More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Randy Jackson

GET UPDATES FROM Randy Jackson
 

Fighting Childhood Poverty: A Role for Everyone

Posted: 02/ 1/2012 8:00 am

This post is part of a series on childhood poverty in the United States in partnership with Save the Children and Julianne Moore. Moore leads the organization's Valentine's Day campaign, through which cards are sold to support the fight against poverty in the U.S. To learn more or to purchase the cards, click here.

Have you ever really thought about what it means to grow up in poverty in our country?

I'm not just talking about growing up in a family that struggles with poverty but in an entire community where every family is struggling.

That means kids who only get junk food because their parents can't afford fresh groceries, who go to schools where the libraries have more empty shelves than full ones and who don't have safe places to study or play after school.

Nearly one in four kids in the U.S. grows up like this.

In a country as wealthy as ours, why do we allow this to happen? How can we expect all our kids to succeed when almost a quarter of our kids don't have the basic tools of life, like books to read and food that helps them growth strong and healthy?

A few years ago, the cast and crew of American Idol started a campaign called Idol Gives Back. We brought together an amazing group of musicians, actors and corporate partners to raise money for kids living in poverty in the U.S. and around the world. All together, we've raised more than $185 million dollars. That's amazing!

I can't begin to tell you the personal satisfaction I get from knowing that we used music -- my life's passion -- to help the lives of so many.

I'm very proud of the work we've done, but we can't just depend on big events to fight poverty; all of us need to be doing it every day.

A couple of years ago for Idol Gives Back, Morgan Freeman and I visited Mound Bayou, a small town in the Mississippi Delta, one of the poorest regions of America. These were great people with great kids, living in a part of the country that had been forgotten by the rest of America. How unfair is that? Why should these kids have less of a shot at making it because of where they were born?

Spending time with these kids got me thinking about how poverty for them isn't an issue on TV or in the newspaper; it's a dark cloud shadowing everything in their lives.

This is why I think the work of Save the Children U.S. Programs is so important. They're working on the ground in these communities, providing services to make sure kids have access to books and other tools to help them learn, are eating nutritious food and have safe places to play. Essentially, it's everything these kids need to have a fair shot in life.

Julianne Moore, my fellow Artist Ambassador for Save the Children's U.S. Programs, is leading a Valentine's Day project for the organization, selling limited-edition Valentine's Day cards designed by some very well-known and fantastic children's book artists and illustrators.

With Idol Gives Back, we used our love of music to help fight poverty here at home. This Valentine's Day, you can do the same thing around your love of art and around love itself.

We can all do something to help in this fight: sending one of these Valentine's cards, volunteering or even just talking to your kids about how other kids live so that they can help be part of this fight.

But there's no excuse to not do anything.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 171
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
01:15 PM on 02/07/2012
The "reality trumps bullies" spend time on how to make money from the Industry Of Child and totally ignore rational reasoning and a huge proof as Nauru population that from one of the richest got one the poorest and in 10 years the obesity and diabetes of the population raised at over 60% from the lack of fresh food. Please look on Internet for that keyword and the VIDEO done by "Johnny Colt iReporter, Special to CNN | June 17, 2011" (I still found 4 min video while the rest of it disappeared...)
As about Romey in U.S. - he admires the actual Administration "Safety Net for the Poor" measures and therefore no one should expect more after he declared that he is "not concerned with the very poor." ....
01:02 PM on 02/07/2012
Please check for Nauru and see the VIDEO done by Johnny Colt iReporter, Special to CNN | June 17, 2011 (I still found 4 min from that video; the rest disappeared from internet!) You'll see what happens when you are not rich but poor and how obesity and diabetes raised, in 10 years, to 60% population from junk food; when the fresh sources of food were cut!
As about the "Safety Net for the Poor " of Romney, all I found was that "he is "not concerned about the very poor" because government programs already help them."; in other words he thinks that this administration has been done enough for them.
05:14 PM on 02/05/2012
I wonder if this was the "Safety Net for the Poor" Romney was talking about!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:50 PM on 02/05/2012
Popular basic tools of generational childhood poverty: cell phone, large plasma TV, some sort of video game, and maybe 22" rims. One way or the other, this is your tax dollar at work. As far as fresh food... if the adults can afford to spend SNAP dollars on the ever present junk food, they can afford the fresh food that goes further per dollar. The rub is you have to prepare it YOURSELF. It's about personal responsibility and bad CHOICES as much as opportunity. For many, it's a cycle that resets each generation with the rejection of education on the front end.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realitytrumpsbull
two 'alves of coconut!
01:27 PM on 02/05/2012
I think no small part of a child's success, is the 'magic' of parental responsibility. Some parents are irresponsible. Some are barely conscious. Some spend most of their adult lives under the influence of intoxicants, and narcotics etc. They don't spend enough/any time, thinking about the future, or working to hold down a job with which to earn the money to provide for the material needs of the next generation. Yet, somehow, they're coherent enough to sign up for government assistance and largely solve the problem that way, or at least sign the release form turning their kids over to state custody. We don't live in a perfect world, and some kids will likely spend the balance of their formative years in a state home or in a foster home of some kind, due to lack of necessary parental support.  To become a parent, is to take on a 20-year responsibility, roughly. If you're not mentally geared to that, not emotionally prepared for that, not profesionally at the point where you can earn enough to provide for the needs of your prospective family, then you need to carefully consider your future, and your ways. Or, at least have good friends down at the welfare office, because you'll be needing them.
08:42 AM on 02/08/2012
I agree totally. Have worked in inner city schools my entire career only to see drugged up parents who don't care. My exchange student wanted to see poverty in the US. Couldn't find it. All he kept saying was, "but they are fat...they have cars... Satellite tv, tattoos, using drugs". Lifestyle crisis....not poverty.
12:10 PM on 02/05/2012
Ever notice that no matter how many charities there are, nothing is ever fixed? It seems the dysfunction present in the system far outweighs anyone's good intentions.

The sad truth is that food is so abundant and easily produced that it should be free for everyone. The U.S. government pays farmers NOT to grow food and still Americans are able to discard enough food every year to feed the world's poor nations three times over. All while eating 3 times as much as any human needs to.

So why are there still so many humans starving? Simple. It's not profitable to feed starving people. And if there's no money to be made in solving a problem, it doesn't get solved.
11:58 AM on 02/05/2012
Children's charities are a funny thing. We want to help kids so they don't grow to be uneducated failures, yet we don't want to help their failing, uneducated parents because, "THAT"S WELFARE!" Never mind the fact that they grew up in the same environment we're trying to save the kids from.

Silly humans.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ssassy78
Laughter is the best medicine.
11:51 AM on 02/05/2012
I hope Randy is serious about what he is saying. If he means what he says about his desire to raise children out of poverty, I'd like to know what he pays his gardeners, maids, cooks, etc. If he is paying his own workers enough of a wage that they pay fed taxes and can afford health insurance, then I'll believe what he says. If his worker's kids are on free/reduced lunch, live in subsidized housing or receive Earned Income Credit, then he is part of the poverty problem and will simply prove to be another rich man who would rather give out food baskets than support actual wages.
05:59 AM on 02/05/2012
Imagine Randy? I guess you never ate cereal with water instead of milk, I bet you never were presented the contents of your class food drive in front of all your friends. I'm sure if you have concerns about your health, physical and mental, you can go get help. Besides the stats, this article makes it seem like poverty exists in some deep dark corner of the world that we know nothing about. All of these glamourous "Help the Kids" foundations are never seen in my neck of the woods. The people at the top are so far from the bottom, struggling is just a word used to emphasize an unfortunate demographic. You may see me as little money, but I have a big heart and can't stand to see how our inner-city youths are neglected by society. I would love nothing more in the word to have the resources to help, I can barely put food in my stomach right now. Randy Jackson why don't you buy a pair of Wrangler jeans? give the difference from your designer ones directly to a struggling youngster. That would mean more to a kid to have a successful adult show support and compassion.
Sincerely,
Full-time worker, High School Coach, Little League Volunteer
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wbischo
02:38 AM on 02/05/2012
If family, children and education were priorities in this country, We would NOT be in the bottom of the barrel of almost every rating poll in each of these categories. It is a function of those who seek power, to make certain that the population they seek to hold power over, is NEVER truly educated. They must keep the population at large poor and dependent, so they can gain power by making false promises to make everyone's life "better". .
08:51 AM on 02/05/2012
That makes no sense. Knowledge has never been so free to anyone that wants it. Many people don't want it. They have no desire to acheive anything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ssassy78
Laughter is the best medicine.
11:46 AM on 02/05/2012
And many have been socially constructed to be just that way...

I'm not saying it's a valid excuse, but it is our reality.
02:07 PM on 02/02/2012
The problem with social expanding social welfare programs is making sure you do not cross a boundary to the support of growing social parasitism - see the Haredi in Israel, whose growth at state expense looks likely to become an existential threat to the state itself. So it is reasonable to be careful about such programs (but not mindlessly opposed).

That said, there are things that can be done that should be cost effective: Extended school days with low cost hot meals would be a reasonable approach. Expanded school libraries and after-school programs would also be cost effective and well targeted - they can help the impacted children without unnecessarily supporting unwise or unfortunate decisions by their parents.

There is only so much that schools and agencies can do. I have a co-worker who recently had the court award him custody of his daughter - the mother was abusive and spent all the child support money on meth and alcohol. His daughter had failed one year of school and was failing another. In his strict but supportive environment his daughter has blossomed and is now a middle school student with mostly A's and B's. More money for the mother would not have helped the girl.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wbischo
03:13 AM on 02/05/2012
As long as courts keep doing such a lousy job of "deciding" who is to be awarded custody of children, there will be problems with children of divorced parents. Children don't always know what is best for themselves, and the courts are overwhelmingly gender biased towards the mother without regard to "fitness", or "desire", "TO mother". Any money given through welfare programs should require "earmarks" for the needed items from those who request it, and receipts returned showing how the money was spent. Those who don't "cheat" won't mind doing this. Ideas on how our education system should be improved would require pages of comment, for me to give my own personal opinion, after years of being involved with children, schools, and adult education programs.
07:34 AM on 02/05/2012
Ok, you do realize you would have to hire a lot more workers to oversee the program you are advocating? I worked as a Public Assistance caseworker. I worked thru my breaks, including lunch and STILL could not keep up with my caseload. Now you are advocating that recipients bring in receipts and that a caseworker actually examine these and decide if they spent their cash grant well??? That is rather subjective. Would we have a checklist. If they bought ONE THING that was a no-no (say, a candy bar), would they lose their grant? You have to think these things thru when advocating for change. Why don't you volunteer down at the welfare office to help the already overworked case workers?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
charleyvldm9
He thinks outside the box.
07:21 PM on 02/01/2012
As you said kids are more poor now.What happened to the $185 million?
12:57 PM on 02/02/2012
Actually, I like Randy a lot, but I'd like to have a detailed spread sheet of where the money went, too. Kudos to them for raising all that money. Did it do some good? Are there children who have risen above poverty because of it? It would be great to know.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wbischo
03:36 AM on 02/05/2012
Children are not "raised above poverty" with "donations" of money or needed items. These are only temporary aid and the "poverty" is still there. The elimination of poverty can only happen when heads of families have good educations, and their children can attend good schools with GREAT teachers. Parents, in particular, should then be given opportunities for reasonable vocational training and/or college, to prepare themselves for work which pays a "living wage". They also need a work contract, which would give them a reasonable expectation that their jobs won't "disappear" overseas and leave them destitute. Freedom from poverty also will be more likely when EVERY PERSON has affordable health care guaranteed. Health care cost is a major cause of bankruptsy. It will take years to accomplish all these things, but they will NEVER HAPPEN, when we have politicians who are against doing any of them, and an apathetic population which is willing to wait until "the other guy" gets it done. It should not require "Government" to mandate these things. The citizens of this country should DEMAND IT for themselves and help plan for it to be done. .
06:20 PM on 02/01/2012
Please see: http://www.cnn.com/video/?/video/ireports/2011/06/16/orig.jtb.nauru.cnn

I think the above video proves enough well that poverty and junk food is the cause of obesity. Blame the government – and not the poor parents - for allowing food with dangerous chemical to be sold on the market. Over 300 (in Sweden over 600!) chemicals, that are used here in food and beverage, have been for long forbidden in Europe! You could also blame the government for allowing Predators to make money from invading homes and ripping parents of children and children of parents without a police investigation and without a judgement and warrant dictated by Justice!
Javalation
Laughing in a Daydream
05:29 PM on 02/01/2012
Just ask Mitt for help. He'll solve it in a flash.
05:00 PM on 02/01/2012
Don't we pay a fortune in taxes for schools? Why are these kids still not getting a good education and a skill in the 12 or so years that they spend in the public school system?
gmikejake
resist evil
08:36 AM on 02/05/2012
Overall, yes, more, per capita, than any other nation but not in urban ghettoes or areas of poverty in rural America, particularly in "red states." Educational inequality is our biggest problem with our schooling systems and it has been well documented for decades. We have some excellent schools and a whole lot of poorly performing schools. The one variable that explains most of the variance, not all, is the presence of structural poverty in the school district, again, particularly in "red states." You simply cannot begin to promise adequate outcomes for all without adequate resources.