Brad Hirschfield

Brad Hirschfield

Posted: July 29, 2010 09:53 AM

Holocaust Lessons From Oliver Stone

What's Your Reaction:

Oliver Stone may be a nut job, but he has certainly made some wonderful movies. Of late however, he seems to be moving from his typical love of whacky conspiracy theories to rather more ugly ones.

Stone's newest project, a Showtime documentary entitled "The Secret History of America" will, Mr. Stone claims, put Hitler "in context". Stone wants to make sure that our understanding of Hitler does not remain a product of "the Jewish dominated media", as he claims it has been.

I am all for expanding our understanding of even the most terrible events in history. In fact, it is those events, including the Holocaust, which are most often addressed in dangerously over-simplified ways. But somehow, a filmmaker who describes his work in terms reeking of Jew-hatred does not seem likely to make any constructive contributions on this issue.

Of course, that was this weekend. Mr. Stone is turning apologetic, issuing statements in which he says he "made a clumsy association about the Holocaust, for which I am sorry and I regret. Jews obviously do not control media or any other industry".

Which is the "real" Oliver Stone? Is he the conspiracy theorist who resents the mythic power of Jews or the contrite artist seeking to bring deeper understanding to one of the darkest moments in human history?

My guess is that he's a bit of both. But because he simply calls his words a "clumsy error" and refuses to explore how they are actually part of his ongoing approach to world events, one in which some evil external force is always driving decent "little people" into horrible circumstances, I suspect that we have not heard the last of such claims about Jews from Mr. Stone.

There is no doubt that we need fuller explanations of the Holocaust, more sophisticated than those which invoke a demonic individual, Hitler, at whose feet all blame can be laid. In fact, to the extent that Stone demands a wider picture of accountability -- an appreciation that there is plenty of blame to go around in a world which stood largely silent as millions of human beings were murdered simply because of who they were -- I am with him. The list of those who bear responsibility should grow, not shrink, with the passage of time. That is what it means to be increasingly morally sensitive.

There is also no doubt that the Jewish community would do well to more fully appreciate, articulate and memorialize the horror of the Holocaust for people other than Jews. This is crucial if for no other reason than that it is only when the Holocaust can be remembered as a tragedy for all of humanity, that we can expect all of humanity to properly remember it.

None of that will be accomplished by minimizing the unique horror of the Nazis' "Final Solution" to the "Jewish problem", and certainly not by those, like Mr. Stone, who perpetuate some of the central underpinnings of the methodology which fueled the hatred which led to it.

Oliver Stone is no Nazi, but both his work and his words reflect something far more sinister than one clumsy error. They reflect deep and long-held hostilities of which Mr. Stone should be ashamed.

Let's hope the next Hollywood influential who wants to present a new angle on the Holocaust, can do so without resorting to any of the motifs and myths of those who perpetrated it. And let's hope that those new stories help all people to appreciate that all suffering is epic, when it happens to those about whom we care.

 

Follow Brad Hirschfield on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradhirschfield

Oliver Stone may be a nut job, but he has certainly made some wonderful movies. Of late however, he seems to be moving from his typical love of whacky conspiracy theories to rather more ugly ones. S...
Oliver Stone may be a nut job, but he has certainly made some wonderful movies. Of late however, he seems to be moving from his typical love of whacky conspiracy theories to rather more ugly ones. S...
 
Comments
41
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »   (2 total)
photo
mtaylor90028   06:09 PM on 8/01/2010
I LOVE Oliver Stone. I can't wait to see the film on Adolf Hitler that places things in perspective.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
imworking4me2   03:16 AM on 8/06/2010
Your buddy, Josef Goebbels would have loved it, as well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NABNYC   07:17 PM on 7/31/2010
I think we've had more than enough study about the murder of Jews in Europe during World War II. I would prefer that inquisitive souls spend some time going beyond that, and looking at the bigger picture of the 80 million people who died, and all the nations who ended up devastated in that war. It was not a war of Germany against the Jews, although that certainly was one tragic part. But there is so little attention paid, for example, to the 20 million Chinese people who died, or the 15 million Russians.

I also think it is a mistake to continue to teach our children that WWII was caused because Hitler hated the Jews. It ignores the underlying economics of the situation. Wall Street stole all the money, manipulated the markets, and crashed the world's economy, which created the conditions of despair and hunger under which a war of this magnitude could occur. It is important that we begin acknowledging the role of the international financial system. By failing to admit this, we have allowed Wall Street to do it again, and could well end up facing another world war. So by focusing on just one aspect of the war and ignoring the economics, we continue to teach our children inadequate lessons. As evidenced by the recent decision to deregulate Wall Street and let them do it all over again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blaster8   09:03 PM on 8/06/2010
If you for even a second believe that Wall St. had something to do with WWII then you seriously need a history lesson. The US was, at the time, a little pip squeak on the world scene. It's collapse couldn't have caused a world war any more than the Brazilian Bovespa could today. If you want some historical perspective then stop taking the enemy of today and applying it to yesterday.
Who do you think learns that WWII was caused because Hitler hated the Jews? No one. At least, no one who is educated.
Also, if you don't think there is enough attention paid to the 20MM Chinese people killed in the US educational system, try Japan! They don't teach their kids anything about their responsibility in those killings. Every German knows what the Nazis did to the world. The Japanese, to this day, take no responsibility for their atrocities.
Overall I think we could all afford to learn a bit more about history.....Obviously.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StevieTheK   07:08 AM on 8/09/2010
well articulated
photo
RevBookburn   06:40 PM on 7/30/2010
The author's description about Stone's 'whacky conspiracy theories' were falsehoods. Stone released numerous fantastic films (especially Wall Street and JFK) that were miles above the nonsense one gets from Fox "News" or the "History" Channel.
photo
Mazgi   05:47 PM on 7/30/2010
How else will a Has Been get attention if not by saying the most preposterous outrageous and insane nonsense?
photo
bridgeman   05:46 PM on 7/30/2010
I think I will take Mr.Stones apology at face value.
If he repeats his offense his career is over. (i would argue it has been for 5+ years anyway)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alex Karasik   02:23 PM on 7/30/2010
Oliver Stone was once a great filmmaker, but has done nothing of significance since JFK. His prolonged attempts at attention are quite sad these days and the fact that Showtime is the only Network that was willing to show his bound to be wrong, long and boring documentary (like most of the others) shows far they've fallen off. Glad I've got HBO.
arjuna3guna   12:01 PM on 7/30/2010
The power of any Myth is in relation to how many people hold on to the ideas within the myth. The Jewish myth has weakend greatly since the 20s , 30s, ect. Inter marriage has greatly reduced the " pure" Jewish blood if you will and will continue to do so untill they are very few indeed. Such is the luck of many races, from the american indian to any other race. I guess Love conqures all.

The idea of the chosen people is true for all people, for God chooses those who choose God.
photo
Stanley   11:04 AM on 7/30/2010
I agree with your comment completely. The recognition of Jewish persecution does not minimize others who are persecuted by itself. There is no conspiracy story of great non-Jewish persecution stories being shut down. Writers write about what they feel strongly about. African Americans write about their plight and history of persecution. It is normal. The problem is when we identify people by a race or religion for either persecution or conspiracy. It is the same mindset that creates them both. Being neither Jewish nor black it is not impossible for me to empathize. I also don't want to bear the burden of other people's heinous acts, who happen to share my race or religion. Remembering our past is an important part of our culture. Having a wider context of black and jewish persecution creates a great understanding for all. Lets make the story about how Stalin killed more people than anyone in history. Lets talk about starving millions of Ukranians, or the genocide by Ottoman Turks in Armenia. But after we all are horrified about how horrible we are capable of being, lets inspire men and women of every race, religion and culture to love each other, heal our wounds, find forgiveness and really use the medium of film to its greatest effect.
BlueMrsKitty   12:47 PM on 7/30/2010
I so agree with your opening statement. I don't understand why people think that just because group "A" has said that they have suffered discrimination or hardship that they are also somehow saying that group "B" didn't suffer discrimination or hardship. A person can tell his or her truth and that story isn't meant to deny or degrade someone else's truth.
jackstpaul   10:11 AM on 7/30/2010
"an appreciation that there is plenty of blame to go around in a world which stood largely silent as millions of human beings were murdered simply because of who they were."

Newsflash: The Holocaust happened in the middle of the biggest war in human history, a "world war" in which more than 50 million were killed. Russia, US, Britain, Canada et al were going all out to stop HItler and shut down his war machine regardless of the Holocaust.

What exactly were these countries to do that they weren't already doing--trying to stop Germany? England and Russia were obviously and reasonably most interested in protecting the lives of their citizens first and foremost.

The ego-ethno-centrism in your commentary is exactly where some of the criticism comes from re: discussion of Hitler, WWII, etc.
jackstpaul   10:22 AM on 7/30/2010
Oops--last sentence: "commentary" should've been "comment"
photo
cryptozoologist   12:25 PM on 7/30/2010
well, in particular the allies could have bombed the train tracks that they knew full well were hauling trainloads of jews, gypsies, and homosexuals (and others) to work/extermination camps. they could have given visas to members of the aforementioned groups who were trying to escape as well.

the ego-ethno-ignorance in your commentary is exactly where some of the criticism comes from re: discussion of Hitler, WWII, etc.
DrSnuggles   09:30 AM on 7/30/2010
Anti-semitic or not, Oliver Stone has proven time and time again that he is not a responsible historical filmmaker. His works bear the pretense of being accurate while being heavily influenced by his own beliefs. He is a relatively talented crazy person. I also use talented sparingly as his bias sometimes destroys movies which could otherwise have been of higher quality such as JFK, Platoon, or W. Whether or not his bias is antisemitic or not is not the issue, its that his bias overtakes his respect for the truth.

Having said that, Wall Street was awesome.
photo
Frank Smith   08:58 AM on 7/30/2010
Stone was lying to hype his crappy documentary and went too far with it. There is no secret history of WWII that is being kept from you. Hitler was chancellor of Germany for more than six years before open warfare broke out in Europe. There was plenty of support for Hitler here in the States from an active American Nazi Bundt to superhero Charles Lindbergh who thought he was great. The disaster of the Nazi airship the Hindenburg in New Jersey was viewed as just that. A disaster. Fairly normal trade between US corporations and early Nazi Germany? Of course. Why wouldn't there have been?

"There's nothing new in the world except the history you don't know. When the lives of great men are studied from records, they leave some idea of what happened." Harry Truman
martina1965   06:43 PM on 7/30/2010
Have you seen the documentary?
photo
Frank Smith   06:48 PM on 7/30/2010
No, but I read what Stone said about his own work. I will probably give it a look if it becomes available but I don't have Showtime.
bklynsparrow   10:42 PM on 7/29/2010
Thank you Rabbi- I have been trying to explain for days on other threads about Stone and the threads have been brutal. Stone could have easily made his point about the millions of Russians who died without comparing them to the Holocaust or promoting the stereotypes of Jews supposedly controlling the media, in fact blaming us for suppressing information about WW II. It was an absurd allegation and Stone has ever been prone to making those.

"There is also no doubt that the Jewish community would do well to more fully appreciate, articulate and memorialize the horror of the Holocaust for people other than Jews. This is crucial if for no other reason than that it is only when the Holocaust can be remembered as a tragedy for all of humanity, that we can expect all of humanity to properly remember it."

And I have said that many times. I think if we keep defining the Holocaust as a "Jewish" issue, people will not understand, as you said, that it is a tragedy for all humanity. Not for the numbers, not only for the fact that millions were exterminated for who they were, but for the sheer, inhuman way it was so thoroughly carried out, against innocent men, women and children. Gays, Gypsies, the disabled- it was genocidal cleansing of all those who didn't meet the aryan standard.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StevieTheK   07:11 AM on 8/09/2010
bravo
bklynsparrow   10:32 PM on 7/29/2010
"Your line of thinking leads to the absurd notion that we will reach a moral pinnacle when we finally blame everyone for the crime of a few. "

That si not what he is saying at all. He is talking about understanding in a wider context.
photo
HeevenSteven   10:24 PM on 7/29/2010
I'be long disagreed with Stone on many things, but I don't understand why this piece is in the Religion section, and not the Media, or Politics, or World section...
bklynsparrow   10:42 PM on 7/29/2010
There's been a number of therads, in different sections about this.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Json   02:54 AM on 7/30/2010
I clicked on it from the entertainment section.
Ariel Caplan   09:22 PM on 7/29/2010
"I am with him. The list of those who bear responsibility should grow, not shrink, with the passage of time. That is what it means to be increasingly morally sensitive."

With respect rabbi, I disagree. The increasing of time must not spread the blame around beyond where it does not belong. Your line of thinking leads to the absurd notion that we will reach a moral pinnacle when we finally blame everyone for the crime of a few. I do not hope the list of wrong-doers grows, and I don't hope it shrinks. I hope that we make a more precise list of wrong-doers, based on our long-standing values.

There isn't much more that we need to know about the holocaust or Nazi Germany. All of this effort to contextualize is not done for the sake of historical accuracy. Rather there is a desire to revise the past in order to manufacture a narrative that is more in keeping with today's culture. None of the "contextualisation" provided by Oliver Stone is historically serious. It is ideological propaganda. Let's defend neither his conclusion nor his intent.

We should be glad that Stone made his comments though, because this serves to publicly inform us that the left-wing conspiratorial worldview is very compatible with antisemitism. Finally the mainstream media is forced to acknowledge that fact.
musings2   10:22 PM on 7/29/2010
If "the left-wing conspiratorial worldview is very compatible with antisemitism", then does that mean that the right-wing authoritarian, faith-based world-view is very compatible with philosemitism? I think you may be onto something, as I believe that pure philosemitism is actually a position of patronizing, which has as its ultimate object the conversion of everyone to one religion. Even if there might be some leftists who find antisemitism congenial to them, I doubt that Stone is one of them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StevieTheK   07:13 AM on 8/09/2010
As to your final paragraph, one only has to loiter for a short time in the comments section of the Huff Po to see that very worldview in action. Sadly.

Twitter Edition