Last week, Urban Strategies Council, a smart and savvy nonprofit in Oakland, Calif., caused a bit of a local stir with a report looking at who's been buying up foreclosed properties in their city -- a town that's been seriously hit by the foreclosure crisis. What they found is almost certainly not limited to Oakland, and should be cause for discussion nationwide.
In a nutshell, Urban Strategies reported that widespread foreclosures are producing a massive change in the ownership of entire communities:
Our analysis reveals that -- as of October 2011 -- investors had acquired 42 percent of all properties that went through foreclosure since 2007 in Oakland. Of these properties acquired by investors, 93 percent are located in the low-income flatland neighborhoods of the city. Further, only ten out of the top 30 most active investors are located in Oakland.
The picture the report paints is disturbing, with outside investors suddenly wielding disproportionate influence in what have traditionally been the city's most disenfranchised neighborhoods. These neighborhoods are mostly inhabited by people of color, the communities hit hardest by foreclosures in recent years. Now, a relative handful of investment firms (one out-of-town company alone has bought up over 300 properties) are swooping in and paying cash, crowding out individual buyers. As a Bay Citizen's story put it:
Many of these investors are turning the homes into rental properties and charging rent that is significantly higher than the monthly mortgage payments many families would have to make if they purchased the homes."They are massive landlords in neighborhoods that historically have had high rates of homeownership, and very few people are aware of the investor activity that's taking place under their feet," said Steve King, the organization's housing and economic development coordinator.
The city is seeing a massive transfer of wealth from individual homeowners to a handful of companies. And right now there aren't a lot of standards governing how these companies do business. It's not too much to suggest that it might be good for the community to have standards regarding maintenance and upkeep, for example, in order to preserve the stability of neighborhoods.
And if we really want to salvage something good out of this situation, how about an effort to ensure that upkeep and rehab work for these investor-owned properties goes to diverse small businesses located in these struggling communities?
Finally, let's not forget that this is happening because of a housing crisis. There is a crying need for affordable housing, for both ownership and rental. If investors are going to be buying up homes in bulk, a significant percentage should be set aside for affordable housing.
While I can't say for sure that this is happening all over the U.S., there is no reason to believe Oakland is an anomaly. There are certainly plenty of places where mass foreclosures are likely to smell like profits to potential investors.
What we are learning is that the foreclosure crisis is affecting and even remaking communities in ways that no one had envisioned or prepared for. This is something that citizens and their elected officials need to start discussing and figuring out how to address.
It's been said that every crisis is an opportunity, and what's happening to foreclosed homes sure looks like a crisis. Let's make it an opportunity to protect neighborhoods, aid local businesses and provide affordable home ownership and rental opportunities for those struggling to keep a decent roof over their heads.
Follow Preeti Vissa on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Greenlining
I'm not so sure of the other two suggestions. First of all, how exactly does ensuring that maintenance "goes to diverse small businesses" within the community differ from uniformly enforcing maintenance obligations? Is she referring to making sure that minority businesses aren't excluded from maintenance enforcement?
Setting aside affordable housing also raises tricky questions if we're talking about levels of rent that are actually below mortgage rates. This also only seems feasible once a landlord controls enough properties to balance any loss on affordable housing through profits on other units. If I controlled 4 properties and was forced to take a loss on 2 of them that would be pretty harsh. The issue could probably be resolved with a housing credit to either the tenant or landlord though.
Just a side thought. If these regulations afforded much more leeway to small landlords it might be much preferable to choose housing run by a large company instead of a local small landlord. Your tenant's rights might be tied to the depth of your landlord's pockets to some degree.
______________________________________
How would you ever do that? That would require a different type of economy than we live in and is not even vaguely realistic. If you want to have an impact, lobby to limit investment properties and the number of investment properties someone can buy in a city. There is strong precedent for that type of regulation. Focusing on diverse owned small businesses doing the renovations is a dead end.
Approved FHA buyers don't have a chance to buy anything in competition with cash buyers.
the big swinging dicks all over the big end of town regard selling a housea at a time as beneath their dignity
they are too lazy to invest 401ks eg sensibly
they wanna flip a bil here & a bil there over a nice lunch
if i invest in a property trust, last thing i want is a piece of a skyscraper - but thats what u get
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/20/us-usa-foreclosures-investors-idUSBRE82J12M20120320
The Government’s Plan to Sell Foreclosures in Bulk is a Terrible Idea
http://bayarearealestatetrends.com/2012/01/10/the-governments-plan-to-sell-foreclosures-in-bulk-is-a-terrible-idea/
http://www.housingpredictor.com/2012/wholesale-home-sell-off.html
http://www.thestreet.com/story/11224917/a-huge-housing-bargain--but-not-for-you.html
Government Set to Sell Foreclosures in Bulk
http://www.cnbc.com/id/45925851/Government_Set_to_Sell_Foreclosures_in_Bulk
The government should NOT be in on this.