iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Philip K. Howard

GET UPDATES FROM Philip K. Howard
 

Big Change: An Eight Point Platform

Posted: 10/26/2012 10:50 am

"Big change" is an appealing new slogan. Most Americans believe that big change is needed -- 81 percent of voters believe "government in Washington is broken and needs basic overhaul," according to a recent Clarus poll. But what might "big change" involve? Here's a platform that builds on some of the proposals in Simpson-Bowles budget deficit reduction plan, but goes further and addresses systemic flaws of our paralyzed government. In general, we must simplify government to reduce the deficit and spur the private sector to create jobs.

BIG CHANGE Agenda:

  1. Transform Public Healthcare. Transition Medicare and Medicare to a single provider -- an accountable care organization contracting with the government to provide all a recipient's needs. The current fee-for-service system wastes $200-300 billion annually.
  2. Radically simplify regulation. Bureaucracy discourages jobs. End bureaucratic central planning, and refocus regulation on goals and governing principles. Make people accountable for results, not compliance. Appoint commissions in each area to recommend "spring cleanings" of accumulated regulation.
  3. Force Congress to set priorities. Sunset laws should put all programs up for review every 10 years. Change the rules of Congress to end partisan stalemate. It's impossible to balance the budget without rethinking old entitlements and subsidies. Obsolete programs waste at least $100 billion annually.
  4. Restore accountability to public service. The civil service system is broken, making sensible public management almost impossible and smothering good public servants. End the presumption of lifetime tenure. Protect against partisan personnel decisions by a neutral civil service review board.
  5. End benefits for the rich. Means-test public subsidies, including tax deductions.
  6. Simplify the tax code. Start over with a simple, transparent schedule of rates. End most corporate subsidies. Lower the corporate tax rate to match other countries and encourage repatriation of offshore capital.
  7. Make justice reliable. America has become the defensive society. Doctors practice defensive medicine. Entrepreneurs fear a ruinous verdict. Unreliable justice is a drag on job creation. Restore predictability as a core goal of justice, giving judges responsibility to draw boundaries of reasonable claims. Create special health courts, saving over $50-100 billion annually.
  8. Bulldoze school bureaucracy. What do forms and rules have to do with inspiring students? Bureaucracy can't teach. Give principals and teachers back the freedom to do their jobs.


These changes would balance the budget, end government paralysis, and begin to transform America's public culture. Americans know we need it. Are any leaders bold enough to say it?

 
FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 253
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
04:13 PM on 11/01/2012
The government could probably get out of debt in a few years if they abolished Child Protective Services and gave all the children back to their parents. The Courts falsify "reasonable efforts" rulings which is all they need to get the funding. Abolish the Juvenile Dependency Court all together. Make child protection more like it was intended, saving severely abused children from physical and sexual abuse and since it is such a noble cause, plenty of people would volunteer, right?
04:43 PM on 10/29/2012
I would add term limits to this list....Term limits for the senate and house.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:31 AM on 10/29/2012
This week's Mitt Romney should run on this crap and take it down the toilet with him when he loses.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
05:34 PM on 10/28/2012
What's different now is that nothing gets resolves unless it's on a global level and accompanies a huge reduction in greenhouse gases worldwide.
12:19 AM on 10/28/2012
One more item I would add to the list, is to put in a new budget deficit tax on all natural resources that are drilled or mined. We would allow natural gas to be exported to other countries, but a 10% federal tax would be added to the export of it. This tax would go directly to the federal deficit. Once the federal budget is balanced, those revenues would go towards medicare and social security funds to bring them back up. We hear some much about how much coal, natural gas and oil that we have, if so, than lets market it to other countries. Let the energy corporations make a buck, as well as the government. In that scenario it is a win win. In terms of natural resources, we can certainly make the statement that nobody built it, as it was there before mankind. We can also argue that all American's are entitled to share benefits of the vast amount of natural resources found in the US.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nicumber
11:11 PM on 10/27/2012
"How Law is suffocating America," is a book I am putting on my Christmas list. In this article, I like the specific and detailed points made while remaining concise. What stood out for me: "Sunset laws should put all programs up for review every ten years. "Transition medicare to a single provider--an accountable care organization contracting with the government to provide all a recipient's needs" "Lower the corporate tax rate to match other countries and encourage........" Phillip Howard should run for office.

Laurel
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conor McCartney
08:37 PM on 10/31/2012
Philip K. Howard is awesome, all of his books are fantastic and easy reads
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mdfinch
11:10 PM on 10/27/2012
Sensible ideas except the most important ws left out. Reform and "big" change has to begin with taking teh "money" out of policy decisions. Take the money out of campaigns andhave a public financed system with set limits. Take the money out of lobbying on national and local level. No longer can influnce be purchased through contributions to politicians. That also means perks that come from people loobying the government promoting specific agendas. One person one vote not many votes because they can be bought.
07:05 PM on 10/27/2012
Point 2 is out of whack. Emphasize results, not compliance? That's a prescription for fraud, corner cutting, graft, waste, kickbacks, and a whole bunch of other bad stuff up to and including dead citizens. Fits the GOP agenda perfectly, by the way. They call it market-driven. Whatever, we need rules and we need compliance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conor McCartney
08:38 PM on 10/31/2012
what is the point of making sure that railings are 44.5 inches high or taller in compliance with OSHA if it has nothing to do with safety?
05:34 PM on 10/27/2012
If "oil production" was called," removing a natural resource that could never be replaced" would the american public be so quick to encourage it?
05:13 PM on 10/27/2012
change seating in the house and senate to alphabetical order. This could increase understanding and moderation.
if Romney starts a war, how many mormons will be in the front lines?
Why don"t "patriots" like to pay taxes?
How do draft dodgers and tax dodgers support the troups?
If corps are people, why can't they be put in prison?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
ThatsTheTheWayItIs
religion, ideology, partisanship are delusional
04:44 PM on 10/27/2012
The majority think DC is broken because of what it does - not because it does too little. People are tired of partisan politics because they disagree with both the Left and Right. They don't want big change, they want less change. They didn't want ACA, they don't want to change Medicare.

The majority prefer the status quo to the change OWS or the Tea Party want.
They think DC is broken, not the US. They want DC to go away, not become more powerful.
03:51 PM on 10/27/2012
Only one thing will fix our government. Campaign Finance Reform.

Then our representative's would do what is best for our country and not what is best for their doners.

As long as bribery and the revolving door is legal forget about this being a representative democracy. It is a prime example of Fascism.

Take the money out of politics. Blaming this and that politician does no good. As our legalized corrupt bribery system exists today we are irrelevant.

Campaign Reform would heal the split of the American people that big money has encouraged in order to weaken us and keep us fighting with each other.

Any politician HAS to play ball. Find a politician who does not take money. If he does not he will not win. He will join us little people whining about how we would do it if we were in power.

Blaming this and that politician does no good. The blame lies ultimately on American citizens.
02:06 PM on 10/27/2012
"Make justice reliable."

Now that's specific, I don't know why no one ever thought of it.
01:58 PM on 10/27/2012
I'm convinced that nothing of value will come out of our government until we stop policies that encourage politicians to spend more time working toward re-election and ensuring their own personal wealth than doing the people's business. Here is my list:
1. Term limits. Elected office should be a privilege, not a career. One six-year term, then you move on with your life, no pension.
2. No lobbying position for 4 years following a term.
3. No bills written by outside special interest groups. We pay representatives to do this work, and they need to do it.
4. Government funded campaigns. Candidates get the same amount of money to run their campaigns, people may donate to the government campaign finance fund and the money is equally distributed. This will be a good first glimpse as to whether a candidate is a good manager or not.
5. Constitutional amendment to assert that corporations are not people, thus eliminating the ability of decision-makers within corporations from having undue influence and essentially more power than any other voter.
Now who will be brave enough to promote this?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:32 PM on 10/27/2012
Only publicly financed elections are desirable of needed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nicumber
11:31 PM on 10/27/2012
"A six year term", a very reasonable time period to achieve something of worth to the country. A great and even more specific commentary on the article by Phillip Howard. Perhaps the realities of climate change and the havoc, that "Sandy" will unfortunately bring will force bravery from some politicians. As long as the majority in office are comfortable no change will come. "Government funded campaigns with equal distribution to the candidates sounds very fair.

Laurel
08:49 AM on 10/28/2012
I'm not sure what it will take for climate change to become a worthy issue in Washington. It seems that those who deny it will continue to do so, calling every event an anomaly. I'm glad Obama has started to do something, despite our economic woes. But I think we can be sure that these efforts will go by the wayside in a Romney administration.
photo
chanahan
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
01:29 PM on 10/27/2012
Most of the ideas are good, but #1 and #5 don't fit. Having a monopoly for Medicare and Medicaid (I think the article had a typo) would not necessarily end up with cost savings, monopolies rarely do. Ending benefits for the rich doesn't make sense. The rich use little service from government in return for their taxes and soc sec is a system in which people put money away for their retirement. If all people don't get out based on what they put in, then it is simply another welfare program in which the rich are paying for others. As far as tax deductions for the rich are concerned, #6 would take care of that if we went to a flat tax with no deductions. Or better yet, no income tax at all and move to a consumption tax.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:33 PM on 10/27/2012
BS, the rest of the first wold has better health care, for all people and at half the cost.
photo
chanahan
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
09:05 AM on 10/29/2012
There is no country in the world that has better health care than the US.  We have the best hospitals, best medical schools, and best research institutions in the world.  Those institutions are used predominantly by Americans.  85% of Americans have health insurance and generally like the care they get.

The only benefit of socialized medicine systems is that everyone is covered, but that is provided at the expense of service.  Health care is a scarce good and something will ration it to consumers.  In the US individuals make that choice and in socialized medicine countries, the government makes that choice.
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
05:23 PM on 10/28/2012
I've heard it said that if the rich don't get SS, they will have no reason to act other than to oppose it. So you may have a point there. But the income cap after which the rich don't pay into SS could be lifted. I disagree that the health care reform would lead to bad medicine. Since it would eliminate waste and the race for profits that is inappropriate for any health system, it will lead to some degree of improvement by definition. That seems to be the case in other industrial nations.
photo
chanahan
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance
09:09 AM on 10/29/2012
Soc sec is a system in which people pay in and get out from it based on what they pay in.  The cap is now about $106K and the max payout is about $2500/month.  If you put the cap at $200K, then you would have to give the top contributors $5000/month.  Unless of course you want to turn soc sec into a welfare program in which the wealthy pay for the poor.

Health care is a scarce resource that will be rationed in some fashion.  Either individuals will make an economic decision on what they can afford given their insurance and assets, or the government will decide.  In European systems, the way the governments keep the cost down is to reduce service.  For example, a European will wait for months for procedures that are routinely done in the US.  Also, the latest medical breakthroughs are not generally available in Europe and much more quickly disseminated in the US.