iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

GET UPDATES FROM Rabbi Shmuley Boteach

Why Powerful Men Can't Keep Their Pants On

Posted: 05/17/11 07:58 PM ET

The number of public men destroyed of late through sexual scandals is simply staggering. Within 48 hours of each other we heard that IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who many believed would be the next President of France, as well as Arnold Schwarzenegger, until a few weeks ago the Governor of the most populous state in the Union, self-destructed with sex scandals.

The stories themselves are beyond belief. An IMF chief, disciplined enough to oversee one of the world's most important banks, is alleged to have forced himself on a hotel housekeeper. Schwarzenegger, disciplined enough to rise from immigrant status with a funny accent to become one of the biggest movie stars in the world and one of the most powerful men in the United States, apparently could not muster the control to prevent himself from fathering a child with a woman who worked in his home.

The biggest mistake we make in determining why powerful men cheat is to believe they're looking for sex. If it's sex they're after they have wives who can cater to their needs. No, these men are looking for something else entirely: validation. Men cheat not out of a sense of entitlement but out of a sense of insecurity. And the bigger they are the harder they fall, not of arrogance but out of fear and weakness.

What makes men slowly climb the ladder of success is a desire to prove they're a somebody. They want to be and feel important. They seek to rise from the poverty of namelessness and the penury of anonymity. It is not the promise of their potential that drives them, but the fear of being a nonentity. They absorb the noxious lie of a culture bereft of values that only money and power will rescue them from being a nobody. Therefore, even as they ascend the ladder of 'success,' they do so with a gaping hole in their center. And whatever accomplishments they will shove into that hole -- money, fame, power -- it goes in one end and comes out the other. They never feel good about themselves. They are never content. They are defined by insatiability and characterized by voraciousness, which explains why Wall Street bankers who were earning tens of millions of dollars a year still felt it was not enough and cut corners to make even more.

The first rule of success is that there is nothing on the outside that can compensate for a feeling of failure on the inside. External accouterments of success -- from armored limousines to an army of personal bodyguards -- can never protect you from the din of demons who whisper to you that for all you have achieved you are still are a big zero.

And that's why these men turn to women to make them feel good about themselves. They want to feel desirable. They seek to silence the inner voices that taunt them as to their own insignificance. Because of its power, sex has a unique capacity to make insecure men feel -- however fleetingly -- like they're special. Having women desire them makes them feel desirable.

So why can't their wives give them this same feeling? Because the man who thinks of himself as a giant loser sees the woman dumb enough to marry him as a loser squared. She, as the woman who bears his last name and his children, is part of his entire loser package. But the woman who is not married to him, who has never aligned herself with his failures, remains eminently desirable and can thus make him feel the same.

When Tiger Woods self-destructed with an alleged 15 mistresses, I was asked to be on a TV show discussing why he did it. He had a beautiful wife. Why wasn't that enough? The male panelist next to me said, "It's simple. Men love sexual variety and Tiger had the money and the fame to get it." I responded, "If it was variety he was looking for, why did he have sex with the same woman 15 times over? Every single one of the women he allegedly cheated with looked just like his wife, a blond-haired Nordic bombshell. There was no variety. No Asian woman, no African-American woman, etc."

The explanation lay elsewhere. When he was a little boy they took Tiger, put a metal stick in his hand, and told him, "If you learn to use this better than any man who preceded you and knock that little white ball farther than anyone who competes against you, you'll be a somebody," which was another way of saying that right now you're a nobody, you're nothing.

Contrary to the Biblical message that every human being is born a child of god. Tiger heard the opposite. You are either the child of success or you don't' exist. So, no matter how many tournaments he won and how much money he earned in his mind, Tiger still remained a nobody with a lot of trophies and a lot of money. But none of that external success changed the original message: he was born a zero. So, he tuned to an endless number of woman to make him feel desirable and special. He sought someone who wanted him for his being and not his sporting prowess. And he was stupid enough to believe that any of these women would be out with him if he weren't' a champion. It was his wife alone who loved him, but in his selfishness he lost her.

This also explains why so many men who cheat end up opening up emotionally to the women they cheat with. If it was just sex they were seeking they would not be sending these women texts telling them how lonely they are and how only she, the mistress, understood them.

You may ask what this has to do with a renowned banker and politician allegedly attacking a hotel housekeeper? We don't yet know all the circumstances of the alleged assault, so I do not wish to discuss this case in particular. But I have counseled enough men in similar circumstances to know that they don't expect the woman to resist. When you inhabit a $3000 a night hotel penthouse -- yet more external accouterments of success -- and the woman in question is an immigrant cleaning up, you're convinced she'll be as impressed with the bells and whistles of success as you are and she'll melt like putty in your hands. Her resistance becomes a complete shock.

The motivation, however, remains the same. Men who inhabit the top social sphere are usually driven to get there by a constant need to prove themselves. And in taking a woman who would otherwise have no sexual interest in you and transforming her instantly into a woman who desires you, you quiet the failure demons for even a brief moment. In this sense, Strauss-Kahn's comment in an earlier interview with the French publication Liberation, after he had been caught having an affair with a subordinate -- "Yes, I love women. So what?" -- displays a stunning degree of self-ignorance. The degree to which he loves women was never the issue but rather the degree to which he hates himself.

These scandals of decent men ruining themselves either through affairs or, much more seriously, through allegedly illegally and outrageously forcing themselves on women, should serve as a wakeup call to a society that continues to have a single definition of success for men. It's not your gentlemanly behavior, sense of personal honor, or your devotion to your wife and kids that makes you special. No one really cares a hoot for all that. It's rather the level of name recognition and money you attain that really makes you hot.

Shmuley Boteach, 'America's Rabbi,' is a renowned relationships expert and broadcaster whose books on love and marriage have been translated into 17 languages, with the most recent being, "The Kosher Sutra: Eight Sacred Secrets of Erotic Desire." Follow him on Twitter @RabbiShmuley.

 
 
 

Follow Rabbi Shmuley Boteach on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RabbiShmuley

The number of public men destroyed of late through sexual scandals is simply staggering. Within 48 hours of each other we heard that IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who many believed would be the nex...
The number of public men destroyed of late through sexual scandals is simply staggering. Within 48 hours of each other we heard that IMF head Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who many believed would be the nex...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 428
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
12:33 PM on 06/07/2011
"A man is as faithful as his options." Chris Rock Powerful men have more options.
No need for psychological analysis. No need to make it complicated. As to the blather about it not being about sex, well, former MLB player David Justice answered that pretty bluntly.
photo
Icecube
NFC East. Pick your poison.
11:38 AM on 06/02/2011
Oppurtunity?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
noteaforme
The Tea Party parties like it's 1399.
06:17 PM on 05/27/2011
Biology doesn't "dictate" anything. I'm tired of people who don't understand science legitimating criminal behavior through some sort of pseudo-scientific discourse. Evolutionary science can be read to support monogamy, but of course people find it convenient to try to enable certain behaviors. The fact is that some people cheat, some people don't, and "biological imperative" has very little to do with it. From what I've seen (most) people who cheat just need/want attention/affirmation and don't care who gets hurt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
noteaforme
The Tea Party parties like it's 1399.
06:13 PM on 05/27/2011
Please put your pants back on, powerful men.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:56 AM on 05/26/2011
The real question is, why should it be so difficult for men to have sex with an endless supply of beautiful women? Why must people with positions of power and wealth able to make their fantasies come true? When the price of sex is cheap and meaningless, we'll probably see an exponential reduction in violence, greed and other types of destructive behavior.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Isenki
Public campaign funding
03:15 AM on 05/26/2011
I didn't see biology or evolutionary imperative mentioned once, why is that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hope Richardson
Cynical Comedian, Future World Dictator, Otaku
04:38 PM on 07/05/2011
Maybe he just focuses on behaviorism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ivan Brugal
11:13 AM on 05/25/2011
Dude, who are you?
Can you speak more nonesense?
Both unsuccessfull and successfull, religious and secular men, cheat...
The diference is unsuccessfull men are less atractive so theyd have less chances,
Its called hormones.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:56 PM on 05/23/2011
Its not about cheating, it's bigger than that....the President, anyone in a position in gov't that has access to security information, is a security threat when they are promiscuous. I don't care about,
Tiger Woods, or any one in sports or the movies, they call sleep with 1000s ... so what. But a President, then we have a problem.
I feel it's a security risk .... given that, it's poor judgment. A public official has to know better.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:29 PM on 05/24/2011
"But a President, then we have a problem."

... or a governor ...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:15 PM on 05/24/2011
Agree
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:51 PM on 05/25/2011
Dan, I don't mind it when someone married or single sleeps around, that is their business. I would not impose my moral compass on anyone. However, when a
person is in public office or has access to sensitive information then it becomes my business and I think that person should be held accountable. . . .a governor, Senator, President, etc etc. I am sure we are on the same page here.
photo
SophiavanBuren
Author of ILLUMINATION
07:33 PM on 05/23/2011
what if the answer to the question of why "people" (not just men, not just women) cheat, is this:

To feel desired.

When you are married, or with the same person for a long period of time, isn't the goal to be equal partners? To love each other unconditionally and respect each other? Maybe that is the ideal, but maybe for some, it's not enough. Maybe for the weak of character, it's absolutely the opposite: they absolutely DO NOT want to feel equal. To be equal may make them feel in some ways, inferior.
Maybe Tiger Woods, Jesse James, Arnold and DS Kahn didn't like being "an equal"to their wives. Maybe, like this article insinuates, they needed to have their ego stroked by people who don't know them as well, and who see them not for who they are, but for who they pretend to be. They seek new women, women who could remind them of how they used to be... women who make them feel dominant and desired.

Maybe they wanted to feel powerful and superior, and sex is one obvious outlet for this. Education, money, fame and success and even love aren't enough for these kinds of people.

The hollow kind.
01:09 PM on 05/23/2011
A bigger question: "Why does the media constantly blame and single out the entire male gender for infidelity?"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:37 PM on 05/24/2011
The rabbi used current infidelity scandals as a starting point for talking about the subject. There are at present no comparable infidelity scandals involving women in positions of power. I can't even think of any comparable infidelity scandals involving women in positions of power in the last 20 years. (So OK, there was Oprah's alleged lesbian affairs, but a talk show host is hardly comparable to a powerful politician.)

So when there's a substantial number of women in positions of power who are exposed as having committed adultery, we can talk about the reasons behind that. Until then, if the shoe fits ...
11:13 AM on 05/23/2011
"If it's sex they're after they have wives who can cater to their needs."

From a man with nine children who seems to think his experience applies to all marriages.

Men cheat, and so do women - but men are rarely ever rewarded with millions after it happens.
11:18 AM on 05/23/2011
In fact, even when it's the woman who cheats then she's still the one most likely to end up with his money, house and children.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Larry Motuz
More prayers, fewer preyers.
11:52 PM on 05/22/2011
This kind of analysis applies to anything. Why do the rich want more::er, because they're insecure; why did Jack rob a bank::er, Jack was insecure. Why have men, in history, had harems::er, because they're insecure?...and women leaders not::er, because they're secure?

Men cheat because novelty is exciting, period. Immoral, fraudulent,whatever.

As a comic once put it: "Once I see one woman naked, I want to see all women naked."
10:07 PM on 05/22/2011
Sorry, but this post comes across as silly-phosical to me. I do not think we need all of this psychological analysis to figure out why lots of men, whether "powerful" or not, are not true to their marriage vows of monogamy. Biology is a much simpler explanation. It is not hard to figure out that human males have an instinctive desire to have sex with as many women as possible. Contrariwise, human females have a desire to attach themselves with a mate who will assist with raising of the children, which for humans being around an awfully long time. Therefore, women gravitate toward sexual relationships with fewer partners (in Western culture theoretically only one partner) than men do. Against this biological framework we have the overlay of culture, religion, upbringing, and individual personalities. Thus, most Westerners claim to favor monogamous relationships as the ideal. However, biology gets in the way. Not with everybody, of course, maybe even not with most. It depends on the individual.

Is this a politically correct view? Maybe not, but there is plenty of reason to bet on the biological command for men to desire sex with multiple women rather than get into all of these philosophical musings that lead nowhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Athirson
Who is Jonathan E.?
08:19 PM on 05/23/2011
Biology also dictates that the woman seeks a partner who can provide for their offspring. Which is why they are attracted to power, status, and $ perhaps more than any other characteristic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:39 PM on 05/24/2011
Synopsis of the above: "Men just can't help themselves, it's biology."
10:02 PM on 05/22/2011
Yep, if you are a very powerful man, especially one who considered himself to have saved the world from economic ruin, you could come to think that you were entitled to women, especially a lowly maid.

I think another factor is how much time these men spend away from home and their wives, in fancy but lonely hotel rooms. I'm sure that was a factor in Tiger Woods' case.

Plus, throughout most of history, very powerful men would have had harems with hundreds of women. It must seem unfair to today's powerful men to have to stick to just their wives.
09:40 PM on 05/22/2011
Consider that perhaps it is not power that removes decency, but a lack of decency that
is essential to the pursuit and accumulation of power. I mean, what normal decent person
goes into politics? How many regular Joes become CEOs? To make it you have to be an
egotistical back stabber who wilfully ignores the lessons all around him.

At least in enough of the cases, to keep the nightly news interesting and the tabloid
publishers rich.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Real Patriot
Individuals have human rights, not religions.
10:08 PM on 05/22/2011
Yes, many who make it to the top are just sociopaths.