More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rachel Kramer Bussel

GET UPDATES FROM Rachel Kramer Bussel
 

So What If Monica Lewinsky Is Single? An Open Letter to the Daily Mail

Posted: 03/15/11 07:12 PM ET

Dear The Daily Mail,

I understand that you need to sell newspapers, but I read your article on Monica Lewinsky twice and, after coming away with no new information about her each time, am puzzled over why you would print this. Is her single status really news?

While you thoroughly rehashed the fact that Bill Clinton basically had an affair with her then threw her under the bus, we already knew that. You quote her extensively from 2004... seven years ago. The only new quotes come from a "friend" of hers in the National Enquirer.

The details you portray are not in dispute; no one is claiming that Lewinsky and Clinton had intercourse. The fact that their affair consisted largely of her blowing him led to, you might remember, a major cultural inquiry into whether oral sex "is" sex. You might want to read the most excellent anthology Our Monica, Ourselves: The Clinton Affair and the National Interest (NYU Press, 2001) for a nuanced look at the politics at play.

I'm especially interested in Lewinsky, and perhaps protective, in part because I got my start in erotica by writing a fantasy story about her called "Monica and Me" that was published in the anthologies Starf*cker and Best Lesbian Erotica 2001. I later started dating a woman who was a fan of both the story and the intern behind it, who later wound up meeting Monica at a party for the magazine Heeb (she told Monica about the story, and from what I was told, had no problem with it).

She fascinated me because I thought she was hot (still do) and admired her chutzpah in going after the man she wanted. Was she a little naïve? Probably... but who wasn't at 22? I believe she did fall in love with him back then and that he fed her romantic fantasies because he was intrigued by her, and that kind of attention, and got off on the power trip of having a young woman literally on her knees, obsessing over him, if I may play armchair psychologist to a former president. I don't judge him for that, but I do judge him for then blatantly lying while making her out to be the one telling an untruth. In doing so, he did far more lasting damage to her life and career than he has suffered.

Beyond that personal interest, though, the fact is that while I can read about Bill Clinton eating a veggie plate in US Weekly's celebrity sightings along with his political work in the mainstream press -- and the fact that he's still extremely popular and, oh yeah, married to the Secretary of State -- Monica Lewinsky's name is forever going to be associated with Clinton and the ensuing scandal. She's had to try to build a career and life after that, while for Clinton the affair was just a blip on an already-existing career. No matter what else she does, like get her master's degree in social psychology from the London School of Economics, that is what she's going to be remembered for. I think if we all took a few seconds to have some empathy and imagined our most embarrassing act being forever publicly linked to our name, we might be less harsh in judging Lewinsky.

Also, here's a news flash: lots of 37-year-old women are single. Lots of young women have affairs with older, more powerful men. I admire her for weathering the scandal and not letting the over-the-top slut-shaming, which continues to the present (See "You might as well hang it up. You were a fling, a bug on a windshield, a phase - if your 'romance' even existed at all." at Gather) get her down.

As to the claim that she would "would take him back in a second," I have a lot of trouble believing that's true, but even if it were, by all accounts, Clinton is extremely charismatic and I'm sure that, married or not, plenty of women would want to sleep with him, or more. If he were single, I bet plenty of his female Hollywood friends would be more than a little interested. He's not my type, but I can concede that he is probably the perfect definition of "silver fox." But the idea that Lewinsky is pining for him seems like a convenient way to basically say, "Pity the single, childless lady," and by extension, any single woman in her thirties.

Maybe, just maybe, Lewinsky wants to stay out of the spotlight and have as close to a normal life as she can. Maybe she is just going about her life... kind of like everyone else (except she hangs out with Terry Richardson). The idea that her being single and childless is some sort of affront (to who, exactly?) and tragedy (of her own making seems to be implied) is offensive. Considering that she never sought out the spotlight, and when it was thrust upon her it was almost always as a way to hold her up as an example of the woman who "brought down a President," I think we should give the woman a break. There are plenty of women clamoring for the spotlight who want us to talk about their latest conquests. Maybe you should focus on them instead, or actually ask Monica what she's up to rather than rely on sketchy tabloid hearsay.

Sincerely,

Rachel Kramer Bussel

Rachel Kramer Bussel (rachelkramerbussel.com) is a New York-based author, editor, blogger and event organizer. She has edited 38 anthologies, including Gotta Have It, Passion, Orgasmic, Fast Girls, and Bottoms Up, and is the Best Sex Writing series editor. She writes widely about sex, dating, books and pop culture.

 

Follow Rachel Kramer Bussel on Twitter: www.twitter.com/raquelita

 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
10:33 PM on 03/17/2011
She could meet some great guys at a cigar bar.
08:57 PM on 03/17/2011
I think the idea no man will want her because when they take her home they must say "This is Monika Lewinsky" is stupid.

Some educated, highly intelligent men are known to marry porn stars or women with really a questionable past.

Monika gave a b/j so what...it shows she likes giving a b/j what man would not want that?

I think Monika has other issues. Trust, abandonment, fearful of ifs and whats....and though valid, she will benefit from cognitive therapy and give herself a chance. it is also possible maybe she is not into guys anymore...why not? maybe she was experimenting with him and did know her orientation.
KingCranky
Texas Liberal
04:49 AM on 03/17/2011
I stuck up for Clinton during this fiasco, but always thought Lewinsky got a very raw deal.

As you pointed out, she was very young, and anyone at 22 does not always make the best, most rational decisions.

Matters of the heart cause people to screw up, especially when it's with someone who's not only incredibly charismatic, intelligent AND the President of the US.

Here's hoping Lewinsky can overcome all that ridicule and scorn directed her way, that's the best way to deal with all her carping critics, a positive, meaningful, productive life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Rappaport
tired of the con game called "free markets."
02:05 AM on 03/17/2011
Actually, Lewinsky once made a fairly intelligent comment about how it would be difficult for her to find a husband. She asked how could a young man take her home to meet his parents and say, "This is Monica Lewinsky."

Pretty intelligent comment.
photo
gomezrules
Why Don't We Do It In The Road?
05:34 PM on 03/16/2011
The poor gal probably can't get a commitment form a guy because of fear on their part of what they might catch from her, thanks to Clinton. Sad but true..
02:23 PM on 03/16/2011
If you're really so caught up in crap passing for news, check out some of the stories on the Huffingtonpost, which you've posted your column to: "Kim Kardashian in a teeny bikini".
09:07 AM on 03/16/2011
Defamation on the part of the press who interject factoids not related to the story is not new. One piece on Ann Coulter introduced her as "The 51 year old unmarried Coulter." No dig there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jced
I'd love to kiss ya...but, I just washed my hair!!
08:09 AM on 03/16/2011
I think you are absolutely correct...I am a great fan of Bill's (flaw's and all), but a perspective of this sort on Miss Lewinski has been sorely needed.
02:39 AM on 03/16/2011
You admire her chutzbah for going after a married guy? I was pretty young when this whole story happened but my impression of her was that she saw a chance to have a little power over the most powerful man in the world and she went for it. She's no longer relevant and she's not even very interesting. Sleeping with the president does not make you Marilyn Monroe.
10:55 AM on 04/09/2011
It is interesting that Marilyn Monroe would be held up as the example of quality. Is being a celebrity vamp really much more admirable than being a white house intern, presumably with high professional aspirations, and getting a master's from the London School of Economics?
12:21 AM on 03/16/2011
Someone commenting on the Perez Hilton blog chastised him for lifting this wholesale from the National Enquirer. It doesn't ring true. And the fact that they may have gotten the Edwards story right, doesn't mean much. Even a broken clock. . .
She should speak out herself and set the record straight. How did she survive the whole thing? Excoriated by millions of hypocrites, starting at the top with Mr Gingrich. And threatened with 27 years in jail for denying the affair( by a bunch of crazed prosecutors with a political agenda).
GraceNotes
We live for books.
11:47 AM on 03/16/2011
I imagine that publishers have been after Ms. Lewinsky for years to "tell-all" in her own version of that story.
photo
Ojodelgato
Bios? We don't need no stinking Bios!
03:15 PM on 03/18/2011
She had a book out that told her side. I don't think it sold well.