What does God sound like? For those who do not believe in God, the answer is nothing. But for those who do believe, and specifically for those who believe in revelation, this is a good time of year to ask that question. Shavuot (Pentecost) begins Tuesday night, May 18th.
This holiday, originally the festival of first fruits in the Hebrew Bible, came to be associated with the story of God giving the Ten Commandments to the ancient Israelites as recorded in the Book of Exodus, and later on also became associated with Jesus' return to his disciples following his Easter/Passover death and resurrection.
In each case, Shavuot/Pentecost is a time when many Jews and Christians tell a story of hearing God's call. In a world filled with people claiming to hear God's call all the time and often to deadly effect, it's worth looking back at these two stories and seeing what they tell us about the experience of hearing God.
I am not talking about determining which, if either, of the stories is historically accurate. Those are faith claims, which nobody can adjudicate. But the implications of the different stories, what their lessons are, and how living in light of those lessons affects people -- that can be debated. And in this case the differences are significant.
According to the Book of Acts (2:1-12), Jesus' disciples were gathered in Jerusalem for Shavuot -- not surprising, as it is one of the three pilgrimage festivals observed by the Jews of antiquity. With language clearly reminiscent of Exodus' description of God's revelation at Sinai as recorded in Exodus, the Holy Spirit descends upon the disciples, and each is heard to be speaking in a different language.
Given that all are from the Land of Israel and would normally have spoken Aramaic or possibly Hebrew, this is pretty remarkable. In fact, the other pilgrims who have journeyed to Jerusalem are astounded. Having come from Parthia, Media, Mesopotamia, Cappadocia, Asia, Egypt, Rome, Crete, and Arabia, and speaking different languages, they are all able to understand what the disciples are saying. Each seems to have been taken with the ability to speak in the language that people needed to hear. It's actually a powerful lesson in speaking to people in their own language.
Interestingly however, it seems that the content of each disciple's revelation is the same. The "proof" that this is the word of God lays in the fact that the message is identical but capable of being shared in the multiple languages that God puts in the mouths of various disciples.
Hearing God in this story is about one message that is told in many tongues. According to Acts, God always says the same thing but adjusts the language to meet the needs of the audience. That's a very different understanding from the one offered by the rabbis who lived at roughly the same time as the authors of Acts.
According to rabbinic teaching on the experience of revelation at Sinai, to hear God is to hear the lessons one needs most in one's own life. For these rabbis, God sounds different to different people, and the content of God's message is different depending upon who is receiving it.
In describing the events of Sinai, the rabbis say that each person received the teaching that he or she needed to hear, and it was offered based on where they were in their lives. Old people heard what they needed. Children heard what they needed. Men according to their needs and women according to theirs. In effect, the proof of the divine nature of the events at Sinai was not that one word went out to all; it was that an infinite God speaks in an infinite number of ways, and does so based upon those to whom that God speaks.
According to this approach, any form of religious coercion, and any presumption of any one person or group having the last word on what God says, must be tossed out. While groups may compete over religious norms or the making of policy in light of how they understand God's word, they can never look at others and tell them that what they think "could not have come from God." This approach provides what may be the most important corrective to any system that believes in a revealed law (i.e., confusing legitimate faith with one particular understanding of that faith).
As Jews head into the final preparation to stand at Sinai once again, I hope that we do so with the expressed awareness that if any "proof" of revelation is to be had, it lies in the diversity of approaches and opinions about what "really" happened at Sinai, and what Torah (Jewish wisdom) "really" means.
If Torah is the infinite gift of an infinite God, then the infinite number of ways it can be legitimately interpreted, and those who do so, must be as sacred as the Torah itself, whether we agree with those interpretations or not. That's what God sounds like to me, and at least a great number of my spiritual ancestors of whom I remain a proud and devoted student.
Follow Brad Hirschfield on Twitter: www.twitter.com/bradhirschfield
Shavuot - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
When is Shavuot in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015? - Shavuot
History Of Shavuot, Shavuot 2010, Shavuot 2011, About Shavuot ...
So, what God look like? He looks like a typical middle eastern man (or men) who created "Him" a few thousands of years ago. Then you can throw some scarry attributes to this "Person" like Omniscient, Omnipotent, Omnipresent (all the Omnis). Some also think that He is three and He is one at the same time, I can not figure out the math for this one.
That is what God looks like.
"What does God sound like? For those who do not believe in God, the answer is nothing."
I'm a Pantheist. Just because I don't believe that God is a hairy old white man living in the sky doesn't mean I'm not in awe of the sound of the wind, the rain, or the sight of the Sun in the morning. In fact it shouldn't matter what ones belief is as long as their moral compass points to the gift that the Spiritual world gives us to help aleviate suffering.
I have seen people of the same language argue about different words they used but with meanings the same almost fight. Being true using words of the same language, how difficult is it when using symbols of an unknown culture? Therein lies the cause of wars between religions "believing they are doing god a favor" in fighting them.
To hear god's voice is to know the meanings behind the words used, not just to hear the words pronounced. Therein lies the reason all scriptures are sealed, people know not the meanings of words written in the scriptures. Often times they so exalt the scriptures that they will not use common known definitions for the terms written. The term "word" as found in John 1:1 is a prime example, ask Christians what does it mean and they say Jesus, not "a verbal means of explaining" suggesting everything made is explainable and comprehensible to man.
Why?
If we cannot know - as some claim - because ... well, because we cannot know (that's the explanation I usually hear) - then how you'd know that there is only one god?
If I can imagine one, I can easily imagine 1000 of them. I mean if this is an imaginary figure.
On the other hand, if this is based on observations, records and measurements, then which would you consider as confirming that amount of gods = 1 (not 0 and not 1000)?
I recognize a universal knowledge is accessible by every man and is often tapped into by what is called prophets, but they only see a glimpse and explain it metaphorically. The metaphors uses symbols relative to the culture to which they are given
I, as a Christian, greet you and wish you a Happy Shavuot and share with you the wonder of what God's voice sounds like...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHsbwY4EPyA
God sounds awesome. Anyone here met him?
"Where There Is Love, God Will Be There Too..."
This was among something like 10 or 15 definitions that I encountered from posters here.
Not sure one needs another word for love though, it just creates confusion.
One of Marianne Faithful's songs is one of my very favorites:
"There's a little bird that Somebody sends,
Down to the earth to live on the wind..."
"ARE YOU KIDDING ME? I send down 10 commandments and you guys mess it up. I flood the planet to start over and you guys mess it up. I send down an actual human like person to explain it in detail and then sacrifice him so you all can start over and you guys still mess it up. I give up. You guys are on your own. I can't even be bothered to rapture you idiots."
I pretty sure that's how it sounds right now.
The 10 commandments were a set of dos and don'ts to teach us to believe everything has a purpose but we accepted them literally. The flood was not water but of ignorance to take the "dominion powers" Jesus demonstrated from man in mass so they would have to learn how they had been able to do them. The sacrifice of him who showed the way was so man, in ignorance, could develop radiation material enrichments and other things need to maintain the civilization to follow this one (Revelation 21).
So I am pretty sure that is what it sounds like at this time, now as you put it.
What does thunder sound like? For those who do not believe in thunder, the answer is nothing. But for those who do believe, and specifically for those who believe in lightning, a rainy season is a good time of year to listen.
Does this make sense? Does sound of thunder depend on whether you believe in it?
Or...MORE popular?
Many more ave had this idea before me:
http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/ayahuasca/ayahuasca_info7.shtml
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Campbell
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bah%C3%A1'%C3%AD_Faith
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kingdom_of_God_Is_Within_You#Tolstoy.27s_relationship_with_Mahatma_Gandhi