The California Supreme Court has just 'sentenced' our state's taxpayers to an additional debt of $180,000 more per year. How? The state's high court upheld the death penalty in two cases.
Imposing the death penalty adds enormously to the cost of prosecution and permanent lifetime housing for an inmate. The death penalty is certainly a polarizing public policy issue, but I wonder how many people realize that it's also a vortex-like drain on their own pocketbooks.
Whether you're for or against the death penalty, you are paying for it. And Californians are paying more for it than any other state. Here are the staggering numbers, from a report by the ACLU of Northern California:
$90,000 a year - taxpayers' extra cost of holding one inmate on death row, over and above the cost of keeping an inmate in the general prison population
$10.9 million - taxpayers' cost of one death penalty trial, based on the records of a sample of trials
$117 million a year - taxpayers' cost of seeking execution, after conviction, for inmates throughout the state
Altogether, Californians spend as much per year in pursuit of executions as the salaries of more than 2,500 experienced teachers, or 2,250 new California Highway Patrol officers.
Why are we putting our cash-strapped state and county governments, and ourselves, through this? The ACLU of Northern California's county-by-county comparison, 'Death by Geography,' found that counties that sentencing people to death do not experience lower homicide rates or raise rates of solving homicides.
Instead of California cutting $50 million from the fund for victims of violent crime, as the legislature and governor did last year, the ACLU California affiliates suggest the state cut its expensive death penalty. Instead of cutting programs emphasizing education, rehabilitation and addiction treatment, cut the death penalty. The state would save $1 billion over five years without releasing a single prisoner, including $400 million that would be saved by eliminating a new facility planned for death row inmates. Thousands of budget-minded Californians have joined our CUT THIS campaign.
As I testified to the Californian Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice in 2008: "California's death penalty system is arbitrary, biased, expensive and susceptible to fatal error. It cannot be fixed. It should not be tinkered with. It should be ended."
Ramona Ripston is Executive Director of the ACLU of Southern California.
Tim Siedell: Can We Really Afford to Hire Another Supreme Court Justice in This Economy?
Nobody's buying supreme these days. As we struggle to climb out of a devastating recession, Americans are being forced to make due with less. Times are tough.
Costs of the Death Penalty | Death Penalty Information Center
ACLU report: Latinos increasingly sentenced to death in Calif ...
The problem with the cost is the automatic appeals process that criminal defense attorneys have set-up for the people on death row. The stats that the ACLU provides show that most of the cost is in unnecessary appeals for those that have already been convicted with overwhelming evidence.
Life without parole is cheaper and should some exonerating evidence come out you can get them out.
Review my fact checking of the ACLU and the California Commission on the Fair Administration of Justice cost analysis in the comment section at
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-clark/cut-this-the-death-penalt_b_627759.html
The ACLU/CCFAJ are wildly inaccurate.
Secondly, is there any reason for the death penalty to cost significantly more than life without parole?
No. It only takes the will of the state to respect their own citizens money and have a commitment to justice, just as Virginia does.
"Death Penalty Cost Studies: Saving Costs over LWOP"
http://homicidesurvivors.com/2010/03/21/death-penalty-cost-studies-saving-costs-over-lwop.aspx
Few would discount the value of an objective review, something which the citizens of California deserve and they have no received from the ACLU, a group dedicated to ending the death penalty.
As for making them work outside the prison? And take away jobs from others who are not in jail?
They're for the death penalty, they're against government "waste," they think the $126M (a drop in the bucket of the current deficit) can be made up either by limiting the expensive appeals or by doing something else in the budget.