In the debate over school improvement, individuals and groups advancing agendas with little or no evidence to back them up have somehow claimed the mantle of education "reformers," while teachers, their unions and others with actual education expertise often are portrayed as obstacles to reform--despite their desire to be involved in an improvement process that frequently shuts them out.
In this upside-down approach to school "reform," teachers are required to implement top-down policies made without their input, often in an austerity environment, with little more than an exhortation to "just do it," and then are blamed when the policies fail. Not surprisingly, these "strategies"--such as mayoral control, school reconstitution, misuse and overuse of standardized tests, vouchers, merit pay, or simply stripping teachers of voice and professionalism--haven't moved the needle.
The American Federation of Teachers has promoted a better way. Shortly after I became president, we established the AFT Innovation Fund, a union-led effort to provide grants and assistance to AFT affiliates who envision and pursue educational innovation. The Innovation Fund, now in its third year, supports both promising ideas and proven programs that can be scaled up.
Most important, when teachers and other school employees work collaboratively with administrators and others on school improvement, students do better. That's why the AFT Innovation Fund encourages this shared responsibility and promotes built-in teacher voice and buy-in--essential components of successful education reforms. It is one more way our members and leaders advocate for reforms to be implemented with us, not done to us.
The Innovation Fund, which is supported by the members of the AFT and by several generous foundation grants, distributes close to $3 million each year to incubate teacher- and union-designed projects. This unique effort in venture philanthropy currently supports the projects of some 20 state and local AFT affiliates, which already are producing impressive results.
Two of our first grants--to the AFT state affiliates in New York and Rhode Island--have been used to do pioneering work on teacher development and evaluation. These grantees' leadership in this area helped the AFT win an early Investing in Education (i3) grant from the U.S. Department of Education to develop evaluation systems that support continuous school and teacher improvement.
Innovation Fund grantees also are upending conventional wisdom in the charter sector. The fund has supported the development of a model union-charter contract for a Chicago charter high school as well as efforts to open "in district" charters in Austin and San Antonio, Texas. And it has nurtured the creation of the Minnesota Guild of Public Charter Schools--the first union-affiliated charter school authorizer in the nation, which seeks to put teachers' voice and ideas back into the charter movement just as former AFT president Albert Shanker envisioned.
Several recent investments seek to ensure teachers have a voice and a role in the rollout of the Common Core State Standards, so that these standards don't sit on a shelf, as happened in the last push for common standards in the 1990s. The Chicago Teachers Union is working with classroom teachers to create model lessons aligned to the standards. The district was so impressed that it asked the CTU to demonstrate its lesson-development process and advise on how best to prepare teachers to teach to these new, higher standards.
The Innovation Fund also has made grants to improve early childhood education. In New York City, the United Federation of Teachers has adapted the PBS show "Between the Lions" for very young children and developed a program to teach home-based child care workers best practices in early literacy development. Similarly, AFT-St. Louis has received a grant to create that district's first-ever professional development program for early childhood teachers. Already, more young children are being enrolled in St. Louis because parents are responding to the message that public early childhood programs are of high quality.
In every location, the Innovation Fund and its grantees partner with districts, parents and community groups. Such collaboration is a core value for the AFT, and it is essential to ensure that ideas fostered by the Innovation Fund can be sustained.
Rather than work with teachers and their unions, many self-described reformers accuse them of being resistant to reform and concerned only about adults, not students. The serious, hard work of AFT members and unions to improve teaching and learning proves those accusations false. And unlike many so-called reformers who think that disruption and conflict equal reform, we are about seeding innovations, helping them take root and nurturing their growth, so that all kids can succeed.
Follow Randi Weingarten on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rweingarten
Turn the publics into elite schools.
Let the privates face universal enrollment and the inability to expel anyone.
Now, that would be the defining moment in the debate on which model is better.
Imagine a teacher discipline board, freed from the confines of some moronic ed code, that would get rid of the trouble makers. Imagine turing over to the for profit schools all of the hard core bad kids.
It would work wonderfully. There is an immediate solution that would turn our publics into world class institutions. Allow them to expel students to for profit privates. Let the for profit privates be assigned the role of universal enrollment and complete testing accountability.
Let's turn this equation around. Voucher schools get the WORST, publics keep the best. That would WORK.
Also, teachers could keep costs down by eliminating a lot of administration and removing the profit motive of many charter operators.
While I agree that the private schools have a better teacher to student ratio, 15:1 on the average, and more individual attention is paid to the child I disagree they provide "superior" education. Sure , the private school may provide the opportunity for your child to socialize with kids of the rich and powerful but the private schools do not provide a better education.
A quick check of the Educational Testing Service (ETS) website will find a study: "How Teachers Compare," that refutes more urban myths about public school teachers being academically deficient. Teachers rank with all other college educated professions: their literacy skills are a little better on evaerage than lawyers; and, their math skills on average a little below that of engineers. And all (nearly) public school teachers are "credentialed" while that is not a requirement for private schools.
So, you are able to draw conclusions on a single data point. WOW, you're good (or full of BS).
America's educational ranking and expenditures are proof that unions aren't helping.