iOS app Android app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Philip N. Cohen

GET UPDATES FROM Philip N. Cohen
 

'Help, My Eyeball Is Bigger Than My Wrist!': Gender Dimorphism in Frozen

Posted: 12/18/2013 1:15 pm

I can't offer much in the crowded field of Disney gender criticism. But I do want to update my running series on the company's animated gender dimorphism. The latest installment is Frozen.

Just when I was wondering what the body dimensions of the supposedly-human characters were, the script conveniently supplied the dimorphism money-shot: hand-in-hand romantic leads, with perfect composition for both eye-size and hand-size comparisons:

2013-12-18-17.jpg

With the gloves you can't compare the hands exactly, but you get the idea. And the eyes? Yes, her eyeball actually has a wider diameter than her wrist:

2013-12-18-23.jpg

Giant eyes and tiny hands symbolize femininity in Disneyland.

While I'm at at, I may as well include Brave in the series. Unless I have repressed it, there is no romance story for the female lead in that movie, but there are some nice comparison shots of her parents:

2013-12-18-32.jpg

Go ahead, give me some explanation about the different gene pools of the rival clans from which Merida's parents came.

Since I first complained about this regarding Tangled, I have updated the story to include Gnomeo and Juliet. You can check those posts for more links to research (and see also this essay on human versus animal dimorphism by Lisa Wade). To just refresh the image file, though, here are the key images. From Tangled:

2013-12-18-33.jpg

From Gnomeo:

2013-12-18-41.jpg

At this point I think the evidence suggests that Disney favors compositions in which women's hands are tiny compared to men's, especially when they are in romantic relationships.

REAL WRIST-SIZE ADDENDUM

How do real men's and women's wrist sizes differ? I looked at 7 studies on topics ranging from carpal tunnel syndrome to judo mastery, and found a range of averages for women of 15.4 cm to 16.3 cm, and for men of 17.5 to 18.1 cm (in both cases the judo team had the thickest wrists).

'Then I found this awesome anthropometric survey of U.S. Army personnel from 1988. In that sample (almost 4,000, chosen to match the age, gender, and race/ethnic composition of the Army), the averages were 15.1 for women and 17.4 for men. Based on the detailed percentiles listed, I made this chart of the distributions:

2013-12-18-graph123.jpg

The average difference between men's and women's wrists in this Army sample is 2.3 cm, or a ratio of 1.15-to-1. However, if you took the smallest-wristed woman (12.9 cm) and the largest-wristed man (20.4), you could get a difference of 7.5 cm, or a ratio of 1.6-to-1. Without being able to hack into the Disney animation servers with a tape measure I can't compare them directly, but from the pictures it looks like these couples have differences greater than the most extreme differences found in the U.S. Army.

This post was originally posted at Family Inequality and on thesocietypages.org.

Philip N. Cohen is a professor of sociology at the University of Maryland, College Park, and writes the blog Family Inequality.

Follow Philip N. Cohen on Facebook: www.facebook.com/FamilyInequality

 

Follow Philip N. Cohen on Twitter: www.twitter.com/familyunequal

FOLLOW WOMEN