More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Brad Hirschfield

Brad Hirschfield

Posted: March 2, 2010 02:21 PM

ADL's Foxman Crying Wolf?

What's Your Reaction:

According to a Twitter feed from the Jewish Council on Public Affairs' national meeting in Dallas, ADL head Abe Foxman lashed out at Andrew Sullivan, calling him a good example of an educated anti-Semite. While neither I nor anyone else has been able to confirm the veracity of the tweet that carried the quote, nobody will deny its accuracy, either. That's bad.

Andrew Sullivan is many things, and some of his recent analysis of the Middle East conflict has been woefully inadequate. It is his recent musings about the conflict and Israel's role in it that appear to have provoked the attack by Mr. Foxman.

Lately, Sullivan finds it easier to substitute easy moral equivalence for the more complex reality in which there is blame enough to go around, without claiming that all bad acts are equally bad. But be that as it may, bad analysis does not an anti-Semite make, especially since the latter is a claim about a person's beliefs, and inner beliefs cannot be measured by a few comments, no matter how objectionable Mr. Foxman or anybody else finds them.

But a tiff between Foxman and Sullivan is not the real story here. In truth, Sullivan seems to love these dust ups -- they are simply grist for his ever-churning word mill. If anything, he should send Foxman a thank-you note. And the fact that Foxman labels Sullivan a Jew-hater is hardly surprising. It's simply one more case of the old adage that when all you have is a hammer, the whole world looks like a nail.

The story here is the dangerous devaluation of the real and ugly phenomenon of anti-Semitism. Equally distressing is the fact that Foxman, one of the nation's leaders in the fight against anti-Semitism, also leads the process of its devaluation as either a meaningful term or a genuine challenge.

There is no question that Jew-hatred persists in this country along with other racial, ethnic, and gender-based hatreds, and that both Foxman and the ADL have played important and even heroic roles in combating them. But with Jew-hatred on the decline in this country and, even more importantly, increasingly becoming the domain of the least educated and empowered segments of society, it often appears that Foxman has become a hammer in search of more nails.

In doing so, a great man becomes the boy who cried wolf. And in a world in which real wolves remain, he not only looks foolish but feeds the belief that all claims of anti-Semitism are ridiculous. After all, people will reasonably conclude, look who's making them!

If you are genuinely concerned about real anti-Semitism, stop tossing out that charge every time someone does something that any Jew finds disagreeable. The charge of anti-Semitism is powerful, which is why people love to use it. But it is powerful precisely because it describes an ugly state of mind and the potentially deadly actions that flow from it. If regularly used to describe anything else, the term, like the boy's cries of wolf, will lose its potency, including at those moments when real wolves approach.

 
According to a Twitter feed from the Jewish Council on Public Affairs' national meeting in Dallas, ADL head Abe Foxman lashed out at Andrew Sullivan, calling him a good example of an educated anti-Sem...
According to a Twitter feed from the Jewish Council on Public Affairs' national meeting in Dallas, ADL head Abe Foxman lashed out at Andrew Sullivan, calling him a good example of an educated anti-Sem...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cliffhammond
Onward through the fog!
04:29 AM on 04/16/2010
So what else is new? Andrew, get in line. Anybody who won't send the ADL a dollar is anti-Semitic. BTW, drink ya milk or ya won't get no more cookies!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BigMitch
An awesome Alaskan dude.
03:19 AM on 04/02/2010
I agree with almost everything you say. I haven't followed Andrew Sullivan enough to pass judgment so, all that is left is the presumption of innocence.

However, there's daylight between us. A lot of what passes for criticism of Israel is, in fact, liberal anti-Semitism. And if one calls it out, he is accused of playing the anti-Semitism card to silence legitimate criticism of Israel.

Any comparison to the current Israeli regime to Nazis is repugnant. Any reference to the thoroughly disproved USS Liberty libel, is suspect. In many cases it is simply ignorance, but there is not enough ignorance to account for the persistence of this slur.

When there is a total double standard applied to Israel, I can raise questions about motivations. I'm suspicious when I hear that the Israel lobby holds the American government hostage. The attacks on AIPAC are so full of disinformation that I find it hard to remember the axiom., "Never attribute to mendacity, what can be explained by stupidity." Unquestioning acceptance of Arab propaganda is not a very high standard of intellectual activity, and in so many other areas, I see great depth of thinking here.

I am with you on the Andrew Sullivan page. But if you close your eyes to real anti-Semitism here, you are not doing our people any favors.

And remember, if all criticism of Israel were anti-Semitic, then on any point at least 40% of the Israeli population would be guilty.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cliffhammond
Onward through the fog!
04:32 AM on 04/16/2010
"A lot of what passes for criticism of Israel is, in fact, liberal anti-Semitism."

Oh please. Pardon the wrong metaphor, but will you get off the cross? We need the lumber.
08:52 AM on 04/16/2010
Any comparison to the current Israeli regime to Nazis is repugnant [?]
It is not a matter of taste or tastelessness,Mr Hirshfield, when Israeli action suggests that a comparison is in order then it should be evaluated not dismissed out of hand.
Any reference to the thoroughly disproved USS Liberty libel, is suspect
When was the USS Liberty incident proved to be a libel [baseless?]
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lbsaltzman
Permaculture and Sustainability
04:43 PM on 03/04/2010
Foxman and the rest of the pro-Israeli lobby have made careers out of slinging false charges of anti-semitism at most if not all critics of Israel, including Jewish critics. It is a dangerous and foolish practice that doesn't help the situation at all, and is acutally harmful to Jewish people everywhere. They would like to intimidate people into approving everything that Israel does, and they support the most rightwing tendencies in Israeli politics.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RedDogBear
06:13 PM on 03/03/2010
I actually sympathize with the gist of this article but I have to ask: writing columns about a tweet that may or may not have happened? This is what journalism has come to?
longtimegone
my micro-bio remains empty
01:50 AM on 03/05/2010
Agreed, on both points.
photo
basenji
Dog lover
04:46 PM on 03/02/2010
Good advice, but it's too late. Foxman at al, made the mistake of thinking they can curtail criticism of Israeli policies by tossing around the anti-semism term. It backfired and now nobody cares. All it accomplished is show how desperate the defenders have become.
02:44 PM on 03/02/2010
If you are genuinely concerned about real anti-Semitism, stop tossing out that charge every time someone does something that any Jew finds disagreeable.

---


Amen!