On a fresh crop of newly released Nixon tapes, the President, who disliked Jews but helped rescue Israel during the Yom Kippur War, says of his senior Jewish advisers Henry Kissinger, William Safire, and others that they shared a common Jewish inferiority complex and worked hard to compensate.
"What it is, is it's the insecurity," Nixon said. "It's the latent insecurity. Most Jewish people are insecure. And that's why they have to prove things."
Wow, I wonder where he got that idea. Could it have been from Kissinger's own words on the tapes? After a meeting with Golda Meir in the Oval Office where she raised the issue of trapped Soviet Jews, Kissinger turned to Nixon and said, "The emigration of Jews from the Soviet Union is not an objective of American foreign policy. And if they put Jews into gas chambers in the Soviet Union, it is not an American concern. Maybe a humanitarian concern."
One shudders at the words of the first ever Jewish Secretary of State bending over backwards to show the leader of the free world that he bears no special kinship with his people. While the Kennedy's unapologetically championed the rights of a free Ireland, with Teddy Kennedy being instrumental in bringing Gerry Adams of Sin Fein to the United States, Kissinger is adamant that even another holocaust would not be an American concern.
But as King Solomon said, there is nothing new under the sun. It's simply not news that Jews often lack self-respect and constantly seek mainstream, non-Jewish legitimacy. Which is why even as an orthodox Jew I believe passionately that Jewish pride is more important than Jewish observance. Jewish self-esteem is the body within which the soul of Jewish observance must reside.
At Oxford one of my students who had become religious balked at wearing a Yarmulke around his friends. I told him, "I don't care if you drive on the Sabbath or eat sweet-and-sour pork. Just do so with a Yarmulke." He thought I had lost my mind. "A Yarmulke is not more important than the Sabbath. And second, there is no way I'm going to drive on the Sabbath or eat a cheeseburger at MacDonald's with a Yarmulke on."
"Aha," I said, " so now you that when you proudly affirm a Jewish identity you feel uncomfortable acting in a manner that contradicts your Jewish commitments."
I thought of this story recently in an incident with the American Jewish University (formerly, the University of Judaism) in Los Angeles after my organization, This World: The Values Network, approached the AJU to ask if they would partner with us on a West Coast version of my debate with Christopher Hitchens, the world-renowned atheist and humanitarian who is battling esophageal cancer, on 'Is there an Afterlife?,' which we had just staged at the Cooper Union in New York (the DVD is available on my website).
The AJU responded with an offer to have their Whizen Center host the event and pay me as a speaker, bringing in Rabbi David Wolpe and author Sam Harris to make it a four person debate. They made it clear, however that they had a very limited budget and could therefore offer a small stipend, to which I readily assented given my normal practice of accommodating important organizations with limited funds. I later discovered, however, that the tiny budget seemed to apply only to the religion, rather than the atheist side of the debate, a matter I raised with Dr. Robert Wexler and Mr. Gady Levy, who run the esteemed speaker program. I shared with them the point of principle that, while there may have been a misunderstanding here, the community ought to try and treat its own with the same respect it treats others and simply telling me that unless I accept their offer the event, which we conceived, will proceed without us is unacceptable. We are currently in discussions to fix the matter so that this important debate can be staged for the Los Angeles Jewish community.
Indeed, the story of Jewish insecurity and not valuing our own is as old as Jewish history itself, affecting even our greatest heroes.
Seventeen years ago I met Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and asked him to lecture for our L'Chaim student organization at Oxford, which, at 5,000 members, was second in size only to the Oxford Union itself. I told Rabin that we had already hosted Peres, Netanyahu, and Shamir and would be honored to have him as well. He asked me, "Who will be hosting me? The University or the Jewish students?" I explained that it would be a joint event between us and the Union. But he pressed again for clarification. Would it be the Jewish students who were inviting him or the mainstream students?
Rabin was Israeli Chief-of-Staff during the Six Day War, who oversaw Israel's greatest military victory and to whom Jews the world over remain forever indebted. But even this tough-as-nails sabra struggled, as do we all, myself included, with the seductive nature of non-Jewish legitimacy. Mikhail Gorbachev, Stephen Hawking, Michael Jackson, Australian Prime Minister Bob Hawke, UN Secretary General Javier Perez de Cuellar, and countless other non-Jew luminaries all proudly addressed our students from our rostrum.
Rabin ended up graciously accepting our invitation but was forced to turn around after having arrived in Britain due to a terrible bombing in Tel Avid. The lecture was later delivered by his son Yuval who gave one of the most eloquent and proud speeches about being Jewish that I have heard.
I sometimes see the same trend with my own children. A prouder, more stalwart, less insecure generation of Jews is replacing us. They walk with Yarmulkes held high and tzitzit waving in the streets. They fight for Israel on campus even when marginalized for doing so. They are the living fulfillment of Malachi's prophecy (4:6) that the day will come when the hearts of the parents are returned through their children.
Rabbi Shmuley Boteach is the founder of This World: The Values Network, which brings together international speakers to debate the great values-based issues of our time. In four weeks he will publish his new book, "Honoring the Child Spirit: Rabbi Shmuley and Michael Jackson in Conversation about What Parents Can Learn from their Children." www.shmuley.com
Follow Rabbi Shmuley Boteach on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RabbiShmuley
This helps prove it.
The comment by Nixon reflects his own insecurities that he needs to categorize and put down everyone different than himself. But Boteach seems to confuse people having different beleifs about their religion as reflecting a lack of pride.
Rabin was Israeli Chief-of-Staff during the Six Day War, who oversaw Israel's greatest military victory and to whom Jews the world over remain forever indebted. But even this tough-as-nails sabra struggled, as do we all, myself included, with the seductive nature of non-Jewish legitimacy. Mikhail Gorbachev, Stephen Hawking, Michael Jackson, Australian Prime Minister Bob Hawke, UN Secretary General Javier Perez de Cuellar, and countless other non-Jew luminaries all proudly addressed our students from our rostrum."
This author invalidly calls Rabin a Jewish Hero. When in fact, Rabin is a war criminal and would be the anti-hero of a lot of Jews.
"LABOUR PRIME MINISTER, Y. RABIN.
Qualifications: War Criminal. In 1948 (on instruction from Ben Gurion) ethnically cleansed some 70,000 Palestinians from Lydda and Ramleh. This included the massacre of several hundred resident civilians (to get them moving). In 1967 Rabin ordered the ethnic cleansing of some 5,000 from the villages of Emwas, Beit Nuba and Yalou and the dynamiting and bulldozing of their homes. "
http://guardian.150m.com/palestine/war-criminals.htm
"Israel Hess (April 26, 1935 - September 27, 1997) was a radical right-wing Israeli rabbi.
Israel Hess was a controversial figure who advocated exterminating the Palestinians as a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. On February 26, 1980, Bat Kol, the student publication of Bar-Ilan University, published an article by Hess entitled "Genocide: A Commandment of the Torah."[1] Hess interpreted Deuteronomy 25:17 as a commandment to obliterate the memory of Amalek, which he considered to be the Palestinians. In the article, Hess argued in favor of "racial purity" and described the antagonism between Israel and Amalek as "an expression of the antagonism between light and darkness, the pure and the unclean."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Hess