Co-Authored by Phil Radford, Executive Director of Greenpeace USA and Aaron Viles, Deputy Director of Gulf Restoration Network
The BP disaster turns two this week. Two years since the nation was reminded that offshore drilling is dirty, dangerous, and deadly. Two years since the slow-motion disaster began changing our region, our communities, our ecosystem.
As we look back and assess where we are today, a troubling picture is emerging from the Gulf.
Throughout the foodchain, warning signs are accumulating. Dolphins are sick and dying. Important forage fish are plagued with gill and developmental damage. Deepwater species like snapper have been stricken with lesions, and their reefs are losing biodiversity. Coastal communities are struggling with changes to the fisheries they rely upon. Hard-hit oyster reefs aren't coming back and sport fish like speckled trout have disappeared from some of their traditional haunts. BP's oily fingerprints continue to mar the landscape and destroy habitats.
With these impacts already here, some scientists are alarmed by what they're finding. Unfortunately their concerns are largely drowned out by BP and the "powers that be" shouting through very large megaphones that "all is fine, BP is making it right, come and spend your money." But the truth is far different. The Gulf of Mexico, our nation's energy sacrifice zone, continues to suffer.
Of course, the Gulf wasn't a pristine ecosystem on April 19, 2010. The coastal wetlands of the Mississippi River delta were in a crisis state, losing a football field-worth of wetlands every hour due to our mismanagement of the river for flood control and dependable shipping lanes. This crisis has been greatly exacerbated by the oil industry being allowed to dredge 10,000 miles of canals through our coastal zone, removing marsh and increasing subsidence.
Louisiana's coastal wetlands system is among the fastest disappearing landmasses on earth, diminishing at the rate of 18 square miles every year. The coastal zone is vast however, making up 30 percent of the nation's coastal wetlands but is experiencing 90% of the nation's wetlands loss, a total of over 1,800 square miles since 1932.
These wetlands are absolutely critical to our nation. Supplying $3 trillion annually to the U.S. economy, the Mississippi River and the Gulf coast create an international gateway for products like coffee, grain, seafood, oil, and gas. The Gulf coast has historically been the cradle of nearly one-third of the commercial fish and shellfish harvest of the lower 48 states. Critical for migratory birds, the coast is used by up to 40 percent of North America's duck, geese, and eagle populations. Jazz, Funk, Zydeco, and Fats Domino were all born in southern Louisiana.
More importantly, Louisiana's natural storm defenses -- such as barrier islands, marshes, and cypress swamps -- protect Louisiana's coastal communities. Louisiana's infamous levees need wetlands to survive hurricane-level storms. But in the face of rising sea levels and stronger storms fueled by climate change, rebuilding these wetlands is the only way to make South Louisiana, and all it entails, sustainable.
Listen to the Greenpeace Radio Interview featuring Gulf Restoration Network's Aaron Viles
With an estimated $50 billion price tag to re-engineer the lower reaches of the Mississippi River to reintroduce sediment and freshwater into the marsh to rebuild wetlands, this crisis demands a national commitment. In the face of rising seas, subsiding marsh, and increasing energy costs, coastal scientists estimate we have less than 10 years as a nation to begin the restoration process.
Here's the irony. Despite the horrors the BP disaster has brought to the region, it also presents a unique opportunity to jump start this $50 billion restoration project. BP will be on the hook for an historic fine under the Clean Water Act, as much as $17.6 billion depending on how aggressively and effectively the U.S. Department of Justice pursues the super-polluter. The oil industry (well, one very large corporate representative) might finally be forced to fix what they broke in our ecosystem. Congress is considering a bill that would devote 80% of the Clean Water Act fines would go to gulf restoration projects. Congress needs to pass this bill without holding it hostage to anti-environmental legislation.
Two years after the disaster, it's outrageous that this is where we sit. Two years after the Santa Barbara oil spill, Earth Day was born, and helped to launch the modern environmental movement. Two years after the Exxon Valdez spill, the Oil Pollution Act had been passed by Congress, raising the bar on how we deal with oil accidents. Yet two years after the BP disaster, we're faced with horrible political gamesmanship, a vulnerable and threatened ecosystem, and struggling communities.
It's well past time we hold BP accountable, demand better leadership from Washington DC, and take significant steps to restore the Gulf, and protect against all future drilling disasters. We hope you'll help. Two years later and misguided politicians are not doing what's needed to fix the Gulf nor are they changing the "energy as usual" policies that got us in trouble in the first place.
Greenpeace submitted nearly 50 Freedom of Information Act requests in the summer of 2010 during the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster for photos and information. These photos have never been released by the government. They were taken as the oil was hitting the coastline and, in many cases, in areas where the Coast Guard and BP were forbidding independent journalists or citizens from doing our own documentation by boat or air.
Greenpeace is still analyzing more than 20,000 images from the US Fish & Wildlife Service. Below is a map with a selection of 300 of never before seen images. Please comment and tag the photos where you can see oil, and birds or other signs of wildlife.
Follow Philip Radford on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Phil_Radford
Sen. Tom Carper: 42 Years of Celebrating Our Planet: How Far We've Come and Where We Need To Go
Two years after BP oil spill, offshore drilling still poses risks
Ala. AG says work on BP case nearing fruition
Two years after BP oil spill, Patt clears the air with EPA head Lisa Jackson
And the people who have lived on the Gulf, and off the gulf, for decades... Gone or leaving.
How much will BP be paying?
I don't think that BP had a clear and coherent crisis communications message immediately after the spill, and I do not think they have a clear message currently. Two years ago, it was difficult for the media to gain access to the oil spill area and to get updated information. Today, it seems that BP is still telling the public that everything is going to be fine.
I don't think BP is being honest with its communications, and I do not think that the company is behaving morally. I agree that the government should be holding BP accountable for its actions, but I also (probably naively) believe that BP should just behave ethically on its own accord, because it is the right way for a corporation to behave.
Thank you for your post,
Ashley Morris
Graduate Student | Drury University
www.drury.edu
Reference:
Ma’anit, A. (2010). That petrol emotion. New Internationalist, (437). 20-22.
Advocates make lousy scientists. Greenpeace abuses science as badly as climate-change deniers.
The real problem is, nothing has been learned; BP and other oil companies will do this again.
Monsanto and GMO's, antibiotics and chemicals.
Obama and his Social Dmeocrat Party cannot continue to portray themselves as the party of "caring" if you keep pointing out inconvenient facts !!!
Find a rug and sweep this under it ... for secular sake.
Examples of this "watermelon" organization that it went off the rails some time ago:
The co-founder quit when he realized no one at the highest levels in Greenpeace had any science background:
http://www.fonvca.org/agendas/apr2011/Articles/From%20Greenpeace%20founder%20to%20nuclear%20defender-562.pdf
Greenpeace wants to ban chlorine. Chlorine is an element, good luck with that:
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1995-04-09/news/9504100221_1_chlorine-greenpeace-industry
Obama has a Super-PAC that permits donors to contribute unlimited amounts of funds anonymously (well, though dummy, single act corporations, which amounts to the same thing). If we were omniscient, we would know how much BP has given to Obama 2012.
That's the Super-PAC he announced was open for business the day after he and Holder settled the foreclosure fraud case against the five Too-Big-To-Fail banks for not much of nothing.
Before you start saying I am paranoid or whatever, let me direct you attention to:
http://www.barackobama.com/2012-first-quarter-volunteer-fundraisers.
Scroll down to the bundlers' category ("Amount Raised: $500,000+").
Scroll down that list until you see the name "Jon Corzine"
He's the former Goldman Sachs head, N.J. governor, US senator and head of bankrupt MF Global. Do you remember MF Global? It's the deriviatives clearing house that stole $1.2 billion of its segregated clients' deposits to pay JP Morgan.
$1.2 billion.
Now we understand why Corzine has not been arrested, jailed or nothing except asked if he would like his glass refilled at Obama fund-raisers.
See how Obama's government and re-election campaign work in tandem?
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2012/04/201241682318260912.html
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2012/03/20123571723894800.html
http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2012-04/shocking-deformities-gulf-seafood-found-after-bp-oil-spill