iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Phil Simon

GET UPDATES FROM Phil Simon
 

The Hubbub Over Google's New Privacy Policy

Posted: 01/26/2012 2:11 pm

Google recently announced that it will soon start more closely stitching user information together. Effective March 1st, Google will monitor user behaviors, habits, preferences, concerns, desires, and activity closer than ever before. Information gleaned from YouTube (say, watching a Rush video) may be used to place a relevant ad in Gmail, perhaps for concert tickets.

Many people are crying foul. They lament the privacy ramifications for Google users and the world at large. Are these real concerns, or are they overblown?

Under the Microscope

Google already touches the lives of nearly everyone on the planet every day, whether they know it or not. As such, everything that it does faces intense scrutiny. As I write in The Age of the Platform, the company for years has been about so much more than search. Its diversified platform includes many popular and integrated "planks" -- including, Gmail, YouTube, Docs, and Maps. As such, a change to its privacy policy potentially has profound implications.


From the books and articles I've read (as well as the conversations I've had with Google employees), the company has had the ability to do this for years. I for one commend Google for being transparent about its change in policy. After all, no longer can companies sneak through important changes. We are all journalists now.

The larger question concerns the fairness of the new privacy policy. After all, you can't opt out of the new policy. So, what's a Googler to do?

Considerations

For one, realize that Google makes your life simpler. It saves you time. It saves you money. To me, the "cost" of seeing an increasingly relevant ad in my search results or next to my emails is inconsequential compared to the significant benefits that I realize using Google's products. You don't have to click on ads.


Second, realize that Google is a business. It has to monetize the different planks on its platform. It is a publicly traded company with a fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders. Along these lines, don't single out Google for this type of thing. If you think that Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Twitter, and scores of other companies don't use customer and user data in similar ways, you're grossly mistaken.

Finally, in point of fact you can opt out very simply: Don't use Google products. I can't think of a single Google product that has no substitute. Vote with your virtual feet. You can leave Google at any time.

Feedback

What say you?

 
 
 

Follow Phil Simon on Twitter: www.twitter.com/philsimon

Google recently announced that it will soon start more closely stitching user information together. Effective March 1st, Google will monitor user behaviors, habits, preferences, concerns, desires, an...
Google recently announced that it will soon start more closely stitching user information together. Effective March 1st, Google will monitor user behaviors, habits, preferences, concerns, desires, an...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:30 PM on 01/28/2012
Based on the assertion that Google needs to monetize their services (and for some reason can't charge for it), then those who say "its no big deal." certainly won't mind when insurance companies use the data to increase your rates based on:
1) Locations traveled and amount of travel
2) Party places visited on social network sites
3) purchase decisions
4) volume of posts/emails/text messages.

If the data was collected legally and you agreed to give it to google under the precept of "making your experience better", then you are in agreement that google knows what makes your experience better; you agree that Google can pick who gets your data and you must agree that Google will have your best interest in mind.
06:52 AM on 01/27/2012
From Mike Elgan 1. Google won't "follow you." You're simply logged in until you log out. That log in now fully applies to all Google services covered by this new unification.

2. Google won’t suddenly “harvest more personal data about you.” Let's say Google currently knows A about you on Gmail, B about you on YouTube and C about you on Search. Under the new system, Google will know ABC about you on each of those three services. But Google doesn't know more about you. They still know ABC about you, just as before.

3. Of course you can opt out. You can also log out, and log-out is now much more powerful. When you log out from, say, Gmail, you log out from everything.

In reality, Google is merely consolidating and unifying far-flung services to create a single, personalized experience across Google properties that will keep the company relevant and enable it to move to the next phase in the evolution of the Internet. And the company is doing so in a transparent manner that I wish more companies would embrace.
04:28 AM on 01/27/2012
I really don't see any inconsequence with this policy. Yes you don't have to use Google products. We costomers feel free to use Google; Google collects data from customer behaviors. These two processes are independent to each other. Privacy here is just a perception. It really doesn't matter during these two processes.
06:18 PM on 01/26/2012
The countervailing argument is that it doesn't need to be an either/or proposition. Google could be legally required to allow customers to opt-out of this level of tracking. I don't blame Google for maximizing profits, but I do blame policymakers for not protecting privacy.

Acxiom, the digital data mining/marketing company, knew more about the 9/11 hijackers than law enforcement did. Bad on law enforcement, but it gives you an idea of how powerful this information is.
03:23 PM on 01/26/2012
Your advice is simple, but also simplistic. You rely upon an unrealistic conception of the world as an open marketplace of goods and services, which it is not. The tech companies provide services which are often necessary for operating in the contemporary world, with communications services more akin to phone and water services than to luxury goods. Yes, I understand that legally the companies have a huge range of options, but Google's abandoned motto of "Don't Be Evil" used to be an acknowledgment that ethical considerations might have a place in a world of capitalism. Was that naive?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Phil Simon
Author, The Age of the Platform: How Amazon, Apple
02:53 AM on 01/27/2012
Perhaps it was naive, but it's not the first company to amend its stance. Twelve years ago, Amazon said that it wasn't interested in becoming a publisher. Now, that's exactly what's it doing, much to the chagrin of the publishing industry. I don't see how marketing to me more accurately is evil. Google needs to make money. If that's simplistic, then so be it.
04:49 PM on 01/29/2012
Yes, I do think boiling everything down to money is simplistic. We're in agreement.
03:21 PM on 01/26/2012
This piece of 'journalism' brought to you by Google.

Thanks for this nice bit of spin. Good to know where HP stands on internet privacy (and journalistic integrity).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
03:03 PM on 01/26/2012
Personally I have no problem with it at all.I use google a lot for searches and I use Bing a lot as well.As far as the privacy thing and all the other stuff,hell all of us are being monitored everysingle day and night of our lives.When we go to the store for gorcery's and or anything else we might ned or want,it's all collected and evaluated.When we go to the movies,out to eat,you name it we are being monitored and evaluated to our likes and dislike and oreferenses,political statuses,everything we do is monitroed colected by super computers and evaluated.There is no escaping it unless one dropped offf of the grid entirely and even to do that requires months of hard work and needs to be kept in check every waking and sleeping hour of our lives.The point is,there is no privacy in any of our lives no mattter who we are and what we do etc
photo
MikeFraietta
Good eye might. But not an Aussie.
02:59 PM on 01/26/2012
I like being marketed to accurately. I seriously do not mind Google, or any other service, tracking all of my habits. Privacy is a perception of the past. The faster humans realize this, the faster we can tackle so many of the world's problems.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Phil Simon
Author, The Age of the Platform: How Amazon, Apple
04:23 PM on 01/26/2012
I am in violent agreement, Mike. If I don't like it, I don't have to use it. Period.
photo
Catriona
Wha daur meddle wi me?
01:31 AM on 01/28/2012
Accurate? They think I'm a bloke. (And that is my photo up there by my name.) How accurate is that?

I looked at lamps back in October, and Google is still littering my screen with lighting adverts. (Go away. The kitchen is finished. The lamps were bought before Halloween, and have long been installed.)

A friend had a miscarriage. She is no longer pregnant, and won't be having a child. Yet Google is STILL littering her screen with adverts for baby and child-related stuff.

I'll pass on Google.
04:14 AM on 01/27/2012
I agree.
photo
Joel Libava
I'm The Franchise King®
02:28 PM on 01/26/2012
Nice job, Phil.

I can't believe they are doing The Zuck.

It's disappointing.

The Franchise King®