More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Philip Radford

Philip Radford

Posted: May 11, 2010 04:31 PM

Will Obama Make History Out of Oil Spill Crisis?

What's Your Reaction:

The word "crisis" in Chinese is composed of two characters. The first represents danger, and the second represents opportunity. President Obama weathered the financial crisis. Today, the President faces his second crisis.

The BP Deepwater Oil Spill will likely be the worst oil spill in U.S. history. The President can continue on his current path -- blame BP (it is BP's fault) and deflect questions about how his offshore oil drilling policies are likely to lead to more spills -- or he could free Americans of one of the main drivers of recessions, environmental disasters, and terror strikes.

What would free America from all of this, and put President Obama firmly in the history books, is merely changing the engines of cars. The President should use this crisis as the opportunity to shift America's cars to 30% plug-in electrics and plug-in hybrids by 2020 and 90% by 2030.

Here's why: Oil prices have been a driver behind recessions since the 1970s. Recent studies now reveal that oil price increases were a major driver behind our current recession.

The President was in an embarrassing place in Copenhagen last December, when he had little to offer a world that waited for his promised leadership on climate change. His current policies cut pollution by 10% of what other countries were promising. More creative, strategic leadership is needed from the White House if the world is to have a fighting chance in saving the climate.


Greenpeace image: The cost of offshore drilling


The President can prevent future recessions, oil spills, embarrassments at climate treaty meetings, wars for oil, and cut off funding for terror attacks by adopting the moonshot proposal put forward by companies like Cisco Systems and PG&E, who called for the electrification of cars in this ambitious, feasible blueprint.

In giving utilities the new, lucrative business of powering cars, the President should demand that all new electricity is clean or efficient (i.e. energy efficiency, offshore wind, regular wind, solar, geothermal), and that utilities accept a cap that is part of a plan to cut global warming pollution by 40% by 2020 and cuts pollution to 350 parts per million of carbon pollution by 2050. Anything less would be fiddling while Rome burns.

There are many ways to go about this:

  1. Simply roll out the blueprint;
Or, if you happen to feel urgency in the time of crises and would like to guarantee success, you do this as well:
  1. Require that 30% of new cars are plug-in by 2020 and 90% are by 2030 through the EPA or Congress;
  2. Rewrite national building codes to include outlets for plugging in cars across the country;
  3. Shift oil subsidies, conservatively estimated at10 billion per year, to making the grid "smart" so that consumers can charge their cars at home at night and power their offices (for money!) during the day;
  4. Require states to implement new rules for buying and selling electricity that favor renewables (time of use metering) and plug-ins without costing consumers more. This, plus the building codes, could be tied to highway funding or other programs;
  5. Providing tax incentives to plug-in buyers; and
  6. Simple steps laid out in the blueprint.

Simply implementing the blueprint would cut the emissions associated with transportation by over 50% by 2030. The grid improvements needed to make the grid smart would enable solar, battery storage, wind, and other renewables to play a much more significant part in America's energy production, moving America one more step towards the energy revolution.

The President can remain defensive, pointing fingers at BP, while gambling the health of our communities and economies on more offshore oil drilling, or he can be one of the great leaders of our times.

 

Follow Philip Radford on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Phil_Radford

 
 
  • Comments
  • 41
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ferrarimanf355
ZOMG TEH REI!
10:26 AM on 05/26/2010
Well, it looks like moments like this are going to be extinct.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYShvOOgmEk

Might as well buy a Mustang and smoke 'em while I got 'em, before the eco-thugs outlaw anything fun-to-drive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truth67
05:03 PM on 05/13/2010
the louisiana legislature is offering free oil changes
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truth67
04:57 PM on 05/13/2010
do you suppose these oil executives will follow the lead of wall street? how big will their bonuses be for having to deal with this?
10:23 PM on 05/12/2010
The “Beyond Petroleum†oil spill in the Gulf, like the Massey Energy mining disaster in West Virginia, only underscores how the era of cheap, safely-attainable fossil fuels has come to an end. Mr. President, don't you get it? Now is the time to announce that we are in a transition to a completely different energy system. Please show leadership! Yes, you can!
05:31 PM on 05/12/2010
Obama's biggest problem is that he's too worried about finding the middle ground on issues. That's always been his style of leadership going back to his days at the Harvard Law Review. This is why he'll never take the lead on any issue. On health care, he deferred to Congress instead of coming up with some bold proposals of his own. On financial reform, he seems to be doing the same thing. Even on the Times Square bomber and the issue of reading Miranda, he's not taking a firm stand on either side but seeking the middle ground. I really hope this is not the kind of leader he's going to continue being. Good leaders aren't afraid to take a firm stand on an issue and put forth ambitious goals. If I were Obama, I would go to BP and say "fix this leak by Friday or I'm sending in the military and then we're sending you the bill."
Democrat in the South
Empathy, the most important word
10:58 PM on 05/12/2010
Hear,Hear! It seems hopeless when you KNOW that we have the brains in this country to move forward and get off oil, but our elected leaders won't let that happen because they're protecting the criminals that bribe them. The excuses that we hear from them like it's not the will of the people, slow down ( stall ), it's too expensive, etc..........are just......I don't have the words to describe how disgusted I am with crooked politicians. I was so excited when Obama was elected because I thought we would finally be able to move forward. He has done some good things but not gone far enough in these desperate times. It appears that only Republican Presidents are able to implement their agendas. Guess America still hasn't hit bottom, because looks like they haven't had enough. Now that we see how much time we've wasted staying in the past, we don't have any more time to waste. We can move forward if we 'choose' to. " Yes We Can".
04:27 PM on 05/12/2010
modern science is said to be advancing very fast...we are moving ahead to build colonies in other planets...but still we are driving 150 years old petroleum fueled vehicles..did our modern science don't have the answer to an alternate cheap fuel for our transportation..

whats happening with the researches around world for an alternate fuel for transportation...why still the science cannot give us a cheap alternate fuel in these 150 years.. world is suffering from pollution by petroleum products...world economy is dancing on the beats of oil prices...still whats is stopping all these scientists around the world leaving the common man's hard earned money in the clutches of these petroleum companies...

..now think again...

who is against these researches for an effective alternate cheap fuel for the common man to live a decent life...
Democrat in the South
Empathy, the most important word
11:01 PM on 05/12/2010
OIL companies? ding, ding, ding
04:26 PM on 05/12/2010
Obama has so far shown a disturbing lack of imagination and creativity in the energy area.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
NotStarvingArtist
"Art is the signature of civilizations."
12:14 PM on 05/12/2010
So, who is getting this message to Obama? Publishing it on HuffPost doesn't necessarily put it in front of him.
12:11 PM on 05/12/2010
"The U.S. federal government receives one of the lowest government takes (gas and oil royalties) in the world. Studies issued in 2006 and prior years similarly show that the United States has consistently ranked low in government take compared to other governments."
GAO study: http://www.gao.gov/htext/d07676r.html

Governments and their ........Royalty %

Mexico ......................................... 31%
U.S. ................................................42%
Trinidad & Tobago ..................... 49%
Australia ........................................54%
Egypt ..............................................81%
Venezuela .....................................91%
Iran .................................................93%
Cameroon ......................................11%
Alaska Govt. .................................. 64%

Oil and natural gas produced from federal leases generated over $6.5 billion in royalties in 2009. BP's 1st quarter profit was $5.6 billion. So how about as a first step retaining a greater financial share of the resource OWNED by all Americans and use those proceeds to fuel the renewables revolution. There will be no better time politically to cut the subsidies to oil companies and claiming a sane and equitable return from oil extracted from federal lands. Since we'll continue to use oil in the interim, we may as well control it.

As a federally owned, strategic, finite resource oil and gas should be treated as such and the oil companies should be relegated and regulated into a contracted utility status: drilling and delivering the commodity at a reasonable cost/profit ratio. Along with funding renewable technologies serious deepwater blow-out containment research is needed, since the oil giants do little of the former and none of the latter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bloggerrogr
Thou shalt not whine
12:07 AM on 05/13/2010
qzulix;
You completely overlook the fact that the U.S. holds 3% or less of the world's available petroleum reserves, yet we consume 25% of global production. It doesn't matter what our 'take' is; the sad fact is that we have to purchase oil on the world commodities ('spot') market and that is not going to change.
Also, every $1 increase in the cost of a barrel of crude ultimately results in a $1.5 billion increase to Iran and it's President, Madman Awkward-dinnerjacket which he then uses to pursue his nuclear weapons program. How dum is that?
FWIW
01:42 AM on 05/13/2010
Didn't you notice I wrote "in the interim?" Look, royalty isn't it's statutory name; by law it's call the "take," meaning: "You can metal-detect for Spanish Gold on my 1000 acres as long as you give me my TAKE." That's your and my resource our government is giving away to private multi-national oil companies who, yes, do sell it on the global market, but they also make a ginormous profit that we could use here to fund renewable technologies. It's revenue just waiting to be claimed and put to use. Better than a tax.

The real point is that yes, it's finite, but that oil will continue to be extracted from federal lands at globally-meager royalty rates. Raising the rate of royalty payment is simply a change in the profit ratio for the oil companies who drill in many waters with much higher takes than the U.S. The oil would hit the market at whatever the going per-barrel rate and we'd get 80% of the profit and the Oil company would get 20%, say, like Egypt.

Did you know the fed govt takes in-kind payment to fill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve? Me neither until this week. The oil co simply transports the crude federal take% to the reservoir and pumps it into the ground. We own that oil extracted from federal land and should be paid at a better rate than 42%

Don't forget Exxon's $35 billion, 0-tax 2009 profits.
02:07 AM on 05/13/2010
It's not about the oil; it's about the BENJAMINS! The money's the object, Bloggerrogr.

FWIreallyW
edva
Capitalism vs Humanity
08:27 AM on 05/12/2010
I hope and pray that Obama is smart enough to realize that THIS IS THE MOMENT to push through on alternative energy. DON'T COMPROMISE with the well-oiled party of "hell no". JUST DO IT!!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
wassilij
shamanlight
05:19 AM on 05/12/2010
Whats needed is a corporate death penalty.......If any corporation like BP or Halburton causes a disaster to occur.....The entire corporation including all assets are dismantled and all assets liquidated to pay for the cleanup and economic losses felt by those whose livelihoods they have destroyed.........making it RETROACTIVE!!!.......NO more Halburton...or BP or whatever CORPORATIONS were involved!!!
Not a single one of these Rat B@stards could man up and take responsibility for this disaster that has ruined the entire southern coast of the US...How much longer are WE the people going to allow these CORPORATIONS to destroy our life support system?.......DESTROY THESE CORPORATIONS....Starting NOW !!....No second chances....no 75 mile limit BS,,,,
If this was the policy from the beginning....Safety measures and plans ABC and D would be in place.....the only plan they had was called GREED
.......One coast down ......Two to Go.....Are you willing to take that risk? Make them pay...with a CORPORATE DEATH PENALTY!!!....RETROACTIVE!!
edva
Capitalism vs Humanity
08:24 AM on 05/12/2010
Absolutely!! Anybody, and any business, connected with this mega-disaster should be put out of business permanently, their assets seized, and their executives imprisoned. That would show others the price of disregarding public and environmental safety.
Democrat in the South
Empathy, the most important word
11:05 PM on 05/12/2010
We need to hold accountable who didn't do their job of regulating. Start at the top.
02:22 AM on 05/12/2010
I'm all for this idea, but there is no mention of how much this will cost. I'm going to guess that it requires a larger investment than we can afford in these times.. Wouldn't Obama's original plan of tapping into our own oil reserves at least buy us some time until we have fixed our economy and refined our renewable energy technology to be more cost efficient
Democrat in the South
Empathy, the most important word
11:10 PM on 05/12/2010
As I understand it, drilling in the gulf only provides 3% of what we use and even that doesn't necessarily go to the US. And if that's true, we don't NEED to drill here, big oil just WANTS to drill here.They want to drill where ever they can to make a buck. Money is the only thing that matters to them and they don't are who they have to f@$..K to get it.
Democrat in the South
Empathy, the most important word
11:15 PM on 05/12/2010
they don't care, sorry, left off a letter
05:40 PM on 05/11/2010
We don't need this bloody oil anymore.

BOYCOTT BP

When you destroy public property, your property becomes public.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Phil Radford
Greenpeace Executive Director, poker player, h
12:50 AM on 05/12/2010
"Bloody" oil is right. http://www.votevets.org/index_html has it right - we don't need to have Americans die for oil anymore.

But anyone one who tells you we can get off of foreign oil while still using oil is lying because saying that polls well. The cheapest oil is in the middle east. The last drop to be used will be from the Middle East - likely Saudi Arabia. You don't fill your car at your local off-shore oil station. Oil is a global commodity. The only way to get off of foreign oil is to get off of oil. That's why transitioning to plug-in cars and banning off-shore oil drilling is the way to go.
05:14 AM on 05/12/2010
And if you live on the West Coast, don't forget that ARCO is BP.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Margery Kempe
Raised by wolves. Phd in
06:34 PM on 05/12/2010
Thanks for that--and being from Huntington Beach, a double thank you. I need to know who to boycott...now can we get some new clean energy infrastructure please?
05:30 PM on 05/11/2010
If there was a tax credit to cover the cost of alternative energy sources, particularly installation of solar photovoltaics that ARE MADE HERE IN THE USA, not China or overseas, me and thousands of others would do it NOW. Just think of the solar energy that the $billions spent on the useless occupation of Afghanistan to protect an oil/gas pipeline have cost and continue to cost, in terms of the national debt and loss of lives.

VoteVets.org understands this http://www.votevets.org/index_html
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Phil Radford
Greenpeace Executive Director, poker player, h
12:46 AM on 05/12/2010
Hi my friend -- there are tax credits for solar. There is a federal tax credit, and depending on the state in which you live, there are state tax credits. Check this easy-to-navigate website of incentives for clean energy state by state and spread the word - http://www.dsireusa.org/ and spread the word.
01:17 PM on 05/12/2010
Paul, I live in western NC and all I see are tax credits for corporate use of renewable energy. We have been talking with a company here and am pursuing solar, to include properly orienting the design of a new "green" very efficient house for both passive solar and solar photovoltaic placement.
05:13 PM on 05/11/2010
Don't forget the Pickens Plan - convert fleet vehicles to liquid natural gas. Big rigs can carry big tanks of LNG but not big racks of expensive batteries.