The 'responsibility to protect' is currently being debated in American policy circles. Do wealthy nations have an obligation to intervene when innocents are being slaughtered by their own governments? What should the role of Western powers be in the current Arab uprisings against tyranny?
For Jews and Christians, the Bible already decided this question thousands of years ago with a celebrated verse that appears in this week's Torah reading: "Thou shalt not sit idly by the blood of thy neighbor." (Leviticus 19:16) If someone is drowning we must jump in the water to save them. And if peaceful demonstrators are being mowed down by tyrants then we must prevent these monsters from killing them.
Yet today many Jews are weary of the 'R2P' for fear it can be invoked against Israel in its battle against Hamas, even though the analogy is ludicrous. Israel is a law-abiding, flourishing democracy while Hamas is a terrorist organization committed to Israel's destruction. We Jews dare not override the fundamental human responsibility to protect the innocent for fear that Israel-haters will subvert the principle's intent and use it to prevent the Jewish state from its legitimate right to protect its citizens from terrorism.
But I continue to be puzzled at President Obama's inexplicable failure to call on the nations of the world to join together to protect innocent Arab citizens from being slaughtered in Syria, Bahrain, Yemen, Egypt, and Libya. The United States is the world's foremost bastion of freedom, its voice an invaluable source of inspiration to those who hunger for liberty. In a January, 2008 interview with the Reno Gazette-Journal's editorial board, then-Senator Obama declared his desire to be a transformational president like Ronald Reagan. History handed him that opportunity on a platter when once-unthinkable Arab demonstrations demanding freedom erupted throughout the Middle East. But with the notable exception of the president's laudable actions in Libya to punish Gaddafi for his crimes -- a policy advocated by courageous presidential advisors like anti-genocide advocate Samantha Power -- the president is silent while Arab men, women, and children are mowed down in the streets of Damascus, Douma, and Qabon. An American president whose father was African has unique credibility in condemning those who abuse their citizen's rights. Yet Obama watches on the sidelines and forfeits his claim to leadership.
But while he is not condemning Assad of Syria or Ali Abdullah Saleh of Yemen, President Obama is once again obsessing over a preferred party, Israel.
The New York Times is reporting, based on a recent speech delivered by Secretary of State Hilary Clinton to the World-Islamic Forum in Washington, D.C., that President Obama may shortly put forward a peace plan for the Israelis and Palestinians that would entail Israel retreating to 1967 borders and sharing Jerusalem as the capitol of a Palestinian State. The pressure that such an action would bring on Prime Minister Netanyahu, especially with the plan being offered by a sitting U.S. President, would be unbearable. Equally, forcing Israel to return to the 1967 borders would be near suicide, with Israel returning to a total width around the Tel Aviv area of just 10 miles.
Enter John Boehner and Eric Cantor, respectively the Speaker and Majority leader of the U.S. House of Representatives, who are preempting Obama's pressure on Israel by inviting Prime Minister Netanyahu to address a joint session of Congress in May, thereby allowing the Prime Minister to put forward his own plan rather than having one foisted on Israel by Obama. Boehner's press release said, "America and Israel are the closest of friends and allies, and we look forward to hearing the prime minister's views on how we can continue working together for peace."
Cantor has gone much further, telling Netanyahu last November that the House would "serve as a check on the administration," and putting out a statement after he met with Netanyahu that "the Republican majority understands the special relationship between Israel and the United States, and that the security of each nation is reliant upon the other."
As the youngest House majority leader since 1947 and the highest-ranking Jewish elected official in American history, Rep. Cantor of Virginia is that most unique of political leaders: utterly humble, accessible, wise, and proud of his identity. As a Jew committed to tradition, Cantor uses his values to create policy. On the occasions that I have visited with him to discuss Biblical values as they pertain to leadership, I have been awed by the dignity he accords every visitor, regardless of social station. A sincere servant of the people and the consummate Southern gentleman, he reminded me immediately of the teaching of our sages, "Greet every person you meet with a warm and pleasant countenance."
Often people of ethnicity elected to high office bend over backward to deny their heritage as if by doing so they automatically broaden their mainstream appeal. Of Obama himself many of us had high hopes that the first African-American president would walk in the footsteps of Martin Luther King, Jr. and serve as an international champion of human rights. It saddened us, therefore, as we watched him hug Hugo Chavez, curtsy to the king of Saudi Arabia, refuse at first to condemn Ahmadinejad's slaughter of peaceful protestors in Tehran, and remain largely silent as Arab citizens are murdered by their governments across the Middle East.
Cantor could not be more different, proudly promoting the special relationship between the United States and Israel, two liberal democracies who are the world's foremost targets of terrorism because of the threat each poses to the condescending and sanctimonious argument that democracy can only work in select parts of the Western world.
It should be the purpose of the American Jewish community to groom more leaders -- both Republican and Democrat -- of Cantor's caliber. Next month we will be launching a course as part of a newly conceived American Institute of Jewish Values whose purpose it will be to train young Jewish scholars in the art of promoting universal Jewish values to the mainstream culture and enriching the political and cultural discourse with Jewish wisdom.
As Americans we can debate 'R2P' and other policies. But such debates must be carried out amid our total agreement on the universal values that underlie the policy, namely, the Biblical principle establishing the infinite value of every human life -- Jew, Christian, Arab, and atheist alike.
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is founder of This World: The Values Network, which is now launching the American Institute of Jewish values to promote universal Jewish teachings in the American media. For more information write to info@ThisWorld.US
Follow Rabbi Shmuley Boteach on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RabbiShmuley
The application of the verse to global international policy is a misapplication, however, the quote and discussion does segue into a fundamental foreign policy truth…President Obama is taking the wrong approach toward Israel!
“President Obama may shortly put forward a peace plan for the Israelis and Palestinians that would entail Israel retreating to 1967 borders and sharing Jerusalem as the capitol of a Palestinian State. …forcing Israel to return to the 1967 borders would be near suicide, with Israel returning to a total width around the Tel Aviv area of just 10 miles.
Enter John Boehner and Eric Cantor,… preempting Obama's pressure on Israel by inviting Prime Minister Netanyahu to address a joint session of Congress in May, thereby allowing the Prime Minister to put forward his own plan rather than having one foisted on Israel by Obama. “(Rabbi Boteach).
American foreign policy and support for Israel has traditionally been non-partisan. America’s special relationship with Israel should continue to be non-partisan. Thank you Mr. Boehner and Mr. Cantor for Republican support.
http://www.tikkun.org/nextgen/gershon-baskin-sums-up-the-peace-movement-perspective-on-netanyahus-phony-peace-offer-to-be-made-in-a-talk-to-the-republican-dominated-house-of-representatives
Another demonstration of American secularism the religious values where some are more equal than others?
It is the heighth of absurdity to suggest that the interests of the US and Israel are identical, or even convergent. In a geopolitcal and strategic sense exactly the reverse is true; since the end of the Cold War, the returns that the US may have once arguably enjoyed from the "special relationship" have been diminishing at an alarming rate.
It is simply not in America's interests- whether strategic, economic or diplomatic, to alienate an enormous and worldwide demographic, as well as an increasingly powerful bloc of developing nations, to placate the lobby of a foreign country.
Simply put, the American people owe Israel nothing- not in a moral sense, not in an economic sense and not in a military sense.
It's time to get the albatross off from around the US neck.
Americans are not free. They don't know it.
Send Dr. Jonathan David Farley to Mars. Same degree of demagoguery of empty slogans.
It does not mean opposing your government to promote the interests of foreigners 4000 miles away.
The first is patriotism
The second is treason.
haha!
which is exactly why cantor has nothing of substance to say; and can only spout gop platitudes and talking points
If you are making the very strong statement that the Jewish American community should commit time, money, and resources to grooming more leaders just like Cantor then it would behoove you to commit at least some small portion of an article discussing whether Cantor's policies are good for Americans as whole, not just about what's best for Israel or furthering Israel's relationship with America, or how devoted he is to his religion. You haven't touched on his views regarding social issues, economics, his debatable grasp of the fundamentals of how the government works, his views on foreign policy outside of Israel, healthcare, or anything else. Perhaps you'd like to explain to us why every single one of those issues is irrelevant to whether or not you think the American Jewish community should be out grooming leaders to be just like him.
The United States has major policy differences with Israel, and has had them for decades, most notably over settlements, the occupied West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem, etc. Israel is also the largest recipient of US foreign aid in the world, which means that the President of the United States has every right to express those differences firmly and clearly.
http://67.23.4.161/fpmatters/201011150008
In fact, Israel receives more aid than any other country. Not only that, It receives more than the next ten countries combined.