iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rabbi Jill Jacobs

GET UPDATES FROM Rabbi Jill Jacobs
 

The Torah Is Political. Rabbis Can Be, Too

Posted: 09/26/2011 10:55 pm

Is there a liberal conspiracy to infect America's pulpits?

In a recent op-ed for the Wall Street Journal, Tevi Troy, a senior fellow at the conservative Hudson Institute and former member of the George W. Bush administration, rails against rabbis who devote their Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur sermons to speaking about "political" issues such as health care, tax rates or food stamps.

As one of the rabbis whom Troy criticizes (albeit anonymously), I want to respond to his charges.

Troy references a recent phone call for rabbis, organized by the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism and sponsored by the Central Conference of American Rabbis, the professional organization of Reform Rabbis, on which he and I were two of the five speakers. The call featured three experts on the current economic situation -- Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Ellen Nissenbaum of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities and Troy himself. Rabbi David Saperstein, the Director of the RAC, offered homiletic advice for speaking about contentious issues, and I presented texts that might guide sermons and teaching sessions about the economy. (Troy and I have this in common: He was the political conservative on the call, and I was the Conservative rabbi.)

Troy writes, "When I suggested that we separate politics from spirituality, a third participant pushed back, saying 'the Torah is a political document.' A curious assertion in a crowd that would quickly denounce any invocation of the Bible in political discussions."

I was this third participant. I do believe that the Torah is a political document. And I would not, as Troy assumes, "denounce any invocation of the Bible in political discussions." In fact, I passionately invoke the Bible in political discussions. My first book, "There Shall Be No Needy: Pursuing Social Justice Through Jewish Law and Tradition," brings biblical (and other Jewish) wisdom to bear on contemporary political, economic and social issues. In my second, "Where Justice Dwells: A Hands-On Guide to Doing Social Justice in Your Jewish Community," I tackled the question of why and how to bring the power of Jewish communities to bear on contemporary issues.

When I say that the Torah is political, I do not mean that it is partisan. I do not believe that the Torah tells us to vote Republican, Democratic, Green or Pirate. I consider any candidate who claims to have God on his or her side deluded and dangerous.

But being partisan is different from being political.

The Torah is political because it lays out a vision for a just civil society. It is political because it forms the basis for a social contract. It is political because it concerns itself with relations among human beings as much as with relations between human beings and God. It is political because a liberation struggle stands at its core. It is political because it demands that those with more wealth take responsibility for those with less. It is political because it forbids those with more power from taking advantage of those with less. And it is political because it is a document meant to be lived.

Troy claims that "Jewish tradition doesn't give much guidance on the optimum level of marginal tax rates, Medicare restructuring, or food-stamp funding." It is true that one will not find -- in the Torah, in the Talmud, in the Shulchan Arukh or in other codes of Jewish law -- a precise plan for restructuring Medicare. One does find, however, hundreds of discussions and legal rulings about how to care for the sick, about the role of doctors, about the place of the elderly and the poor and about the responsibility that individuals in society have toward one another. These laws, values and historical experiences can and should guide us as we debate how best to craft a health care system. And the same can be said for Jewish wisdom on housing, poverty, criminal justice, taxes, and other social and economic issues.

Rabbis (and ministers, priests, imams and others) should not -- ethically or legally -- tell their communities how to vote. But preaching about how to vote is not the same as preaching about what values and priorities ought to be embodied in health care policy. Preaching about how to vote is partisan. Preaching about health care, poverty and how we structure a just society is moral leadership.

There is no better time than Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur for rabbis to speak about the pressing issues of the moment. Troy characterizes these days as a time "to bring forth a universal message about the unity of the Jewish people, the importance of our shared religious tradition, and the need to rededicate ourselves to observance of the Torah in the year to come."

But I prefer the traditional summary of the focus of these days: Tefilah (prayer), Teshuvah (repentance/return) and Tzedakah (acts of justice). Through tefilah we reflect on our year and find spiritual connection to the Divine and to the community with whom we pray. Through teshuvah we repair our relationships with God and with one another. And through tzedakah we turn outward and devote ourselves to creating a more just world in the year that has just begun.

Rabbis must bring the thousands of years of accumulated Jewish wisdom to bear on these issues. This is what it means to be a religious leader. A religious leader does not stick to "safe" topics like Jewish unity and ritual practice (though these have their place, too). A religious leader takes ethical stands on the hard issues of the moment -- and does so with integrity, with a strong basis in his or her religious tradition, and out of love and a passion for creating a more just world.

We do not need more partisan politics. But we are in desperate need of religious moral leadership.

 
 
 

Follow Rabbi Jill Jacobs on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rabbijilljacobs

FOLLOW RELIGION
 
 
  • Comments
  • 30
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Cindy Tregan
Proud D.F.H. Lib'rul
04:05 PM on 09/28/2011
I have no problem at all with you being political in your synagog/temple/whatever. Just get rid of that pesky 501(c) classification first. You wanna be a political action organization - then you pay taxes.

Simples.
09:59 PM on 09/27/2011
I agree that any partisan political candidate who claims that God is on his/her side is "deluded and dangerous." And I agree that "being partisan is different from being political."

I agree that the Torah is political, and, in like manner, so are the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth and every other spiritual teacher.

All of the wisest, most enlightened teachers have taught very similar, universal truths -- that we are created equal, that God wants us to love one another and care for one another, and that the humble and meek shall inherit the earth and turn "swords into plowshares."

That cannot happen, however, until the proud, militant and greedy realize their error.

That's where we stand right now. We wait for the deluded, misguided people to realize they are as the blind led by the blind.

It's really very simple, if and when you get the message (see http://messenger.cjcmp.org).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joshua Sager
TheProgressiveCynic.com
03:47 PM on 09/27/2011
While I agree with the premise of this article's argument, I believe that a very important distinction needs to be made while making the argument that politics is equal to social vision. I think that a more accurate way to say this is that the Torah espouses a series of secular views and social norms which are then able to be translated into a social contract and then politics.
I don't think that the causality is: Torah -> Social contract -> Politics, but that the social contract is a secular basis for the Torah. The norms that the writers and interpreters of the Torah are that of a defined social contract (charity, rule of law, etc.), but those views exist independently of the Torah as well. I see the causal chain as: Torah Political views. While this argument is semantic, I think that it is important to note that religious views are based in the social contract, not the other way around and thus religion is not necessary for a functioning society. When people assert that religion is necessary for the social contract, they usually want to spread their religion through policy (even if they mean well for society).

SarcasticLiberal.blogspot.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forrester1
02:24 PM on 09/27/2011
"Is there a liberal conspiracy to infect America's pulpits?"

No, they are already infected.
The liberal agenda, at least some of the liberal agenda, is to do away with the need to believe in antiquated religions and to assume control of our own destinies.

Keep your gods to yourselves.
photo
BurtonDesque
Fear a Blank Planet
12:46 AM on 09/29/2011
This, of course, explains why atheism is inversely correlated with being conservative.
01:11 PM on 09/27/2011
Are you your brother's keeper? Republicans see this as "Am I my brother's money keeper?" The answer is yes and when I keep his money I also get to enslave him and blame him for being poor.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
pene
critical thinker
12:35 PM on 09/27/2011
they can be political as long as they give up their tax exempt status.
alto2
I fed my micro-bio to the microfiche.
12:23 PM on 09/27/2011
"A religious leader takes ethical stands on the hard issues of the moment -- and does so with integrity ...." Rabbi Jacobs, would that your words were taken to heart by every seminarian, and that he/she were endowed with wisdom to discern those "hard issues" (although I suspect we all understand that they are not usually those "culture wars" issues that are diversionary tactics, meant to distract from the most serious ones). Seminarians still can be influenced; most who have already been graduated and are serving in religious communities have doubtless learned how to be sufficiently "political" in order not to jeopardize their livelihoods.


Superb essay. You are surely some of the "religious moral leadership" so sadly lacking in public discourse .
iridium53
Semper Fi
10:22 AM on 09/27/2011
You write, "We do not need more partisan politics. But we are in desperate need of religious moral leadership."

I say you are correct - at least as far as "moral leadership."

We have serious problems in our country. And they require serious, and urgent, solutions.

14 million hungry children.
46 million people living below the poverty line. Another 50 million very close.
No net new jobs since 2001.
25 million unemployed and looking for work.
Millions without adequate housing and healthcare.
Millions living in desperation and fear.

We can do better.

We must demand that our governments - at all levels - do better.

We must seek to regain "government of the people, by the people, for the people" from the corporate special interests that seem to be killing our country.
photo
Pole
retired professor of History, Comparative Religion
10:10 AM on 09/27/2011
I totally agree with the Rabbi. Not only is the Torah political; so is the Talmud. Reading through the Tanakh beginning with Moses and reading through the prophets, one sees a view of divine law that puts people ahead of power or money or ownership, the three bulwarks of modern Capitalism. Then one only needs to see which political party favors what Moses and the prophets do not to know which side is with God's Law and which side is with the princes and kings of Israel. How many Jews know the Tanakh and Talmud is another question. How many Christians know their bibles thoroughly without the editorial comments of a conservative preacher is also a question. Its all there to read and fortunately still available. Jewish traditions are filled with accounts of helping the poor, giving aide to the disadvantaged to see which side the bible favors. Do Justice, love mercy and walk with your God, Micah trumpets. Do not engage in deceit or greed or cruelty, Amos rails and the other prophets affirm. Its all there and the sign posts are clear.
photo
AbeMartin
The best person fer a job is never a candidate
12:21 PM on 09/27/2011
Any commentator who believes or states that the writers of the Old Testament could anticipate the challenges we face twenty-five hundred years ago is delusional.  What the writers did do is speak not only to the Jews with whom they were contemporary, but also laid out a structure of hundreds of laws which are designed to orient human behavior toward the Lord, one's family, one's peers and employees, the land on which we must depend for our continued existence and animals.

Everything considered, despite the constant negative references of those who consider Judaism anathema to their concept of the Divintiy  esp.  the "vengeful, wrathful, angry God of the cultic early Israelites" which originated as one of the Sumerian or Ugaritic deities, the O.T. has remained a vibrant intellectual fountain that has served as the foundation of several world wide faiths.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forrester1
02:29 PM on 09/27/2011
Remember---homosexuality and ham are both abominations in the bible.

Sound policies for the 21st century.

The O.T is just that...old. We don't wash our clothes on the bank of the river anymore either.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CarlyHope
09:16 AM on 09/27/2011
Rabbi you are 100% Correct!

The Torah is very clear on matters of poverty and economic justice, and while its certainly not a partisan document its also not one a philosophy that aligns itself with greed. If we implemented half of what the bible tells us to economically there would be far fewer poor people in America today. I don't want my Rabbi to only discuss the ethical issues of 1940s Germany or of modern Israel, but the ones we are actually living with day to day!.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JewishPhysician
fraternity, trust, discourse
06:26 AM on 09/27/2011
Torah dictates our ethics and our religious practices. Both liberalism and conservative thought processes are supported by Torah Values.
There is no place for a real political charged sermon overall, but to discuss ethics, social obligations and the like is a very orthodox way to go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forrester1
02:30 PM on 09/27/2011
What exactly does any religion know about ethics?????????

Proof is in the pudding they say, and the history of religion is a history of violence.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JewishPhysician
fraternity, trust, discourse
01:38 AM on 09/28/2011
Something tells me that you are not too swift in terms of history of Judaism. Good luck.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
12:38 AM on 09/27/2011
Certainly Rabbis can be political--but only as private citizens. The synagogues, like the other churches, need to stay apolitical or else give up tax-free status.
alto2
I fed my micro-bio to the microfiche.
12:32 PM on 09/27/2011
All the Scriptures have political implications. To argue that they do not is to say that we divorce them from our everyday life, which cannot be an option for a believer. There are certain values that are trumpeted over and over again -- in both Testaments, especially in the prophets and in the gospels -- as being those values which the people of God are expected to live out, to exemplify, in the society they create and support. To be a religious (and moral) leader is impossible without speaking of those values, unless all you expect of a religious leader is the re-telling of entertaining stories.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Caru
Politics is fun to watch.
12:40 PM on 09/27/2011
That's fine and dandy. Now, pay taxes.
photo
Pole
retired professor of History, Comparative Religion
04:36 PM on 09/27/2011
Speaking about social issues unrelated to congregational events, are not addressed often. The prophetic function when exercised historically, was not popular in its time, yet the compliers considered the prophetic voice important enough to include in the Tanakh. I imagine until this century,synagogue worship did not include much prophetic pronouncements. Outside forces not sympathetic to Jews,might be listening. Since the State of Israel, such pronouncements are not needed. It is in America that Rabbis have a unique opportunity to speak up for the sojourner, needy, disadvantaged and discriminated minorities. In the 20th century many Jewish Civil Rights workers did their part to move us past discrimination. If we lose the prophetic voice, who will speak for us?
11:44 PM on 09/26/2011
If the Torah is a political document, then I am the King of England. Really, Rabbi, you certainly have a right to espouse your political views any way you want, but the idea that Torah is anything but the law of how we are supposed to live and act as INDIVIDUALS to get closer to HaShem and to perfect our souls is, as you well, not accurate. What happens collectively is determined by G_d and in fact has already been determined. I am sure you are an excellent Rabbi and a fine person, but if you want to be a politician too, well, you know. Shana Tova
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CarlyHope
09:19 AM on 09/27/2011
So when the Torah says we should cancel all debts every seven years, that has no baring to you on our times politically and socio-economically? How about when the Torah makes clear that God disapproves of collateral loans? That says nothing to you about the housing crisis?

The wisdom is there in the Torah, its very clear how God wants us to treat the poor. And if you don't like what it says I'm sure you can find a way to reinterpret it - but that doesn't mean we shouldn't talk about it.
12:06 PM on 09/27/2011
First, I am not criticizing the Rabbi, or you. And if I implied that you should not talk about Torah, then I apologize to you, because, as you know, we should be talking about Torah frequently every day. And of course how we act as individuals makes big difference, sometimes more than we know. But the Torah commands us not to judge others, even in their observance or non-observance of the Law, so my view is that if a Rabbi chastises people for not doing as he/she says they should to be in compliance with the Law, then at that time they are using their personal views to criticize others and that is prohibited by Torah. If more people followed the laws of Shmiras haloshon I think there is a better chance that we would see a better world. Shana Tova!!
photo
Pole
retired professor of History, Comparative Religion
04:48 PM on 09/27/2011
I am sorry and disappointed you feel that way. Pluralism is one of the rights we have in this country, including the right to speak with a prophetic voice. Rabbis who stay with what is safe my become irrelevant. It is unlikely synagogues in centuries past spoke with a prophetic voice as they were sojourners outside of their real homeland. But America invites a pluralistic voice, not only across religions but within religious traditions. We should applaud that.
05:25 PM on 09/27/2011
I read your comment, but I must say I have no idea to what you are referring. I did not say anything about pluralism, however you define that. And it is my understanding that Rabbis speak with courage gained from HaShem and certainly are not fearful. I have no idea what you mead by "they were sojouners" unless you mean that any Jew that does not live in Israel is outside her homeland. The Torah has nothing to do with secular politics or with various countries except for Israel. Whatever you were speaking about I wish you well