Rachel Ben-Avi

Rachel Ben-Avi

Posted November 17, 2008 | 06:42 PM (EST)

Sarah Palin in The Eye of The Beholder

digg Share this on Facebook Huffpost - stumble reddit del.ico.us RSS

I was puttering around today, going through my late husband's library of books collected during and after his eight years studying at Yale Divinity School, and I had the TV on in the background, Wolf Blitzer interviewing Sarah Palin, and I thought to myself, why don't you try to listen to what she says instead of just muttering under your breath and thinking about Tina Fey, so I actually settled in to pay attention, and after five minutes or so, I thought, what is this like? My brains feel as if someone injected scrambled eggs into them -- or no; it was noisier than that and more hectic, it was like being in a fun house. I remembered afternoons at the Jersey shore, where my parents used to take us, my brother and me, to visit my grandparents in Belmar during the summer, and if we were really lucky, some grown-up cousin or uncle would take us to Asbury Park, where they had rides in little cars with bumpers and we could get in, drive around, and crash, screaming and ecstatic into each other hard as we wanted to, and they had crazy mirrors there that made you look funny, fat and stretched out weirdly, so that you were Shmoo-like, oddly shaped, and there were always lots of really loud sounds, right there, in, ya know, the fun house.

Sarah Palin, I thought, somehow creates a verbal representation of that kind of mental chaos, it seems, effortlessly. She just opens her mouth, and this stream of stuff flows out that starts out sounding as if it's actually aimed at some destination and as if it's going to make sense, and then little by little, or sometimes instantly -- like, 'ya know, on the spot -- disintegrates into a word salad that pours out and then spews around, and then slows down and after a few bumps and pot holes ends up dangling and then disintegrating mid air, a little like a -- I know it's banal -- but really, like a bridge or maybe a road to guess where? Nowhere.

Why this blather is riveting to the number of Americans who find it so, is a puzzle, but the fascination must, I figure, have something to do with speed of the verbal ejaculation coupled with the sublime confidence this woman has in herself, supported -- all of it -- by the absolute absence of recognition on her part of her own embarrassing foolishness and incompetence. And I mean incompetence of several sorts. She cannot think or speak logically; she knows astonishingly little just in terms of, say, grade school information and worse, does not seem to have a clue how little she knows; she appears to have no memory of what she's said a week earlier or even sometimes thirty seconds earlier; she has no recognition of the fact that somehow Joe McCarthy has risen Lazarus-like from his tomb to inhabit her and sans permit (to give her the benefit of the doubt) is firing the synapses in her head to make her hold forth not like a patriot (which position would seem to be her most desired) but rather like one of those (you should excuse the expression) actually "un-American" rabble rousing jackasses from the 1950's. She says the same nonsense over and over until one is tempted to throw a pot at the TV to shut her up, but one is inexplicably riveted, and so the TV stays on, and the listener keeps listening while she keeps spewing language of whatever sort, just as fast as she can. And mindlessly.

Of course, if she had a mind, if she had even the most modest veridical assessment of herself, her abilities or, more to the point, lack of them, she would have declined the nomination fast and in no uncertain terms, if only to spare herself , not to mention John McCain, her family, and the Republican Party, humiliation.

I try to picture her ugly, maybe morbidly obese? With really bad acne, a Mohawk, and maybe a nose ring, tattooed, missing some teeth in front, smoking. Would the media be after her everywhere she goes? Would substance matter then? Clearly, it doesn't matter now. Would it matter then? Well, would it? Would McCain have picked her in the first place? How shallow are we?

Or, maybe -- here's a new thought -- our basic values are upside down. There. That's it. Maybe we should re-think altogether what we say we deem important. Maybe we ought to value the look of the thing rather than the substance. Maybe brains and knowledge and plain simple good sense, and principles, class and character and temperament and thoughtfulness and empathy and kindness and good manners and such stuff as say, oh, for example Obama seems to embody, ought not to be valued as much as the very simple look of the thing.

Like, picture Sarah, ya know? I mean, compare her to Eleanor Roosevelt. Is there any contest?

I rest my case.

 
Comments
7
Pending Comments
0
iPhone App Promo

Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to

View Comments:
photo

She speaks in broken cliches taking two words forward and one back. The listener tries to remember what she is refering to then realizes she is refering to the previous cliche which was not complete. It causes my brain to react like it did in the sixth grade at those word math problems. "Two trains were racing towards each other. One going 90 miles an hour and the other 70 miles an hour ......................."

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:23 AM on 11/19/2008
photo

Every time SP talks my brain starts hurting just trying to make sense of her verbal convolutions.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 04:50 PM on 11/18/2008

Sarah-speak is what you get from drinking beer with Bush.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 01:53 PM on 11/18/2008
- cgr I'm a Fan of cgr permalink

Bravo. Well said! I found myself exhausted trying to figure out what she was trying to say. Until I realized she wasn't trying to express an idea; she was just talking, using words that sounded good to her, and multiplying them in the effort to sound smart. Oy.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 10:18 PM on 11/17/2008

Thank you! You helped me understand why I feel so unsettled whenever I listen to her speak... her assault on the English language does create chaos in my brain. Thank you... I loved it. For those of you posting here... you might also want to read Dick Cavett's blog (NY Times)--The Wild Wordsmith of Wassila... it too was funny and hit the nail on the head!

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:50 PM on 11/17/2008

Rachel, you've hit this right on the nose.Every time I hear her I get the feeling she's still in junior high. It is beyond belief that she's made it to Gov. She's like that annoying little brat from down the street that you wish would just go home. The Alaska school system needs some work.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:32 PM on 11/17/2008
photo

You nailed it!

Nothing further need be added.

    Favorite    Flag as abusive Posted 08:27 PM on 11/17/2008
Comments are closed for this entry

You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in  or  Connect