iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Preeti Vissa

GET UPDATES FROM Preeti Vissa
 

Democracy: Is California About to Make History?

Posted: 09/01/2012 1:35 am

For better or worse, California's ballot initiative system sets national trends. From Proposition 13, which cut property taxes and set off a nationwide tax revolt in 1978, to medical marijuana two decades later, my state regularly leads the way.

And California's version of citizen democracy may be about to get a lot more inclusive. Considering the efforts at voter suppression going on in so many other parts of the country, this is a breath of fresh air.

Today, millions of California voters have no say in a crucial part of that process: deciding what gets on the ballot in the first place. That's because while the citizens of this incredibly diverse state speak 200 languages, our initiative petitions speak only one: English.

This is not a trivial problem. We have millions of naturalized citizens, including me and my immediate family: people from Asia, Latin America and all over the world who have put down roots in the Golden State.

About half of them, some 2.1 million eligible voters, don't speak or read English well. Thanks to the federal Voting Rights Act, their right to vote is protected. And voting materials such as ballots and the official state voter guide are prepared in nine different languages -- Chinese, Hindi, Japanese, Khmer, Korean, Spanish, Tagalog, Thai, and Vietnamese -- to ensure that these citizens have the information they need to cast an informed vote.

But existing law doesn't cover initiative petitions. As a result, millions of "limited English proficient" voters have essentially no say in deciding what they and their fellow citizens get to vote on. Worse, they may be subject to exploitation by dishonest signature-gatherers who misrepresent the contents of a petition.

That's not just a theoretical concern. Last year, when my colleagues conducted a listening tour of California communities to get folks' opinions of the initiative process, Spanish-speaking voters in Riverside, just east of Los Angeles, told of precisely such experiences.

But all of this may be about to change. Legislation now on Governor Jerry Brown's desk, called S.B. 1233, would have the state translate initiative petitions into all the languages covered by the Voting Rights Act. As I write this, the governor hasn't said whether he will sign the bill.

This is a simple reform, and the cost is trivial - literally less than California spends on its prison system in eight minutes. Sadly, some have tried to put a partisan spin on it, claiming it's some sort of Democratic conspiracy or, bizarrely, that letting voters read petitions in their own languages would be "an extra burden to our citizens."

Balderdash. This is an easy, inexpensive way to bring more of our citizens into the democratic process, and Gov. Brown should sign it into law immediately.

If you'd like to send Gov. Brown a message encouraging him to sign SB 1233, please sign our online petition.

 

Follow Preeti Vissa on Twitter: www.twitter.com/Greenlining

FOLLOW POLITICS
For better or worse, California's ballot initiative system sets national trends. From Proposition 13, which cut property taxes and set off a nationwide tax revolt in 1978, to medical marijuana two dec...
For better or worse, California's ballot initiative system sets national trends. From Proposition 13, which cut property taxes and set off a nationwide tax revolt in 1978, to medical marijuana two dec...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 141
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:22 AM on 09/08/2012
The reason it will not happen is that the language will not be translated is because the initiative descriptions and language carry legal standing. Since there are subtle differences in meaning between translations the courts would have to rule the English or the Spanish meaning is the legal one.

As for the opinions and reference material written by the supporters or opponents, it is up to them to write in a foreign language if they choose to.

All the instructions are already in multiple languages.
11:35 PM on 09/05/2012
Question to the author: in a functioning democracy with rights come responsibilities. If you want the full rights of citizenship, is it too much to ask to learn English? If I went to any other country on the earth and insisted that they print the ballots in English, how do you think they would respond?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
First Blast
res ad triarios venit
10:31 AM on 09/05/2012
They need to respect our tradition and learn English. Nothing less is acceptable
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Viper1st
multi quasi faceted
08:37 PM on 09/04/2012
In both Democrats & Republicans Platforms?

Republicans = English only
Democrats = Learn English
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jannas2cents
03:29 PM on 09/04/2012
I am so opposed to this concept on so many levels. First of all, the State of California is in dire financial condition, as is all the rest of the country. For immigrants to insist that election material be provided to them in their native language when there are 200 languages spoken in this one state is ridiculous. It is so wrong of immigrants to come here and then expect their newly adopted country to cater to their needs in their native language. It is so self-centered and so selfish. When one considers all the opportunities afforded to immigrants in this country and the long waiting lists of people trying to enter, for those who do get in to demand their newly adopted country provide political literature in their native language is just too much to ask or expect. I'm on a letter-writing campaign to do all I can to stop this legislation from being passed. I cannot even imagine the thought process going on here -- I assume those who immigrate here come in order to provide a better life for themselves and their children and then to not even bother to learn the language? Why come to this country anyway? Why not stay in your native country if that's where your attachment lies?
03:36 AM on 09/13/2012
I can definitely echo the sentiment that it is wrong for immigrants to come here and then not assimilate.

Republicans are no doubt afraid that people who would vote Democratic may actually get that chance. Moreover, there is definitely this fear that immigrants are taking over the nation/state, and that this concession is speeding that process along.

However, we have a Constitution for a reason. The 14th amendment, coupled with the Voting Rights Act, protects the rights of these non-English-speaking citizens.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jannas2cents
08:11 AM on 09/13/2012
nabakov100:
I agree. We already have a Constitution, the 14th Amendment and the Voting Rights Act, so there are already enough laws on the books to protect everyone's right to vote. To quote Governor Jerry Brown: "Not every human problem can be solved with more laws".
 
 
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BiggpussJr
pissin em off one comment at a time.
09:32 AM on 09/04/2012
Simple and cost effective solution. :LEARN ENGLISH!!!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jannas2cents
04:02 PM on 09/03/2012
Does she expect that because 200 different languages are spoken in this state, that all literature about elections and voting be printed in 200 languages? Who should pay for this extraneous expense? Is it too much to ask of immigrants to learn to speak, read and write the language of the land in which they have chosen to immigrate? Were they forced or coerced to come here? Speaking one language is a unifying force in any state or country and to speak multiple languages is a devisive and polarizing force. Examples of what happens in multiple-speaking countries: French-speaking Quebec tried to secede from the rest of Canada. Yugoslavia: The bloody conflict in this multiple-language country ultimately broke up into multiple countries caused by ethnic cleansing and the difficulty of different ethnic groups not having the unifying force of a common language -- they never learned how to get along or live with one another. Multiple languages in one country causes an "Us vs Them" mentality and no one feels they fit in. There are FREE English languages offered in every community in America for immigrants to learn to speak the language, and I think it should be required for citizenship. We are a country of immigrants and prior to the current generation of immigrants, legal and illegal, most learned to speak the language within a few years after immigrating. If it's too much trouble to learn the language, these people should return to their homeland.
05:24 PM on 09/03/2012
Chinese, Hindi, Japanese, Khmer, Korean, Spanish, Tagalog, Thai, and Vietnamese are all languages "of the land in which they have chosen to immigrate," just like English. We don't have some sort of official language, and just because a lot of people speak English does not make it an official language. You can choose to exclude people based on their language proficiency, if you like, but I think America's glorious 200 year history included many people who barely spoke English and yet made significant contributions to the country. Nicola Tesla, for example, was never very good at English, neither was Einstein until later in life. Ayn Rand spoke English with a heavy Russian accent all her life. English language skills do not determine whether someone is a good American. Being narrow minded and xenophobic, on the other hand, are moral failings. Who says you're not the one who should learn the languages of the people who move here? What makes English superior to any other language? The America I know and love welcome diversity, instead of trying to water it down and make everyone conform.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jannas2cents
11:17 PM on 09/03/2012
The article on which we're commenting has to do with political campaign literature and voting material in which the author feels this printed material should be available in all of the 200 languages spoken in the state of California. While it's true that immigrants can function well in our society without having to learn the language, if they want to have the privilege of participating in the political process, they should learn to speak, read and write English. It's not that hard and can be learned with tape cassettes, CDs or classes -- it's a matter of motivation and wanting to become a part of one's newly adopted country. If I were to move to a different country, one of the first things I would want to do was learn the language so I would fit in and be able to function in that country. I can't imagine NOT wanting to learn the language of the land in which I lived.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jannas2cents
08:41 PM on 09/04/2012
kwyang: The "lot of people" you're referring to who speak English represent 82% of the population, which is also the language used in government and in our courts. (Spanish speakers represent 10.7%, other Indo-European 3.8%, Asian and Pacific island languages 2.7%, other languages .7%) I'm reminded of JFK's line (paraphrased here) 'ASK NOT WHAT YOUR COUNTRY SHOULD DO FOR YOU ..... ASK WHAT YOU SHOULD DO FOR YOUR COUNTRY". So what are these folks doing FOR their country anyway? Please tell me. I'd like to know. If they can't even be bothered to learn the language of their new country, what is it they do that's so special? How would you describe their partricular contribution? It's really quite shocking and even offensive how polarized this generation of immigrant groups are and how they make no effort to become a part of their new country, but instead set themselves apart like countries within a country. It's not good for our country as a whole to have so many different ethnic groups in the country who do not want to be a part of the country. It's even disturbing.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:39 AM on 09/03/2012
So only NINE of TWO HUNDRED other languages will be printed on ballots? Want to be inclusive? Then print ballots in the remaining ONE HUNDRED AND NINETY-ONE languages.
05:25 PM on 09/03/2012
If we had unlimited funding we wouldn't need to restrict the convenience to the most popular languages, in an ideal world people can request materials in whatever language they want.
09:36 AM on 09/03/2012
Sorry to be such a wet blanket but this is America and we speak English. Learn it.

And as for California being a bellwether for national change. Your state is dead broke. And so is federal government. Strong work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vince Almaraz
04:07 PM on 09/04/2012
You have way too much common sense. I'm afraid you would be able to make it as a California politician.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vince Almaraz
04:07 PM on 09/04/2012
I meant to say you WOULDN'T make it as a California politician.
06:57 AM on 09/03/2012
Election materials and ballots, yes.

Initiative petitions, no.

At least, not at taxpayer expense. If special interests, or grassroots persons/organizations wish to translate their causes into multiple languages, they're free to do so at their own expense just like they have the option to pay people to gather signatures.

-------------------------

There's enough frivolous or deceptive c-rap on the ballot already. This would just encourage more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Gregory Hannigan
Self-annointed political pundit
03:28 AM on 09/03/2012
I don't live in California anymore or else I'd be all for this. As a nation of immigrants it's important we make every effort possible to include our new neighbors into the process.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jannas2cents
04:05 PM on 09/03/2012
Or perhaps these new neighbors should make the effort to learn the language of the land to which they've immigrated so they will fit in, like all previous generations of immigrants have done.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Gregory Hannigan
Self-annointed political pundit
04:15 PM on 09/03/2012
I bet you they are. But it's not as easy as an adult to learn a new language as it is for children. And this would mostly be aimed at new arrivals, not immigrants who have been there 10+ years.
05:38 PM on 09/03/2012
No, diversity is strength, let people use whatever language they're comfortable with. There's already enough pressure to learn English without any more coercion or trying to make it harder for people to vote. "All previous generations of immigrants" also had to go through humiliating procedures at Ellis Island and had their last names forcibly changed, should we go back to that, too? We live in the 21st century now. It's time to be better than our ancestors.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
01:26 AM on 09/03/2012
There are many free online translation tools available. What prevents all these community activists from using these translation tools and publishing the translation on their websites?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jannas2cents
04:08 PM on 09/03/2012
Or what's preventing these immigrants from attending all the FREE English language classes that are conducted in every community in America? To immigrate here and then expect your new country to conform to you and your particular language is absurd -- the tail trying to wag the dog.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:26 AM on 09/03/2012
No sorry, that's where I draw the line - we all have a common language for communicating official matters - English. And by the way I grew up in a non English speaking home, and didn't start speaking English until at least 5. Yet we all learned to speak English when communicating with our neighbors, it's the least one can do for a country that's been so good to you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hlasv3
Liberty requires eternal vigilence
09:18 AM on 09/03/2012
That is a lovely sentiment that used to work but California is already gone. It has expired.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:01 PM on 09/03/2012
Oh no, I have tickets to go out there next week.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lordstrom
libertarian stock trader, wrestling fan, buddhist
05:14 PM on 09/02/2012
It's really disgusting and inefficient to want to translate everything government does into several different languages.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hlasv3
Liberty requires eternal vigilence
09:19 AM on 09/03/2012
Oh, California can afford it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
joncavanaugh
I am, and forever remain, at your service.
05:02 PM on 09/02/2012
I don't think California is about to make history. I think it's about to become history.