More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Raja Krishnamoorthi

GET UPDATES FROM Raja Krishnamoorthi
 

Tie Congressional Pay to Results

Posted: 08/09/11 01:22 PM ET

Dear Friends,

The downgrade of U.S. debt followed by the market crash yesterday provided ample evidence that Washington is broken, and Congress is a dysfunctional three-ring circus. I was outraged last week when Congress couldn't get its act together to avoid a debt crisis, and this week millions of middle-class Americans saw their savings further dwindle when the markets crashed in reaction to the antics in Washington. Especially vexing is that our congressman, Joe Walsh, favored defaulting on America's bills and, earlier in the year, favored a government shutdown over working together to keep our government and economy afloat. It's no wonder that a record 82% of Americans disapprove of Congress. Their performance is pathetic, and it's time to shake things up.

If I am elected to Congress, I plan to introduce legislation tying Congressional pay to performance. For too long, people in Washington and Congress point fingers at each other even as millions of middle-class Americans remain unemployed, and our economy continues to sputter. They must realize that we are all in this together, and I respectfully submit that the best way to remind Congress of this is to tie their pay to their collective results. If America does well, they do well. If Americans suffer, they must suffer. Members of Congress earn almost $175,000 a year, far in excess of the average American; therefore, we must hold them to a standard befitting their pay. Accordingly, I would introduce the following concepts:

  • If there is a shutdown of government, members of Congress will not be paid under any circumstances, and their benefits will be suspended;
  • If the government defaults on its bills, members of Congress will be last in line to get paid, and their benefits will be suspended;
  • If the Congressional "super-committee" fails to act, and draconian discretionary cuts are triggered this fall, the pay of Congressional members will be cut by 50%;
  • If our economy enters a double-dip recession, members of Congress will suffer a pay cut of 50%.

Members of Congress argue that because they are subject to election every two years, they face the full brunt of voter sentiment, and therefore there is no need to tie their pay to performance. I disagree. They often get re-elected because their fundraising prowess allows them to scream louder than their opponents during election season. But when you're yelling, you're not listening... and you quickly lose sense of voter sentiment. Today we are in an economic crisis. We must change course, and they must be responsive to our needs as a people.

Our own Congressman Walsh loves to point fingers at others for the follies of his Republican-led Congress. We cannot tolerate this any longer, and as I have mentioned before, his personal and egregious child-support scandals coupled with his official performance merit resignation now. I have even begun to circulate an online petition calling for Rep. Walsh to step down. In any case, today, we say enough is enough to all their antics. Please join me in shaking up Washington and Congress.

Best regards,

Raja

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patg00
2 is the odd prime
01:28 PM on 08/15/2011
Limit congressional staff to 1 lawyer, and an Admin assistant.
01:46 PM on 08/11/2011
Ban lobbists altogether, make it a criminal offense AND tie pay to performance, lets also have a "super party" of citizens decide on what benefits politicians get, and a citizen budget group to authorize expenditures, see what it's like living within your means instead of just deciding for the rest of us...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:53 PM on 08/11/2011
"# If there is a shutdown of government, members of Congress will not be paid under any circumstances, and their benefits will be suspended"

The shut down is when the executive branch does not sign on the dotted line when congress passes a proposed budget to them, this is open to abuse as the person in the presidential seat could keep saying no until either the shut down happens, or the congress prints what they are told to by the executive branch.

I dont think neutering one branch of the government just to gain some votes for a congressional run now is a good idea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KevinOConnor
full-time citizen
03:07 AM on 08/11/2011
Brilliant Raj! I've been thinking about this for years now. Many public officials are able to buckle down a second income as well. The fact that we're creating an elitist class with our tax dollars is appalling. I personally think our representative should receive a median American salary. Maybe we'll reduce the incentives to destroy the middle class by offering way too much money and better health benefits than most of us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
himaui
11:04 PM on 08/10/2011
thank goodness someone is finally stepping up to the plate!

forgot to mention that he bounced checks, owes campaign workers over $20K, needs to drive on a non-suspended license, and there's something else i'm forgetting....beyond the back childsupport payments.

that guy is a walking disaster! GO RAJA!
ChangeAgent007
Changing the world everyday
01:46 AM on 08/11/2011
Don't forget he filed for bankrupcy too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KevinOConnor
full-time citizen
03:11 AM on 08/11/2011
So did Walt Disney, Mark Twain, P.T. Barnum, Francis Ford Coppola, Larry King, Donald Trump, Jose Conseco, and Rembrandt. So what?
05:20 AM on 08/10/2011
Probably could pass a rule requiring that:

Any contribution from a Corporation to the election of a Congressman or Senator shall prohibit that Congressman or Senator from voting in the affirmative on any legislation that would favor that Corporation in any way.

I think this could be a way to reverse Citizens United. Let companies spend whatever they want, but Congressmen and Senators that receive money from them automatically are unable to help them. We all know that they're tainted by the money they get and that they simply pretend that it's not money for votes when, in fact, everyone knows that it *is*.

$$$ for Congressional and Senatorial votes is *the* problem with our government. If something isn't done then soon enough it will never be *our* government again - it will simply be a legislative stock exchange with the Lobbyists acting as the traders. Frankly, it seems like we're already there
07:29 PM on 08/09/2011
Don't forget they pay nothing for insurance and have those cushy pensions.
05:21 AM on 08/10/2011
They should eliminate both of those. For sure, they do not deserve pensions and if a few of them got sick and had to quit we might get more change by natural attrition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KevinOConnor
full-time citizen
03:13 AM on 08/11/2011
If we find them guilty after impeachments, they lose their pensions!
07:26 PM on 08/09/2011
Couldn't agree more. Although Congressman Walsh is true to his word as a true "cut spending" Republican. He cut his spending of his child support and, like so many Republican plans, it hurt the very young, the infirm and, especially women. But sacrifices need to be made... as long as the person sacrificing is not likely to be a political donor.
I would think Congressman Walsh's Republican colleagues would be proud to have someone so dedicated to their "no compromise" on spending ideals that he's willing to personally live up to them and cut off his children and ex-wife.
05:31 AM on 08/12/2011
Isn't there more to the story....?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
patg00
2 is the odd prime
01:31 PM on 08/15/2011
maybe, but i don't see anybody telling it here.
06:36 PM on 08/09/2011
Take members of Congress out of their own privileged retirement system and into Social Security and Medicare. If not, then any cuts in our public programs should be proportionally applied to their own benefits. Only then should they be making decisions regarding the systems to which they force the rest of us to join.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OneManRoaring
Tech specialist, former educator & active citizen!
08:22 PM on 08/09/2011
I agree and while we are at it, let's give them the same work week/year as civilian government workers in other branches of the government such as administrative assistants at the Department of Treasury.

Also...let's pass a law that prohibits any member of Congress from EVER working as a lobbyist or for any company that was or is involved in lobbying. That would certainly bring about changes!
01:52 PM on 08/11/2011
Yea, imagine tying your pay to how many days/ hours you work, what a novel thought? And if you miss too much( unless it's excused by illness or family leave- whatever benefits the rest of us gets) you're fired! And no pension or medical benefits. Although since they're all millionaires how much would that hurt? we would save some money though...oh and drive your own damm car, pay for the gas yourself, along with insurance. if you want a driver pay for him/her too.
01:15 PM on 08/09/2011
can we tie their capital gains tax rates to performance. Inverse of approval ratings. The income we pay isnt even a tiny part of most of their income. they could never get a check from us and still make millions a year.
05:24 AM on 08/10/2011
Pay for performance should probably be based upon the combination of GDP and the Employment rate. GDP goes down, their salary goes down. Employment goes down, their salary goes down.

But if GDP and Jobs go up, they make more money. That's a start, but what's really needed is a way to penalize them for taking money from corporations or being supported by PACs.

There has to be a way to end the PACs and the Lobbyists and that is what we really need.