protects and offers opportunity to all Americas.
The Climate Equity Alliance has stepped up just in time, to be that voice.
Loading comments…
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
National Security
Is an irrefutable reason to switch to rooftop solar and wind, and cut way back on oil.
National Security
Demands we minimize nuclear Tech to medicine and sensing.
National security
requires we stop piosoning our people with mercury from Coal, and destroying our environment with coal mining.
See my profile for a detailed energy plan with calculations and links.
Question... What integrity , qualifications and scientific knowledge do any of these groups have that their opinions in any way give credence to the cult of global warming , or that man can have any affect over climate change.
Do your own d a m n research.
If you cared enough about the issue, you would have just followed the links embedded in the article, googled a few names, and you would have already answered your own question.
Now you want someone to answer it for you. That's just lazy.
Three words:
FEED
IN
TARIFFS
If we don't stop the Big Energy rape of our open spaces, ratepayers and taxpayers (yes, i'm including Big Solar and Big Wind in that), we will never, ever get energy independence, clean power, or social justice. Until WE the PEOPLE are the centerpiece of renewable power generation and are compensated fairly for producing clean power right where it is needed, we will never stop the decimation of this planet or of its middle and lower classes.
feed in tariffs are the fastest, cleanest, cheapest way to maximize renewable energy, create jobs and stimulate our economy. they are wildly successful in 48 other countries. The NREL has even come out in favor of them this week, for chrissakes. the only thin blocking them are BIG ENERGY PROFITEERS who want to kill our deserts and centralize/monopolize our power supply.
Hardly a diverse group representing majority interests in the US. How about adding some productive groups to the mix and see what that does to your consensus?
What about the group Green For All is not diverse or unproductive, pray tell?
A book by Peter Barnes Capitalism 3.0 describes a system wherein we would all get a dividend each year from the use of the commons of the atmosphere. What we need is some imaginative thinking here.
Protecting lower and middle income people from the costs of lowering Co2 emissions is an impossible task. The only way to lower Co2 emissions is to tax the heck out of every single person on the globe. And there's no proof that lowering Co2 emissions will stop global warming and no proof that higher temperatures will hurt more than they help via increased crop production etc.
Not true. Again I refer you to Capitalism 3.0 by Peter Barnes. I realize this will require some investment of time and money, but it is an easy to understand book.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with
