More

Raymond J. Learsy

Raymond J. Learsy

Posted: September 18, 2007 07:23 AM

It Was Always About The Oil, Stupid!


Finally, someone in a position of influence in Washington, someone who can't be accused of playing partisan politics, has spoken the truth about George W. Bush's invasion of Iraq: It was primarily about the oil.

Alan Greenspan, the former Federal Reserve chairman who attained rock-star status during his tenure in Washington, declares in his new memoir that "the Iraq War is largely about oil." Calling his admission a "politically inconvenient fact," the maestro, as his fans pronounced him during his star turn in our nation's capital, has struck a rather dissonant chord for the Bush administration, which has insisted -- and will vehemently continue to insist -- that oil had nothing to do with our disastrously divisive and tragic invasion of Iraq.

We all know the changing and changeable list of White House-proclaimed motives for our decision to start a war, ranging from Saddam Hussein's alleged store of weapons of mass destruction to America's duty to bring freedom and democracy to Iraq, to the need to deal a decisive blow to Islamic terrorists. We also know that we are now bogged down in a civil war with no apparent end. But a discussion of the rightness of this war is not my intent here. Rather, I'm going to take the opportunity to remind you, dear readers, of the evidence that points to the truth of what Greenspan is saying. The administration has already begun to hit back, with Defense Secretary Robert Gates challenging Greenspan's version during an appearance on ABC's This Week program, and we can expect that the self-serving pronouncements will flow freely. So it's important to recall the facts.

In my 2005 book, Over A Barrel: Breaking The Middle East Oil Cartel, and an updated version, Over A Barrel: Breaking Oil's Grip On Our Future (coming soon to a bookstore near you), I reported the details. To begin with, after toppling Saddam Hussein, the United States passed up a golden opportunity to break Iraq's ties with OPEC, thereby removing its vast reserves of crude oil from the cartel's malicious grip. Instead, the Bush administration hastened to reinstate the connection, claiming America had no business intervening in Iraq's dealings with OPEC.

Of course, we had no such qualms about intervening in every other aspect of Iraqi life, randomly arresting and imprisoning thousands of Iraqi men, dissolving the Iraqi army, ridding the country's institutions of the only people who knew how things worked, and virtually guaranteeing that an anti-U.S. insurgency would ensue under the amateurish ministrations of Paul Bremer, head of the Coalition Provisional Authority.

But when it came to oil, we pretended it was "hands off." In reality, however, we first enlisted oil professional Philip J. Carroll, formerly of Shell Oil, to "advise" the Iraqi Oil Ministry. Then, after Rob McKee, a former ConocoPhillips executive with ties to Halliburton, entered the picture, it was full steam ahead on building a strong national oil company that would be dependent on Big Oil consultants and destined to rejoin the OPEC band of extortionists. As Greg Palast wrote in Harper's magazine, any objections from the Iraqi Governing Council were summarily dismissed, while Vice President Dick Cheney openly advocated an OPEC-friendly policy for Iraq.

For the oil boys, it was just business as usual, the American consumer and the world economy be damned. And, as we've seen in the intervening years, as oil climbed from $28 a barrel in September of 2003 to over $80 a barrel in September of 2007. This increase in oil price alone is costing the American consumer an additional $400 billion a year. The consumer is only peripherally on the mind of an administration beholden to Big Oil and big oil prices -- even if it means war with all its cost of lives and treasure.


 
 
  • Comments
  • 65
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
01:33 PM on 09/23/2007
We are allowing ourselves to be extorted. Only we can stop it.
11:09 PM on 09/18/2007
To see for yourselves what the war was for, I suggest that you read what its instigators had to say about it. They published it in the PNAC document "Rebuilding America's Defenses." There they stated plainly that it was for hegemony. Control of Iraq's oil was part, but establishing permanent bases there (because of the geography) was also a part. They even said that they could use Saddam as a pretext but that he wasn't the reason. That document was available long before Bush took office. But like Mein Kampf, those who should have read it didn't.
So we talk about foolish things and the drumbeat for more war goes on. Tell your representatives that we want action to stop the nonsense. Words! Like Eliza Dolittle, we've heard enough of them. Show us something real. Cut off thge funds. Shut down the government if necessary. Shout the demand: No More Lies! No More Wars !
12:26 AM on 09/19/2007
Hegamony, BINGO! All the motives hinge on CAPITALISM! and its World DOMINATION! Yes, Yes!
09:44 PM on 09/18/2007
We are all arguing about the details of this invasion now, just as planned. The perpetrators knew that once they got in, they had it made, and they do, and they will make it last until the next election and make a lot of money. They were able to accomplish this mainly by fooling people and working on their fears and insecurities about NRA (guns), gays, abortions, believe jesus saved you or go to hell, flag supporter or traitor, etc. There are a lot of people who practice arrogant ignorance-a little, or even minute, amount of knowledge is a dangerous thing. These cynical asses figured out how to appeal to these people, and boy, did it ever work. A friend of mine sent to me an article sent to him by the NRA stating Kerry was going to take our guns away, so he voted for Bush. He has a college degree, no matter. Multiply that by a few million and you make an election close enough to steal. Damned depressing if you ask me. Barnum and Bailey stuff still works. The M-I complex is probably planning something to scare these people into voting their way again, probably Iran-related, and it may work again. Logic, reason and rationale thought have nothing to do with it. Not that the Islamic people are innocent but as somebody has been saying, they should, in my opinion try to tone down the rhetoric and the overkill reacting to these people, and treat any attacks as local police matters. Sounds better than what has been going on, but that makes too much sense and does not make anybody much money. Sad.
12:09 AM on 09/19/2007
I recently sat in at a meeting with a Sen. Maria Cantwell aid and an Iranian born older woman. Her position was that most Iranians are fairly well-educated. They don't like I'm-a-dinner-jacket! (Stephanie Miller), but they rush even to his defense when Bush/Cheney do their posturing against their country. This from an Iranian.
09:31 PM on 09/18/2007
Everybody is wrong .
It's not about the oil
It's not about making money
It's not about Freedom
It's not about WMD
It's not about Democracy
What it is about is -- the CONTROL of the money from the oil , they dont want those angry Middle Easteners ( terrorists ) using all that money (theirs) on NUCLEAR technology (Bombs) , before the oil is gone they will have 90% of the worlds money .
Bush has admitted this twice , and nobody noticed .
09:18 PM on 09/18/2007
Warwick2005us--I, too see Israel as a huge force in our foreign policy. Could it be that they are taking most of the $3 billion+ a year in aid they get from us and sending it back over here to invest in our politicians? If you look at the money politicians get from AIPAC, you will see a lot of democrats on that list.
Trouble is, there doesn't seem to be any way to criticise Israel without being called antisemitic. Does the statute of limitations ever run out on that?
07:03 PM on 09/18/2007
It was always baout the MONEY!! Oil money primarily. Possibly. But do not discount the influence of the big military contractors and all the other "contractors" that have been handed government contracts without any oversight by anyone else in our supposedly representative government. These groups have set themselves up through the cheney/bush cabal and have a long term for-profit stream of revenue from the American taxpayers. Control of the oil, and these "contracts" are what the cheney/bush criminals are really trying to protect and defend in their fanatic drive to keep the "war" (actually--invasion and occupation) in Iraq continuing.
07:03 PM on 09/18/2007
Just before the invasion of Iraq, Bush made a speech and gave some solemn advice to the people of Iraq.

(No, it wasn't "run for your lives, we're about to destroy everything and everyone you hold dear)

Did he say "We're coming to liberate you. Please don't shoot at our valued American Troops"?

Nope. He said "We're coming to liberate you. Don't you DARE set any oil fields on fire."
06:52 PM on 09/18/2007
Great stuff, but not entirely right. Oil is a factor in the politics around the Iraq war, but moving large amounts of the economy to Republican defense contractors is much more important. Other political factors also play in. Please read Jane Smiley's "Shock" article, it's really good.
06:51 PM on 09/18/2007
The original operational name for the invasion of Iraq was "Operation Iraqi Freedom" or OIL for short. Once this Freudian slip was spotted by the White House Press Office it was hurriedly changed to "Operation Iraqi Freedom".

Funny that Cheney and cohorts should want Iraq in OPEC along with our new foreign policy demon, Chavez. Who, along with Putin, just loves oil at $60+ a barrel. National security, I don't think so.

To paraphrase an old saying "You can fool some of the people some of the time, but the gas guzzing consumer stays fooled ALL of the time.
01:04 AM on 09/19/2007
Small correction, respectfully it was "Operation Iraqi Liberation". Then "Operation Iraqi Freedom".
05:31 PM on 09/18/2007
What happened to the Hunt Oil Co deal with the Kurds for their oil?
05:23 PM on 09/18/2007
Primarily about oil?????

It was also about oil... but primarily about Israel! Just look at the main forces that led us to war: the Neocons, AIPAC, and the "liberal hawks" (who may be socially liberal, but true Likudniks when it comes to US foreign policy in the Middle East).

To come up with this bullshit of "primarily about oil" is an effort to steer the American people´s attention away to the Israel Lobby and the way it has led us to the Iraq war and how it is forcing us into another war (Iran).
10:57 PM on 09/18/2007
How right you are! But it is so unpopular to say so. This is the ugly truth that America doesn't want to face, and no politician will take the lead on it either. So where does that leave us?
12:35 AM on 09/19/2007
In the big picture, Israel and it's worthless scumbag squatter population doesn't amount to a pee hole in a snowbank. They are big oil's cover for weilding a large stick in the Middle East. Yes, there are a lot of wackjob extremist jews working in the federal government, the Brookings Institute, and other so called policy think-tank organizations. And yes, people like William Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith,Elliot Abrams, Richard Perle, and Scooter Libby are ignorant, arrogant, extremist Arab/Persian hating creeps weilding undue political influence. But like Israel, they are essentially a tool used by large military hardware/service providers and more importantly - mulitnational oil corporations. Big business in America runs America. The folks working in DC are hand picked by the corporations that are calling the shots. Just think of it this way - if the oil didn't exist in the middle east - do you really think a secular country like the United States would give a rat's ass about supporting an illegally formed religious state like Israel? Do you honestly believe that the people who are really pulling the strings support Israel because of their deeply held religious convictions? If you actually believe this, then perhaps I can sell you some prime swamp....ahem....I mean waterfront property in Lousiana.....
05:23 PM on 09/18/2007
Of course it was about oil. When Wolfowitz, the great architect of the war as you may recall, was asked why we attacked Iraq and not North Korea (since the issue was claimed to be about WMDs) he responded, "Well, Iraq is swimming on oil."
And Greenspan is correct to backtrack some. It isn't all about oil. Iraq's location is also a key. Militarily speaking, hegemonywise.
04:35 PM on 09/18/2007
It is pity to see American public could be fooled big time by George Bush and his Neo-Con Republican Cronies. American public will bieleve whatever lies White House dish it. American Public think Bush's word is gospel, he cannot lie, he get all his instructions from Jesus Christ. I know Jesus Christ never tell lies, I know Jesus Christ would not kill a single soul whatever religion they belong to. Then why Amrican public think Bush is not a Big liars. He has no morality, he killed so many innocent Iraqis and Americans, and made so many millions of Iraqis refugees and homeles. Bush and his cronies do not have concious, I do not know how they could sleep at night seeing all the news from Iraq and seeing so many American soldier's dead bodies arriving home.

My fellow Americans, it won't be too long that you will see gasoline prices are so high, you won't be able to drive SUV and heat your home.

You still have time to stop Bush's madness. Please voice your oppostion against White house Iraq policy. Stop Bush from invading another country Iran illegally. Bush and his Neo-Con cronies are beating drum to get your support. If they do it you will regret rest of your life. God Bless America to be sensible.
12:31 AM on 09/19/2007
I think the DSM-5,6,or7 version refers to this disorder as Sociopath-in-Chief!
03:41 PM on 09/18/2007
Oil has always been on the Bush/Cheney agenda despite the fact that the U.S. does not import the bulk of its oil from Mesopotamia. The latter comes from North America, Mexico and northern South America. The Bush "cartel" has maintained close ties with middle eastern oil producers and Little Bush with Cheney's propping up is not going to let this connection sever during the present administration. Nor is it likely to afterwards.
03:07 PM on 09/18/2007
The Bush administration will kill every man, woman and child in the Middle East if it means oil profits.

America will destroy itself, am most of the civilized World with it for Oil.

When do you think they will Nuke Iran ?